Are you saying you are that daft you cannot post links, yet you know everything about the DWP that we don't...?
You are just a troll, under izod10, Tiber and now jori123, pretty sad, chummy..........
You and Gant don't seem to have enough drama in your lives and seem to always want to stir things up and create friction by making accusations and being abusive. Neither one of you seems even a little bit willing to accept that others don't share your opinions and have different views and as a penalty, such people must be degraded when ever possible. We don't call you criminals for ignoring the TFRD Code yet you seem willing enough to call us do -gooders for following the law. I think the problem must be that you're bored and lonely and want to keep having these circular discussions that have no end, just to let everyone know you;re still out there, fighting the good fight but not mature enough to accept that different views exist and to move on to other new things. Sad really.
So if someone killed 3 of your family you would be happy with a "sorry" a brown envelope to the police and that would be sufficient...
you must be more forgiving than me?
Poker-faced fraudster nabbed in million-baht investment scam
By Mitch Connor
Picture courtesy of Bangkok Post
In a dramatic turn of events, a key figure in a jaw-dropping multi-million baht investment scam has been collared by the law in Phuket.
Full Story: https://aseannow.com/topic/1345147-poker-faced-fraudster-nabbed-in-million-baht-investment-scam/
Anyone that thinks that that climate change is by now an exact science is wrong and here I'm referring to just natural climate. All climate Models (and there are a few) revolve around solving PDE's (Navier-Stokes for example) for quite a few variables. Only in very simple states can the PDE's be sovolved analytically but for the climate they have to be numerically approximated. Then there is the problem differentiating land and sea effects and further differentiatin terrain, mountains, forests, hills, valleys and planes which all react differently and affect each other. Not to mention various forces that also need to be accounted for. Now add to that Global Warming (human/animal influence on climate) concrete buildings and roads, how close or far they apart, big small and so on and on. The enclosed picture is from a MIT lecture, 2008, describing a simple 1 year computer model simulation. Each square is divided further into 'grid-cells' and some basic equations applied. It apparently took about 1.5 trillion calculations. More complete simulations require a great deal more computing power...and where does that come from?
Some people argue that we have better technology now but what they don't relaise is that the information we are collecting now will not impact predictions until several years time.
Yes, there is a general upward trend but the reality could be worse or not so bad depending how the approximations are viewed.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now