12 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Maybe you understand it.

Many of us, me included, try to understand what he says, and we try to make sense of it. But because he is lying all the time and is inconsistent all the time it just doesn't make any sense.

 

If you think you understand him then please explain his current rumbling about the Panama Canal and Greenland. Does this make any sense? What do you understand?

Or he is just an ahole who talks a lot without thinking? Maybe his fans think this is entertaining, but the rest of us think: Why does he do that? It doesn't make any sense.

 

Do the people of Greenland want to be part of America? NO! So, case closed. Shut up. 

I do understand.  Trump throws a lot of stuff out there just to get reactions and see who pees their pants.  What he actually does or doesn't do will yet to be seen in the future.  I hope that clears it up for you because if it doesn't then I can't help you.

12 hours ago, frank83628 said:

'You' is plural, I could have said Lefty or libtards, there are also others l, but they get automatically deleted

Using terms such as you have listed is a display of lack of intellectual rigour

2 hours ago, kimothai said:

I do understand.  Trump throws a lot of stuff out there just to get reactions and see who pees their pants.  What he actually does or doesn't do will yet to be seen in the future.  I hope that clears it up for you because if it doesn't then I can't help you.

Thank you.

It's good to know that 70+ million Americans think a president should act like that. Amazing, and very sad.

On 1/9/2025 at 8:16 AM, newbee2022 said:

That's totally BS. 

Nothing to do with Left or Right. And I guess there are a lot of "wackos" (please mind your words) on both sides. 

For me Trump is a dangerous egomaniac and egocentric, who should be monitored by psychiatrists. 

Your opinion that Donald Trump is a dangerous egomaniac is completely undermined by the nature of his first term of office which was peaceful with little or no drama. I would, however, agree that he is somewhat egocentric, but no harm in that. 

1 minute ago, Thingamabob said:

Your opinion that Donald Trump is a dangerous egomaniac is completely undermined by the nature of his first term of office which was peaceful with little or no drama. I would, however, agree that he is somewhat egocentric, but no harm in that. 

I disagree. The older he gets the more dangerous might turn his stubbornness, narcism and erraticism. We can't predict but should be prepared.

13 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

I disagree. The older he gets the more dangerous might turn his stubbornness, narcism and erraticism. We can't predict but should be prepared.

By all means be prepared. I doubt, however, you will have much to worry about. We shall see ..

16 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

By all means be prepared. I doubt, however, you will have much to worry about. We shall see ..

Yeah, 4 interesting and hopefully peaceful years ahead

8 hours ago, radiochaser said:

You forgot to include biden in your honor list. 

You should bring that to the attention of g_money

22 hours ago, G_Money said:

Agreed!  Not the first.

 

But certainly well deserved!

 

Greatest political comeback in U.S. history.

You reckon, it seems your man is upsetting the World when he isn't even in charge.

I reckon you will be eating your own words in the not too distant future, you voted in a DICTATOR, and you never saw it coming, typical Trump voter........................

3 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Your opinion that Donald Trump is a dangerous egomaniac is completely undermined by the nature of his first term of office which was peaceful with little or no drama. I would, however, agree that he is somewhat egocentric, but no harm in that. 

Peaceful?

I feel his call to arms on Jan 06 for his supporter to storm congress was less than peaceful deaths and injuries

 

13 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

Peaceful?

I feel his call to arms on Jan 06 for his supporter to storm congress was less than peaceful deaths and injuries

 

There was no 'call to arms'.

Just to prove I'm not a Trump fanboy (as already stated) I was outraged to hear that his 'incoming administration' is demanding the UK take back all the ISIS <deleted> who left to join their 'caliphate' and behead anyone they didn't like there. This includes that <deleted> Begum.

 

Here's two links - the LBC video is worth a watch, and the SkyNews one has more detail in a quick read.

 

https://news.sky.com/story/trump-britain-should-take-back-islamic-state-fighters-11639896

 

 

Check this out - cringe scale factor 10.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/cjwlw5y2gnvo

On 1/8/2025 at 3:20 AM, Keep Right said:

What I really like about Trump is that he knows how to get under the skin of the left wing socialists. He is a master of "The art of the deal." Of course any sane person, which includes very few of the left wing, knows that this is only posturing and part of the attempt to start a conversation on the subject of Greenland and the Canal. It only gets better from here and I am so looking forward to a total meltdown from the left wing wackos.

LOL !

 

Sure 'nough. He's a MASTER on the art of the deal. Or maybe he's just baiting his critics, which would make him a Master Baiter, right?

 

You can fool some of the people all of the time. Abe knew MAGAs were in the future. So did H.L. Mencken.

 

The guy who actually wrote the infamous book made up the personna MAGAs know as the Dealmaker. That writer has admitted it was all a ruse, all made up. Absent his dad's allowance, co-signing of every loan until dad passed, and the eventual inheritance of his actually successful father, 45 would be lucky to be pouring Slurpies at a 7-11 on a highway truckstop in Keokuk, Iowa.

 

There's a reason the guy continues to grift...with golden sneakers, autographed bibles, threads from his Georgia booking suit, NFTs where he pretends he's a fighter pilot or astronaut, etc. It's because he squandered what dad handed him. If not for the Game Show and the PT Barnum-like skills of Mark Burnett, not only would 45 never have been POTUS, but he'd be dead broke. Six bankruptcies are proof of his "dealmaking" and business acumen. Stiffing subcontractors and fraud (for which he has been found guilty on numerous occasions, whether regarding bank and insurance fraud, or charity fraud) are his "Business Plan". Years ago---you can Google this---he had to have daddy go into one of his NJ casinos and buy $3.2 million in chips so sonny boy could make a payment on a New York loan from a bank, a loan that was guaranteed by personal assets. (NJ was primarily junk bonds, on which he defaulted and ultimately foisted his loss on to the US Taxpayer. In MAGAstan, sticking losses on to the taxpayer seems to constitute "dealmaking")

 

As for no 'sane' people believing he really intends to take NATO member Denmark's Greenland via military force, apparently the leaders of Denmark are not sane, because they have taken exception to his silly mouth diarrhea.

 

He's the dumb person's idea of a smart guy, a failure's idea of a success, and a loser's idea of a winner. Did he win in 2024? Sure. Of course both H.L. Mencken and George Carlin would know why. Those who don't know Mencken's famous quote re democracy can Google it. As for Carlin, he said: "Think of how dumb the average person is; then realize half the people are dumber than that." With a plurality, not an outright majority in 2024, Carlin's words ring true. For those of us lucky enough to be on the right side of the mean on the IQ Bell Curve, we have schadenfreude to enjoy over the next 4 years, as 47 absolutely will do what he does best: fail and blame others. In his bizarre Greenland/Panama/Canada presser, he also said "I'm inheriting a terrible economy". LOL. BIDEN inherited a Recession and 6.8% unemployment. 47 is inheriting a growing economy that is performing 3 times better than the average G7 nation since 2020, has low UE, and even just saw a massive surprise in data showing job openings are running at 8 million. BOTH savings and consumer spending rose in 2024, which is something  historically seen more often in the 1960s. 47 is just trying to make excuses for the failure he knows deep down he will create.

 

Here's an interesting video, no doubt sacrilege and blasphemy to those who worship the bloated one, where folks who have done actual research:

 

 

MAGAs who could not benefit from the Biden Boom are not going to do any better under 47. Those with marketable skills and talents saw our net worth soar in the last 4 years. Those who diss Biden are really just admitting they lack what the modern tech economy requires.

 

 

16 hours ago, Walker88 said:

LOL !

 

Sure 'nough. He's a MASTER on the art of the deal. Or maybe he's just baiting his critics, which would make him a Master Baiter, right?

 

You can fool some of the people all of the time. Abe knew MAGAs were in the future. So did H.L. Mencken.

 

The guy who actually wrote the infamous book made up the personna MAGAs know as the Dealmaker. That writer has admitted it was all a ruse, all made up. Absent his dad's allowance, co-signing of every loan until dad passed, and the eventual inheritance of his actually successful father, 45 would be lucky to be pouring Slurpies at a 7-11 on a highway truckstop in Keokuk, Iowa.

 

There's a reason the guy continues to grift...with golden sneakers, autographed bibles, threads from his Georgia booking suit, NFTs where he pretends he's a fighter pilot or astronaut, etc. It's because he squandered what dad handed him. If not for the Game Show and the PT Barnum-like skills of Mark Burnett, not only would 45 never have been POTUS, but he'd be dead broke. Six bankruptcies are proof of his "dealmaking" and business acumen. Stiffing subcontractors and fraud (for which he has been found guilty on numerous occasions, whether regarding bank and insurance fraud, or charity fraud) are his "Business Plan". Years ago---you can Google this---he had to have daddy go into one of his NJ casinos and buy $3.2 million in chips so sonny boy could make a payment on a New York loan from a bank, a loan that was guaranteed by personal assets. (NJ was primarily junk bonds, on which he defaulted and ultimately foisted his loss on to the US Taxpayer. In MAGAstan, sticking losses on to the taxpayer seems to constitute "dealmaking")

 

As for no 'sane' people believing he really intends to take NATO member Denmark's Greenland via military force, apparently the leaders of Denmark are not sane, because they have taken exception to his silly mouth diarrhea.

 

He's the dumb person's idea of a smart guy, a failure's idea of a success, and a loser's idea of a winner. Did he win in 2024? Sure. Of course both H.L. Mencken and George Carlin would know why. Those who don't know Mencken's famous quote re democracy can Google it. As for Carlin, he said: "Think of how dumb the average person is; then realize half the people are dumber than that." With a plurality, not an outright majority in 2024, Carlin's words ring true. For those of us lucky enough to be on the right side of the mean on the IQ Bell Curve, we have schadenfreude to enjoy over the next 4 years, as 47 absolutely will do what he does best: fail and blame others. In his bizarre Greenland/Panama/Canada presser, he also said "I'm inheriting a terrible economy". LOL. BIDEN inherited a Recession and 6.8% unemployment. 47 is inheriting a growing economy that is performing 3 times better than the average G7 nation since 2020, has low UE, and even just saw a massive surprise in data showing job openings are running at 8 million. BOTH savings and consumer spending rose in 2024, which is something  historically seen more often in the 1960s. 47 is just trying to make excuses for the failure he knows deep down he will create.

 

Here's an interesting video, no doubt sacrilege and blasphemy to those who worship the bloated one, where folks who have done actual research

 

MAGAs who could not benefit from the Biden Boom are not going to do any better under 47. Those with marketable skills and talents saw our net worth soar in the last 4 years. Those who diss Biden are really just admitting they lack what the modern tech economy requires.

 

 

 

I wouldn't disagree with what you've written there, but Trump is just another product of the US system. That's what it's all about - get rich or die tryin', right? He (it turns out) is adept at pushing all the right buttons, and pulling all the right tricks to get ahead in a system that loves and rewards bull<deleted>ters. He's not alone in it.

But then again, did you see the movie 'The Apprentice'? A 'drama documentary' about Trumps rise. I was initially reluctant to waste two hours on viewing some hatchet job, but it actually turned out to be a good movie, in that it treated him fairly, showed him warts and all, and how he in fact owed a huge amount of his success to Roy Cohn. In true Trump style he turns his back on the AIDS riddled Cohn at the end of the movie, which leaves off just at the point where the bombast we now see begins to fully emerge.

If the movie is at all true, Trump pulled off a couple of major strokes, which saved his skin and grew his empire. Not everybody can do that, or indeeds wants to even risk it.

Bankruptcy - it's a tool of the American system! Huge parts of American business law are built around legalised bankruptcy and they all use it when it suits. Trump is nothing but a product of a mad system.

On 1/10/2025 at 4:17 PM, Thingamabob said:

There was no 'call to arms'.

Ok, Just encouraging them to take over Congress, there are tapes of it 

exact words on encouraging them to march to congress and said he would meet them there 

"If you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore".

 

13 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

Ok, Just encouraging them to take over Congress, there are tapes of it 

exact words on encouraging them to march to congress and said he would meet them there 

"If you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore".

 

"Peacefully and patriotically" ie not like the blm and anti Trump insurrectionists in their summer of love. 

9 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

"Peacefully and patriotically" ie not like the blm and anti Trump insurrectionists in their summer of love. 

That was long after his original statement, 

He clearly knew there were people in that crowd who were ready to and intended to be violent, and he certainly did nothing to discourage that. He not only did nothing to discourage it, he strongly hinted it should happen

4 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

That was long after his original statement, 

He clearly knew there were people in that crowd who were ready to and intended to be violent, and he certainly did nothing to discourage that. He not only did nothing to discourage it, he strongly hinted it should happen

How did he "strongly hint it should happen"? Did he offer to pay their bails for example? Did he tell them to get up and in the face of every govt official they encountered? 

 

Just now, SunnyinBangrak said:

How did he "strongly hint it should happen"? Did he offer to pay their bails for example? Did he tell them to get up and in the face of every govt official they encountered? 

 

No, he is not that stupid, but, folk can and did read between the lines, and you know it, Trump knows it too..😉

 

43 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

Ok, Just encouraging them to take over Congress, there are tapes of it 

exact words on encouraging them to march to congress and said he would meet them there 

"If you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore".

 

No reference, anywhere, to arms.

2 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

"Peacefully and patriotically" ie not like the blm and anti Trump insurrectionists in their summer of love. 

The January 6th Select Committee found that the words “peacefully and patriotically” were drafted by Trump’s speechwriters – not Trump. Those two words were also completely at odds with the rest of Trump’s highly inflammatory remarks, during which he retold multiple lies about the election and directed the crowd’s anger at Vice President Pence and lawmakers. While Trump uttered the word “peacefully” just one time during his speech, which lasted more than an hour, he used variations of the word “fight” 20 times. That was Trump’s authentic voice. Though Trump knew the assembled crowd was “angry,” he ad-libbed the word “fight” on approximately 18 occasions. Trump also personally added multiple incendiary lines, including this one: “We fight like Hell and if you don’t fight like Hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

https://www.justsecurity.org/91904/dissecting-trumps-peacefully-and-patriotically-defense-of-the-january-6th-attack/

16 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

No reference, anywhere, to arms.

You & I both know that "fight" in this case was not about going to a polling place and casting a vote

You are being disingenuous, knowing full well that mobs do not take "prayer books" to fights, even you would know the that many US citizens have the right to conceal carry, mob rule takes over as it did during the Salem Witch hunts where they often went with pitch forks , as some did this time

Ole Bon Spurs is a coward and wants people harmed as long as he remains protected.

Read the sworn statements of people who there with him on day, peace is something he did not want, he made that clear.

Calling people traitors is no an incitement to peace, you know that 

 

2 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

You & I both know that "fight" in this case was not about going to a polling place and casting a vote

You are being disingenuous, knowing full well that mobs do not take "prayer books" to fights, even you would know the that many US citizens have the right to conceal carry, mob rule takes over as it did during the Salem Witch hunts where they often went with pitch forks , as some did this time

Ole Bon Spurs is a coward and wants people harmed as long as he remains protected.

Read the sworn statements of people who there with him on day, peace is something he did not want, he made that clear.

Calling people traitors is no an incitement to peace, you know that 

 

 

No I'm afraid I disagree and you're assuming the worst.

There's a song I like, called 'Fight For Your Right - To PAAAAARTY!'.

Do you think that means attack the Capitol Building?

Or even some College Dorm?

When a politician goes on TV and says he wants to fight for equal pay - do you take that to mean he's going to start a bombing campaign?

When they tried to blow Trumps brains out he screamed 'Fight! Fight! Fight!'. Who do you think he meant? HOW do you think he meant it?

OK, don't answer - I know your answer.

But my take on that is he was asking his supporters to never give up, never surrender, even if they blew his brains out.

On 1/8/2025 at 7:03 AM, Walker88 said:

At a presser Tuesday, 7 January, at Mar-a-Lago, the President-elect said he would not rule out military force to take Greenland and the Panama Canal.

 

Your hero, right, MAGAs?

 

Oh, and he threatened economic force to annex Canada, plus he wants to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

 

It's 1700 again; do you know where your Colonial Master is?

 

(Plenty of videos of his presser, for those who want to see their hero pretend he's a warrior.)

You Leftist love to project and hang onto every word and move Trump makes.  So far, nothing has happened,  On the other hand look at the actual fires Biden HAS created and a burning and you don't see it.  Just a bunch of Marxist losers inflamed by a Marxist media.

1 minute ago, thaipo7 said:

You Leftist love to project and hang onto every word and move Trump makes.  So far, nothing has happened,  On the other hand look at the actual fires Biden HAS created and a burning and you don't see it.  Just a bunch of Marxist losers inflamed by a Marxist media.

Trump did so well during 2016/20, that they got rid of him...

Biden created the fires...............

 

Have you been let out for the day...............🤪

3 hours ago, Flyguy330 said:

 

No I'm afraid I disagree and you're assuming the worst.

There's a song I like, called 'Fight For Your Right - To PAAAAARTY!'.

Do you think that means attack the Capitol Building?

Or even some College Dorm?

When a politician goes on TV and says he wants to fight for equal pay - do you take that to mean he's going to start a bombing campaign?

When they tried to blow Trumps brains out he screamed 'Fight! Fight! Fight!'. Who do you think he meant? HOW do you think he meant it?

OK, don't answer - I know your answer.

But my take on that is he was asking his supporters to never give up, never surrender, even if they blew his brains out.

Suuure. The fact that he organised a political meeting called "stop the steal" near the Capitol, and then sent them to the Capitol, is totally unrelated to the fact that he used variations of "fight" 20 times during his speech!

 

You've won the price of the most pitiful post of the day!

7 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

You & I both know that "fight" in this case was not about going to a polling place and casting a vote

You are being disingenuous, knowing full well that mobs do not take "prayer books" to fights, even you would know the that many US citizens have the right to conceal carry, mob rule takes over as it did during the Salem Witch hunts where they often went with pitch forks , as some did this time

Ole Bon Spurs is a coward and wants people harmed as long as he remains protected.

Read the sworn statements of people who there with him on day, peace is something he did not want, he made that clear.

Calling people traitors is no an incitement to peace, you know that 

 

Tedious and less than accurate. I repeat, there was no call to arms.

On 1/10/2025 at 12:03 PM, RJRS1301 said:

feel his call to arms on Jan 06 for his supporter to storm congress was less than peaceful deaths and injuries

Who exactly are you saying "urged his supporters to storm congress..." Why don't you provide some clarity on this mystery person who "urged his supporters to storm congress". Maybe supply a link to verify and confirm your claim. In the meantime, watch this short clip and see if it is relevant to your baseless claim and is the same person who was "urging his supporters to storm congress".

Does march =storm? LOL

 

 

On 1/11/2025 at 5:49 PM, RJRS1301 said:

He not only did nothing to discourage it, he strongly hinted it should happen

What did the couple of dozen FBI rat-finks do about the action that day? Why was nobody including Trump charged with insurrection? Anyone still spouting the Jan 6 insurrection has not much going for them except helpless desperation and serious hatred and ignorance. Give it a rest, you making a fool of yourself.