2 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

The liar is the one who cannot produce any evidence to back his claims, I have shown definitive evidence to justify my factual comments, you have not shown any evidence that the notice has been withdrawn.

To clarify...

"The majority of Red Notices are restricted to law enforcement use only.

Extracts of Red Notices are published at the request of the member country concerned and where the public’s help may be needed to locate an individual or if the individual may pose a threat to public safety"

https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/Red-Notices/View-Red-Notices

 

 

 

First, you refuse the accept proof, of the Red Notice clearly stating "Public" instead you try and make us believe it was made "Restricted" without notice.. Also, you seem to forget.. rather conveniently, that the 1st notice, disappeared, so the 2nd one was "issued" though never should on interpols site. Reda this link, then explain it.
https://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/crimecourtscalamity/2020/10/07/real-or-fake-cops-show-interpol-notice-for-boss-red-bull/

 

I for one am still not buying Red Bull.  I don't really do energy drinks.  Anytime I see someone with a red bull I tell them the founders grandson murder  evading justice and worthless thai justice story.