Which of these women would make the best 2024 US president. Why?

[GammaGlobulin]

Which of these women would make the best US president?

 

What are the reasons for your views?

 

Please don't worry whether or not any one of these women are alive. This is not the point of this Topic.

The idea is to state the qualities that you consider essential for a female US president.

 

And then, perhaps, extrapolate from your thinking about the qualities these women possess, to assess whether there are any living women that might prove to be the best US Prez that the United States has had in a very long time.

 

Of course, it's possible that some of these women might still be alive.

However, this is not important nor essential for this analysis.

 

a. Warren

 

 

b.  Thatcher

 

c.  Bush

 

d.  Dole

 

e.  Harris

 

f.  Roosevelt

 

g.  Golda Meir

 

h. Unknown Quantity

Feel free to add one more...

At your discretion.

 

 

So, which of the above might make the best US president in this year, 2024, through 2028?

And why....

 

If one, or more, of the above might not be a US citizen, then this is also irrelevant for the purposes of this thought exercise.

 

And, may the best woman win!

 

Best regards,

 

Gamma

 

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTE:  Please ONLY consider individuals who are actually women, biologically speaking.  In other words, TWO X chromosomes, and no XY pairs allowed!!!! (Thank You.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[still kicking]

5 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

Which of these women would make the best US president?

 

What are the reasons for your views?

 

Please don't worry whether or not any one of these women are alive. This is not the point of this Topic.

The idea is to state the qualities that you consider essential for a female US president.

 

And then, perhaps, extrapolate from your thinking about the qualities these women possess, to assess whether there are any living women that might prove to be the best US Prez that the United States has had in a very long time.

 

Of course, it's possible that some of these women might still be alive.

However, this is not important nor essential for this analysis.

 

a. Warren

 

 

b.  Thatcher

 

c.  Bush

 

d.  Dole

 

e.  Harris

 

f.  Roosevelt

 

g.  Golda Meir

 

h. Unknown Quantity

Feel free to add one more...

At your discretion.

 

 

So, which of the above might make the best US president in this year, 2024, through 2028?

And why....

 

If one, or more, of the above might not be a US citizen, then this is also irrelevant for the purposes of this thought exercise.

 

And, may the best woman win!

 

Best regards,

 

Gamma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[G_Money]

First and foremost.

 

Eliminate Harris.  93 days now without holding a FORMAL press conference.  What is she hiding from?  Unheard of.

 

Second place (a close second) goes to Warren.  Is she still claiming she’s an Indian?

The rest are no longer relevant.

 

[G_Money]

43 minutes ago, still kicking said:

 

The dapper Don.   Get some!

[still kicking]

Nice make up

[John Drake]

Barbara Jordan.

[MalcolmB]

Being President is a man’s job.

 

That is why women never win.

 

People are not stupid.

[Will B Good]

 

 

There is no doubt in my mind that my wife would make the best US president.......in 18 years she has not be wrong about anything......not even once.

[GammaGlobulin]

58 minutes ago, John Drake said:

Barbara Jordan.

 

Maybe so.

The United States has NEVER before had a Black Prez.

 

If she were elected, then Jordan would be the First Black President of the United States, without doubt.

 

She was also not a big fan of Nixon, apparently.

 

 

 

[herfiehandbag]

Interesting juxtaposition of topics in the present listings on AN!

[organicman]

Women make horrible leaders because they are emotional beings compared to men, who work on logic. We all know that making an emotional choice is usually the worst-case scenario. Men are tougher on their policies and do what is right while women and weak men want a soft approach. I still remember in the 90s how the newspapers used to compare male to female leaders all the time and always made this point. Both sexes prefer a man to be their boss. 

 

It is the same reason why the Right always talks about valid points, whereas the Left always avoids debates. It's the same as talking to a child that's run by their emotions. Most of these Leftists are women and Trump haters cause they are too brainwashed by emotion instead of looking at Trump for his track record and logic regarding borders, America first, banning child sex change and WOKE, etc... We all know America was 10000x better under Trump than Biden and Harris. 

 

That is why the Left has made logic hate speech today and why degeneration is acceptable and encouraged. 

 

Any emotional person can easily be controlled compared to someone who is rock-hard and in charge of their emotions. Real, strong men have these characteristics. Watch Kamala's rally speeches, she is drunk or on something. Trump doesn't drink or do drugs. Who would you want in charge of nuclear codes? Also, look at Trump's children compared to Kamala's children (WOKE, drug addicts, tattoos). 

 

Remember, a strong leader makes a country strong while a weak leader makes the people weak hence will turn to drugs and alcohol to fill that void.

 

Fox News is one of the only News outlets that 'Centre' today that reports the news still in the USA. For Australia = Sky News Australia. Canada = Rebel News.  

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

1 hour ago, organicman said:

Any emotional person can easily be controlled compared to someone who is rock-hard and in charge of their emotions. Real, strong men have these characteristics.

 

One should be cautious when using this term...strong men....

 

Although I know your intended meaning, yet there is also a different meaning for strongmen which, actually, first came to my mind:

 

 

 

[EVENKEEL]

Condoleezza Rice. What an outstanding woman she is.

[madone]

Are there so few admirable women around that we are reduced primarily to ex-presidents wives and the dead?

[BritManToo]

What's wrong with Taylor Swift?

[madone]

 

2 hours ago, organicman said:

Women make horrible leaders because they are emotional beings compared to men, who work on logic. We all know that making an emotional choice is usually the worst-case scenario. Men are tougher on their policies and do what is right while women and weak men want a soft approach. I still remember in the 90s how the newspapers used to compare male to female leaders all the time and always made this point. Both sexes prefer a man to be their boss. 

 

It is the same reason why the Right always talks about valid points, whereas the Left always avoids debates. It's the same as talking to a child that's run by their emotions. Most of these Leftists are women and Trump haters cause they are too brainwashed by emotion instead of looking at Trump for his track record and logic regarding borders, America first, banning child sex change and WOKE, etc... We all know America was 10000x better under Trump than Biden and Harris. 

 

That is why the Left has made logic hate speech today and why degeneration is acceptable and encouraged. 

 

Any emotional person can easily be controlled compared to someone who is rock-hard and in charge of their emotions. Real, strong men have these characteristics. Watch Kamala's rally speeches, she is drunk or on something. Trump doesn't drink or do drugs. Who would you want in charge of nuclear codes? Also, look at Trump's children compared to Kamala's children (WOKE, drug addicts, tattoos). 

 

Remember, a strong leader makes a country strong while a weak leader makes the people weak hence will turn to drugs and alcohol to fill that void.

 

Fox News is one of the only News outlets that 'Centre' today that reports the news still in the USA. For Australia = Sky News Australia. Canada = Rebel News.  

 

wow. just so much to unpack. 

[madone]

Just now, BritManToo said:

What's wrong with Taylor Swift?

bottom heavy.

[GammaGlobulin]

17 minutes ago, madone said:

Are there so few admirable women around that we are reduced primarily to ex-presidents wives and the dead?

 

Women have changed, during the past 50 years, in case you may not have noticed.

Or, perhaps you are not old enough to be able to make a valid comparison.

 

 

[Real Name Hidden]

Stormy Daniels

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

Women have changed, during the past 50 years, in case you may not have noticed.

Or, perhaps you are not old enough to be able to make a valid comparison.

 

 

Not really. Only difference is that they don't want to be female now and want to be men.

Eg

They want to be allowed into boys only schools and mens clubs

they wear pants instead of dresses

They don't want to be feminine or sexy any more

They want to be the boss, and are trying to change the law to make female board members compulsory

they have driven men out of teaching so they can mold the next generation

They want to be soldiers with guns and fighter pilots

They want to be captains on navy ships

They want to be on submarines

They don't want to be housewives or raise children anymore

Etc.

[thaibeachlovers]

None of the women you suggest.

I can't think of a single woman I'd want as president, but then I can't think of any men I want as president either, unless they can clone Kennedy- the one and only decent POTUS in my lifetime.

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

What's wrong with Taylor Swift?

She's female?

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

Condoleezza Rice. What an outstanding woman she is.

I don't often disagree with you but IMO she was as vile a person as any monster that walked on planet Earth.

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, madone said:

Are there so few admirable women around that we are reduced primarily to ex-presidents wives and the dead?

Unfortunately yes. Plenty of admirable women, but none I'd want with the nuclear football.