Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/25/2024 at 10:51 AM, riclag said:

Harris was and is  a huge supporter of

of   BLM! This is their 2020 appearance !below , in a politifact announcement.

 

https://www.tampabay.com/news/nation-world/2020/07/22/politifact-is-black-lives-matter-a-marxist-movement/

 

https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/jul/21/black-lives-matter-marxist-movement/

 

In the article above it says Patrice Cullers one of the founders was Marxist Trained. 
 

https://www.socialistalternative.org/marxism-fight-black-freedom/black-lives-matter-marxism/

 

Harris dad taught Marxist Economics!

Snopes -True

 

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/harris-father-marxist-economist/

 

 

Who let you out of the cellar?

  • Haha 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

FBI has advised the greatest threat of domestic terror is in fact the extreme right wing.

 

Far Right violence a growing threat and law enforcement’s top domestic terrorism concern. 

 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/far-right-violence-a-growing-threat-and-law-enforcements-top-domestic-terrorism-concern

2023 article : Old news

New news : The threat of terror!


Who are the Proud boys they’re all locked up.555

This is 2024, the year of riots on college campuses and in cities around the them. And the threat facing Americans with millions of unvetted illegals crossing the border.

Your a etched in stone Trump hater , there is no amount of facts or reasoning I can give you that you’re gonna agree with.

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

FBI has advised the greatest threat of domestic terror is in fact the extreme right wing.

 

Far Right violence a growing threat and law enforcement’s top domestic terrorism concern. 

 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/far-right-violence-a-growing-threat-and-law-enforcements-top-domestic-terrorism-concern

 

FBI has been weaponized.

 

If you are that clueless Google:

 

Weaponization + FBI

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, AdmiralKrag said:

 

FBI has been weaponized.

get a life.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, riclag said:

<Your a etched in stone Trump hater , there is no amount of facts or reasoning I can give you that you’re gonna agree with>

 

Snipped for brevity, don't hate trump just believe he will be a disaster for US and other Western countries. However your comment applies in reverse to you and other MAGA supporters immersed in Darkness. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
On 10/25/2024 at 11:22 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

I know there are high and low IQ people on both sides.

But Trump and MAGA supporters are obviously mentally challenged. Why else would they vote for a moron? 

maybe because they are tired of the Dems policies. Kamala is not the answer to the problems in the US, she will just make the divide bigger.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, riclag said:

“They are all the people that could never function in normal society now given power, jobs and ill deserved respect. Add to this all the angry (broke) Karen's and all the rest dependant upon government largesse. That's not simply social security which everyone deserves to get their money back”.

 

Well said!But the left will not accept you’re analysis.


Affirmative action and wanting more control of City, state government's through 

DEI & social justice advocacy is representative of identity politics as opposed to merit .

 

 

I don't disagree, but I respect states rights. As long as US taxpayers are not on hook for state incompetence let them run their shixholes into the ground.. like California,  New York. Especially Pennsylvania , MI

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, flexomike said:

maybe because they are tired of the Dems policies. Kamala is not the answer to the problems in the US, she will just make the divide bigger.

She is Obama and the dem elites installation , as she pivots to Biden’s 

Middle Class BS!  The give away is she let in Millions of  illegals who are getting free b’s .while poor Americans 

get scraps.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, AdmiralKrag said:

 

You are aware that the Biden laptop, Steele dossier were FBI contrivances just for starts right? Maybe it's you that ought to wake up and get yourself a life. Maybe the heat from gay sauna has gone to your head?

 

I guess you won't be enlightening yourself.

 

If you are to inept to run a competent search just go to Judicial Watch. They are nailing the feds almost on a daily basis

 

What's with the accusation of homosexuality? Best for you to pull your head in.

 

Sure aware of various legal issues with Biden family members. Believe his son has been found guilty of some offences.  Luckily for trump he's shielded by politicians who failed to live up to their Oath to support the Constitution for partisan political motivation and using his wealth for never ending appeals, or should I say his donors money; why does a multi billionaire need to beg for money - (grifting yet again).

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, AdmiralKrag said:
7 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

In the vast majority if states, you do need to show an ID to vote... 
Voter ID Laws - Vote.org

 

Yes, but in I think it's 13 + DC you do not. So, roughly one third

 

Besides .. so what? One is too many. Every vote is only as strong as the weakest link in the chain.

I actually agree with you that everyone who votes should be required to identify themselves. The problem with IDs is that not everyone has one. I don't think that just because someone does not have a particular type of ID, they should not be allowed to vote. For example, perhaps they could be accompanied by someone else who could vouch for their identity.

However, voting requirements are left up to each state. Some, as you indicate above, require no ID, and some, unfortunately, will only accept a short list of photo IDs that not everyone has. 

The bottom line for me is that not having an ID should not be a big problem. Your vote could be taken but put on hold somehow, and only counted if its necessary to determine the outcome of the election. Then, your vote could be scrutinized more closely.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The left did not accept defeat in 2016, and they will not accept defeat now if Trump wins. 

 

They did not accept defeat in 2016, so they challenged it in the courts, not the streets. And, as you know, they lost. Then, they reluctantly accepted it. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

What's with the accusation of homosexuality? Best for you to pull your head in.

 

Sure aware of various legal issues with Biden family members. Believe his son has been found guilty of some offences.  Luckily for trump he's shielded by politicians who failed to live up to their Oath to support the Constitution for partisan political motivation and using his wealth for never ending appeals, or should I say his donors money; why does a multi billionaire need to beg for money - (grifting yet again).

 

A male must be gay or totally simp to vote for weak af, Manchurian candidate Kamala Harris

 

You're a laff. You excuse and explain away the point you came at me with - that the FBI was directly involved in manufacturing public lies which you have blithely dismissed the potential impact on the tightest election in US history.

 

Then you come back to take another swipe at Trump. Critical thinking much?

  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

I don't know anyone who is voting for Biden in this election!

That wasn’t what I posted about.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

I actually agree with you that everyone who votes should be required to identify themselves. The problem with IDs is that not everyone has one. I don't think that just because someone does not have a particular type of ID, they should not be allowed to vote. For example, perhaps they could be accompanied by someone else who could vouch for their identity.

However, voting requirements are left up to each state. Some, as you indicate above, require no ID, and some, unfortunately, will only accept a short list of photo IDs that not everyone has. 

The bottom line for me is that not having an ID should not be a big problem. Your vote could be taken but put on hold somehow, and only counted if its necessary to determine the outcome of the election. Then, your vote could be scrutinized more closely.

 

This argument is weak af. Maybe their welfare cards?

 

Well, it's law in all the sensible states.

 

The notion that not everyone has an ID is absolute insanity and just propaganda. Then they need to go out and get one! Even school children and Junior high School and I bet now it is in elementary schools have school ID.

 

If you can't be bothered to obtain an ID why should we think that your vote would matter anyway?

 

This is just a long tired and abused bit of leftist propaganda. We should somehow feel sorry for people to lazy or too stupid to go down to the DMV and get themselves an ID

 

Patently absurd

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

They did not accept defeat in 2016, so they challenged it in the courts, not the streets. And, as you know, they lost. Then, they reluctantly accepted it. 

 

Hillary hasn't accepted it and still cackles on about it to this day.

 

That weeks long drama and later court challenge was not accepting. That isn't normally how US elections have been historically decided. Correct?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...