.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Announcements
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
143
Biden calls for Trump to be jailed 14 days out from the election
He hasnt been convicted in NY as thwere is no Final Judgement of Conviction. You know this yet keep lying. -
0
Tensions Rise as Jury Selection Continues in Daniel Penny's High-Profile Trial
As the trial of Daniel Penny proceeds in New York City, emotions continue to run high, with protesters labeling Penny a "murderer" as jury selection moves forward. Penny, a 25-year-old former Marine, is facing charges of second-degree manslaughter and negligent homicide after allegedly causing the death of 30-year-old Jordan Neely on a subway in 2023. Earlier this month, Judge Wiley made critical rulings that will shape the trial. Both the prosecution and defense had filed motions to suppress certain pieces of evidence, but Wiley denied both sides' requests. The prosecution had opposed the defense’s attempt to introduce Neely’s medical records and call specific witnesses. Meanwhile, the defense objected to the introduction of Penny's statements made to police at the subway station and precinct shortly after the incident. Wiley’s decision cleared the way for all evidence to be presented during the trial. Experts in the use of force have weighed in on how the trial could unfold. Dr. John R. Black, a retired police lieutenant and expert witness in cases involving high-stress decision-making, spoke to *Newsweek* about the prosecution's likely strategy. "The prosecutor's argument is primarily an argument of disproportionate response. This person did not represent the level of threat by which the technique that the other person chose was applied, so there's a mismatch," Black explained. Similarly, Jamie Borden, a police veteran and expert in use-of-force cases, emphasized the role perception could play in the prosecution's case. "The prosecution is more than likely building their case on a passionate belief that something was done wrong. That doesn't mean that it wasn't done wrong, but I'm saying that they'll present their case from a point of passionate belief about the appearance of the incident." On the other hand, Black suggested the defense would likely argue Penny’s actions were justified given the circumstances. "The other argument is we have the right to use a proportional level of force, and actually the law would say a reasonably necessary level of force to protect ourselves or to protect another." Penny faces significant legal consequences if convicted. He could be sentenced to five to 15 years for the manslaughter charge and up to four years for negligent homicide. As the trial continues, the debate surrounding the case will undoubtedly intensify, as it touches on broader issues of race, mental health, and public safety in America’s largest city. Based on a report from Newsweek | 2024-10-24 -
0
Trump Backs Netanyahu’s Autonomy on Potential Iran Strike
Former U.S. President Donald Trump has encouraged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to act independently regarding a potential retaliatory strike against Iran. In an interview with Saudi state-owned news outlet Al Arabiya, which aired on Sunday, Trump expressed his support for Netanyahu's decision-making in response to Iran’s recent missile barrage against Israel. “Well, I think [Netanyahu is] going to do what he wants to do. And I think he has to do that,” Trump stated when asked about possible Israeli airstrikes on Iran in retaliation for the October 1 missile attack. Trump also criticized current U.S. President Joe Biden's foreign policy approach, calling it “horrible” and urged Netanyahu to follow a path contrary to Biden’s advice. “Biden was giving him some very bad – look, Biden has been historically horrible on foreign policy. Incompetent,” Trump said. “I would say what you do is anything [Biden] says, do the opposite, and you’ll be brilliant.” He further implied that Biden's instructions to Netanyahu put Israel in a precarious situation, saying, “[Biden] gave [Bibi] instructions not to do anything, and Israel is under great danger.” In the interview, Trump responded to the suggestion that he might be the only leader capable of ending the ongoing Middle East conflict due to his close ties with Netanyahu. Trump agreed, saying, “I think you’re right. He does listen to me.” While he refrained from disclosing how he would prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, Trump expressed respect for the Iranian people, labeling them as “great negotiators.” He hinted at the possibility of reaching a diplomatic solution, noting, “In its own way, [Iran is] probably in danger, maybe more so than they would have thought a month ago.” He stressed his desire to avoid further bloodshed, remarking, “I don’t want to see people killed. Everyone’s being killed in the Middle East. I don’t want to see that.” Iran launched roughly 180 ballistic missiles at Israel in retaliation for the Israeli strikes that killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh. This recent barrage marks the second direct attack on Israel by Iran since the Hamas terror attack on October 7, 2023. Based on a report from the NYP 2024-10-24 -
0
Kansas Woman Shares "Unbearable" Horrors of Hell After Near-Death Experience
In 2019, Charlotte Holmes of Wichita, Kansas, found herself at the center of a life-altering event when a routine checkup with her cardiologist took a sudden turn. Her blood pressure skyrocketed, leading doctors to suspect she was either having a stroke or an impending heart attack. Rushed to the hospital, Charlotte was quickly placed on an intravenous drip. But soon after, her heart stopped. For 11 minutes, she was clinically dead. During those moments, Charlotte says she experienced both heaven and hell in vivid detail. Recalling her story on the Christian TV show *The 700 Club*, Charlotte's husband Danny remembered the eerie atmosphere in the hospital room. “I looked around, and I knew there were no flowers in that room,” he said. “That’s when I knew she was not in this world.” As for Charlotte, who was 68 at the time, she recounted the beginning of her experience: “I could see Danny standing in the corner... I could see all the nurses around." But then, her vision shifted. "I opened my eyes, I looked around at the beauty. I could see the trees, I could see the grass. And everything was swaying with the music, because everything in heaven worships God.” Charlotte described heaven as indescribably beautiful, noting that its magnificence is beyond human comprehension. “It’s so above what we can even imagine – [by] a million times, a million times,” she said, emphasizing that earthly words fall short in conveying what she saw. Led by angels, she recalled feeling “pure joy” and an absence of fear as she entered heaven. There, she was reunited with deceased family members, including her mother, father, and sister, who appeared healthy and vibrant. “They didn’t look old, they didn’t look sick, none of them wore glasses,” Charlotte said. “They looked like they were in their 30s... They looked wonderful.” Among the most profound moments was her encounter with a bright light, which she instinctively knew to be God. Standing alongside Him was a toddler, whom Charlotte identified as her son, lost during pregnancy. “I lost that child,” she shared. “I was five-and-a-half months pregnant. I can remember them holding the baby up and saying, ‘Charlotte, it's a boy.’ Then he was gone.” Seeing the toddler before her, Charlotte was overwhelmed. “I said, ‘God, how is that possible?’ [And] He says, ‘They continue to grow in heaven.’” But her experience was not limited to the joys of heaven. God chose to show her a glimpse of hell. “I looked down, and the smell, and then rotten flesh – that’s what it smelled like – and then screams,” Charlotte recalled. The stark contrast between the beauty of heaven and the horrors of hell was overwhelming. “After seeing the beauty of heaven, the contrast to seeing hell is almost unbearable,” she said. Charlotte remembered God’s words as she witnessed hell: “He says, ‘I show you this to tell you, if some of them do not change their ways, this is where they shall reside.’” The imagery and warnings left a deep impact on her. Soon after, Charlotte heard her father’s voice, telling her to return to the living world and share her experience. At that moment, she felt herself being drawn back into her body and awoke in her hospital bed. She made a full recovery and was released from the hospital two weeks later. Since then, Charlotte has dedicated herself to sharing her story, believing that it carries a powerful message. “People need hope,” she said. “They want to know that there really is something out there, they want to know that everything's OK.” Her belief in heaven is unwavering. “Heaven is more than you can imagine,” Charlotte stated. “I’m so grateful I can look you square in the eye and tell you for sure, heaven is real.” Based on a report from MSN 2024-10-24 -
0
Broken Border Surveillance Cameras Expose Gaps in U.S. Security One Third Not Working
For up to a year, nearly a third of cameras along the U.S.-Mexico border have been out of operation, a flaw that could be aiding illegal immigration, according to a Newsweek investigation. Border agents stationed at critical points along the southern U.S. border have been fighting to control immigration as cartels exploit these surveillance gaps to smuggle undocumented migrants into the country. Many of these cameras, intended to alert law enforcement to illegal crossings, have been deemed obsolete, with immigration authorities acknowledging that the technology is no longer fit for purpose. One border agent described the situation as a "big nationwide issue," noting that the blind spots created by these malfunctioning cameras allow traffickers to cross undetected. This revelation has fueled criticism from Republicans who argue that the camera failures highlight what they see as the “wide-open border policies” of the Biden-Harris administration. Republicans claim that these policies are encouraging human trafficking and illegal immigration. Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, both aiming to sway voters ahead of the upcoming presidential election, have yet to fully address the challenges at the U.S.-Mexico border. Public sentiment appears to be in line with these concerns. According to a recent Gallup poll, 42 percent of Americans view the situation at the border as a "crisis," while 35 percent see it as a "major problem." Additionally, 55 percent of Americans support reducing immigration, the highest percentage recorded since 2001. Senator Marco Rubio of Florida seized on the findings, stating, "From day one, the Biden-Harris Administration has ignored our immigration laws and allowed criminals to flood into our communities. Reports of gaps in our surveillance should surprise no one while this administration remains in control." As the issue escalates, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is facing increasing pressure. Officials have acknowledged that their Remote Video Surveillance Systems, used along the border for over 15 years, are outdated and in need of significant upgrades. Maintaining these systems has become costly, as they require constant manpower to monitor the feeds. Hector Garza, vice president of the National Border Patrol Council, emphasized how this problem has worsened over the past eight months. Initially thought to affect only specific areas, it is now understood to be a broader issue nationwide. Garza highlighted that these surveillance gaps have contributed to an increase in human smuggling, particularly in the Laredo sector of the Texas-Mexico border. "Blind spots on the border are hotbeds for smuggling activity," Garza stated, explaining how agents have lost their ability to anticipate and intercept illegal border crossers. Without functional cameras, agents face higher risks, as they are unable to properly monitor organized crime syndicates operating in these areas. "The camera towers along the border are one of our best assets that we have to be able to know what is coming across the border and to be able to better place agents in different areas," he added. The malfunctioning camera network has created significant security risks, especially in areas notorious for cartel activity. Around 30 percent of surveillance cameras along the U.S.-Mexico border are currently non-operational, with 150 out of 500 cameras affected by the outages. With law enforcement heavily reliant on these systems, the gaps in surveillance have made it increasingly difficult to monitor the border effectively. As the situation unfolds, there are calls for urgent repairs and upgrades. However, without immediate action, the failures in border surveillance will likely continue to be exploited by smugglers, leaving U.S. border agents under greater strain. Based on a report from Newsweek 2024-10-24 -
0
Sharp Rise in Infant Mortality Linked to Abortion Bans Following Dobbs
In the 18 months following the Supreme Court's decision in the Dobbs case, which ended the federal right to abortion, the United States saw a troubling rise in infant mortality. According to new research, hundreds more infants died than anticipated, particularly those with congenital anomalies or birth defects. This increase highlights the significant impact that abortion bans and restrictions, enacted in several states post-Dobbs, are having on broader health trends. “This is evidence of a national ripple effect, regardless of state-level status,” said Dr. Parvati Singh, an assistant professor of epidemiology at The Ohio State University and lead author of the study. The study, published in *JAMA Pediatrics*, compared infant mortality rates in the 18 months after the Dobbs decision with historical data. It found that, in multiple months following the ruling, infant mortality rates were higher than expected, with some months seeing a 7% increase in deaths. In October 2022, March 2023, and April 2023, infant mortality was significantly elevated, resulting in an estimated 247 additional deaths in each of these months. The researchers attributed about 80% of these deaths to congenital anomalies, conditions that can range from mild to severe and affect vital organs such as the heart and spine. In some cases, infants born with these anomalies may only survive a few months. Dr. Singh emphasized the gravity of the findings. “This is the tip of the iceberg,” she explained. “Mortality is the ultimate outcome of any health condition. This is a very, very acute indicator. It could be representative of underlying morbidity and underlying hardship.” The research comes amid increasing evidence that states with abortion bans are seeing a rise in births, particularly among women carrying fetuses with lethal congenital anomalies. Many of these pregnancies, experts say, would have likely ended in abortion if access to the procedure had been available. “Whether the pregnancy was wanted or unwanted, we know that many of these are pregnancies that would have ended in abortion had people had access to those services,” said Dr. Ushma Upadhyay, an associate professor at the University of California, San Francisco, who was not involved in the study but has conducted extensive research on abortion trends in the U.S. Experts also warn that abortion bans may be contributing to broader issues in prenatal care and healthcare access. As Dr. Upadhyay noted, “The well-being of a pregnant person is inextricably linked to the well-being of the pregnancy.” She added that abortion bans can affect a person's willingness or ability to seek prenatal care, especially in communities facing structural barriers such as poverty, lack of education, and food insecurity. These factors, she explained, compound the risks of poor pregnancy and birth outcomes. Dr. Alison Gemmill, a demographer and perinatal epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University, also highlighted the systemic effects of abortion bans. Gemmill’s previous research identified a similar rise in infant mortality in Texas after the state enacted a six-week abortion ban in 2021. “These studies are providing a signal that people aren’t getting the care that they need, and because of that, there are spillover effects,” Gemmill said. “It’s never going to be the case that everybody’s going to be able to overcome the barriers of these bans.” Infant mortality is a measure that includes all deaths that occur before a baby’s first birthday, making it difficult to pinpoint the exact reasons for the higher death rates in certain months. However, the researchers noted that the timing of the spike in infant deaths—four, nine, and ten months after the Dobbs decision—aligns with the typical gestation period and the time when congenital anomalies are usually diagnosed in the fetus. The new findings shed light on the far-reaching consequences of abortion restrictions, raising urgent questions about access to healthcare and the well-being of both mothers and their infants. As policymakers continue to debate the future of reproductive rights in the U.S., this research offers stark evidence of the real-world impacts of these legal changes. Based on a report from CNN 2024-10-24 -
0
Trans golfer STOPS competing in women’s golfing after recognizing “biological realities.”
Nicole Powers, a transgender woman who has competed in various sports, including golf, recently opened up about her experiences competing alongside cisgender women. After reflecting on her participation, Powers has made the decision not to compete in women's sports, expressing that she no longer feels it is fair to do so, given the perceived advantages she may hold over biological women. In a particularly candid moment, she pointed out the complexity of her situation, highlighting the tension between her identity and the expectations placed on her by others. "I’m not a woman; I’m a trans woman. And it’s like this bizarro world where I’m trying to defend my reality against people who are trying to defend something I’m telling them I’m not." Powers also shared how this internal conflict affected her performance during competitions. She admitted to holding back on the golf course, saying, "I didn’t want to raise any flags. So if I’m standing on the tee box with three other women, I’m not going to just bomb a drive out on the fairway 310, 315 yards, even though I knew I could. Despite my lifelong transition or transition for 10-plus years, I knew that I could do that, but instead, I would maybe club down; lay off a little bit on my game, because I didn’t want to raise those flags." Her discomfort went beyond the course, with Powers acknowledging the ethical dilemma she faced, particularly when it came to winning prizes or accolades. "In the back of my head this entire couple years, I was playing in professional tournaments, I knew I wouldn’t feel right if I did take awards [from women]." Powers’ decision comes amid a broader national debate over the participation of transgender athletes in women's sports. Many states have enacted or are considering laws that limit or ban transgender women from competing in female divisions. This discussion has intensified after changes to Title IX by the Biden administration, which expanded protections for transgender athletes. Powers weighed in on the larger conversation, calling for governing bodies to take the concerns of female athletes seriously. "I don’t know what the governing bodies need to do, but they need to listen to women athletes. Women, adult human females, they need to listen to those athletes, listen to their pain points, and understand that there has to be a change." She concluded by advocating for clear guidelines in sports that ensure fairness for all participants. "There has to be a clear line in the sand. And it’s not from a position of discrimination at all. It’s just from a position of fairness, from the original reason why we [have] women’s sports and men’s sports." Powers’ reflections bring a personal voice to a deeply complex issue, highlighting the challenges of navigating fairness, identity, and competitive integrity in sports. Based on a report from Marca | X 2024-10-24 -
0
Tim Walz "Look, Elon is on stage jumping around skipping like a dips*** on these things,"
Minnesota Governor and Democratic vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz launched a sharp critique of Elon Musk during a rally in Madison, Wisconsin. Appearing alongside former President Barack Obama, Walz took aim at Musk’s support for Donald Trump, likening the tech billionaire to Trump’s "running mate" in an unexpected jab. The governor then turned his attention back to Musk. Since purchasing Twitter in 2022 and rebranding it as X, Musk has been increasingly involved in the political arena, funneling money into super PACs such as America and Future Coalition. Musk’s efforts to promote these political action committees have drawn attention, including his controversial plan to randomly hand out $1 million checks to individuals who sign a petition supporting his PAC. Earlier in the month, Musk made headlines when he appeared on stage with Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, a location where Trump had been shot earlier in the year. Musk’s performance onstage, which included some energetic jumping, didn’t go unnoticed by Walz, who used it as material for a biting onstage insult in Madison. "Look, Elon is on that stage jumping around skipping like a dips*** on these things," Walz remarked, drawing laughter and applause from the crowd. The mocking tone was clear, as Walz emphasized the spectacle Musk had made of himself during the rally. "You know it," he added, to roaring approval from the audience. Walz’s remarks underscore the growing political entanglement of Musk, once known primarily for his roles at Tesla and SpaceX, and now increasingly seen as a figure with significant influence in conservative political circles. With Musk’s overt political donations and his public appearances alongside Trump, he has become a target for Democratic figures like Walz, who are eager to call attention to Musk's role in bolstering Trump’s platform as they work to galvanize voter support. Based on a report from the Independent | X 2024-10-24 -
0
Meta’s Suspension of Jet-Tracking Accounts Sparks Free Speech Debate
Meta, the parent company of Instagram and Threads, recently suspended accounts that tracked the private jets of public figures, including Meta’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg and former president Donald Trump. This move mirrors actions taken by Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter), which sparked controversy over the balance between privacy and free speech. Meta's decision to block these accounts comes after they posted publicly available flight data about the private jets of well-known figures like Zuckerberg, Musk, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Kim Kardashian, Kylie Jenner, and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. Alongside this data, the accounts also shared estimates of the carbon emissions generated by these flights. However, the posts did not disclose who was on the planes or the purpose of the flights. Meta's spokesperson Andy Stone stated that the accounts were disabled for “violating our privacy policy” and posing a “risk of physical harm to individuals.” According to Stone, this decision was based on a recommendation from Meta’s Oversight Board. However, the board’s 2022 guidance primarily addressed the sharing of private residential information, such as home addresses, and did not reference flight or travel data. This leaves ambiguity around the platform's rules for posting information about public figures’ travel. The flight information tracked by these accounts, though publicly available, has been used by journalists and researchers to report on public figures. For instance, details about Elon Musk’s private jet flights have been included in news stories that documented his travels across Pennsylvania during the 2020 U.S. presidential election to attend rallies in support of Donald Trump. Jack Sweeney, a college student from the University of Central Florida, ran many of these jet-tracking accounts, including those on Instagram and Threads. He said that Meta provided no warning or explanation before suspending his accounts. "This is exactly what Elon did," Sweeney remarked, referencing Musk’s earlier move to block his X accounts. Sweeney defended the accounts, stating that “this information has journalistic value. It lets you see what these people are working on with the businesses they run. It brings awareness to the climate, that these people are flying all around the world.” Sweeney was also critical of Meta’s justification, arguing that the planes he tracks are not private residences. “The jets I track are not ‘private residences’ even if you claimed they sleep on the plane,” he said. After X suspended Sweeney’s accounts in 2022, the platform also temporarily suspended several journalists, including one who reported on the account suspensions. While X now prohibits real-time location sharing, Sweeney continues to post about Musk's jet on X, but with a 24-hour delay. Alex Howard, a government transparency advocate, criticized Meta's decision on Threads, writing, “Meta has just created an opaque offline privacy policy for certain oligarchs & public figures that [Zuckerberg] will enforce when & how he wishes.” Meta sought advice from its Oversight Board on broader privacy concerns but did not ask specifically about flight data. The board suggested that Meta consider suspensions for serious violations where sharing private residential information leads to threats of violence or harassment. Stone declined to comment on whether any specific incidents of physical harm were linked to the jet-tracking accounts or if anyone had requested the suspension of the accounts. In a related incident, representatives of singer Taylor Swift threatened to sue Sweeney for “stalking and harassing behavior” earlier this year, though no legal action has been taken. An account tracking Swift’s private jet had already been suspended. Musk, Bezos, and Swift’s representatives did not respond to requests for comment. Meta’s decision, much like Musk’s, has reignited debates over the tension between protecting privacy and allowing public access to information that can hold powerful figures accountable. Based on a report from the WP | X 2024-10-24 -
0
Suella Braverman Backs Robert Jenrick for Tory Leadership: A Clear Path Forward
At this crucial juncture, our party stands at a crossroads, but I am confident that, with the right leadership, we can meet the moment. Leadership contests give us the opportunity to reflect, renew, and move forward. Both Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick have stepped up to the plate, not merely out of personal ambition but from a profound sense of duty to the party and the country. Their determination to tackle the challenges before us is evident, and I believe either of them would lead with distinction. As we navigate these testing times, it’s critical that our next leader embodies the values, vision, and authenticity needed to steer Britain through the storm. In recent years, we've not always struck the right balance. We all share responsibility for the missed opportunities following the 2019 election, but we cannot dwell on past mistakes. Our party has proven time and again that when united behind a compelling vision, we can rebuild, inspire, and lead. We can do it again. Kemi and Robert have demonstrated an acute understanding of the pressing issues facing our nation: immigration, economic growth, policing, and national identity. These aren't mere political talking points but critical issues that impact the daily lives of people across the country. It’s essential that we address these challenges honestly and openly. Too often, we’ve avoided or diluted tough conversations. Our voters expect transparency, and they deserve it. This is how we will reclaim our place as the voice of the hardworking, patriotic majority. We must reject half-measures and decline management. Instead, our vision must be bold, anchored in the values that have always strengthened our party: responsibility, fairness, and opportunity for all. We cannot rely on Labour’s weaknesses to carry us forward. Yes, Labour is faltering, and Keir Starmer’s leadership is uninspiring, but we must guard against complacency. The political landscape is shifting rapidly, and we must adapt. While the challenges we face are daunting, we have overcome adversity before. With the right leader, we will do it again. The trust of the British people is something that we must earn through action, not rhetoric. One of the key issues that has caused disillusionment among our supporters is our failure to control legal migration and halt the small boats. This is a matter central to our nation’s future, and we must offer clear, decisive solutions. Before we can expand our support, we need to rebuild trust with our core voters by proving that we are serious about tackling the global migration crisis. For this reason, I am throwing my full support behind Robert Jenrick. He has laid out clear policies on defence, housing, economic growth, and energy, and his principled resignation from government was a bold statement of conviction. This is exactly the kind of leadership we need. Robert has presented a strong, unambiguous plan to address the issues that matter most to our voters, and he understands that leadership is about more than just vision; it requires the determination to see it through, even when the road is tough. We cannot afford to be timid or hesitant. We need a leader with clarity, strength, and courage—someone who will face challenges head-on. Robert Jenrick is that leader. His proposal to reform migration policy by withdrawing from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and imposing visa caps is not just a necessity; it is the foundation upon which we can rebuild trust and win back voters who have lost faith. With my decades of experience working within these legal frameworks, from immigration barrister to Attorney General and Home Secretary, I am convinced that this is the responsible path forward. Our party is at a turning point, but I am confident that with the right leadership, we can rise to the occasion. We’ve done it before, and we will do it again. With courage, conviction, and a clear sense of purpose, we can lead Britain into a new era of opportunity and prosperity. Robert Jenrick has the vision and resolve to take us there, and I believe he is the leader who can unite us and deliver the future Britain deserves. Based on a report from the Daily Telegraph | X 2024-10-24
-
-
Topics
-
-
Recently Browsing 1 member
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now