Official: Trump Nominates RFK Jr. for Health Secretary

[Screaming]

Kennedy will be a breath of fresh air after years of being lied to by the liar and fraud, Fauci:

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/06/07/nolte-dr-fauci-either-liar-fraud/

 

 

[riclag]

18 hours ago, johng said:

let's hope so ,I also want to see them tried for their crimes against humanity along with their accomplises Fauchi  ,Gates etc

The remedy, the elixir!

Payback!

What went around is coming around!

Hit them where it hurts , in the pocket book .

[Hamus Yaigh]

20 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

it seems like Trump is deliberately trying to pick even lower quality candidates than the first time around.

I'm sure its more to do with the likelihood anyone with suitable qualifications would be reluctant to work for him.

[Keep Right]

It is unbelievable that some are complaining about Kennedy after years of mismanagement by Fauci and Levin. Kennedy will expose the lies and corruption under Biden's appointments.  

[johng]

14 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

There's not enough tinfoil in the world, obviously.

Obviously not for you

[johng]

15 minutes ago, Keep Right said:

Kennedy will expose the lies and corruption under Biden's appointments

lets hope so  and also MAHA 👍

[Hamus Yaigh]

On 11/15/2024 at 5:31 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

Good choice. Democrat sycophant heads are already exploding.

One doesn't need to be a democrat sycophant, just plain common sense to know that having RFK Jr., a conspiracy theorist, is a bad choice. He has made controversial statements about vaccines, suggesting a link between vaccines and autism, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary.

[Lacessit]

If the Chinese were designing a virus for the next pandemic, they could not wish for a better appointment.

 

A recovering heroin addict who claims a worm ate part of his brain.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

[frank83628]

2 hours ago, xylophone said:

 

 

Perhaps drugs and a worm are responsible for his scrambled mind!

 

or the lying msm, with their hit pieces and smear campaigns scrambled yours

[Lacessit]

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

Fear mongering nonsense.

Polio is still endemic in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

 

There are ten countries where tuberculosis is still endemic.

[dinsdale]

3 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Polio is still endemic in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

 

There are ten countries where tuberculosis is still endemic.

So. Do you think RFK Jnr will ban all vaccines? This simply will not happen. mRNA gene therapy on the other hand will be investigated IMO.

[dinsdale]

29 minutes ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

One doesn't need to be a democrat sycophant, just plain common sense to know that having RFK Jr., a conspiracy theorist, is a bad choice. He has made controversial statements about vaccines, suggesting a link between vaccines and autism, despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary.

You raise an interesting point. "overwhelming scientific evidence". Who controls said scientific evidence? IMO someone coming in to shake up the CDC, NIH, big pharma and big food can only be positive.

[Lacessit]

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

So. Do you think RFK Jnr will ban all vaccines? This simply will not happen. mRNA gene therapy on the other hand will be investigated IMO.

I don't know what a conspiracy theorist and all-round nutter will do.

 

I think it is highly likely he will ban fluoridation of tap water, which will make the dentistry profession very rich.

 

Or perhaps he will ban sugar as well, Prohibition all over again. Everyone knows how well that worked.

[MicroB]

35 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

I don't know what a conspiracy theorist and all-round nutter will do.

 

I think it is highly likely he will ban fluoridation of tap water, which will make the dentistry profession very rich.

 

Or perhaps he will ban sugar as well, Prohibition all over again. Everyone knows how well that worked.

 

Not straightforward to overturn SDWA.

 

 

 

[spidermike007]

3 hours ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

I'm sure its more to do with the likelihood anyone with suitable qualifications would be reluctant to work for him.

That is a very good point.

#1 if you do your job well, Trump is likely to fire you.

#2 if you disobey him, question him, or do something he does not like, he is likely to fire you.

#3 if he fires you, he will do everything in his power to make it look like it was your fault, and not his. He will trash your reputation. So, you are correct. Only low end, garbage candidates will be up for the job. And that is all he has picked to date.

[johng]

2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

think it is highly likely he will ban fluoridation of tap water,

Good...if anyone wants extra floride they can have it  no need to add it to tap water (almost mandatory consuption) same with sugar..they don't add that to tap water do they ?

if you want either it should be up to the individual to decide  not the "guberment"

[johng]

Also it should be up to the individual to decide if they want to take a very "safe and effective" medicine like ivermectin and refuse other concoctions that have not been time tested for safety.

[Lacessit]

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

That is a very good point.

#1 if you do your job well, Trump is likely to fire you.

#2 if you disobey him, question him, or do something he does not like, he is likely to fire you.

#3 if he fires you, he will do everything in his power to make it look like it was your fault, and not his. He will trash your reputation. So, you are correct. Only low end, garbage candidates will be up for the job. And that is all he has picked to date.

Apparently it is the same with the lawyers that work for him on his multiple civil and criminal cases.

 

No reputable legal firm in America will touch him with a barge pole, much like no US bank will loan him money.

 

The lawyers that do work for him are either the desperate dregs of the profession, or chancers hoping for promotion into his administration.

[Lacessit]

10 minutes ago, johng said:

Good...if anyone wants extra floride they can have it  no need to add it to tap water (almost mandatory consuption) same with sugar..they don't add that to tap water do they ?

if you want either it should be up to the individual to decide  not the "guberment"

I do hope you are avoiding tea, coffee, shellfish and raisins, all of which are rich in fluoride.

 

I would have loved to have fluoride in my tap water when I was young. My teeth have paid for the Mercedes of at least one dentist.

 

As for ivermectin, it is effective against intestinal parasites. There is no proof it is an effective prophylactic against COVID, apart from non-peer reviewed "studies" by social media quacks.

 

Tell me, do you also refuse public health measures such as vaccinations for polio, TB, typhoid, tetanus and hepatitis?

[johng]

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

do hope you are avoiding tea, coffee, shellfish and raisins, all of which are rich in fluoride.

Nope not avoiding them at all...except you fail to realise it is my choice to eat them or not...not so much choice if the industrial waste is deliberately mixed into public drinking water is there ?

 

I certainly refuse the recent "public health measures" that were nothing short of an authoritarian dictatorship and nothing to do with "health"

closing the beaches where people could exercise,get fresh air ,relax and  get a free dose of vitimin D clearly showed it was not about "health"

 

Ivermectin was malighned as a "horse dewormer" not fit for human consumption even before any studies had been carried out and even though it is a highly safe and affective human medicine ...why ?

because there could be no other "treatment" available if an untested experimental therapy was to be foist upon an unsuspecting puplic

bypassing the usual years and years of safety testing.

 

1 hour ago, Lacessit said:

polio, TB, typhoid, tetanus and hepatitis?

All these were in decline before due to better public health measures...

sewage managment , washing hands after toilet and before eating/preparation of food  refrigeration etc.

[still kicking]

Deluded themselves’: Republicans’ fantasy about a second Trump term brutally shattered

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/deluded-themselves-republicans-fantasy-about-a-second-trump-term-brutally-shattered/news-story/a031dfaf4b7ee62c0045588be0e4c0c3

[candide]

6 hours ago, dinsdale said:

You raise an interesting point. "overwhelming scientific evidence". Who controls said scientific evidence? IMO someone coming in to shake up the CDC, NIH, big pharma and big food can only be positive.

Back to conspiracy theories again!

 

Peer-reviewed and well ranked scientific publications are controlled by whoever can be conveniently blamed for it, but crappy YT videos banned in this forum tell the truth! 😀

[Lacessit]

31 minutes ago, johng said:

Nope not avoiding them at all...except you fail to realise it is my choice to eat them or not...not so much choice if the industrial waste is deliberately mixed into public drinking water is there ?

 

I certainly refuse the recent "public health measures" that were nothing short of an authoritarian dictatorship and nothing to do with "health"

closing the beaches where people could exercise,get fresh air ,relax and  get a free dose of vitimin D clearly showed it was not about "health"

 

Ivermectin was malighned as a "horse dewormer" not fit for human consumption even before any studies had been carried out and even though it is a highly safe and affective human medicine ...why ?

because there could be no other "treatment" available if an untested experimental therapy was to be foist upon an unsuspecting puplic

bypassing the usual years and years of safety testing.

 

All these were in decline before due to better public health measures...

sewage managment , washing hands after toilet and before eating/preparation of food  refrigeration etc.

Fluoride is added to drinking water as sodium fluoride, NaF, 99.9% purity. . Its description as industrial waste is a lie promoted by the anti-fluoride school.

 

Ho-hum. The usual COVID delusions.

 

Better public health measures? The USA averages 48 million food-borne illnesses a year.

 

Please get a spellchecker, or post when you are sober.

[candide]

7 hours ago, Lacessit said:

If the Chinese were designing a virus for the next pandemic, they could not wish for a better appointment.

 

A recovering heroin addict who claims a worm ate part of his brain.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

He can try ivermectin. It's at least effective against worms.

[xylophone]

1 hour ago, still kicking said:

Deluded themselves’: Republicans’ fantasy about a second Trump term brutally shattered

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/deluded-themselves-republicans-fantasy-about-a-second-trump-term-brutally-shattered/news-story/a031dfaf4b7ee62c0045588be0e4c0c3

This is a great post with a link which lays bare the ignorance and stupidity of trump and co. So sad for America being governed/ruled by this bunch of no-hoper dipsticks.

[Patong2021]

10 hours ago, Keep Right said:

It is unbelievable that some are complaining about Kennedy after years of mismanagement by Fauci and Levin. Kennedy will expose the lies and corruption under Biden's appointments.  

 There was no mismanagement by either Biden, nor Levine. On the contrary, Dr. Levine has had a clean record. Not one complaint of wrongdoing or professional misconduct and no scandals during her tenure as head of the PSHCC.

What exactly did she do that was wrong, and please not your imagined wrongdoings, but actual errors and/or wrongdoings.

[Patong2021]

3 hours ago, johng said:

Nope not avoiding them at all...except you fail to realise it is my choice to eat them or not...not so much choice if the industrial waste is deliberately mixed into public drinking water is there ?

 

I certainly refuse the recent "public health measures" that were nothing short of an authoritarian dictatorship and nothing to do with "health"

closing the beaches where people could exercise,get fresh air ,relax and  get a free dose of vitimin D clearly showed it was not about "health"

 

Ivermectin was malighned as a "horse dewormer" not fit for human consumption even before any studies had been carried out and even though it is a highly safe and affective human medicine ...why ?

because there could be no other "treatment" available if an untested experimental therapy was to be foist upon an unsuspecting puplic

bypassing the usual years and years of safety testing.

 

All these were in decline before due to better public health measures...

sewage managment , washing hands after toilet and before eating/preparation of food  refrigeration etc.

 

The beaches were closed because of what people did there. The public consumption of alcohol and drugs, the rowdy behaviour by  youth and yobs, and close contacts were the problem. Because people refused to behave responsibly and insisted on engaging in high risk behaviour, public health authorities were obliged to temporarily restrict public gatherings.  People could still go outside to get their exercise and vitamin D.  

 

You are mistaken. Ivermectin was promoted as a cure all before  there were any clinical trials. Its promotion defied commonsense and was based upon data that was often falsified or manipulated. (This has been repeatedly proven.)  Covid 19 is an inflammatory illness caused by a virus.  Ivermectin has been around for years and its mechanism of action was well documented. This mechanism has no known impact on viruses.    The worst aspect of the Ivermectin nonsense is that it delayed the rollout of known low cost anti inflamatories because the promotion of   the ineffective ivermectin eroded confidence in health research and medications.

 

For reference sake;

 

Ivermectin binds selectively and with high affinity to glutamate-gated chloride ion channels in invertebrate muscle and nerve cells of the microfilaria. This binding causes an increase in the permeability of the cell membrane to chloride ions and results in hyperpolarization of the cell, leading to paralysis and death of the parasite. Ivermectin also is believed to act as an agonist of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), thereby disrupting GABA-mediated central nervous system (CNS) neurosynaptic transmission. Ivermectin may also impair normal intrauterine development of O. volvulus microfilariae and may inhibit their release from the uteri of gravid female worms.   

 

Much of the evidence for ivermectin in COVID-19 relied on pre-print in vitro data, and the clinical utility of the data was not proven. Due to a number of factors - for example, the relatively low number of patients per trial and the speed at which these trials were conducted - studies on the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 were characterized by statistical errors and accusations of plagiarism. In addition, the use of aggregate patient data in large-scale meta-analyses (as opposed to individual patient data (IPD)) was shown to disguise otherwise blatant data errors, such as extreme terminal digit bias and the duplication of blocks of patient records.

 

Ivermectin  was an illustration of what happens when unqualified  people with  financial self interests promote untried and untsted potions. The continued support of  the  ineffective Ivermectin demonstrates the refusal of the magical conspiracy promoters to consider actual scientific facts. they just can't accept that they are wrong and that their actions  resulted in deaths.

[dinsdale]

7 hours ago, candide said:

Back to conspiracy theories again!

 

Peer-reviewed and well ranked scientific publications are controlled by whoever can be conveniently blamed for it, but crappy YT videos banned in this forum tell the truth! 😀

This is industry funding for countries health regulators.

Light says the problem with drug regulators is widespread. Even the FDA—the most well funded regulator—reports 65% of its funding for the evaluation of drugs comes from industry user fees (table 1),9 and over the years user fees have expanded to generic drugs, biosimilars, and medical devices.

“It’s the opposite of having a trustworthy organisation independently and rigorously assessing medicines. They’re not rigorous, they’re not independent, they are selective, and they withhold data. Doctors and patients must appreciate how deeply and extensively drug regulators can’t be trusted so long as they are captured by industry funding.”

https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538

Sponsorship bias in clinical research

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceutical companies fund the vast majority of the clinical research that is undertaken on medications but face a conflict of interest between producing good science and results that will enhance the sales of their products.

Objectives: To document concrete examples of bias in clinical research induced by pharmaceutical industry sponsorship.

Methods: This paper uses a thematic approach to documenting the extent of these biases in the following areas: research question/topic, choice of doses and comparator agents, control over trial design and changes in protocols, early termination of clinical trials, reporting to regulatory authorities, reinterpretation of data, restrictions on publication rights, use of fake journals, journal supplements and symposia, ghostwriting, publication and reporting of results and outcomes.

Results: Bias in favour of industry is apparent in every one of the themes examined with the result that research funded by industry undermines confidence in medical knowledge.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23135338/

 

[dinsdale]

4 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

The beaches were closed because of what people did there. The public consumption of alcohol and drugs, the rowdy behaviour by  youth and yobs, and close contacts were the problem.

Here's an excellent example.

 

 

[dinsdale]

15 hours ago, Lacessit said:

If the Chinese were designing a virus for the next pandemic, they could not wish for a better appointment.

 

A recovering heroin addict who claims a worm ate part of his brain.

 

What could possibly go wrong?

Did they design it for the last one?