pattayasan Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago 4 minutes ago, ModdaPunk said: It's pretty logical. Conservatives have been insulted non-stop by the woke mob. This sh/t has been going on for years. Now the times they are a changing, you know... As written in the bible: "For they have sown the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind." Fair Play. When exactly did hate speech and misogyny become fair play? It looks lot like victim blaming here.
ModdaPunk Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 16 minutes ago, pattayasan said: When exactly did hate speech and misogyny become fair play? Since censorship, cancel culture and misandry became fair play. But now it's over. Ahead are 4 years of penitence and humiliation for the left. Edited 9 hours ago by ModdaPunk 2
thaibeachlovers Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 19 hours ago, RuamRudy said: So respect is only offered if they live within your defined guidelines? That's generally how it works. Women IMO only respect men that live within their defined guidelines.
thaibeachlovers Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 2 hours ago, pattayasan said: When exactly did hate speech and misogyny become fair play? It looks lot like victim blaming here. I do wish people stopped calling men misogynists just because they don't believe women are always right. I doubt there are any real misogynists on here. I may complain about relationships, but I have no problem with having female friends. Likewise with hate speech. IMO the usual suspects claim that anything that they don't approve of is hate speech. There is a lot of real hate speech going on in a certain country, but it gets ignored by the hypocritical wokeists of the western world. I reckon it's a hangover from the days when calling someone a misogynist actually cancelled people, but no one cares about it now as been so misused for so long. 1
pattayasan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 4 hours ago, ModdaPunk said: Since censorship, cancel culture and misandry became fair play. But now it's over. Ahead are 4 years of penitence and humiliation for the left. LOL, it's the right who are going to be running around like chooks with no head after electing the worst president in history for the second time. If you think the left wing are all misandrists you really have a problem. Hilarious really. Real men don't need to hate on women for anything. Think about that for a while. The reverse is true also. 555.
pattayasan Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: I do wish people stopped calling men misogynists just because they don't believe women are always right. I doubt there are any real misogynists on here. I may complain about relationships, but I have no problem with having female friends. Likewise with hate speech. IMO the usual suspects claim that anything that they don't approve of is hate speech. There is a lot of real hate speech going on in a certain country, but it gets ignored by the hypocritical wokeists of the western world. I reckon it's a hangover from the days when calling someone a misogynist actually cancelled people, but no one cares about it now as been so misused for so long. More labeling, LOL. It's a trademark of the right. How come the left don't use invented garble like wokeist and cancel culture? Have you ever wondered?
metisdead Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago A post with comments trolling about an unrecognized medical condition has been removed. Posts using derogatory and toxic nicknames or intentional misspelling of people’s names will be removed. If you don’t want your post to be removed, spell people’s names correctly, this applies to both sides of the political debate.
Lacessit Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 hours ago, ModdaPunk said: Since censorship, cancel culture and misandry became fair play. But now it's over. Ahead are 4 years of penitence and humiliation for the left. Two years. By then, the Americans who voted for Trump will have realized what a horrific mistake they have made, and will vote accordingly in the mid-terms. Meanwhile, Trump or Vance will be trying to polish a turd. I do not repent from saying the turkeys voted for Christmas. No doubt MAGA's will try to humiliate leftists. That's merely to make themselves feel good about their manifold shortcomings.
RuamRudy Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said: That's generally how it works. Women IMO only respect men that live within their defined guidelines. To use the example to which I was replying, why should respect only be offered to women who have 'approved' hairstyles or provide sex on demand? That sounds like a very Fahrenheit 451 world to me. I guess the way the right wants to ban certain books, maybe that is where we are headed. 1
Yagoda Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 13 hours ago, Hawaiian said: Agree. I'm 84 and my woman is 30 years younger. She still calls me Babe. And that's no lie. Ewwwwwww...54 years old? How do you even get it up.
Yagoda Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 13 hours ago, Elkski said: I watched that Nick F rant. I can't believe he isn't gay because no woman who knows him will ever be spreading her legs for him without cash. I admit the Expectations of many western women have increased along with their education and weight and I was lucky in my first marriage but surely didn't like what I saw in the dating pool 10 years ago. I've read that lots of young men are frustrated by women who are educated and earning their own way and won't settle for misogynistic aholes anymore. The only question is how far will the pendulum swing to the left in 4 years and the midterms. With appointments like JFK Jr and accused pedo Matt Gaetz. The blacks and Latinos with papers were worried the new immigrants would work harder than they want to is why they voted to close the border. Can't wait to see the numbers stay similar. No woman ever spreads her legs for a man anywhere "without cash". Just depends on how you define cash 1
proton Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 46 minutes ago, Lacessit said: No doubt MAGA's will try to humiliate leftists. That's merely to make themselves feel good about their manifold shortcomings. Leftists don't need any help with humiliation, just look at the idiots screaming, crying, cutting their hair off and saying they will no longer have sex, just because they lost an election. What could be more humiliating than spending over a billion dollars, and having to pay celebrities millions, and still lose? ha ha. Edited 2 hours ago by proton 1
pattayasan Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, proton said: Leftists don't need any help with humiliation, just look at the idiots screaming, crying, cutting their hair off and saying they will no longer have sex, just because they lost an election. What could be more humiliating than spending over a billion dollars, and having to pay celebrities millions, and still lose? ha ha. Indeed. The right wing were lucky. Instead of having to raise the money from the base like the dems did, they relied on rich self interested billionaires to buy the election for them. Think Musk, Murdoch and Mellon. The axis of evil.
proton Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 17 minutes ago, pattayasan said: Indeed. The right wing were lucky. Instead of having to raise the money from the base like the dems did, they relied on rich self interested billionaires to buy the election for them. Think Musk, Murdoch and Mellon. The axis of evil. So the Republicans were wrong for raising less than half that the democrats did, then wasted. 'Evil' still can't stop the liberal slurs and lies that helped you lose, some people never learn.
Hawaiian Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Yagoda said: Ewwwwwww...54 years old? How do you even get it up. Speak for yourself. And why would I tell you, of all people, my secret?
Yagoda Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Hawaiian said: Speak for yourself. And why would I tell you, of all people, my secret? Because I've tried superglue and popsicle sticks and it didnt work. So if you tell me, I can PM you with the intimate details of what an encounter with fresh, hardbodied 20 year old is like.
Airalee Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, pattayasan said: Indeed. The right wing were lucky. Instead of having to raise the money from the base like the dems did, they relied on rich self interested billionaires to buy the election for them. Think Musk, Murdoch and Mellon. The axis of evil. Kamala Harris Has More Billionaires Prominently Backing Her Than Trump https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2024/10/30/kamala-harris-has-more-billionaires-prominently-backing-her-than-trump-bezos-and-griffin-weigh-in-updated/ Our breakdown records 83 billionaires supporting Harris and 52 backing Trump so far (see the lists for both below). 1
Lacessit Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, proton said: Leftists don't need any help with humiliation, just look at the idiots screaming, crying, cutting their hair off and saying they will no longer have sex, just because they lost an election. What could be more humiliating than spending over a billion dollars, and having to pay celebrities millions, and still lose? ha ha. What makes you think I am doing any of that? I don't feel humiliated, just sad Americans have been so stupid.
Yagoda Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, proton said: Leftists don't need any help with humiliation, just look at the idiots screaming, crying, cutting their hair off and saying they will no longer have sex, just because they lost an election. What could be more humiliating than spending over a billion dollars, and having to pay celebrities millions, and still lose? ha ha. and then still owe $20 million bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahaha
mokwit Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago On 11/14/2024 at 10:29 AM, Lacessit said: Please. The word you are trying to use is ELICIT. Illicit has an entirely different meaning, and is an adjective, not a verb. I wonder if you can identify a persons generation by this misappropriate use of words that sound (roughly) the same, but have different meanings and different spellings. Alternatively it could be none native speakers or something like that.
ModdaPunk Posted 58 minutes ago Posted 58 minutes ago 3 hours ago, pattayasan said: Hilarious really. Well keep laughing. It won't last, beieve that :))
spidermike007 Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago (edited) The dems want to blame the loss on anything but running a terrible campaign, fielding a poor candidate, and allowing the extreme left to dictate policy, such as trans rights and woke nonsense, which the vast majority of Americans reject. If they do not begin taking responsibility, it is game over. The extremists on the far left need to be shown the door. Woke went way too far. Just say no to complete nonsense. Edited 50 minutes ago by spidermike007
novacova Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago 6 minutes ago, mokwit said: I wonder if you can identify a persons generation by this misappropriate use of words Yes, especially Australian youngsters…they lack any sense of composure
spidermike007 Posted 53 minutes ago Posted 53 minutes ago (edited) This was not about misogyny. It was about a terrible candidate who had too few positions on the issues. Edited 50 minutes ago by spidermike007 1
ModdaPunk Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Lacessit said: Two years. People will still feel Trump's policies in 20 years ;)
pattayasan Posted 46 minutes ago Posted 46 minutes ago 1 hour ago, proton said: So the Republicans were wrong for raising less than half that the democrats did, then wasted. 'Evil' still can't stop the liberal slurs and lies that helped you lose, some people never learn. You've ignore the money spent in their name, like by the people I mentioned. You are being devious.
Airalee Posted 41 minutes ago Posted 41 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, pattayasan said: You've ignore the money spent in their name, like by the people I mentioned. You are being devious. You ignored my reply to you. How convenient. You are being disingenuous. Very common for leftists. https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2024/10/30/kamala-harris-has-more-billionaires-prominently-backing-her-than-trump-bezos-and-griffin-weigh-in-updated/ 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now