Jump to content

The Guardian Steps Back from Elon Musk’s Platform X Amid Content Concerns


Social Media

Recommended Posts

image.png

 

The Guardian has announced its decision to stop posting from its official accounts on Elon Musk’s social media platform X, citing increasing concerns over the platform’s content. Formerly known as Twitter, the platform’s environment and approach to content moderation, particularly during the US election cycle, prompted the news organization to reconsider its engagement. The Guardian stated that “the benefits of being on the platform formerly called Twitter were now outweighed by the negatives,” explaining that the platform now hosts “often disturbing content.”

 

In a message to readers, the Guardian announced, “We wanted to let readers know that we will no longer post on any official Guardian editorial accounts on the social media site X.” The Guardian had previously operated over 80 accounts on X, collectively followed by around 27 million users.

 

Concerns over “far-right conspiracy theories and racism” have long troubled the Guardian regarding X, but the platform's handling of the US presidential election campaign brought their misgivings to a head. “This is something we have been considering for a while given the often disturbing content promoted or found on the platform, including far-right conspiracy theories and racism,” the Guardian said, adding that “the US presidential election campaign served only to underline what we have considered for a long time: that X is a toxic media platform and that its owner, Elon Musk, has been able to use its influence to shape political discourse.”

 

The platform and Musk, who acquired it for $44 billion in 2022, have faced criticisms from anti-hate speech organizations and the EU over content moderation issues. A self-described “free speech absolutist,” Musk has allowed previously banned figures, such as conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, influencer Andrew Tate, and British far-right activist Tommy Robinson, to rejoin the platform.

 

The Guardian clarified that readers could still share its articles on X, and the platform would occasionally feature in its live news coverage. Reporters would also continue to use X for news gathering, although official Guardian editorial accounts would be absent. Individual journalists, meanwhile, will be able to use X according to the outlet’s social media guidelines. The Guardian explained, “Social media can be an important tool for news organizations and help us to reach new audiences, but at this point X now plays a diminished role in promoting our work. Our journalism is available and open to all on our website and we would prefer people to come to theguardian.com and support our work there.”

 

Responding to the news, Musk labeled the Guardian “irrelevant” and a “laboriously vile propaganda machine,” adding a touch of his characteristic, outspoken criticism to the ongoing public debate over his platform's direction and standards.

 

Based on a report by The Guardian 2024-11-15

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NedR69 said:

WFC?  It's just another libtard bs outlet.

Isn't X at this point a bigger more influential newsmaker than the guardian is anyway? They are on his platform he isn't on theirs. Although they will have to talk about him to sell news.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Guardian's example will lead other corporations to withdraw their support and advertising, as well have already seen. Musk has previously thrown a whammy about that. He famously told them what they could do with themselves.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

The Guardian's example will lead other corporations to withdraw their support and advertising, as well have already seen. Musk has previously thrown a whammy about that. He famously told them what they could do with themselves.

 

 

Yes free speech followed by a lawsuit if companies decide they don't want to spend there advertising money next to bastions of truth like Alex Jones

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Great sports section

 

Especially if your into one legged, trans, visually impaired minorities doing an egg and spoon race to promote BLM.

 

Good riddance to The Guardian. They can get back to begging for donations on their website. I can't imagine anyone outside Islington would risk being seen buying it at the newsagents. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

Especially if your into one legged, trans, visually impaired minorities doing an egg and spoon race to promote BLM.

 

Good riddance to The Guardian. They can get back to begging for donations on their website. I can't imagine anyone outside Islington would risk being seen buying it at the newsagents. 

Manchester United News. Always a tidbit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Social Media said:

The Guardian stated that “the benefits of being on the platform formerly called Twitter were now outweighed by the negatives,” explaining that the platform now hosts “often disturbing content.”

There’s a lesson in there for those who care to pay attention.

 

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...