Kamala Harris' first solo interview!

[frank83628]

3 minutes ago, FriscoKid said:

No, where are they? 

search the political soap box, pages to choose from.

[FriscoKid]

Just now, frank83628 said:

search the political soap box, pages to choose from.

FAKE NEUZE!

[candide]

3 minutes ago, John Drake said:

 

She appears to be totally scripted. As in she's going to follow her script no matter what question is asked. Look, as some people on this forum know, I'm not a Trump voter. I was for RFKjr and still would have liked to vote for him. But these sort of scary appearances by Harris are gradually nudging me Trump's way. 

She follows well-designed campaign strategies and tactics and sticks to them. It is effective and efficient. That's what is expected from a rational leader and it makes MAGA fans desperate. 😃

 

Now, if you are objective, have a look at Trump's claims to reduce all prices....

[DougieMax]

2 minutes ago, FriscoKid said:

FAKE NEUZE!

Just about any of them. If you want, I can post a screen shot of the two pages of people I've put on my ignore list who just can't help themselves.

[John Drake]

3 minutes ago, candide said:

She follows well-designed campaign strategies and tactics and sticks to them. It is effective and efficient. That's what is expected from a rational leader and it makes MAGA fans desperate. 😃

 

Now, if you are objective, have a look at Trump's claims to reduce all prices....

 

I've taken Trump to task for years on this forum. And I've done so especially over the past six or seven months. This, in fact, is one of only a very few posts where I've even mentioned Kamala Harris.

[candide]

9 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

search the political soap box, pages to choose from.

Only after substracting threads opened by Riclag! 😃

[Hanaguma]

51 minutes ago, FriscoKid said:

Is this the “Moaners For Trump” therapy and self-help group for group members only?

...as if on cue, within the first 10 responses the "b-b-but Trump!" crowd rears its collective ugly head.  

 

And no, anyone is free to comment on how weak and insecure Harris looks when she speaks. Even you. 

[candide]

3 minutes ago, John Drake said:

 

I've taken Trump to task for years on this forum. And I've done so especially over the past six or seven months. This, in fact, is one of only a very few posts where I've even mentioned Kamala Harris.

Ok. My point is that there's nothing better on her opponent's side about this topic. It's wishful thinking on both sides.

[frank83628]

14 minutes ago, FriscoKid said:

FAKE NEUZE!

10 pages of crybaby Trump bashing

 

 

[Hamus Yaigh]

1 hour ago, DougieMax said:

Absolutely ridiculous that we have to suffer the likes of Joe and Kamala sitting in the White House. Yet we're told over and over again that there is something wrong with people like me who do not prostrate ourselves at the feet of their greatness and extreme qualification for office. And we can look forward to hearing from the predictable cadre of posters here decrying as racist or some such the ridicule that Kamala and her so-called interview deserve.

 

It's nothing to do with prostrating yourself or racism. Like the Pope told you, you have to pick the lesser of two evils. That seems like an easy choice.

[stevenl]

2 hours ago, DougieMax said:

Absolutely ridiculous that we have to suffer the likes of Joe and Kamala sitting in the White House. Yet we're told over and over again that there is something wrong with people like me who do not prostrate ourselves at the feet of their greatness and extreme qualification for office. And we can look forward to hearing from the predictable cadre of posters here decrying as racist or some such the ridicule that Kamala and her so-called interview deserve.

 

 

All the republicans have to do is field a decent candidate. Didn't do that in 2020 and didn't learn the lesson.

Edited September 14 by stevenl

[impulse]

54 minutes ago, stevenl said:

All the republicans have to do is field a decent candidate. Didn't do that in 2020 and didn't learn the lesson.

 

You seemed to leave the voters out of the selection process.  Just like the Dems did.

 

[Inderpland]

Just love this little support group thread for all the grievously wounded MAGA faithful who are all nursing their proverbial nuts after watching Trump taking such a self-inflicted b****cking!😁

And as usual, the hypocrisy is mind-blowing. Imagine having a circle-bleet about an alleged soft Harris interview when Trump for four years had Hannity (and others) go down on him over and over again. Pathetic.

[Inderpland]

2 hours ago, DougieMax said:

Just about any of them. If you want, I can post a screen shot of the two pages of people I've put on my ignore list who just can't help themselves.

Which obviously begs the question; why would this guy even participate in this particular sub-forum when all he wants is an echo chamber?

 

PS. Yes, I know he won't see this as I'm sure he's honored me by blocking me.

[FriscoKid]

4 hours ago, DougieMax said:

Just about any of them. If you want, I can post a screen shot of the two pages of people I've put on my ignore list who just can't help themselves.

Sad that you have to ignore so many people who are speaking the truth. It says something about you. You can only stand to read the minority of viewpoints of the people who agree with your apologist views of your man-god.  

[FriscoKid]

5 hours ago, DougieMax said:

Trump is Hitler, and sh!t.

WOW!

[DougieMax]

34 minutes ago, FriscoKid said:

Sad that you have to ignore so many people who are speaking the truth. It says something about you. You can only stand to read the minority of viewpoints of the people who agree with your apologist views of your man-god.  

You can feel honored to be among them now. You and the others are there because I haven't heard a new idea from any of you for almost a decade. Nothing but the same tape played on loop endlessly over and over again.

 

Besides, there can't be any real back and forth. Your side is allowed to make all kinds of false claims, call names and generally behave like <deleted>. But if I reciprocate, you babies run to the report button and the mods are happy to accommodate your tears. Why even take the chance and dialogue with you people.

 

Oh, and don't forget: Orange Man Bad.

Edited September 14 by DougieMax

[FriscoKid]

22 minutes ago, DougieMax said:

You can feel honored to be among them now. You and the others are there because I haven't heard a new idea from any of you for almost a decade. Nothing but the same tape played on loop endlessly over and over again.

 

Besides, there can't be any real back and forth. Your side is allowed to make all kinds of false claims, call names and generally behave like <deleted>. But if I reciprocate, you babies run to the report button and the mods are happy to accommodate your tears. Why even take the chance and dialogue with you people.

 

Oh, and don't forget: Orange Man Bad.

It's just an anonymous forum and it appears that you're taking things way too seriously with your ignore list escapades.
 

Try practicing some relaxation techniques. Perhaps even some meditation. Or maybe just try rolling yourself a nice fat joint. You sound way too stressed over nothing and need to find a way to chillax a bit over there DougieDooo. 
 

Edited September 14 by FriscoKid

[Cameroni]

5 hours ago, candide said:

She follows well-designed campaign strategies and tactics and sticks to them. It is effective and efficient. That's what is expected from a rational leader and it makes MAGA fans desperate. 😃

 

Now, if you are objective, have a look at Trump's claims to reduce all prices....

 

She actually follows a script word for word. When the ABC moderators did ask her why she reversed her position on fracking (for votes) she replied:

 

"My values have not changed".

 

Lol. The same words she said in that first kindergarten interview with Papa Walz.

[GroveHillWanderer]

5 hours ago, John Drake said:

Yep. I was just about to follow up with that. Because that's exactly what her responses sounded like. There's shallow and then there's Kamala Harris style shallow. I've never heard this bad of a response from a major party political candidate.

Really? So you haven't heard the absolute nonsense Trump regularly comes out with, in response to almost any question?

 

For example, here's his recent response to a question about how he would make child care more affordable. 

 

“Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down, and I was, somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that, because, look, child care is child care is. It’s, couldn’t, you know, there’s something, you have to have it. In this country you have to have it.”

 

"But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to — but they’ll get used to it very quickly – and it’s not gonna stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care."

 

"We’re gonna have — I, I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just, that I just told you about."

 

And you think Kamala Harris's responses are bad?

 

Trump tried to explain how he plans to make childcare more affordable. It was a word salad

[Danderman123]

Kamala Harris' First Solo TV Interview Key Takeaways

 

Vice President Kamala Harris gave specifics on her "opportunity economy" plans in an exclusive interview Friday night with an ABC News Philadelphia affiliate, suggesting that she offers a "new generation of leadership" that is focusing on "investing in areas that need a lot of work."

[candide]

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

She actually follows a script word for word. When the ABC moderators did ask her why she reversed her position on fracking (for votes) she replied:

 

"My values have not changed".

 

Lol. The same words she said in that first kindergarten interview with Papa Walz.

Communication 101. A consistent communication strategy based on repeating the same message. Efficient and effective. It works, according to polls.

 

Meanwhile, the Orange moron is completely erratic (see Grovehillwanderer post above) and is likely not even able to follow a script. 😃

[Cameroni]

9 minutes ago, candide said:

Communication 101. A consistent communication strategy based on repeating the same message. Efficient and effective. It works, according to polls.

 

Meanwhile, the Orange moron is completely erratic (see Grovehillwanderer post above) and is likely not even able to follow a script. 😃

 

Also known as the puppet on a string strategy. You pull the cord, and no matter what you ask "My values have not changed".

 

Will you feed me?

[Hanaguma]

37 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Kamala Harris' First Solo TV Interview Key Takeaways

 

Vice President Kamala Harris gave specifics on her "opportunity economy" plans in an exclusive interview Friday night with an ABC News Philadelphia affiliate, suggesting that she offers a "new generation of leadership" that is focusing on "investing in areas that need a lot of work."

"Specifics"???

 

Come on, man.  

 

"Investing in areas that need a lot of work"  is a rather non-specific answer, to be charitable.  What areas? What kind of work? Who is this new generation of leadership- a pair of nearly 60 year old Washington insiders?  I mean, everyone knows that Trump is a BSer, but at least he is entertaining about it. Kamala doesn't even look like she is trying. And she doesn't have to.  She sat for a five question interview and this was the best she could come up with.  God save America.

[candide]

19 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Also known as the puppet on a string strategy. You pull the cord, and no matter what you ask "My values have not changed".

 

Will you feed me?

She knows her strength and weaknesses and is able to deal with  them. She doesn't believe she is a genius and listens to experts. She works hard to prepare herself and is young enough to have the required energy. As expected, she's succeeding (at least for the time being).

 

Just compare with the Orange moron who thinks he's a stable genius and knows better than the others, even when he knows nothing. He's lazy and anyway lacks energy because he's too old. He is unable to concentrate and is completely erratic.

Edited September 14 by candide

[In Full Agreement]

8 hours ago, DougieMax said:

we're told over and over again that there is something wrong with people like me who do not prostrate ourselves at the feet of their greatness and extreme qualification for office

 

 

Yes there is something wrong with people like you.      

[Cameroni]

2 hours ago, candide said:

She knows her strength and weaknesses and is able to deal with  them. She doesn't believe she is a genius and listens to experts. She works hard to prepare herself and is young enough to have the required energy. As expected, she's succeeding (at least for the time being).

 

Just compare with the Orange moron who thinks he's a stable genius and knows better than the others, even when he knows nothing. He's lazy and anyway lacks energy because he's too old. He is unable to concentrate and is completely erratic.

 

He got careless and, ironically, got suckered by fake news. But I'm not sure if this debate will have any impact come election day.

 

But yes, he should have focused more on her, than his own record.  

[candide]

49 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

He got careless and, ironically, got suckered by fake news. But I'm not sure if this debate will have any impact come election day.

 

But yes, he should have focused more on her, than his own record.  

Are you following a script  too? 😀

[DougieMax]

5 hours ago, In Full Agreement said:

 

 

Yes there is something wrong with people like you.      

Golly gee, you are one clever Kamalite.

[stoner]

6 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

"Specifics"???

 

Come on, man.  

 

"Investing in areas that need a lot of work"  is a rather non-specific answer, to be charitable.  What areas? What kind of work? Who is this new generation of leadership- a pair of nearly 60 year old Washington insiders?  I mean, everyone knows that Trump is a BSer, but at least he is entertaining about it. Kamala doesn't even look like she is trying. And she doesn't have to.  She sat for a five question interview and this was the best she could come up with.  God save America.

 

he was so proud to post that too. like it puts a seal on the whole situation. here look i sent a link showing a vague statement.

 

i fully expect a stupid gotcha question in return. followed by a few you love trump replies. all for simply disagreeing with what was presented as specifics. 

 

in 3.....2......1......