Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Gweiloman said:

As easily as they (OPEC) can increase production they can also cut back on it. The post I replied to talked about a price of $66 in 2026. Do you honestly think the Middle Eastern oil producing countries will be happy with this price in 2026? I’m up to date but it seems like you need to learn some economics.

And what are your credentials for forecasting oil markets?

 

As mentioned by another poster, it seems that you also don't believe the drill baby drill fairy tale!

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

That would apply to all the ones on here claiming the Russian economy is collapsing as well, including yourself.

In case you missed it, this forum is for poster's opinions. There are plenty of sites where you can read more factual information.

Difference is the poster i replied to is contradicting the experts, the people making these decisions, without any arguments.

  • Agree 2
Posted
22 hours ago, stevenl said:

I would presume the people making these forecasts have a lot more insight than an anonymous poster here.

One would think so but over the past 3 years, practically every western experts’ prediction about the conflict, from military to economic has fallen flat on its face. Seems the most accurate predictions are those that are the complete opposite of the so called experts’.

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Gweiloman said:

The experts making the decisions? Lol. The so called experts merely look at data and make guesses. The ones making the decisions on whether to increase or decrease oil production don’t give a rat’s ass as to what the “experts” say.

I call the people making the decision experts. Like the ones deciding on opening a new field depending on their price forecast.

  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, stevenl said:

Difference is the poster i replied to is contradicting the experts, the people making these decisions, without any arguments.

As long as it's clear that it's an opinion I see no need to bring facts into it. Having been around "experts" all my working life, I doubt they know much anyway, given how many basic mistakes they make. No one has a working crystal ball ( though some like the D man thought they did ), so it's all looking at what is happening now and making a guess as to what will happen in the future.

  • Confused 2
Posted
On 11/30/2024 at 12:21 PM, Albo said:

Ukraine is doomed. Should have never listened to Biden.

 

Absolutely unwinnable and always was

 

Relax...we're all doomed.

  • Haha 1
Posted
15 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

 

Especially the Russian prediction that they were pushing at an open door, and that Kyiv would fall within three days!

Must be lacking in anything relevant to now to keep rabbiting on about that.

Is that really all you have?

 

How about some comments on how the Ukrainians are winning in the East... oops, they are losing. Sorry about that.

 

Have a nice day.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

 

From reading your posts, it would seem that you aren't sorry at all that Ukraine is experiencing losses.

 

Why you cheer on the aggressor is beyond me, but if massacres of civilians, the use of chemical weapons, torture and rape of civilians are things you admire, I can see why you might be so fulsome in your support for Putin. 

 

Although things in the east are maybe not quite so dire as you suggest. I imagine the people of Kursk are more than happy to finally be away from the clutches of the evil empire. 

2 + 2 does not make 22.

 

If you read into my posts that I am glad Ukraine is losing, you are wrong. IMO the entire war should never have happened, and it's entirely the west's fault it's still going. Had the US/ Europe not supplied the weapons the war would have been over 2 years ago.

All that destruction and death did not have to happen.

Far as I'm concerned, the sooner Ukraine accepts reality and negotiates, the better.

 

As for Kursk, that will be back under Russian control in due course.

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, kwonitoy said:

 

 

image.png.1bcefd3944637627fe5a2d8c4864ec6f.png

Is it your claim that Ukraine is winning then, LOL.

 

Do you know anything about wars? Read up on the first 2 years of WW2 to see if the UK was winning.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, MicroB said:

https://ceenergynews.com/oil-gas/russia-moldova-transnistria-buy-gas-europe/

 

 

First Putin threatens to stop supplying Europe with natural gas.

Putin said Europe would freeze to death without Russian natural gas

Europe stops buying Russian gas

Europe doesn't freeze to death

Russian natural gas gets cut off to Transnistria, on account of the country Russia is attacking, Ukraine, not being particularly interested in renewing an agreement that will allow Russian gas to flow to a breakaway enclave, Transniestria, that is home to the Russian Army's OGRF.

Transmistrian Russian people get a bit cold, ask their fellow Moldovans for help.

Russia will buy gas from Europe to supply Transnistria.

 

Putin remains the master strategist.

Are you even aware that Germany et al now pay way more for gas than they used to?

Are you even aware that German industry is suffering because energy costs too much?

 

Is that a win in your book,? LOL.

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Is it your claim that Ukraine is winning then, LOL.

 

Do you know anything about wars? Read up on the first 2 years of WW2 to see if the UK was winning.

As most posters only read western msm, they are totally ignorant of what’s happening on the frontlines so you can’t really blame them for thinking that Ukraine is winning the conflict. Some to this day still think that it was Putin who said the conflict would be over in a few days when it was Mark Milley who said it. Can’t help people if they don’t want to know the truth.

Posted
12 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Is it your claim that Ukraine is winning then, LOL.

 

Do you know anything about wars? Read up on the first 2 years of WW2 to see if the UK was winning.

I don't claim Ukraine is winning, but russia is not winning either.

But I do want Ukraine to provale 

It's 3 years of stalemate that russia did not plan for.

And russia has been throwing everything at this and still can't succeed, so much winning for them

 

Where Ukraine is doing well is a hybridized guerrilla warfare only with drones, slowly picking away at russia's oil infrastructure, manufacturing, weapons stores, etc.

 

As regards WW2 and any war, it's the final outcome not the early innings that count.

How'd that work out for the UK?

  • Like 2
Posted
50 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

2 + 2 does not make 22.

 

If you read into my posts that I am glad Ukraine is losing, you are wrong. IMO the entire war should never have happened, and it's entirely the west's fault it's still going. Had the US/ Europe not supplied the weapons the war would have been over 2 years ago.

All that destruction and death did not have to happen.

Far as I'm concerned, the sooner Ukraine accepts reality and negotiates, the better.

 

As for Kursk, that will be back under Russian control in due course.

 

Your posts invariably remind me of this quote by George Santayana, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

 

This glorious red victory you long for will not be the end. It will be the end of the beginning. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Gweiloman said:

You clearly do, obviously…

Well, yes I do, but someone who does not make blanket accusations like yourself.............:coffee1:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...