Donald Trump Jr. Alleges Biden’s Actions Could Trigger World War III Before Trump’s Return

[Social Media]

 

Donald Trump Jr. has accused President Joe Biden of escalating global tensions in a deliberate attempt to provoke a major conflict before his father, President-elect Donald Trump, takes office. The claim follows reports that Biden authorized Ukraine to use long-range U.S.-made ATACMS missiles, capable of striking targets within Russia, in its ongoing war with Moscow.  

 

In a Sunday tweet, Trump Jr. alleged that Biden’s decision reflects the interests of the "Military Industrial Complex," which, he argued, is intent on igniting "World War 3" before his father assumes power in January. “The Military Industrial Complex seems to want to make sure they get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives,” Trump Jr. stated.  

The Military Industrial Complex seems to want to make sure they get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives.
Gotta lock in those $Trillions.
Life be damned!!! Imbeciles! https://t.co/ZzfwnhBxRh

— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) November 17, 2024

 

The move to permit Kyiv’s use of the missiles comes amid heightened tensions between the U.S. and Russia. Russian officials have been vocal in their opposition to the decision. Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin’s top spokesperson, described the development as a potential "new round of tension" between the two nuclear-armed nations. While Washington has not officially confirmed the authorization, it has been widely reported by media outlets.  

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin previously warned that the U.S.’s provision of long-range missiles to Ukraine would mark a significant escalation, equating it to the "direct participation" of NATO and Western countries in the conflict. This latest development comes after a surprising move by Putin to deploy 10,000 North Korean troops to the war’s front lines, specifically in the Kursk region, where Ukrainian forces have advanced since August.  

 

President-elect Donald Trump has claimed he will end the war in Ukraine shortly after taking office but has yet to provide specific details about how he plans to achieve this ambitious goal. In contrast, Biden’s decision to greenlight Ukraine’s use of ATACMS missiles has reportedly been framed as a strategic deterrent. According to Bloomberg, Biden authorized the action in part to dissuade North Korea from sending additional troops to Russia, amid speculation that Pyongyang could deploy up to 100,000 troops to bolster Russia's war effort.  

 

The ATACMS missiles, with a range of approximately 190 miles, provide Ukraine with the ability to strike deeper into Russian territory than ever before. This decision underscores the Biden administration’s ongoing support for Ukraine, even as it draws sharp criticism from some U.S. politicians and international leaders.  

 

Biden’s approach appears focused on maintaining pressure on Moscow while addressing emerging threats from alliances like the one between Russia and North Korea. However, critics, including Trump Jr., contend that such measures could have far-reaching and potentially catastrophic consequences.  

 

Trump Jr.’s comments highlight the divide between the Biden administration’s strategy and the rhetoric from the incoming Trump presidency. While Biden appears committed to bolstering Ukraine’s military capabilities, President-elect Trump has emphasized his intention to pursue peace, albeit without offering specifics on his proposed approach.  

 

As global tensions rise, the stakes remain high. The U.S.’s actions in Ukraine, North Korea’s involvement, and Russia’s responses continue to shape a conflict that shows no immediate signs of resolution.

 

Based on a report by Daily Beast 2024-11-19

 

 

 

[daveAustin]

What a load of codswallop. So Russia can continue to blast away at Ukraine from over the border AND employ soldiers from another country, but Ukraine dare not defend itself? Britain and France have both been calling for Ukraine to use their longer range missiles to help thwart attacks. Let the b’stards have it! If it were to provoke WWIII (which it won’t, they’ll threaten and threaten and wait for a Trump deal), then so be it… by sitting back, it’ll happen anyway. 

[Paradise Pete]

He's just repeating what Putin and Musk told him to say.

[theshu25]

Trump as per usual,all talk and bluster. The idiot coulnd't stop a runny nose let alone a foriegn war.

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, Social Media said:

This latest development comes after a surprising move by Putin to deploy 10,000 North Korean troops to the war’s front lines, specifically in the Kursk region, where Ukrainian forces have advanced since August.  

Let's be clear. Kursk is not the "front line" which is far to the east. Kursk is Russian territory, and any Nth Korean soldiers there are not fighting in Ukraine.

 

Kursk is a side show that failed to divert Russians from the real war, and will end with a lot of dead and captured Ukrainians.

Edited 3 hours ago by thaibeachlovers

[thaibeachlovers]

6 minutes ago, theshu25 said:

Trump as per usual,all talk and bluster. The idiot coulnd't stop a runny nose let alone a foriegn war.

I'll try to remember to quote that when Trump ends the war.

[Snackbar]

Lefty meltdowns are a gift from god

[pattayasan]

Don Jr is just a sock puppet. No analysis offered just rhetoric.

[dinsdale]

3 hours ago, daveAustin said:

What a load of codswallop. So Russia can continue to blast away at Ukraine from over the border AND employ soldiers from another country, but Ukraine dare not defend itself? Britain and France have both been calling for Ukraine to use their longer range missiles to help thwart attacks. Let the b’stards have it! If it were to provoke WWIII (which it won’t, they’ll threaten and threaten and wait for a Trump deal), then so be it… by sitting back, it’ll happen anyway. 

So far there is no evidence that Korean troops have been deployed to active positions in Kursk. As for WWIII well this ain't going to happen unless NATO and US troops get boots on ground and that ain't goin' to happen. The only real change that will be seen is a slowing down of Russia's advance with the onset of winter. ATACMS will have little effect and will not change the course of the war. As for this article the anti-Trump bias is evident. Trump Jnr. Is just politicking with this comment.

Edited 1 hour ago by dinsdale

[morrobay]

3 hours ago, daveAustin said:

What a load of codswallop. So Russia can continue to blast away at Ukraine from over the border AND employ soldiers from another country, but Ukraine dare not defend itself? Britain and France have both been calling for Ukraine to use their longer range missiles to help thwart attacks. Let the b’stards have it! If it were to provoke WWIII (which it won’t, they’ll threaten and threaten and wait for a Trump deal), then so be it… by sitting back, it’ll happen anyway. 

The only thing that is going to happen anyway is that parts of Eastern Ukraine are going to be annexed to Russia. And this same result could have been settled two years ago. All these SAPS for democrats want to do is give Trump a dumpster fire at the least and maybe WW3 .You democrats and your military industrial complex are the root of problems in this world. And should be delt with accordingly. Standby the day is coming.

[Gsxrnz]

Trump is transactional. He will have already told Zelenskyy not to dare using Biden's Blinken's option unless he wants to be screwed in the peace deal. Putin will have also been told to keep his flies closed.

[pattayasan]

3 minutes ago, Gsxrnz said:

Trump is transactional. He will have already told Zelenskyy not to dare using Biden's Blinken's option unless he wants to be screwed in the peace deal. Putin will have also been told to keep his flies closed.

 

The chance of Ukraine not using the ATACMS to attack Russia more or less immediately is nil.

[dinsdale]

2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Let's be clear. Kursk is not the "front line" which is far to the east. Kursk is Russian territory, and any Nth Korean soldiers there are not fighting in Ukraine.

 

Kursk is a side show that failed to divert Russians from the real war, and will end with a lot of dead and captured Ukrainians.

Kursk Oblast was a strategical move (and a poor one at that) and can in no way be seen as tactical. It has taken troops away from where they are most needed on the eastern front. If taking the nuclear facility was the goal then this goal will never be achieved. If it's about trading captured land then this will more than likely happen but the part of the Kursk Oblast that has been taken is in no way commensurate to that of which Russia has taken since 2014 and 2022.

[dinsdale]

2 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

The chance of Ukraine not using the ATACMS to attack Russia more or less immediately is nil.

They will use them but the fact you have failed to mention is they don't have many of them and they will be ineffective in causing any significant damage to halt or reverse the direction of the war.

[JonnyF]

Biden trying to inflame the situation before he leaves so he can claim trump caused WW3.

 

No less than I'd expect from such a nasty piece of work. Good riddance. What a disaster he turned out to be. 

[thaibeachlovers]

6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Biden trying to inflame the situation before he leaves so he can claim trump caused WW3.

 

No less than I'd expect from such a nasty piece of work. Good riddance. What a disaster he turned out to be. 

I suspect he isn't capable of making that decision on his own, so IMO it's the guy(s) behind the curtain that are guilty of trying to start WW3, or perhaps they just bought a load of shares in the company making the things. Cashing in before it ends.

Edited 2 minutes ago by thaibeachlovers

[thaibeachlovers]

1 hour ago, dinsdale said:

Kursk Oblast was a strategical move (and a poor one at that) and can in no way be seen as tactical. It has taken troops away from where they are most needed on the eastern front. If taking the nuclear facility was the goal then this goal will never be achieved. If it's about trading captured land then this will more than likely happen but the part of the Kursk Oblast that has been taken is in no way commensurate to that of which Russia has taken since 2014 and 2022.

Agreed.