Jump to content

Hillary Clinton Warns of Upcoming Misinformation Targeting Kamala Harris


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

You changed it to 1921, well done. I did see that. 

 

But why is she calling the same woman in one photo her great grandmother and in another her grandmother? 

I didn't change anything, Beryl Christie died in 1960, aged 39.

 

You still seem confused.

 

At this point, do you think that Candace Owens was trying to fool you, or is she just incompetent?

 

As for the discrepancy in the photos, maybe somebody mislabeled something in a book.  Pointless question.

 

Hillary Clinton warned about misinformation and you are proving her right 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Well, it's just interesting she descended from a slave owner. 

How many Blacks in the US have a slave owner as an ancestor?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I didn't change anything, Beryl Christie died in 1960, aged 39.

 

You still seem confused.

 

At this point, do you think that Candace Owens was trying to fool you, or is she just incompetent?

 

As for the discrepancy in the photos, maybe somebody mislabeled something in a book.  Pointless question.

 

Hillary Clinton warned about misinformation and you are proving her right 

 

Your post first said 1920, then you put 1921, which is correct. 

 

So two Beryl Christies in the same small parish at around the same time. Hmmmmm

 

I wouldn't put it past Candace she did it on purpose. 

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

Mixed race.

 

You're finally getting it.

 

Do you believe that most Blacks in America are 100% African?


Ask them.  They will be more than happy to tell you.  
 

In case you forgot, all Blacks are not African.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Your post first said 1920, then you put 1921, which is correct. 

 

So two Beryl Christies in the same small parish at around the same time. Hmmmmm

 

I wouldn't put it past Candace she did it on purpose. 

It's dead, Jim.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

How many Blacks in the US have a slave owner as an ancestor?

  

Edit:  White or Black?  You are aware Blacks also owned slaves and Black slave traders rounded up and sold Blacks to the white traders.

 

For whites:
 Not as many as you think.  The average work for a living Southerner who fought for the CSA was not a slave owner.

 

Learn a little history.

  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

No idiot liberals here but I'll have a go in a few lines on a couple of these.

Trump doesn't accept election results.

Trump and associates took steps to overturn the result - fake electors - January 6 - Pence and others stood up.

Trump and associates aren't smart and did it in a half assed way that was doomed to fail.

June 1 2020 in Washington in Lafayette Square was a chilling guide to what might be. 

He's still not smart in 2024 but he's had time to get smarter people involved - and a more compliant potential vice president.

He continues to fight against freedom of the press - even saying that late night comedians should be punished.

Of course Trump isn't the brains behind Project 2025 - not smart enough - but he would clearly love a civil service full of toadies - whatever it takes to give him more control - cutting or controlling  departments that involve oversight. He clearly doesn't respect or want an independent civil service.

His attitude in both thought and deed towards dictators indicates he has no problem with such leadership. He seems to have no moral compass. 

Did I mention he's not smart and would do whatever it takes to keep power.

Even if this risk is a bit overblown and he's all bluster - why take the risk with someone who is not smart and has self interest at the centre of everything he does. 

 
 

I’ll give you D+for effort.

 

Plenty of idiot liberals about.

 

I recommend a line between paragraphs. It helps deciphering jibberish.  
One of the liberal journalists types might reprimand you but I doubt it.  That great honor is normally reserved for the Trump supporters.

 

But out of all your text which part is racist, facist or Nazi?

 

Which civil rights of yours were taken away?

 

Never read or witnessed the end of Democracy.


 

 

 

 

 
 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, G_Money said:

 
 

I’ll give you D+for effort.

 

Plenty of idiot liberals about.

 

I recommend a line between paragraphs. It helps deciphering jibberish.  
One of the liberal journalists types might reprimand you but I doubt it.  That great honor is normally reserved for the Trump supporters.

 

But out of all your text which part is racist, facist or Nazi?

 

Which civil rights of yours were taken away?

 

Never read or witnessed the end of Democracy.


 

 

 

 

 
 

 

Takes nothing to reply like that. No helpful content or rebuttal. 

I made it clear I was commenting on some of the points and not all your points. Even edited your post to show the ones I was looking at. Lazy on your part. Could discuss further e.g. his potential use of the army and how he says he wants to give police - presumably federal police - a day or an hour to do what they need to do outside the law - but I'll leave it there. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

Takes nothing to reply like that. 

I made it clear I was commenting on a couple of the points and not all your points. Even edited your post to show the ones I was looking at. Lazy on your part. Could discuss further e.g. his potential use of the army and how he says he wants to give police - presumably federal police - a day or an hour to do what they need to do outside the law - but I'll leave it there. 

 


You really need to stop listening to or watching those left winger propaganda channels and podcasts.

 

They are pumping you full of crap that’s never happened nor never will happen.

 

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, G_Money said:


You really need to stop listening to or watching those left winger propaganda channels and podcasts.

 

They are pumping you full of crap that’s never happened nor never will happen.

 

 

It only takes two things, listening to what Trump says or do not say, and common sense! He is a nut case, period!

Posted
Just now, Hummin said:

It only takes two things, listening to what Trump says or do not say, and common sense! He is a nut case, period!


You should join the crazy fat guy.

Posted
2 minutes ago, G_Money said:


You should join the crazy fat guy.

I got a stalker. WLC back mr G who knows how to say things in a proper and interesting way 😉

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hummin said:

I got a stalker. WLC back mr G who knows how to say things in a proper and interesting way 😉


Where is your sense of humor?

 

And was unaware replying to someone validates being a stalker, 

 

Are you transam reincarnated?  All those smiling emojis has me wondering.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, G_Money said:


Where is your sense of humor?

I do not think humor is your thing, it takes som IQ to be funny, at least for other people than yourself

Posted
1 minute ago, Hummin said:

I do not think humor is your thing, it takes som IQ to be funny, at least for other people than yourself


I agree.  I am well beyond the “som IQ” and have advanced IQ.

 

I could swear I received a lecture from you the other day about spelling, spell check and proof reading.  

Posted
6 hours ago, G_Money said:


I bet you have every Bond movie ever made on file.

 

Are you a Freemason , Illuminati?

Blah blah..

Facts:

Again:

- Giuliani was previously known for his contacts with Russian operatives and for diffusing Russian disinformation. Fact.

- he left no time for anyone to authenticate it before the election. Fact.

- MSM did not get a copy and could not authenticate it. Fact.

- as soon as MSM got a copy, they authenticated it. Fact.

 

There was no way MSM could authenticate the content of the laptop, and Giuliani could not be trusted.

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, candide said:

Blah blah..

Facts:

Again:

- Giuliani was previously known for his contacts with Russian operatives and for diffusing Russian disinformation. Fact.

- he left no time for anyone to authenticate it before the election. Fact.

- MSM did not get a copy and could not authenticate it. Fact.

- as soon as MSM got a copy, they authenticated it. Fact.

 

There was no way MSM could authenticate the content of the laptop, and Giuliani could not be trusted.


You are Illuminati.  You’re not fooling anyone.

 

How do I join?

Posted
1 minute ago, G_Money said:


You are Illuminati.  You’re not fooling anyone.

 

How do I join?

Blah blah again. You have nothing to contradict the facts I listed. ;😃

There was no way Giuliani could be trusted by MSM without being able to authenticatevthe content.

Facts again:

- Giuliani was previously known for his contacts with Russian operatives and for diffusing Russian disinformation. Fact.

- he left no time for anyone to authenticate it before the election. Fact.

- MSM did not get a copy and could not authenticate it. Fact.

- as soon as MSM got a copy, they authenticated it. Fact.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, candide said:

Blah blah again. You have nothing to contradict the facts I listed. ;😃

There was no way Giuliani could be trusted by MSM without being able to authenticatevthe content.

Facts again:

- Giuliani was previously known for his contacts with Russian operatives and for diffusing Russian disinformation. Fact.

- he left no time for anyone to authenticate it before the election. Fact.

- MSM did not get a copy and could not authenticate it. Fact.

- as soon as MSM got a copy, they authenticated it. Fact.


Are you on automatic rewind?  Or is there an echo in the room.

Posted
37 minutes ago, G_Money said:


Are you on automatic rewind?  Or is there an echo in the room.

You can evoke James Bond, Illuminati, etc.. as much as you want, you have nothing to contradict the facts I listed, which are common knowledge. 😅

 

It is factual that Giuliani did not give a copy of the laptop to MSM, so they could not autheticate it, They had no reason to trust Giuliani.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, G_Money said:

 
You can get him banned???  aka silenced, censored.

 
The left gets more facist and dictator like every day.  

 

Are you another Illuminati?

Posted in response to my post stating that I wouldn't try to get the bot banned.

 

You got it backwards, which is a core problem for Trumpers.

Posted
9 hours ago, candide said:

Blah blah again. You have nothing to contradict the facts I listed. ;😃

There was no way Giuliani could be trusted by MSM without being able to authenticatevthe content.

Facts again:

- Giuliani was previously known for his contacts with Russian operatives and for diffusing Russian disinformation. Fact.

- he left no time for anyone to authenticate it before the election. Fact.

- MSM did not get a copy and could not authenticate it. Fact.

- as soon as MSM got a copy, they authenticated it. Fact.

@G_Money is allergic to facts that are outside his world view.

  • Haha 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Posted in response to my post stating that I wouldn't try to get the bot banned.

 

You got it backwards, which is a core problem for Trumpers.


So you have the capability to try to get him banned but choose not to?

 

Mighty white of you.

 

Are you going to try and have me banned?

  • Confused 1
Posted
9 hours ago, candide said:

You can evoke James Bond, Illuminati, etc.. as much as you want, you have nothing to contradict the facts I listed, which are common knowledge. 😅

 

It is factual that Giuliani did not give a copy of the laptop to MSM, so they could not autheticate it, They had no reason to trust Giuliani.


Yawn

Posted
2 hours ago, G_Money said:


Yawn

Do you get paid by the post?

 

Anyway, this topic makes a great example of irony:

 

Hillary predicted misinformation about Kamala Harris was coming soon, and, on cue, the Trumpers started posting misinformation.

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
18 hours ago, stevenl said:

Those questions have been answered many times already. You're simply ignoring the answers.

 

There are a number of posters whose task is to disrupt discussion.  Please don't feed the trolls.

 

Posted
20 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Well, she's mixed race.

 

Predominantly Indian, but with some black and white heritage also. 

 

She just uses the black tag because it is politically convenient to do so in 2024. The race card is a powerful one in US politics, and she knows it. She'd claim to be from Mars if she thought it would get more votes. 

She must have learned from Obama that claiming to be all black when only half or less black is politically advantageous.

  • Agree 1
Posted
18 hours ago, Hummin said:

It only takes two things, listening to what Trump says or do not say, and common sense! He is a nut case, period!

You claim that Trump is mentally impaired as a fact. You are required to provide proof of facts on this forum. Please provide a medical certificate to that fact, or admit you are making it up. Common sense is not a medical diagnosis.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...