Jump to content

Humza Yousaf's Critique of Elon Musk ‘one of the most dangerous men on the planet’


Recommended Posts

Posted
18 hours ago, Will B Good said:

Free speech as long as it doesn't upset Musk....mmmm?

 

 

Since Elon Musk took over Twitter (now rebranded as X), several high-profile individuals and accounts have been banned. Here are some notable examples:

### 1. **Kathy Griffin**
   - **Reason:** Griffin was banned after she changed her profile name to "Elon Musk" and used his profile picture as part of a satire. Musk indicated that she was banned for impersonating him without clearly labeling it as parody, which violated the platform’s rules against impersonation.

### 2. **Ye (formerly Kanye West)**
   - **Reason:** Ye was banned for posting offensive and antisemitic content, including an image that combined a swastika with the Star of David. This incident followed a series of increasingly controversial tweets from Ye, leading to the ban under Musk's ownership.

### 3. **@ElonJet**
   - **Reason:** This account, run by college student Jack Sweeney, tracked the location of Elon Musk's private jet using publicly available flight data. Musk banned the account citing concerns about personal safety and privacy, although he had previously stated he would allow it to remain active in the name of free speech.

### 4. **Journalists (Various)**
   - **Reason:** In December 2022, several journalists from outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and The Washington Post were suspended. Musk claimed the suspensions were due to these journalists allegedly sharing information that put his personal safety at risk, though this was widely interpreted as a reaction to their critical coverage of him. The suspensions were later reversed following public backlash.

### 5. **Mastodon**
   - **Reason:** Mastodon, a decentralized social media platform, was banned after it promoted the ElonJet account, which Musk had banned. The Mastodon account was seen as encouraging what Musk considered doxxing or endangering his personal safety.

### 6. **Antifa Accounts**
   - **Reason:** Several accounts associated with the Antifa movement were banned. Musk has positioned himself as strongly opposed to the Antifa movement, which he has criticized as being violent and extremist.

### 7. **James Lindsay**
   - **Reason:** The conservative author and commentator was banned after violating X's rules on hateful conduct, particularly around issues related to gender identity and LGBTQ+ topics.

### 8. **Other Political and Activist Figures**
   - Various other figures, particularly those engaging in behavior Musk deems harmful or dangerous, have also been banned. This includes accounts that Musk believes violate the platform’s rules around doxxing, harassment, or spreading misinformation.

### Context
Elon Musk's approach to content moderation on X has been controversial, with critics arguing that his actions have been inconsistent with his stated commitment to free speech. He has reinstated some previously banned accounts (like Donald Trump's) while banning others, leading to debates about the balance between free exession and platform safety.

you just reposted that from the other day with some extra hashtags.

 

 8 out of how many accounts on X? each one gives the reason why they were banned, they broke the rules. that is hardly proof of musk clamping down on free speech.

 

and before he took it over there were far far more independent media channels, conservative or non left accounts blocked or shadow banned...but that didnt seem to bother people.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

The problem is Social media in and of itself, People like Yousaf want to control the information so they make hyperbolic statements about those they can't control and who post things they don't like while ignoring those they either control or they agree with, I am sure there is disinformation coming from both sides but only the information that disagrees with those currently in power is targeted, How come there is no desire to regulate Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Linkedin or any of the myriad others that post decidedly progressive views? 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
18 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

 

How many serving police officers died as a result of the Jan 6. insurrection.........how many serving  police officers died in the BLM riots.......excluding the Boogaloo murder of Patrick Underwood.....nothing to do with BLM?

 

3-0

 

Again, you should get your facts right.

 

ONE police officer died after the January 6 protest because of complications from a pepper spray. Those killed buy their own forces, or suicides, drug overdoses and natural causes, don't count of course.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack

 

At least NINETEEN people died during BLM protest.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Violence_and_controversies_during_the_George_Floyd_protests

 

Goodbye, time to add a lying woke to my list

Edited by CallumWK
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chwooly said:

The problem is Social media in and of itself, People like Yousaf want to control the information so they make hyperbolic statements about those they can't control and who post things they don't like while ignoring those they either control or they agree with, I am sure there is disinformation coming from both sides but only the information that disagrees with those currently in power is targeted, How come there is no desire to regulate Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Linkedin or any of the myriad others that post decidedly progressive views? 

 

I presume this is a rhetorical question?  There is a reason that X is banned in China, Russia, Iran and other countries where governments cannot and do not want to be held accountable.  

 

The only person currently who is even attempting to hold this tyrannical government to account is Musk, and even he is doing it for his own ends as it drives engagement to his platform.   There doesn't seem to be any opposition at all to the madness or lies coming from the government from the actual opposition, as limited in numbers as they may be.  

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chwooly said:

The problem is Social media in and of itself, People like Yousaf want to control the information so they make hyperbolic statements about those they can't control and who post things they don't like while ignoring those they either control or they agree with, I am sure there is disinformation coming from both sides but only the information that disagrees with those currently in power is targeted, How come there is no desire to regulate Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Linkedin or any of the myriad others that post decidedly progressive views? 

exactly.

Facebook censored the iconic photo of Trump after the assassination attempt, they claimed it was an accident, but you don't hear a peep about it. apart from Fox, a google search gives hardly any results about it. Had X censored something similar from Biden or Harris there would be nonstop headlines about it.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

Facebook censored the iconic photo of Trump after the assassination attempt, they claimed it was an accident

 

What was the accident?

 

A guy sunbathing on a roof and his rifle gone off accidentally?

Posted
Just now, CallumWK said:

 

What was the accident?

 

A guy sunbathing on a roof and his rifle gone off accidentally?

hahaha, no, FB claimed the Trump photo got censored by 'accident' 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chwooly said:

The problem is Social media in and of itself, People like Yousaf want to control the information so they make hyperbolic statements about those they can't control and who post things they don't like while ignoring those they either control or they agree with, I am sure there is disinformation coming from both sides but only the information that disagrees with those currently in power is targeted, How come there is no desire to regulate Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Linkedin or any of the myriad others that post decidedly progressive views? 

You nailed it!

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chwooly said:

The problem is Social media in and of itself, People like Yousaf want to control the information so they make hyperbolic statements about those they can't control and who post things they don't like while ignoring those they either control or they agree with, I am sure there is disinformation coming from both sides but only the information that disagrees with those currently in power is targeted, How come there is no desire to regulate Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Linkedin or any of the myriad others that post decidedly progressive views? 

Tons of billionaires , according to this lefty,  Musk is a threat!

Musk would be hailed if he toted the progressives Marxist propaganda  similar too the donors of Progressives  causes!

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

I agree, or at least believe Musk, assisted by his wealth, is one of the most despicable people on the planet.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Posted

Not only is Humza Yousef a racist but he is a particularly stupid one.  No doubt he has been even more racist in private messages on the platform of the person he wishes to sue for calling him racist, and as the owner of that platform Elon Musk will know exactly how racist he has been in not only his public statements (which are already pretty racist) but also in his deleted and private messages on there.    

 

image.png.1c7e4b04ca7d06c790579b20fb7dcd8b.png

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

Seems to be that Muslims are either deep into politics where they criticize anyone who utters a word against them or are radicals protesting how they are all victims.  They move from their 'paradises' to other countries where they are treated better than the locals then try to change an actual paradise to resemble the <deleted>hole they just left. Their bs seems to be able to fool so many people into believing they are not there to take over.

A lot of people need to wake up and realize that their future generations, their kids or their kids kids, are going to be ruled by these radicals under sharia law.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Seems to me that Muslims are either deep into politics where they criticize anyone who utters a word against them or or their religion or are radicals protesting how they are all victims.  They move from their 'paradises' to other countries where they are treated better than the locals then try to change an actual paradise to resemble the <deleted>hole they just left. Their bs seems to be able to fool so many people into believing they are not there to take over.

A lot of people need to wake up and realize that their future generations, their kids or their kids kids, are going to be ruled by these radicals under sharia law.

Posted

Seems to me that Muslims are either deep into politics where they criticize anyone who utters a word against them or or their religion or are radicals protesting how they are all victims.  They move from their 'paradises' to other countries where they are treated better than the locals then try to change an actual paradise to resemble the <deleted>hole they just left. Their bs seems to be able to fool so many people into believing they are not there to take over.

A lot of people need to wake up and realize that their future generations, their kids or their kids kids, are going to be ruled by these radicals under sharia law.

Posted

Seems to me that Muslims are either deep into politics where they criticize anyone who utters a word against them or or their religion or are radicals protesting how they are all victims.  They move from their 'paradises' to other countries where they are treated better than the locals then try to change an actual paradise to resemble the <deleted>hole they just left. Their bs seems to be able to fool so many people into believing they are not there to take over.

A lot of people need to wake up and realize that their future generations, their kids or their kids kids, are going to be ruled by these radicals under sharia law.

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, AboutThaim said:

 

A lot of people need to wake up and realize that their future generations, their kids or their kids kids, 

 

   Do you mean their Grandchildren ?

Edited by Nick Carter icp
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 8/11/2024 at 6:14 AM, Chwooly said:

The problem is Social media in and of itself, People like Yousaf want to control the information so they make hyperbolic statements about those they can't control and who post things they don't like while ignoring those they either control or they agree with, I am sure there is disinformation coming from both sides but only the information that disagrees with those currently in power is targeted, How come there is no desire to regulate Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Linkedin or any of the myriad others that post decidedly progressive views? 

Hyperbolic is understating it, what did he say, the "most wicked evil"? He's been to Palestine and the most wicked evil he's seen is a Musk tweet?

 

Yousaf has not seen a lot of wicked evil at all, like none, one has to conclude.

Posted

The Western World, imbued with Western Judeo Christian values, must always be at war with Islam until they join the 21st century.

  • Confused 2
Posted
9 hours ago, frank83628 said:

i think Elon is pretty funny to be honest.

Screenshot 2024-08-12 at 14.00.02.png

i think you meant "Elon is pretty racist to be honest", that is if you were actually being honest.

 

Not every convicted felon supporter is racist but every racist is a convicted felon supporter, and Elmo is a perfect example.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 hours ago, shdmn said:

i think you meant "Elon is pretty racist to be honest", that is if you were actually being honest.

 

Not every convicted felon supporter is racist but every racist is a convicted felon supporter, and Elmo is a perfect example.

nope, i meant funny!

Posted

the establishment really don't like not being able to control the narrative do they, someone in the EU terrified of the interview with Trump. thinks they are speaking for 300 million people!

Screenshot 2024-08-13 at 09.19.56.png

Posted (edited)

20 million listening to the live conversation, guess people ARE interested to hear Trump speak unedited, despite all the screaming & crying from the  derangement crew claiming the opposite !

Edited by frank83628
Posted
Just now, frank83628 said:

20 million listening to the live conversation, guess people ARE interested to hear Trump speak unedited......!

 

True....it's like driving along the motorway/autobahn/freeway......there's a major accident.....can you drive passed without looking?.....Musk/Trump talking to each other is just another car crash.

Posted
2 hours ago, frank83628 said:

the establishment really don't like not being able to control the narrative do they, someone in the EU terrified of the interview with Trump. thinks they are speaking for 300 million people!

Screenshot 2024-08-13 at 09.19.56.png

 

 

 

 

It is the job of the 'establishment' and politicians, both in power and in opposition to control the narrative.....you really are quite naive.

 

 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

 

True....it's like driving along the motorway/autobahn/freeway......there's a major accident.....can you drive passed without looking?.....Musk/Trump talking to each other is just another car crash.

you have to specifically log on, so absolutely s**t comparison. people have chosen to listen, it will increase over the coming weeks, just like Tucker/Putin did (214.2m views),  far more than any other politician could get. people want to hear and are sick of the lying MSM nobody trusts the fake news anymore.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...