Trump Challenges Special Counsel's Evidence Release in Election Case

[G_Money]

1 hour ago, Berkshire said:

"Don the Con"....such an apt description.  It still amazes me how any Americans can vote for Trump who's such an obvious lying, corrupt conman.

Insert Harris Delete Trump.  Insert conwoman Delete conman.

 

I couldn’t of said it any better.

[candide]

More will come after Trump loses the election, as there will be no hope for his accomplices to get a pardon. 😁

In particular from Giuliani. He's now bankrupt for helping Trump, who did nothing to help him (and actually did not even pay all of the fees he owned Giuliani).

Edited October 3 by candide

[animalmagic]

1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

Simple. The testimony was not voluntary.

They are given the option to plead the 5th, therefore anything they say after that is voluntary.

I think 45 should give them lessons on pleading the 5th, I seem to recall he's an old hand at that!

[Berkshire]

1 minute ago, candide said:

More will come after Trump loses the election, as there will be no hope for his accomplices to get a pardon.

In particular from Giuliani. He's now bankrupt for helping Trump, who did nothing to help him (and actually did not even paid all of the fees he owned Giuliani).

Yeah, Giuliani's own daughter is now supporting VP Harris.  She can see firsthand how Trump destroyed her father's life.  She doesn't want Trump doing the same to the country....good on  her.

[nauseus]

4 hours ago, Walker88 said:

Read it. Astonishing. The evidence comes from the felon's staff and officials he appointed, so any suggestion this is some sort of Dem witch hunt is absurd.

 

politico.com/f/?id=00000192-4ed8-d086-a1fe-7edb0e150000

 

From Page 8 of the filing, it notes that when the felon was advised that what he was doing and saying might lead to violence, he is reported to responded, "Make them riot" and "Do it".

 

From Page 142, when told VP Pence was in danger, and it could be heard on live TV that the terrorists were chanting "Hang Mike Pence", the response from the felon was "So what".

 

I looked at your references and see that your words do not match the report. No surprise there I guess.

 

This just another Jack Smith (J6) waste of time which will go nowhere but cost a small fortune in the process.

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, Berkshire said:

"Don the Con"....such an apt description.  It still amazes me how any Americans can vote for Trump who's such an obvious lying, corrupt conman.

 

While the real con artists are better at the game....not nearly so obvious.

[Inderpland]

2 hours ago, G_Money said:

 Similar to a.  racist, racist, racist?

                   b   facist, facist, facist?

                   c.   nazi, nazi, nazi?

 

Or all of the above, a,b,c? 

                  

No, not similar at all, It is in fact hard to get what you're on about at all. You seem very confused.

Damning evidence has been given by Republicans appointed by Trump to Grand Juries irrefutably proving that he's a stinking insurrectionist and traitor.

Is it clearer for you now?

[Inderpland]

11 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

While the real con artists are better at the game....not nearly so obvious.

Quite right. He's a failure even in this.

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

Simple. The testimony was not voluntary.

As is often the case in the prosecution of criminal enterprises in which multiple persons with close association to the crime ring leader are either witnesses to and/or participants in the indicted crimes.

 

Perhaps even more so when the witnesses have justifiable reason to fear the reaction of a powerful indicted crimson enterprise leader.

 

 

[jerrymahoney]

Thank you. I don't need your (expletive deleted) lecture.

I just thought Walker88 could have mentioned that all these Republicans who provided grand jury evidence against Trump did so under subpoena. Edited October 3 by jerrymahoney

[G_Money]

7 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

No, not similar at all, It is in fact hard to get what you're on about at all. You seem very confused.

Damning evidence has been given by Republicans appointed by Trump to Grand Juries irrefutably proving that he's a stinking insurrectionist and traitor.

Is it clearer for you now?

The only confused people I see are liberals.  They actually think Harris is qualified and would make a great president.

 

Beyond confused.

 

Bitter disgruntled RINO’s naturally will turn on Trump.  He’s not one of them.  Not part of the biggest good ol boy club in America.

 

That can’t stand the fact that he came in from the outside and will fire people in a heartbeat if they don’t perform.

 

 

Edited October 3 by G_Money

[Inderpland]

4 minutes ago, G_Money said:

The only confused people I see are liberals.  They actually think Harris is qualified and would make a great president.

 

Beyond confused.

Compared to the dimwitted insurrectionist traitor a dead seagull with fleas would be preferable.

[BarraMarra]

The problem from an outsider like me is anyone goes against Trump and his supporters are liars, or out to get him. He and his supporters will never accept anything either Vote results or jury decisions that go against him and anything he says his supporters believe. Even film evidence is classed as a stitch up or a witch hunt against him. Like i said in previous threads if Trump said the Earth is flat his supporters believe it must be then. 

[bubblegum]

Blah blah blag, liar witch-hunt blah blah nazi, maxist blah blah

[Chomper Higgot]

33 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

Thank you. I don't need your (expletive deleted) lecture.

I just thought Walker88 could have mentioned that all these Republicans who provided grand jury evidence against Trump did so under subpoena.

Why even a need for expletives? My post was clear, accurate and not in the slightest bit offensive.

 

Regardless, other readers now have some context on the use of subpoenas, I expect you’ll agree that’s a good thing, or at least not a bad thing.

 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

38 minutes ago, G_Money said:

The only confused people I see are liberals.  They actually think Harris is qualified and would make a great president.

 

Beyond confused.

 

Says a guy who is confused over the actual topic of discussion.

[Peabody]

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Simple. The testimony was not voluntary.

And?

[Peabody]

43 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

I just thought Walker88 could have mentioned that all these Republicans who provided grand jury evidence against Trump did so under subpoena.

Ah yes, the old "you must truthfully testify UNDER OATH" trick. Devious bastards.

I can see why you have trouble with the just-released facts.

[Inderpland]

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Simple. The testimony was not voluntary.

So you mean that as a result they gave false testimony/committed perjury?

[animalmagic]

55 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

As is often the case in the prosecution of criminal enterprises in which multiple persons with close association to the crime ring leader are either witnesses to and/or participants in the indicted crimes.

 

Perhaps even more so when the witnesses have justifiable reason to fear the reaction of a powerful indicted crimson enterprise leader.

 

 

He's not a 'crimson' enterprise leader....he's an orange one!

[cjinchiangrai]

6 minutes ago, Peabody said:

Ah yes, the old "you must truthfully testify UNDER OATH" trick. Devious bastards.

I can see why you have trouble with the just-released facts.

In addition to the testimony, there was 1000 pages of documents that confirm the testimony.

[jerrymahoney]

7 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

So you mean that as a result they gave false testimony/committed perjury?

If you want a primer on the US Federal criminal procedure, get from Chomper.

 

He knows.

[Inderpland]

8 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

If you want a primer on the US Federal criminal procedure, get from Chomper.

 

He knows.

I was asking you about your opinion. Do you think these witnesses lied?

[AlexRich]

We are getting closer to the end of Trump and the truth about his illegal and treacherous activities throughout his life and during his period in the White House. The number of Americans who can’t see a traitor standing in plain sight is beyond my belief. 
 

And perhaps, finally, we will get the details on the first fake assassination attempt … which all seems to b3 forgotten about now. 

[Chomper Higgot]

11 minutes ago, animalmagic said:

He's not a 'crimson' enterprise leader....he's an orange one!

I understand he’s crimson with rage right now, ranting online in a series of  all caps lie fests.

[Chomper Higgot]

12 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

If you want a primer on the US Federal criminal procedure, get from Chomper.

 

He knows.

Sorry did I step into your wheelhouse?

[jerrymahoney]

Just your usual condescending tone as you've done about a hundred other times in replying to anything I post.

[Chomper Higgot]

Just now, jerrymahoney said:

Just your usual condescending tone as you've done about a hundred other times in replying to anything I post.

Perhaps if you have anything to say about the correctness of my comment we could discuss that.

 

 

[jerrymahoney]

I only said to Walker88 that he could've mentioned all were under subpoena.

I didn't need to have it explained to me how the grand jury system works. Edited October 3 by jerrymahoney

[Inderpland]

2 hours ago, G_Money said:

And when he wins in November you’ll be addressing him as Mr President.

 

Your new Commander in Chief.

Personally I think 'convict' has a better ring to it.