.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
Why some of us did not get COVID symptoms …even though we were exposed.
-
Recently Browsing 1 member
-
Topics
-
-
Latest posts...
-
1
Elon Musk and JD Vance Spark Controversy with Support for Germany’s Far-Right AfD
Fascists of a feather flock together. Disgusting that these two bozos represent the richest person in the world acting as co-president, and the completely inexperienced VP, a Big Mac beat from being the most powerful person in the world. -
1
Elon Musk and JD Vance Spark Controversy with Support for Germany’s Far-Right AfD
Vice President-elect JD Vance stirred debate on Thursday by sharing an op-ed penned by Elon Musk, in which the tech billionaire voiced support for Germany’s far-right political party, Alternative for Germany (AfD). Vance posted the piece on the platform X, calling it an “interesting piece” while clarifying he was not endorsing AfD, as he viewed Germany's elections as a matter for its own citizens. In his post, Vance explained, “We hope to have good relations with all Germans.” However, he criticized the portrayal of AfD in U.S. media, asserting that “American media slanders AfD as Nazi-lite, but AfD is most popular in the same areas of Germany that were most resistant to the Nazis.” Musk’s guest editorial, featured in the German newspaper *Welt am Sonntag*, raised eyebrows both in Germany and abroad. The Tesla CEO, a close ally of President-elect Donald Trump, argued that Germany faces an impending “economic and cultural collapse.” In his view, the far-right AfD is the only political force capable of reversing the nation’s trajectory. “Only the AfD can save Germany,” Musk proclaimed in a separate post on X. The op-ed sparked immediate backlash. The commentary editor of *Welt am Sonntag* resigned in protest, and the German government accused Musk of attempting to influence its February elections. German government spokesperson Christiane Hoffmann remarked during a media briefing, “Freedom of expression also includes the greatest nonsense,” underscoring the controversial nature of Musk’s intervention. Germany’s ambassador to the U.S., Andreas Michaelis, responded to Vance’s remarks on Bluesky, noting the complexities of German history. “Historical context can be tricky,” Michaelis wrote. “While some areas you are referring to resisted the Nazi party early on, others did not, or later became strongholds of the regime. Germany’s history reminds us how important it is to challenge extremism in all its forms.” Musk’s increasing involvement in global politics has drawn scrutiny. He defended his foray into Germany’s political landscape, asserting that his substantial investments in the country’s technological and industrial sectors grant him a stake in its future. His criticisms have not stopped at Germany; Musk recently targeted British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Labour Party-led government. The February 23 election in Germany has significant implications for the country’s future. While the AfD remains the second most popular party, its far-right policies, including calls for mass deportations and a strong anti-immigration stance, have made it an isolated force in German politics. All major parties have categorically ruled out forming a coalition with the AfD. Amid the growing political tensions, Musk has also called for German Chancellor Olaf Scholz to resign, adding further fuel to the fire. Whether these statements will influence Germany’s electorate remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Musk’s political interventions are becoming a defining feature of his global presence. As debates rage on, both Musk and Vance find themselves at the center of a broader conversation about the role of influential figures in international politics and the dangers of extremism in an increasingly polarized world. Based on a report by The Hill 2024-01-04 -
0
Meghan Markle’s New Chapter: Lifestyle Series, Social Media, and Strategic Ventures
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is making a highly anticipated return to the spotlight with the debut of her new Netflix lifestyle series, "With Love, Meghan." The streaming giant has confirmed the show will begin airing on January 15, offering viewers a blend of practical advice and candid conversations. Produced by Archewell Productions, the company she co-founded with Prince Harry, the series showcases Meghan's creative approach to daily life. Netflix described the series as one where Meghan “blends practical how-to’s and candid conversation with friends, new and old.” According to the platform, the show will highlight Meghan’s focus on “embracing playfulness over perfection” and demonstrate “how easy it can be to create beauty, even in the unexpected.” The series features appearances by notable guests such as Mindy Kaling, chef Roy Choi, and culinary icon Alice Waters. Together, they explore activities like cooking, gardening, and more, encouraging viewers to “roll up their sleeves” and join in the experience. Beyond her Netflix venture, Meghan has launched her lifestyle brand, American Riviera Orchard, which aligns with the themes of her new show. This latest move comes as Meghan continues to carve out a space in the lifestyle and wellness industry, building on her earlier successes as a former actress and creator of the now-archived blog, "The Tig." Netflix previously collaborated with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex on the docuseries "Harry & Meghan," which offered an intimate look into their lives, including their decision to step back from royal duties and relocate to the United States. However, as noted by royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams, this latest series arrives at a critical juncture for the couple. Fitzwilliams remarked on Meghan’s calculated approach, saying, “Her intention in the video is to look relaxed, confident and, above all, symbolize the freedom they claim they have found.” He further explained that the social media account is likely a key tool for promoting Meghan’s upcoming projects, including American Riviera Orchard, while offering her greater control over her narrative. As 2025 begins, the stakes are high for the Sussexes. With her entrepreneurial spirit and a fresh slate of creative projects, Meghan is poised to reestablish herself as a leading voice in lifestyle and wellness. Whether "With Love, Meghan" and her broader ventures can secure enduring success remains to be seen, but interest in her journey shows no sign of waning. Based on a report by CNN | NYP 2024-01-04 -
0
German Trio Charged in Pro-Russia Plot to Target U.S. Bases and Personnel
Three dual German-Russian nationals have been charged in Germany with spying on U.S. military installations and plotting attacks in support of Russian interests. The allegations involve plans to disrupt NATO logistics and retaliate against Western support for Ukraine amid its ongoing war with Russia, according to German prosecutors. The men, identified as Dieter S., Alexander J., and Alex D. due to Germany’s strict privacy laws, face serious charges, including espionage and planning sabotage. The federal prosecutor's office stated that Dieter S., described as the plot’s mastermind, was additionally charged with acting as a sabotage agent, conspiring to cause explosions, and committing arson. Authorities claim the group intended to disrupt NATO operations critical to supporting Ukraine's war effort. Their activities allegedly included surveilling U.S. military facilities, including the Army training area at Grafenwoehr, a key site for training Ukrainian forces. The case gained public attention in April when Dieter S. and Alexander J. were arrested in Bayreuth, roughly 20 miles from Tower Barracks in Grafenwoehr. Subsequent raids on their homes and workplaces uncovered evidence linking them to the alleged plot. Prosecutors said their efforts were aimed at interfering with rail transport and compromising security at military installations, all designed to undermine logistical support for Ukraine. Dieter S. reportedly became involved with Russian intelligence during his time fighting for the Donetsk People’s Republic in eastern Ukraine in 2014. This self-proclaimed republic has been a focal point of conflict since Russia's initial invasion of Ukraine that year. German prosecutors have linked the Donetsk People’s Republic to violent actions against civilians and intense combat operations, classifying it as a foreign terrorist organization. In October 2023, Dieter S. allegedly began collaborating with a Russian intelligence handler, sharing information about potential sabotage targets in Germany. He passed along photographs of military transports and offered to carry out bombings and arson attacks at military and industrial sites. He also pledged to disrupt railway lines essential for transporting military equipment. Alexander J. and Alex D. reportedly joined the conspiracy in March 2023, though specific details of their involvement remain undisclosed. Of the three suspects, Alex D. remains at large, prompting an ongoing search by German authorities. The charges underline the risks of foreign espionage and sabotage as tensions between Russia and the West remain high over the war in Ukraine. NATO facilities, particularly those supporting Ukrainian forces, have emerged as strategic targets in the conflict’s broader geopolitical battle. German prosecutors emphasized the seriousness of the allegations, noting that the actions not only threatened the safety of U.S. personnel but also undermined Germany's security and sovereignty. If convicted, the trio could face lengthy prison sentences for their roles in the conspiracy. Based on a report by Stripes 2024-01-04 -
0
UK Ex-MP Claims Grooming Gang Ethnicity Was Suppressed to Protect Votes
Former Rochdale MP Simon Danczuk has accused Tony Lloyd, a prominent Labour figure, of discouraging him from raising concerns about the ethnic background of grooming gang perpetrators to avoid harming the party’s electoral prospects. Danczuk, who represented Rochdale from 2010 to 2017, alleges that Lloyd, then the Labour Party's parliamentary chairman, prioritized political expediency over addressing the root causes of abuse. Danczuk’s claims center around the infamous 2012 convictions of nine men for sex trafficking and related offences in Rochdale. Among the perpetrators, eight were of British Pakistani origin, and one was an Afghan asylum seeker. Subsequent investigations led to convictions of an additional 33 men, with Greater Manchester Police issuing an apology for failing to act on earlier reports of abuse. As a vocal campaigner on the issue, Danczuk brought whistleblowers to testify before the Commons home affairs select committee. However, he says his efforts were met with resistance within his own party. Speaking to *The Telegraph*, Danczuk revealed, “At no time did Yvette Cooper, who was then the shadow home secretary, seek my advice on the matter.” He further stated that both Lloyd and Jim Dobbin, another Labour MP, warned him not to connect the grooming scandal with the perpetrators' ethnicity. Danczuk detailed his grievances in a 2017 letter to Professor Alexis Jay, who chaired a major inquiry into child sexual abuse. In the letter, he wrote: “Tony Lloyd made efforts within Parliament to dissociate the grooming scandal from the Asian Muslim community – that is a matter of public record. Privately, he told me such links should not be emphasized.” The ex-MP claims that Lloyd threatened him over his criticism of Greater Manchester Police’s handling of the case, particularly after Danczuk publicly questioned the Chief Constable's performance in a *Mail on Sunday* article. “Tony phoned and threatened me,” Danczuk alleged. “He said that if I ever repeated such comments, he would ‘bounce me from Rochdale to Westminster.’ My then-wife was present when I took the call.” Danczuk believes Lloyd's reluctance to highlight the ethnic background of the perpetrators was politically motivated. “I am of the view that Tony did not want the abuse of children linked with the Asian Muslim community because it could have an adverse electoral impact for him in the election for police commissioner and for Labour more generally,” he said. Tony Lloyd went on to serve as Greater Manchester’s police and crime commissioner in 2012 and returned to Parliament as Rochdale MP in 2017. Lloyd passed away in January last year, and Jim Dobbin died in 2014. Danczuk has since echoed calls for a dedicated national inquiry into grooming gangs, aligning with recent statements from Conservative minister Kemi Badenoch. “The 2017 child abuse inquiry focused on historical and Westminster-related abuse,” he told *The Telegraph*. “There should be a national inquiry into grooming gangs, with the power to prosecute those who turned a blind eye or actively discouraged investigations. My concern is that if a Labour government sets the remit for such an inquiry, it could be constructed to yield few meaningful results.” His remarks come as Labour faces fresh criticism for refusing to hold a public inquiry into grooming gangs in Oldham. Tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in on the issue, calling Labour’s stance “disgraceful.” The allegations underscore ongoing tensions over how political considerations intersect with justice and accountability in cases of systemic abuse. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-01-04 -
0
YouGov Complex Start to Labour’s New Era in 2025 Public Opinion
As 2025 begins, the political landscape in the UK reveals a challenging start for Labour, six months into their government. Recent polling data from December paints a sobering picture of public sentiment, offering insights into favourability ratings, government approval, and key concerns dominating the national conversation. Keir Starmer, the Labour leader and prime minister, faces a stark decline in his personal favourability. According to polling conducted for *The Times* in mid-December, Starmer’s net favourability reached a new low of -41. A significant majority of Britons (66%) expressed a negative view of the prime minister, while only 25% held a positive perception. This marks a continuing trend of diminishing public confidence in Starmer’s leadership. On the Conservative side, Kemi Badenoch, the recently appointed Tory leader, is also experiencing a decline in public sentiment as familiarity with her grows. In early November, 39% of Britons were undecided about Badenoch. However, by December, this figure dropped to 33%, and her net favourability rating fell from -20 to -31. Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, remains a divisive figure. His favourability numbers have remained relatively stable, with 28% of Britons viewing him positively and 62% unfavourably, giving him a net rating of -34. Despite this, Farage poses a significant threat to the Conservative Party, as 45% of their 2024 voters hold a favourable view of him, although Badenoch’s 55% approval among Tory voters still provides a buffer. The broader perception of Labour's government mirrors Starmer’s personal ratings, with approval at its lowest point since taking office. A late-December survey revealed that 62% of Britons disapprove of the government’s record, while only 17% approve. Among Labour’s own voters, opinions are mixed, with 38% disapproving and 34% expressing approval. Disappointment runs deep among Labour’s base. Nearly half (46%) of Labour voters surveyed in December said the party’s performance had not met their expectations, while only 28% felt the government was doing well. This sentiment is even more pronounced among the general public, where just 10% believe Labour is performing satisfactorily. Public concerns reflect enduring challenges. The economy remains the most pressing issue, cited by 52% of Britons as a top concern. Immigration and health follow closely, at 46% and 40%, respectively. These priorities vary significantly across party lines. For Labour voters, the economy and health dominate equally, with 55% and 53% prioritizing these issues, while immigration ranks lower at 28%. Conversely, immigration is the primary concern for Tory voters, with 71% listing it as a top issue, followed by the economy at 59% and health at 33%. As Labour embarks on its first full year in government, the data underscores the significant hurdles it faces in aligning public expectations with policy delivery. While the economy, immigration, and health remain focal points for the electorate, restoring faith in leadership and government performance will be critical in shaping public opinion in the months to come. Based on a report by YouGov Public Data 2024-01-04 -
0
To Hamas, Peace is Weakness
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib, a 34-year-old Palestinian American with deep roots in Gaza, has become a beacon of clarity in the often polarized discourse surrounding the Israel-Palestine conflict. With a pragmatic and humane approach, his voice has resonated in the aftermath of the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks, positioning him as a leading advocate for peace and mutual understanding. Alkhatib's rise to prominence stemmed from his ability to express truths that many Palestinians, particularly those in Gaza or the West Bank, cannot safely articulate. As an outspoken critic of Hamas and a defender of Palestinian rights, he navigates a treacherous middle ground that few dare to tread. His efforts have earned both admiration and hostility. “Ahmed is unique because he does speak out, and he takes a lot of shit for it,” said Gershon Baskin, an Israeli hostage negotiator and close ally. “He’s a very clear, sound voice for peace, reason, and logic.” In widely read outlets such as the *Wall Street Journal*, *The Atlantic*, *Foreign Policy*, and the *Times of Israel*, as well as during interviews on CNN, ABC, and NPR, Alkhatib has articulated positions that challenge entrenched narratives. He has condemned Hamas unequivocally, describing the group as harmful to the Palestinian cause, and this outspoken stance has occasionally necessitated a security detail for his protection. Simultaneously, he has criticized the unrelenting brutality of Israel’s military actions, urging empathy for all victims, regardless of their nationality. In the wake of the October attacks, Alkhatib observed a stark shift in public discourse. “This off-the-shelf messaging came down,” he said. “There was no space, whatsoever, to call for the release of hostages. I was equally horrified by the dehumanization of all Gazans as terrorists.” These statements reflect his refusal to accept simplistic, dehumanizing narratives, emphasizing instead a nuanced understanding of the conflict. Despite personal tragedy—31 members of his extended family have perished in Israeli airstrikes since the conflict began—Alkhatib remains steadfast in his commitment to peace. He proudly identifies as pro-Palestinian and has championed humanitarian initiatives, such as a project to establish a civilian airport in Gaza. Yet, he has also distanced himself from certain U.S.-based Palestine supporters who advocate for indiscriminate boycotts or glorify violence. These positions underscore his independence of thought and dedication to fostering constructive dialogue. Hamas had accomplished its goal of sabotaging nonviolent political solutions to the conflict. Additionally, the group’s propaganda, which I experienced firsthand in Gaza, glorified its terrorism and demonized the word “peace,” claiming it was equivalent to betrayal, weakness, surrender and the embrace of Jews. It also focused on Islamizing Palestinian society, which had historically been secular. I remember signing up for a summer camp in 2002, thinking it would be full of fun recreational activities. Though I hadn’t realized it, this camp was organized by Hamas propagandists who proselytized the virtues of armed resistance and being a good Muslim. I told my mom that I wouldn’t be attending the rest of the boring weeklong camp. Even as a child I saw through its cheap propaganda. Through its indoctrination and Islamization of Gaza’s youth, Hamas was breeding future generations of radicalized Palestinians. I remember the “protests” that Hamas regularly organized: They took students out of class, bused them to border checkpoints and Israeli military positions, and had them throw stones at soldiers. These field trips would often end up with young Palestinian children being maimed by Israel Defense Forces fire. Hamas wanted scenes of dead Palestinians for its recruitment efforts and propaganda and to undermine the Palestinian Authority-led peace process. Many Palestinians and their allies, particularly outside Gaza, aren’t willing to condemn Hamas and acknowledge its undeniable role in the suffering of Gazans. Hamas has been a disaster to Palestinian aspirations for freedom and self-determination. It must be ruthlessly criticized and rejected, especially because it is serving the goals and interests of anti-peace Israeli factions. The slaughter on Oct. 7 was meant to destabilize the region and fulfill the destructive aspirations of Hamas and its backers. The group counted on an overwhelmingly violent Israeli reaction to reinvigorate the spirit of resistance born out of Palestinian suffering. Hamas sought to hide its failures and inability to produce any progress in Gaza behind this brutal attack. Hamas counted on international sympathy for the unbearable civilian casualties—including dozens of my own family members—resulting from the Israeli offensive. Hamas bet that these deaths would shield it from criticism. Based on a report by Foreign Policy | WSJ 2024-01-04 -
0
Netherlands: Names of 425,000 Suspected Nazi Collaborators Published Online
In a landmark moment for historical transparency, the names of approximately 425,000 individuals suspected of collaborating with the Nazis during the German occupation of the Netherlands have been published online for the first time. These names come from a vast archive documenting investigations conducted through a special legal system established toward the end of World War II. Among those listed, more than 150,000 faced some form of punishment for their alleged actions. Until now, the full records of these investigations were only accessible by visiting the Dutch National Archives in The Hague, posing a significant barrier to those interested in delving into this chapter of history. The digitization effort, led by the Huygens Institute, marks a significant step toward making this archive more accessible. The Institute emphasized the importance of these records, stating, "This archive contains important stories for both present and future generations, from children who want to know what their father did in the war, to historians researching the grey areas of collaboration." The archive comprises files on various individuals, including war criminals, approximately 20,000 Dutch citizens who joined the German armed forces, and suspected members of the National Socialist Movement (NSB), the Dutch Nazi party. The online database provides basic information, such as names, birthdates, and birthplaces, but it does not indicate whether a person was found guilty or the nature of their alleged collaboration. For further details, users must visit the National Archives and request the corresponding file, demonstrating a legitimate interest in doing so. While the initiative promises to shed light on a dark chapter in Dutch history, it has sparked concerns about the potential misuse of sensitive information. To address these concerns, the initial release of online data has been carefully limited. Rinke Smedinga, whose father was an NSB member and worked at Camp Westerbork—a transit camp from which many were deported to concentration camps—expressed apprehension about the potential backlash. "I am afraid that there will be very nasty reactions," Smedinga told the Dutch publication DIT. Tom De Smet, director of the National Archives, acknowledged the delicate nature of this endeavor. "Relatives of both collaborators and victims of the occupation had to be taken into account," he explained. Yet, De Smet also emphasized the potential for healing and understanding. "Collaboration is still a major trauma. It is not talked about. We hope that when the archives are opened, the taboo will be broken." In a letter to parliament dated December 19, Culture Minister Eppo Bruins underscored the broader significance of this move, writing, "Openness of archives is crucial for facing the effects of [the Netherlands'] difficult shared past and to process it as a society." As this newly accessible archive begins to reveal its secrets, it offers an opportunity for the Netherlands to confront and better understand the complexities of its wartime history—a journey that may help bridge the divide between past and present. Based on a report by BBC 2024-01-04
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now