Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Clarkson is likely too sane to try for Parliament, the lair of nasty and horrible people. IMO no sensible person would want to be mired in that swamp.

Everywhere in democracies people get to vote for or against other people aspiring to become members of the Parliament. And everywhere people complain in wildly exaggerated terms about the results of their own free votes ...

Posted
29 minutes ago, mfd101 said:

Everywhere in democracies people get to vote for or against other people aspiring to become members of the Parliament. And everywhere people complain in wildly exaggerated terms about the results of their own free votes ...

 I don't vote, so I only complain about other people's vote!

  • Agree 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Social Media said:

image.png

 

Jeremy Clarkson has never shied away from airing his opinions. Once primarily a figure of motoring mischief on *Top Gear*, he has evolved into a voice for Britain’s agricultural community. With his growing influence and willingness to challenge the political establishment, some speculate whether Clarkson might someday enter politics, drawing comparisons to Donald Trump’s rise in the United States.  

 

Fifteen years ago, *Prospect* magazine described Clarkson as "more than a belligerent television presenter – he voices the grievances of millions." At that time, Clarkson was synonymous with fast cars, sharp wit, and controversy, gathering a fan base that celebrated his disdain for political correctness. In 2008, a petition titled "Make Jeremy Clarkson Prime Minister" garnered close to 50,000 signatures, and he even received an award for his plainspoken personality. Yet Clarkson steered clear of politics, perhaps because his irreverent persona thrived on a sense of irresponsibility that would be incompatible with a leadership role. As he himself admitted, he’d make a “rubbish” leader.  

 

Jeremy Clarkson, Donald Trump

 

Fast forward to today, Clarkson’s career and audience have undergone a transformation. Through his hit series *Clarkson’s Farm*, the wealthy presenter has embraced farming, becoming a prominent advocate for rural Britain. His fanbase now includes farmers alongside car enthusiasts, uniting groups disenchanted with the government. Recent inheritance tax changes under Labour’s Autumn Budget have only heightened the political fervor among his supporters.  

 

 

This shift was on full display when Clarkson took to the stage in Parliament Square, speaking at a farmers’ demonstration. Microphone in hand, he delivered an impassioned, unscripted speech filled with humor, empathy, and sharp critiques of government policies. Though brief, his performance resonated deeply, proving he could rally an audience in ways traditional politicians often fail to achieve.  

 

James Frayne, a communications expert and partner at Public First, notes Clarkson’s authenticity as a key asset. “Clarkson always just appears an authentic version of himself. He exudes a degree of consistency. That and he’s just a lot cleverer…” This distinguishes him from figures like Gary Lineker, whose political stances can appear more calculated.  

 

The comparison to Trump stems from Clarkson’s ability to connect with a disillusioned public. Pollster James Kanagasooriam recently remarked on X (formerly Twitter), “Genuinely think that if Jeremy Clarkson entered politics now – it could be a moment. Britain’s Trump moment – but far more English and less authoritarian.” With his charisma, massive platform, and a knack for dividing opinion, Clarkson possesses many of the traits that propelled Trump into power.  

 

Still, there are challenges. The UK’s parliamentary system makes a populist outsider’s rise more difficult than in the US. Moreover, Clarkson’s political positions remain vague, defined more by what he opposes than what he supports. As Frayne observes, “We know what he furiously doesn’t like, but we don’t yet know what he does.” Even Clarkson has joked that the government’s role should be limited to “building park benches and that is it.”  

 

Despite these uncertainties, Clarkson’s growing popularity is undeniable. *Clarkson’s Farm* has endeared him to a broader audience, intertwining entertainment with activism rooted in British soil. His social media reach dwarfs that of prominent political figures, including Sir Keir Starmer, amplifying his voice far beyond traditional political channels.  

 

Whether or not Clarkson ever steps into the political arena, his influence is already significant. He represents a growing discontent with the political establishment, channeling the frustrations of rural and working-class Britain. For now, he remains rooted in his Cotswolds farm, but should he choose to act, Clarkson might just find himself at the center of a political movement. As one of his admirers put it, “Little England’s biggest boy” could yet grow up and leave an indelible mark on the nation’s political landscape.  

 

Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-22

 

news-logo-btm.jpg

 

news-footer-4.png

 

image.png

I think we have enough self-promoter, showmen and grandstander already.

Don't need another one.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Chances of Clarkson getting any votes from Liebour inner city ghettos I would predict as Zero.

 

UK is basically the same as the US, sane country sides and chaotic cities full of migrants and criminals

 

Cities such as London, Manchester, Newcastle, Belfast, Glasgow, etc. are quite interesting places. Maybe leave your village and see for yourself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...