Trumpy-nomics -- "fixing" an economy that is already great. What could possibly go wrong?

[Dan O]

10 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

 You wrote in another post, COVID "was an unforeseen situation with no historical reference on how best to handle it."  That is absolutely true and why mistakes were made.  I give Trump credit for how he handled it, despite the mistakes.  And note that I am not blaming Biden for things he inherited.  As you say, learn from our mistakes and move on.

That is correct that it was an unforeseen event. Trump could definitely have handled it better but by how much no one knows.

 

The people that have been continually blaming that economic impact on Biden is who I addressed my original posting to and I stand by what I wrote.

[Dan O]

14 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Meanwhile your boy is nodding off.

 

I threw you a bone. Continue reading.

 

 

 

 

show me one post where I claim that I supported him. Your just bitter because I'm shining light on your choice as being a imbecile and POS and you cant show he's not.. Your a broken record and its sad 

[Dan O]

21 minutes ago, G_Money said:

post the convictions.

 

you’re making the claims.  Prove it or <deleted>.

Here's some lite reading for you. I'm sure you'll claim it just liberal propaganda but you can search any number of sites and get even more.  All the ones he settled out of court to avoid prosecution arent even listed but are available and on record

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_and_business_legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

[Dan O]

26 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

You are confusing democrat narratives with facts. Facts are things that actually happened, democrat narratives are cock and bull stories popular with the less informed observers.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_and_business_legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/05/has-anyone-been-sued-more-than-trump.html

[G_Money]

14 minutes ago, Dan O said:

show me one post where I claim that I supported him. Your just bitter because I'm shining light on your choice as being a imbecile and POS and you cant show he's not.. Your a broken record and its sad 

I’m not bitter but you’re about to blow a head gasket.

[G_Money]

13 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Here's some lite reading for you. I'm sure you'll claim it just liberal propaganda but you can search any number of sites and get even more.  All the ones he settled out of court to avoid prosecution arent even listed but are available and on record

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_and_business_legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

So he wasn’t convicted of everything you mentioned.  I knew that.

Wiki is not a reliable source for anything.  Of all people, you SHOULD know that.

 

Or maybe not.

 

You’ve proven nothing.

[Dan O]

1 minute ago, G_Money said:

I’m not bitter but you’re about to blow a head gasket.

Nope not in the least.  I just like showing what a tool you are with your blind love of a POS

[G_Money]

2 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Nope not in the least.  I just like showing what a tool you are with your blind love of a POS

Your post indicates I was correct.

 

Check your blood pressure.

POS.  76 million don’t agree with you.  Rightfully so.

 

[Dan O]

1 minute ago, G_Money said:

So he wasn’t convicted of everything you mentioned.  I knew that.

Wiki is not a reliable source for anything.  Of all people, you SHOULD know that.

 

Or maybe not.

 

You’ve proven nothing.

Here's more for you and I can keep them coming if you really want me too.

You just in denial though and its making you look very foolish in your position 

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/05/has-anyone-been-sued-more-than-trump.html

 

 

[G_Money]

2 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Here's more for you and I can keep them coming if you really want me too.

You just in denial though and its making you look very foolish in your position 

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/05/has-anyone-been-sued-more-than-trump.html

 

 

Is this a new leftist’s website your following?

 

What does being sued have to do with Trump winning the Presidency?

 

How many did he win and lose?

 

People sue every day in America.  Nothing new.  Even over McDonald hot coffee, malpractice etc.

 

Many high profile business people and companies are involved in lawsuits every day.

 

Your post has no merit. Just like wiki.

 

Even IF they did , the American people see through leftists propaganda.

[transam]

Just now, G_Money said:

Is this a new leftist’s website your following?

 

What does being sued have to do with Trump winning the Presidency?

 

How many did he win and lose?

 

People sue every day in America.  Nothing new.  Even over McDonald hot coffee, malpractice etc.

 

Many high profile business people and companies are involved in lawsuits every day.

 

Your post has no merit. Just like wiki.

 

Even IF they did , the American people see through leftists propaganda.

Really, well they didn't see through Trump's lies, did they........

[G_Money]

9 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Here's more for you and I can keep them coming if you really want me too.

You just in denial though and its making you look very foolish in your position 

 

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/05/has-anyone-been-sued-more-than-trump.html

 

 

In denial?  lol.  Trump is the newly elected president.

 

You still haven’t accepted it.  That’s denial. The reason for you continuing to post his alleged past wrongdoings.  That is ALL you got left to go on.
 

Get with the current times.  Trump is going to be your next President.  

Be a “glass is half full “ guy instead of half empty.

 

You’re so far down the rabbit 🐇 hole you’ll never get out.

Medical intervention may help.  Or may not.

[transam]

5 minutes ago, G_Money said:

In denial?  lol.  Trump is the newly elected president.

 

You still haven’t accepted it.  That’s denial. The reason for you continuing to post his alleged past wrongdoings.  That is ALL you got left to go on.
 

Get with the current times.  Trump is going to be your next President.  

Be a “glass is half full “ guy instead of half empty.

 

You’re so far down the rabbit 🐇 hole you’ll never get out.

Medical intervention may help.  Or may not.

I do think we all know Trump will soon be the next President, so you do not have to keep telling us.

 

What is being discussed is his probable future cock-ups, as he hasn't got a clue...🤒

[EveryG]

On 12/12/2024 at 12:22 PM, johnnybangkok said:

Just the same as the last time he took power, Trump will benefit from 4 years of solid Dem economics that has seen inflation (a world-wide problem) drop to 2.7% and still falling, gas prices stabalising and enviable job numbers. And just like last time, Trump will come in and cut taxes for his wealthy friends and business supporters adding even more trillions to the national debt than the $4 trillion he added the last time round ($8 trillion overall), initiate a tarriff scheme that every economist has predicted to be a world-wide disaster as well as deregulation to the detriment of the environment and public health.

 

But as long as the stock market goes up then most of the Trump fans on here won't really care with their 'I'm alright Jack so <deleted> the rest of you' attitude.

This. We've already seen that he's just trying to slap his name on what is already happening, as he did after a phone call with the president of Mexico, claiming that he got her to do something by threatening tariffs when in reality she was just describing existing policy. 

 

I have not seen a single Trump idea that is a good idea, except maybe no more time changes. Every proposal he has is likely to cause more inflation, and he's even hedging now on bring it down. Remember when Trump wrote COVID checks to every American and insisted his name be on them?  Estimates are that those checks increased inflation by 2.6%. There is an argument that this injection of cash avoided a bigger crisis, but the inflation is (in part) the US economy paying the piper. Them dems also love spending money, but MAGAs should stop pretending that it was Biden alone who caused inflation. 

[candide]

14 minutes ago, G_Money said:

In denial?  lol.  Trump is the newly elected president.

 

You still haven’t accepted it.  That’s denial. The reason for you continuing to post his alleged past wrongdoings.  That is ALL you got left to go on.
 

Get with the current times.  Trump is going to be your next President.  

Be a “glass is half full “ guy instead of half empty.

 

You’re so far down the rabbit 🐇 hole you’ll never get out.

Medical intervention may help.  Or may not.

A MAGA, who has been baselessly denying that Trump lost the 2020 election for years, is now baselessly accusing others of denying Trump's 2024 election! 

[G_Money]

1 minute ago, candide said:

A MAGA, who has been baselessly denying that Trump lost the 2020 election for years, is now baselessly accusing others of denying Trump's 2024 election! 

No comprende!

[scottiejohn]

1 hour ago, transam said:

What is being discussed is his probable future cock-ups, as he hasn't got a clue...🤒

I agree but would suggest the following wording;

 What is being discussed is his probable numerous and potentially dangerous future cock-ups, as he hasn't got a clue...🤒

[gamb00ler]

4 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Even on Mars they know that Trump won the EC and the popular vote.

 

😪

Another classic non sequitur given the context that seems to have eluded you.

[SunnyinBangrak]

1 hour ago, G_Money said:

Is this a new leftist’s website your following?

 

What does being sued have to do with Trump winning the Presidency?

 

How many did he win and lose?

 

People sue every day in America.  Nothing new.  Even over McDonald hot coffee, malpractice etc.

 

Many high profile business people and companies are involved in lawsuits every day.

 

Your post has no merit. Just like wiki.

 

Even IF they did , the American people see through leftists propaganda.

Slate, as Im sure we all remember was the media outlet Hillary gave the Russia collusion bs to that she and her team ginned up. She chose Slate because they have zero journalistic integrity and she knew they would salivate and run the bs without bothering to do basic fact checks. She was right.

 

"The group decided to share the information with a reporter, and Mook subsequently ran that decision by Clinton herself.

 

"We discussed it with Hillary," Mook said, later adding that "she agreed with the decision.A campaign staffer later passed the information to a reporter from Slate magazine, which the campaign hoped the reporter would "vet it out, and write what they believe is true," Mook said.

 

Slate published a story on October 31, 2016, raising questions about the odd Trump-Alfa cyber links. After that story came out, Clinton tweeted about it, and posted a news release that said, "This secret hotline may be the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump's ties to Russia."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/20/politics/hillary-clinton-robby-mook-fbi/index.html

 

Slate! How disgusting. What damage this Russia collusion hoax caused. Btw its payback time!😅

 

No rational being would use lazy propaganda like Slate to prove facts

 

[SunnyinBangrak]

2 hours ago, transam said:

And Trumps are/were not....?..................🤣

 

 

Almost looks like you are using Joy Reid to fact check Trump? Surely not?

[G_Money]

59 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

I agree but would suggest the following wording;

 What is being discussed is his probable numerous and potentially dangerous future cock-ups, as he hasn't got a clue...🤒

Is this what the high intelligence, pub drunken Scotsmen believe?

 

Please provide your evidence.

 

We are waiting.

[candide]

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Slate, as Im sure we all remember was the media outlet Hillary gave the Russia collusion bs to that she and her team ginned up. She chose Slate because they have zero journalistic integrity and she knew they would salivate and run the bs without bothering to do basic fact checks. She was right.

 

"The group decided to share the information with a reporter, and Mook subsequently ran that decision by Clinton herself.

 

"We discussed it with Hillary," Mook said, later adding that "she agreed with the decision.A campaign staffer later passed the information to a reporter from Slate magazine, which the campaign hoped the reporter would "vet it out, and write what they believe is true," Mook said.

 

Slate published a story on October 31, 2016, raising questions about the odd Trump-Alfa cyber links. After that story came out, Clinton tweeted about it, and posted a news release that said, "This secret hotline may be the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump's ties to Russia."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/20/politics/hillary-clinton-robby-mook-fbi/index.html

 

Slate! How disgusting. What damage this Russia collusion hoax caused. Btw its payback time!😅

 

No rational being would use lazy propaganda like Slate to prove facts

 

As usual, you post a distortion of information. 

 

From your linked article:

"There is no evidence to support Musk’s claim that Sussmann or the Clinton campaign peddled information they knew was untrue. Multiple witnesses testified that respected cyber experts harbored genuine national security concerns about the data. Sussmann’s lawyers repeatedly said he had no reason to doubt the accuracy of the material when he provided it to the FBI."

[simple1]

4 hours ago, G_Money said:

Re read post you are responding to.  Might be time for an adult education class..  Reading comprehension.

 

In the meantime this is what Biden is doing with other world leaders.

 

 

<snipped for brevity> trump had meeting with country leaders before without actual positive  outcomes for the US e.g. North Korea and PRC. Made to look foolish on a few occasions. So far as we know his current meetings as President Elect have not produced verifiable positive outcomes for the US. We will know results in say 1 / 2 years.

[scottiejohn]

37 minutes ago, G_Money said:

Is this what the high intelligence, pub drunken Scotsmen believe?

 

Please provide your evidence.

 

We are waiting.

Unfortunately a lot of the world's population are worried that it is very likely to come true!

 

PS;  It is impossible to provide evidence of what may happen in the future!

You can either ignore, guess or fear etc!

 

[Dan O]

3 hours ago, G_Money said:

In denial?  lol.  Trump is the newly elected president.

 

You still haven’t accepted it.  That’s denial. The reason for you continuing to post his alleged past wrongdoings.  That is ALL you got left to go on.
 

Get with the current times.  Trump is going to be your next President.  

Be a “glass is half full “ guy instead of half empty.

 

You’re so far down the rabbit 🐇 hole you’ll never get out.

Medical intervention may help.  Or may not.

You are about as ignorant as they come.

[G_Money]

3 hours ago, Dan O said:

You are about as ignorant as they come.

About?    Sorry, I don’t submit to your ideology and never will.
 

I was extremely accurate in my assessment of a possessed Never Trumper.  
 

Almost but not quite as possessed as our resident X CIA member. That being said you’re not far behind. 

[G_Money]

3 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Unfortunately a lot of the world's population are worried that it is very likely to come true!

 

PS;  It is impossible to provide evidence of what may happen in the future!

You can either ignore, guess or fear etc!

 

Sorry to pop your bubble but most of the world is embracing Trump’s  greatest comeback in history.  Starting with our allies.

 

Only the fools still long for a Harris presidency.

[G_Money]

4 hours ago, simple1 said:

 

<snipped for brevity> trump had meeting with country leaders before without actual positive  outcomes for the US e.g. North Korea and PRC. Made to look foolish on a few occasions. So far as we know his current meetings as President Elect have not produced verifiable positive outcomes for the US. We will know results in say 1 / 2 years.

It is looking remarkably positive with Trump so far.  Better than expected.

 

Don’t you agree?  Of course not.

 

Rule number 1 of a never Trumper

 

Never give credit when credit is due.

 

You’re all the same.  Pathetic and hypocrites.

[simple1]

7 hours ago, G_Money said:

It is looking remarkably positive with Trump so far.  Better than expected.

 

Don’t you agree?  Of course not.

<snipped for brevity> Not to me as he's appointing sycophants for very important roles with little or no experience. As well as indulging in nepotism which I believe it not a good outlook for the American people. 

[jippytum]

Trump will do s good job on the economy as he did last term. 

Trump detractors are shooting themselves in the foot trying to talk the economy prospects down to spite the biggest election winner in decades.