richard_smith237 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 4 hours ago, rattlesnake said: What's your take on the ample footage of celestial bodies which strongly suggests they are of a sonoluminescent nature, and in any case nothing like the NASA representations of them? The idea that celestial bodies, such as stars or planets, could have a sonoluminescent nature is intriguing but also speculative. Celestial bodies, as we understand them scientifically, are primarily powered by nuclear fusion (in the case of stars) or various forms of energy depending on their composition and structure. The light we see from stars is a result of nuclear reactions in their cores, producing enormous amounts of energy that travel through space as electromagnetic radiation, rather than being generated by sound waves or mechanical processes like sonoluminescence. As for the depiction of celestial bodies by organizations like NASA, the visual representations we see, especially in public media, are often colored or adjusted to enhance certain features. The true colours of celestial bodies can be much more varied and are sometimes not visible to the human eye because of the range of electromagnetic radiation (including ultraviolet or infrared) that they emit. What we see in typical images might be a rendering that highlights particular aspects of a celestial body for better scientific interpretation. With this in mind - I believe it quite possible that sonoluminescence may exist - we have a very poor 'distant view' of the universe. This understanding of distant celestial bodies and the potential that some of them may have a sonoluminescent nature presents a far more viable possibility given the lack of understanding compared to our understanding of the Earth in regards to the 'flat earth' vs 'Oblate Spheroid' discussion, which as far as I'm concerned is unequivocally proven and any discussion (i.e. this thread) is merely entertaining but preposterous.
black tabby12345 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago The Earth is a sphere. One decisive evidence for that. The radar waves cannot reach beyond horizon. If the world is flat, it can go further, but it doesn't. 1 1
Yolando Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 10 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said: Rio Gallegos - Johannesburg: why the detour via Sao Paulo? The population of Rio Gallegos is less than 100,000 people and it has no international airport. It surprises you that there are no international flights there? 1 1
harryviking Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago Why on earth will someone waste time on such a retarded thing like this....I mean....c'mon!!😫😫 1
Stiddle Mump Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 1 hour ago, harryviking said: Why on earth will someone waste time on such a retarded thing like this....I mean....c'mon!!😫😫 I'll tell you why Harry. If the earth is not spherical as we are told, it begs the question; 'what else is not true?' Hve a read of; 'The Falsification of History.' by historian John Hamer. It might get you thinking Sir.
Free the 115 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago On 3/16/2025 at 9:34 AM, Stiddle Mump said: Great post Mr Gamb00ler. Even at my age I'm still willing to learn. For me, this topic is somewhat a barometer. I started off thinking that the earth could be round, and then, I read @rattlesnakeand because he certainly knows his stuff, the pendulum swung; and I was 50/50. Then @richard_smith237posts. His arguments were/are very convincing and I went 60/40. in favour of a round earth. But!! The pics Rattles put up are the nuts. So I'm now 40/60. If someone could tell me why a plane can't fly round the coast of Antarctica, it might sort it for me. Or/and, if we drilled a hole through one ocean, say the Atlantic, would all the water pour through it? Into where? Outer space? Maybe inner space! It's a complicated subject alright. I’m going to assume that you know what volcanoes are, and how hot they can become. islands have been formed by Nature “drilling “ holes into the crust. Whole island groups have been formed down the coast of Africa, and I’m sure it’s the same in the Pacific.( Just too lazy to look it up)
Free the 115 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 15 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said: This seals the deal. Are there any spherical earthers that could explain? I think that the fact that all airlines have to route through their own country. I’m assuming that the flight you have quoted is KLM. Why don’t flights go over the Sahara? Rules on using accessible routes will kick in here. Same reason a flight to Florida from the US gets to the coast as quick as it can and then follows it down
richard_smith237 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 5 hours ago, harryviking said: Why on earth will someone waste time on such a retarded thing like this....I mean....c'mon!!😫😫 Its an entertaining discussion in a section of the forum [off the beaten track] specifically set up for such absurdity... I also think it quite important for us to be well aware that we live amongst people who are so flawed of thought that they believe in the utterly absurd regardless of irrefutable evidence. Another 'one' is the completely unfalsifiable theory "Humanity Never Existed" that we [humanity] is just a construct designed by some unknown force, it reliant on solipsism to the extreme - makes for great sci-fi but terrible science, where as flat earth just makes for terrible science, but outstanding trolling !!! 1
FritsSikkink Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago On 12/23/2024 at 3:57 PM, dinsdale said: How about does god exist? Very similar in that there is no evidence to support either. A flat earth or the existence of god/gods. Absolutely ZERO evidence based on science. You should have spend more time on science at school.
richard_smith237 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 3 hours ago, Free the 115 said: I’m going to assume that you know what volcanoes are, and how hot they can become. islands have been formed by Nature “drilling “ holes into the crust. Whole island groups have been formed down the coast of Africa, and I’m sure it’s the same in the Pacific.( Just too lazy to look it up) ... Various reasons.. Pacific Islands (i.e Hawaii) are 'hotspot' Island whereby as the Pacific tectonic plate moved over a stationary hotspot in Earth's mantle. Over millions of years, magma from the hotspot erupted, creating a chain of volcanic islands. Yellow Stone is also caused by the same phenomenon. Others are Subduction Zone Volcanoes – Formed when one tectonic plate sinks beneath another, melting and generating magma that erupts (e.g., Ring of Fire volcanoes). Rift Zone Volcanoes – Occur at divergent boundaries where tectonic plates pull apart, allowing magma to rise (e.g., Mid-Atlantic Ridge) - Iceland etc. Continental Rift Volcanoes – Formed when landmasses split apart, thinning the crust and allowing magma to escape (e.g., East African Rift).
dinsdale Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 7 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said: You should have spend more time on science at school. Maybe I should have. I obviously missed the lessons on the evidence of God's existence and the Earth being flat.
FritsSikkink Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 23 minutes ago, dinsdale said: Maybe I should have. I obviously missed the lessons on the evidence of God's existence and the Earth being flat. There is evidence that the earth is round. I have a school mate who actually been in the ISS space station for months. For god have a look here: https://www.godisimaginary.com/
dinsdale Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 17 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said: There is evidence that the earth is round. I have a school mate who actually been in the ISS space station for months. For god have a look here: https://www.godisimaginary.com/ I think you need to go back and look at my OP. I said there's as much evidence of a flat earth as there is evidence of God. Zero. 1
parallelman Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago 1 hour ago, dinsdale said: I think you need to go back and look at my OP. I said there's as much evidence of a flat earth as there is evidence of God. Zero. Mentioning 'the deivine' I just thought to comment ('light heartedly') that FE Eric Dubay has an explanation for elcipses on a flat Earth. Rahu (from Indian astrology) is the 'body' that eclipses the Sun and Moon by...well it seems to depend on which form of Indian astrology one reads. So it seems that FE's not only use the Christian writings for their belief.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now