Here the Summary and alarming conclusions of this just published peer-reviewed study:

 

Introduction:

This population-based retrospective cohort study assesses rates of adverse events (AEs) involving cerebral thromboembolism (CTE) after COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: Data were collected from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2023. CTE AEs after COVID-19 vaccines were compared to those after influenza vaccines and after all other vaccines using proportional reporting ratio (PRR) analysis by time.

 

Results:

There are 5137 cerebral thromboembolism AEs reported in the 3 years (36 months) after COVID-19 vaccines compared to 52 AEs for the influenza vaccines over the past 34 years (408 months) and 282 AEs for all other vaccines (excluding COVID-19) over the past 34 years (408 months). The PRR’s are significant when comparing AEs by time from COVID-19 vaccines to that of the influenza vaccines (p < 0.0001) or to that of all other vaccines (p < 0.0001). The CTE AEs PRR by time (95% confidence intervals) for the COVID-19 vaccine AEs vs influenza AEs is 1120 (95% confidence interval (723-1730), p < 0.0001) and for COVID-19 vaccines vs all others is 207 (95% confidence interval (144-296), p < 0.0001). Cerebral venous thromboembolism AEs are female predominant with a female/male odds ratio of 1.63 (95% confidence interval (1.52-1.74), p < 0.0001). Conversely, cerebral arterial thromboembolism has a nonsignificant male preponderance. Cerebral venous thromboembolism is far more common than cerebral arterial thromboembolism over 36 months with an odds ratio (OR) of 14.8 (95% confidence interval 14.0-15.5, p < 0.0001). Atrial fibrillation, the most common identifiable cause of cerebral arterial thromboembolism, occurs far more commonly after the COVID-19 as compared to all other vaccines with a PRR of 123 (95% CI 88.3-172, p < 0.0001).

 

Conclusions: There is an alarming breach in the safety signal threshold concerning cerebral thrombosis AEs after COVID-19 vaccines compared to that of the influenza vaccines and even when compared to that of all other vaccines. An immediate global moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines is necessary with an absolute contraindication in women of reproductive age.

 

Source: https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/1982

 

Just one small step in the right direction.

 

When will these propagandized suckers realise, that if you don't get sick, you are not a Big Pharma customer? A well population is a terrible downer on Big Pharma investors.

 

Nature has all the answers. The white-coats are continually trying to better it, and even alter it. It's a crime against nature and humanity. IMO.

 

Of course. If you are sick, go see a doctor.

I had to take the covid jab to keep my job. I didnt agree with it but had to do what i had to do. My response to that was voting for trump

2 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

I had to take the covid jab to keep my job. I didnt agree with it but had to do what i had to do. My response to that was voting for trump

Well Sir, you are still with us. That's good. Hope you didn't get any problems after taking it.

 

It does appear, that it's luck of the draw, what batch** comes your way. Many of the jabs are different and the effects can range from little more than a sore arm to getting brown breaded.

 

My daughter in England is a district nurse. She was told she had to have the jab. She refused. Took a few months off. Done some house-cleaning for income. Then when the jab rules relaxed she joined a medical agency that pays 75% more than her NHS wage did. Bat-sh!t bonkers UK.

 

** www.howbadismybatch.com

 

 

3 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Conclusions: There is an alarming breach in the safety signal threshold concerning cerebral thrombosis AEs after COVID-19 vaccines compared to that of the influenza vaccines and even when compared to that of all other vaccines. An immediate global moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines is necessary with an absolute contraindication in women of reproductive age.

 

Source: https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/1982

And here the jist of the study in a few bullet-points:

... the authors of the study found a horrifying increased risk of BRAIN CLOTS following COVID-19 injection.

• The study found brain clots are 112,000% more likely after COVID-19 vaccination than flu vaccination.

• Moreover, when compared to all vaccines combined, COVID shots are 20,700% more likely to cause brain clots.

As such, the study’s authors and other health experts demand:

• “An immediate global moratorium” on the use of COVID-19 vaccines.

• “Absolute contraindication” for women of reproductive age.

• A full investigation into the alarming breach of safety thresholds.

• Accountability from regulators and manufacturers for ignoring these risks.

= = =

The revolving door should be brought to the people's attention. Just another form of corruption.

 

These regulators should be held upside down, and shaken, until all their dosh falls out of their pockets. Then lock them up for 69 years.

 

Come on RFK; do your stuff.

Such a bunch of happy campers !

On 11/10/2024 at 9:55 PM, owl sees all said:

These regulators should be held upside down, and shaken, until all their dosh falls out of their pockets. Then lock them up for 69 years

What about Dr Fauxci. What's his role in this?

There was no scientific study and there was no medical science/health scientist peer review.  The Journal has no scientific standing and serves the community of those promoting false claims and who need a vehicle by which to say that their claims are published in a peer reviewed journal.  International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science is classified as a "predatory" journal. because someone gave a publication a fancy name does not make it reputable.

 

The authors are not reputable scientists. The lead author is a physician's assistant who works in a dermatology clinic.  She is not a scientist and is not a physician.

James Thorp is the discredited former ObGny who now promotes various potions and health supplements that he claims will promote wellness through the Wellness Company. .

Kirstin Cosgrove is not a health scientist and is not associated with any universities or reputable clinical research organizations

Peter McCullough is the discredited cardiologist who was closely associated with the Wellness Company. Baylor University Medical Center cut all ties with the man because of his Covid 19 misinformation.  The American Board of Internal Medicine recommended that McCullough's board certification be revoked due to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines.

 

Thorp and  McCullogh are often listened on  "research" claiming to support  Covid19 misinformation. These two are not considered reliable, nor ethical.

 

On 11/25/2024 at 11:24 PM, Patong2021 said:

There was no scientific study and there was no medical science/health scientist peer review.  The Journal has no scientific standing and serves the community of those promoting false claims and who need a vehicle by which to say that their claims are published in a peer reviewed journal.  International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science is classified as a "predatory" journal. because someone gave a publication a fancy name does not make it reputable.

 

The authors are not reputable scientists. The lead author is a physician's assistant who works in a dermatology clinic.  She is not a scientist and is not a physician.

James Thorp is the discredited former ObGny who now promotes various potions and health supplements that he claims will promote wellness through the Wellness Company. .

Kirstin Cosgrove is not a health scientist and is not associated with any universities or reputable clinical research organizations

Peter McCullough is the discredited cardiologist who was closely associated with the Wellness Company. Baylor University Medical Center cut all ties with the man because of his Covid 19 misinformation.  The American Board of Internal Medicine recommended that McCullough's board certification be revoked due to his promotion of misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines.

 

Thorp and  McCullogh are often listened on  "research" claiming to support  Covid19 misinformation. These two are not considered reliable, nor ethical.

 

 

And up until a few weeks ago the institution of media was considered reliable. Funny how thay played out too. 

 

Remember he was as sharp as a razor blade until he clearly wasn't.

38 minutes ago, blaze master said:

 

And up until a few weeks ago the institution of media was considered reliable. Funny how thay played out too. 

 

Remember he was as sharp as a razor blade until he clearly wasn't.

 

What's your point? Biased opinions were published in a  known  pay to play journal that has no credibility. It is then presented by someone with a political agenda as "scientific evidence', when it was not.

7 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

What's your point? Biased opinions were published in a  known  pay to play journal that has no credibility. It is then presented by someone with a political agenda as "scientific evidence', when it was not.

 

No credibility says you. People like you also said the media was credible. We all know how that went.

On 11/11/2024 at 6:37 AM, Red Phoenix said:

Here the Summary and alarming conclusions of this just published peer-reviewed study:

 

Introduction:

This population-based retrospective cohort study assesses rates of adverse events (AEs) involving cerebral thromboembolism (CTE) after COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: Data were collected from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2023. CTE AEs after COVID-19 vaccines were compared to those after influenza vaccines and after all other vaccines using proportional reporting ratio (PRR) analysis by time.

 

Results:

There are 5137 cerebral thromboembolism AEs reported in the 3 years (36 months) after COVID-19 vaccines compared to 52 AEs for the influenza vaccines over the past 34 years (408 months) and 282 AEs for all other vaccines (excluding COVID-19) over the past 34 years (408 months). The PRR’s are significant when comparing AEs by time from COVID-19 vaccines to that of the influenza vaccines (p < 0.0001) or to that of all other vaccines (p < 0.0001). The CTE AEs PRR by time (95% confidence intervals) for the COVID-19 vaccine AEs vs influenza AEs is 1120 (95% confidence interval (723-1730), p < 0.0001) and for COVID-19 vaccines vs all others is 207 (95% confidence interval (144-296), p < 0.0001). Cerebral venous thromboembolism AEs are female predominant with a female/male odds ratio of 1.63 (95% confidence interval (1.52-1.74), p < 0.0001). Conversely, cerebral arterial thromboembolism has a nonsignificant male preponderance. Cerebral venous thromboembolism is far more common than cerebral arterial thromboembolism over 36 months with an odds ratio (OR) of 14.8 (95% confidence interval 14.0-15.5, p < 0.0001). Atrial fibrillation, the most common identifiable cause of cerebral arterial thromboembolism, occurs far more commonly after the COVID-19 as compared to all other vaccines with a PRR of 123 (95% CI 88.3-172, p < 0.0001).

 

Conclusions: There is an alarming breach in the safety signal threshold concerning cerebral thrombosis AEs after COVID-19 vaccines c ompared to that of the influenza vaccines and even when compared to that of all other vaccines. An immediate global moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines is necessary with an absolute contraindication in women of reproductive age.

 

Source: https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/1982

 

Could you share a link from a proper institution and not from a source which can't even produce a decent website?

I don't believe any organization, media, etc.  I believe what I personal know.  I don't know anyone who died from covid or even with covid.

 

I do know people that had adverse effects from the vaccine, even 1 child dying from direct result of the vaccine.

 

The science of the vaccine, testing and silly mask contradicts everything I know and learned prior to covid, and after all the silliness started.  My common sense told me it was all wrong.

 

 

 

3 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

Could you share a link from a proper institution and not from a source which can't even produce a decent website?

 

Here's another thought.  Why not discuss the points presented instead of just attacking the source?  Did they get it right, or are you aware of any errors in their data or methodology?

 

3 hours ago, impulse said:

 

Here's another thought.  Why not discuss the points presented instead of just attacking the source?  Did they get it right, or are you aware of any errors in their data or methodology?

 

 

They did not get anything righht because they have not presented a thorough analysis of the data. The person who did the data analysis is not a specialist not qualified to undertake such analysis: She is employed as a physician's assistant. The journal that the  "study" appeared in, is compensated for the publishing: It is not a journal of academic excellence or of a certified research body.

Ever seen the awards that are handed out for "People's Best Employer" or "Lesiure World's Best Resort"? Businesses pay to receive the award for marketing purpose. The Wellness Group which is where  2 of the 4 are associated with, sells health supplements that were once touted as Covid cure alls. Both have been sanctioned by their professional bodies or former employers for  misconduct.