Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, placeholder said:

 

Looks weird without burning and looting and big politicians telling them to do more and their bail will be paid for them. Plus just one day? They could have gone on for months or years and captured entire city blocks.

But no. Just a rowdy one day protest by a crowd swarming with FEDs and various deep state assets(which for some reason the J6 committee didnt tell us, nor Wray until his feet were held to the fire).

No problem, we WILL get to the bottom of the lefts beloved J6.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 1/5/2025 at 5:49 PM, Will B Good said:

Hardly dragging their feet......unless of course they actually know who it was and this is all front.

Anything is possible in this Brave New World.

After all, they managed to make 90 something judicial cases out of sod all.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
7 hours ago, frank83628 said:

If it was 'right Wing' they would have been aressted in a nano second... the fact they still havent speaks volumes 

.unless that is you are a left wing brainwashed sheep... just saying 

Baaaaah.

Posted
12 hours ago, placeholder said:

Another "when did you stop beating your wife" question.


So you don’t have an accurate answer.

 

That’s why you deflect.  Your standard response.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/5/2025 at 10:05 AM, G_Money said:

FBI informants who were planted in the crowd by Biden’s DOJ never to be arrested.

This is Thailand not hopeless USA!!!

Posted
On 1/5/2025 at 12:06 PM, Yagoda said:

Or left wing agitators or government agent provocateurs seeking to gin up Jan 6.

 

Is there a Yevno Azeff around?

 

No only you.....the troll who previously manifested on ThaiVisa/AN as "Nyezhov".

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
17 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Looks weird without burning and looting and big politicians telling them to do more and their bail will be paid for them. Plus just one day? They could have gone on for months or years and captured entire city blocks.

But no. Just a rowdy one day protest by a crowd swarming with FEDs and various deep state assets(which for some reason the J6 committee didnt tell us, nor Wray until his feet were held to the fire).

No problem, we WILL get to the bottom of the lefts beloved J6.

Members of the "rowdy" crowd beat police officers. And attempted to surge violently into the chambers were members of congress were sequestered. Why were they looking for members of congress? What has that to do with a demonstration. Many were there explicitly to stop the transfer of power.. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 1/5/2025 at 10:59 AM, placeholder said:

That's because they were informants. Part of an authorized investigative action.

That's because they were informants. Part of an authorized incitement action.

Posted
3 hours ago, Enoon said:

 

No only you.....the troll who previously manifested on ThaiVisa/AN as "Nyezhov".

 

Wow lookie more silliness 

  • Confused 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Members of the "rowdy" crowd beat police officers. And attempted to surge violently into the chambers were members of congress were sequestered. Why were they looking for members of congress? What has that to do with a demonstration. Many were there explicitly to stop the transfer of power.. 

I see someone bought lock, stock and barell into the narrative. I do wonder whether the reeducation camps Hillary spoke of will be neccessary after all, just not quite how she intended.

Posted
3 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

I see someone bought lock, stock and barell into the narrative. I do wonder whether the reeducation camps Hillary spoke of will be neccessary after all, just not quite how she intended.

All those lying videos? More conspiracy nonsense.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That's because they were informants. Part of an authorized incitement action.

4 informants incited that crowd? Ridiculous. It was a crowd that was chanting Hang Mike Pence. Do you have a source that can identify these 4  alleged informants? Another ridiculous conspiracy theory.

Posted
On 1/4/2025 at 9:13 PM, Yagoda said:

I believe it was Left Wing activists but why?

 

https://www.declassified.live/p/house-report-discloses-new-information

 

"How is it possible the pipe bomber remains at large given the extensive resources first expended by the FBI and at their disposal to this day? Why did the J6 Select Committee avoid looking into the threat, particularly since it posed a mortal danger to both the incoming vice president and the Speaker of the House, who created the committee? Why did Kamala Harris never discuss her near-assassination attempt on the campaign trail? Why did D’Antuono mislead Congress about the condition of cell phone data? Why has the media stopped covering the pipe bombs?"

 

Curiouser and curiouser.

It WAS the FBI, hence the lack of interest investigating it

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
7 hours ago, G_Money said:


So you don’t have an accurate answer.

 

That’s why you deflect.  Your standard response.

An accurate answer? What does that mean? The problem with your question is that it rests on the assumption that someone is Biden's Whisperer? In that it's similar to a when did you stop beating your wife question because it assume that someone is Biden's whisperer without offering evidence. I did offer evidence in the case of Trump. He did pretty much a 180 degree turn on the issue.

Posted
32 minutes ago, placeholder said:

4 informants incited that crowd? Ridiculous. It was a crowd that was chanting Hang Mike Pence. Do you have a source that can identify these 4  alleged informants? Another ridiculous conspiracy theory.

More misinformation from the usual quarters. You really do need better sources for your "news". Why every time you call something a conspiracy does it turn out to be factually true? Is there some satisfaction in being on the wrong side of every topical issue?

 

"The FBI had at least 26 confidential informants on the ground in Washington, DC, during the Jan. 6, 2021 storming of the Capitol — most of whom engaged in illegal activity during the chaos, the Justice Department’s watchdog confirmed in a bombshell report. "

https://nypost.com/2024/12/12/us-news/doj-watchdog-says-fbi-had-26-confidential-sources-in-dc-for-jan-6-riot-but-no-evidence-of-undercover-agents?utm_source=nypost&utm_campaign=android_nyp&utm_medium=social

Posted
1 minute ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

More misinformation from the usual quarters. You really do need better sources for your "news".

 

"The FBI had at least 26 confidential informants on the ground in Washington, DC, during the Jan. 6, 2021 storming of the Capitol — most of whom engaged in illegal activity during the chaos, the Justice Department’s watchdog confirmed in a bombshell report. "

https://nypost.com/2024/12/12/us-news/doj-watchdog-says-fbi-had-26-confidential-sources-in-dc-for-jan-6-riot-but-no-evidence-of-undercover-agents?utm_source=nypost&utm_campaign=android_nyp&utm_medium=social

Thanks for the correction. You forget to mention this part:

Critically, that report also shot down unsubstantiated speculation that the bureau had agents stoking some of the mayhem that day, 

“We found no evidence in the materials we reviewed or the testimony we received showing or suggesting that the FBI had undercover employees in the various protest crowds, or at the Capitol, on January 6,” the report said.

https://nypost.com/2024/12/12/us-news/doj-watchdog-says-fbi-had-26-confidential-sources-in-dc-for-jan-6-riot-but-no-evidence-of-undercover-agents/?utm_source=nypost&utm_campaign=android_nyp&utm_medium=social

 

I am sure you will honorably acknowledge the error in your allegations as well. I'm sure you wouldn't indulge in cherry-picking. I look forward to seeing it in this thread.

Posted
2 hours ago, placeholder said:

An accurate answer? What does that mean? The problem with your question is that it rests on the assumption that someone is Biden's Whisperer? In that it's similar to a when did you stop beating your wife question because it assume that someone is Biden's whisperer without offering evidence. I did offer evidence in the case of Trump. He did pretty much a 180 degree turn on the issue.


As usual.  Deflection is your middle name.

Posted
1 hour ago, G_Money said:


As usual.  Deflection is your middle name.

Thanks for providing so much reasoning to back up your characterization. Oh wait a minute.. I'm afraid you've still got nothing.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...