Trump Urges Israel to Strike Iran’s Nuclear Facilities

[simple1]

2 hours ago, coolcarer said:

These were my questions.

 

How would these analysts know how much damage would be done to come up with an estimate of just a year or two set back? 
 

can you provide a link to your claims that “some analysts claim an attack on Irans nuclear facilities would only slow down the development process by a tear or two”

 

the links you provided have nothing mentioned about that claim 

 

Don't recall the actual article I read, but following links should provide further insight.

 

https://thebulletin.org/2024/10/iran-vs-israel-redux-the-enormous-difficulties-and-ramifications-if-israel-attacks-irans-nuclear-sites/

 

given Iran’s industrial capacity and technological know-how, Iran could rebuild its facilities, begin enrichment to 90 percent, and weaponize its nuclear program. In fact, military strikes could give Tehran a very strong motivation to quickly rebuild its nuclear program and dash for a bomb. In the past, limited attacks on Iranian nuclear personnel and facilities have only incentivized faster nuclear advances.

 

https://www.stimson.org/2024/will-iran-get-the-bomb-in-2024/

[coolcarer]

1 minute ago, simple1 said:

 

Don't recall the actual article I read, but following links should provide further insight.

 

https://thebulletin.org/2024/10/iran-vs-israel-redux-the-enormous-difficulties-and-ramifications-if-israel-attacks-irans-nuclear-sites/

 

given Iran’s industrial capacity and technological know-how, Iran could rebuild its facilities, begin enrichment to 90 percent, and weaponize its nuclear program. In fact, military strikes could give Tehran a very strong motivation to quickly rebuild its nuclear program and dash for a bomb. In the past, limited attacks on Iranian nuclear personnel and facilities have only incentivized faster nuclear advances.

 

https://www.stimson.org/2024/will-iran-get-the-bomb-in-2024/

I am not surprised they are unverified claims you made. Funny how you can dig up loads of other links but not the ones to support your previous claims. 

[simple1]

1 hour ago, coolcarer said:

I am not surprised they are unverified claims you made. Funny how you can dig up loads of other links but not the ones to support your previous claims. 

What's your problem? Analyst articles are opinion pieces. Unless you're embedded in the Iranian nuclear development / defence establishment you won't know what's actually going on. I've provided other articles for consideration - Get a life...

[coolcarer]

6 minutes ago, simple1 said:

What's your problem? Analyst articles are opinion pieces. Unless you're embedded in the Iranian nuclear development / defence establishment you won't know what's actually going on. I've provided other articles for consideration - Get a life...

The problem is yours fella. Making claims with no links stating you can’t remember them. Talk about me get a life….lol

[simple1]

3 hours ago, coolcarer said:

The problem is yours fella. Making claims with no links stating you can’t remember them. Talk about me get a life….lol

 

One last response. I originally posted "There are some analysts who claim an attack..."An analyst wrote an opinion on the Iranian capability to recover from an attack on it's facilities, a bit more info was provided in my last link. but there is no way to actually verify the opinion piece unless one has access to highly classified data, it's an opinion. I trust you can finally comprehend.

[coolcarer]

29 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

One last response. I originally posted "There are some analysts who claim an attack..."An analyst wrote an opinion on the Iranian capability to recover from an attack on it's facilities, a bit more info was provided in my last link. but there is no way to actually verify the opinion piece unless one has access to highly classified data, it's an opinion. I trust you can finally comprehend.

I comprehend very well that what you said has no basis in truth and certainly no link attached to it. 

 

Here is your claim once last time:

 

“some analysts claim an attack on Irans nuclear facilities would only slow down the development process by a year or two”

 

 

 

 

[riclag]

On 10/5/2024 at 8:20 AM, 300sd said:

I tend to agree with Trump. Perhaps no one noticed that recent video on a news outlet showing masses of Iranian's shouting "death to America." Israel will be doing the world a favour destroying Iran's nuclear capacity which the Biden admin has allowed to progress. A country that proves it's behind terrorism should never be allowed to possess nuclear weapons.

The USA whos leaders that sing from the same song sheet since they were put in office will screw this up ,the same as all they’re weak foreign policy initiatives, have in the past through other dem presidents ! Chaos was created because they appeased Iran!

 

The religious fanatics & their terror proxy’s,have a thing for 

America  & Israel ! They didn’t screw with Trump ! Go for the nuke sites and stop beating around the bush, with fanatics hell bent on destroying Israel ,America and former Potus’s.

 

[Yagoda]

Well if you go back to October 5:

 

 

Now what did the IDF do? 

 

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/a-clear-message-to-iran-your-nukes-and-oil-are-next/

 

"The strike appears to have destroyed most, if not all, of Iran’s S-300 air defense systems and some of the advanced S-400 systems acquired from Russia. In a simultaneous assault on air defense systems in Syria and Iraq, Israel significantly reduced Iran’s ability to detect and intercept hostile aerial vehicles. As the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson stated, “Now, the State of Israel has wider air freedom of action in Iran as well.” This development marks a serious setback for Iran’s defensive posture."

 

Let me know if I can aanalyze some other issue for you guys