Jump to content

Elon Musk reportedly creating tension within Donald Trump’s inner circle


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:
1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

The media are responsible for the huge divide with their nonstop lies over the last 8 years, something really should be done about it

Something was, FOX paid out bigly.

Hey Sonny....try not to choke on that "legal note".

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, harryviking said:

Lol! What could ever go wrong with Trump and his gang of "imbeciles"...🤣

Hold on to your hats folks, it will be a wild ride!

Because things are great no,  2 wars, high inflation and living costs under Biden

Posted
7 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Didn't stop Trump from flying too Texas to watch Space X launch an hour ago. When they were together Elon was doing all the talking and Trump was pretty much silent. Trump definitely has a man crush.

I would have liked to see this too.  What's you point?

Posted
38 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Because things are great no,  2 wars, high inflation and living costs under Biden

Is there a bigger imbecile (and election loser) than the muppet from MN that puts tampon dispensers in boys bathrooms in all MN schools AND lies about his military rank and record. Yup, stolen valor Tim, but the cackling moron Kamala may be the bigger imbecile since she thinks killing babies and calling President Trump and his supporters/voters (76.5M) hitler, nazis, fascists, etc will win an election. Who's the imbecile in that election.

Posted
2 hours ago, illisdean said:

Hey Sonny....try not to choke on that "legal note".

 

 

She did not "issue" anything  she just read what Gaetz's lawyer sent her. 😀

 

Standard operating procedure in media to read statements from lawyers.

Posted
13 minutes ago, candide said:

She did not "issue" anything  she just read what Gaetz's lawyer sent her.

Sure, whatever, she still had to read it.

 

The View co-host Sunny Hostin was forced to read out a “legal note” on Tuesday acknowledging that attorney general nominee Matt Gaetz has “long denied all allegations” of sexual misconduct against him and that a criminal investigation “closed with no charges being brought.”

 

Posted
5 hours ago, candide said:

Ok, but according to your source, It's rated "high" for factual reporting.

 

By comparison, Fox News is only rated "mixed"

You do understand that "media fact checkers" are far-Left organization shilling there own narratives as the "only factual narratives" and all else is "disinformation."  I imagine within the next 100 days of the new administration, "media fact check" organizations are going to be held to account for there own narratives, basically after being accused and indicted for facilitating slander, libel, and defamation.  They'll keep running with their own forms of "disinformation," and then they'll be sued.
I doubt media fact check organization will last another two years.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, illisdean said:

Sure, whatever, she still had to read it.

 

The View co-host Sunny Hostin was forced to read out a “legal note” on Tuesday acknowledging that attorney general nominee Matt Gaetz has “long denied all allegations” of sexual misconduct against him and that a criminal investigation “closed with no charges being brought.”

 

Forced by whom? 

It's a SOP in all MSM.

They are all "forced" to read lawyers statements. 😀

Edited by candide
Posted
3 minutes ago, connda said:

You do understand that "media fact checkers" are far-Left organization shilling there own narratives as the "only factual narratives" and all else is "disinformation."  I imagine within the next 100 days of the new administration, "media fact check" organizations are going to be held to account for there own narratives, basically after being accused and indicted for facilitating slander, libel, and defamation.  They'll keep running with their own forms of "disinformation," and then they'll be sued.
I doubt media fact check organization will last another two years.

I understand that I used the same source your MAGA pal was bragging about. 😀

 

The rest of your post is the usual RW propaganda nonsense!

 

I give you a clue: Faux News had to pay a huge sum of money for knowingly lying about imaginary election fraud. 😀

Posted
2 minutes ago, candide said:

Forced by whom? 

It's a SOP in all MSM.

I guess she just decided it would be civil to read that "legal notice" on air because she thought it was the right thing to do. 'Eh?

Most likely she was instructed to read it by the ABC corporate lawyers. 
:angry: "You can't prove that."

:biggrin: Ok, then back to - She just decided it would be civil to read that "legal notice" on air because she wanted to and it was the right thing to do. 

Or forward your own opinion.  This is opinion ya know?

Posted
2 minutes ago, candide said:

I understand that I used the same source your MAGA pal was bragging about. 😀

 

The rest of your post is the usual RW propaganda nonsense!

 

I give you a clue: Faux News had to pay a huge sum of money for knowingly lying about imaginary election fraud. 😀

You just made my ignore list sunshine.  See ya!

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, connda said:

I guess she just decided it would be civil to read that "legal notice" on air because she thought it was the right thing to do. 'Eh?

Most likely she was instructed to read it by the ABC corporate lawyers. 
:angry: "You can't prove that."

:biggrin: Ok, then back to - She just decided it would be civil to read that "legal notice" on air because she wanted to and it was the right thing to do. 

Or forward your own opinion.  This is opinion ya know?

 

She read it because it was sent to her by Trump's lawyer. Why is everything a conspiracy theory?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, connda said:

I guess she just decided it would be civil to read that "legal notice" on air because she thought it was the right thing to do. 'Eh?

Most likely she was instructed to read it by the ABC corporate lawyers. 
:angry: "You can't prove that."

:biggrin: Ok, then back to - She just decided it would be civil to read that "legal notice" on air because she wanted to and it was the right thing to do. 

Or forward your own opinion.  This is opinion ya know?

It's a standard operating procedure in all media. It means they all have to read statements sent by lawyers when they discuss controversial issues.

 

Another MAGA nothing burger! 😀

Edited by candide
Posted

surprised that no one on this thread has commented on the sheer cattiness of this squib of a story, entirely without source.

Admittedly, you don't need a "source" for  an exercise in sheer spitefulness!!

Posted
2 hours ago, candide said:

Forced by whom? 

It's a SOP in all MSM.

They are all "forced" to read lawyers statements. 😀

You practice to be this obtuse? Ok, if so that being the case, let me provide you assistance to hopefully learn something useful. I am going to give you free advise.

 

Use this, it's a one time offer for you. Ask if you need further directions or a user instruction manual.

 

freegooglesearch.jpg.bab706d4b8fe4660457c957fb760f30c.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, illisdean said:

You practice to be this obtuse? Ok, if so that being the case, let me provide you assistance to hopefully learn something useful. I am going to give you free advise.

 

Use this, it's a one time offer for you. Ask if you need further directions or a user instruction manual.

 

freegooglesearch.jpg.bab706d4b8fe4660457c957fb760f30c.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

It's you obtuse. Use your voucher yourself. 😀

All media read statements sent by lawyers when discussing controversial issues: CNN, Fox News.

It's a standard operating procedure.

 

This is a nothing burger again.

Edited by candide

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...