Stepfather Stabbed in Head After Argument Over Fried Eggs in Pattaya
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
.thumb.jpeg.d2d19a66404642fd9ff62d6262fd153e.jpeg)
-
4
-
5
-
-
-
Latest posts...
-
16
Community Tuk-Tuk Driver Shocked as Russian Tourists Engage in Sexual Act During Ride
How am I suppose to commemt without seeing the video of the alledged act ? Is this performance art? I need to know before making an educated, informative and objective opinion. -
252
Will there ever be a safe vaccine?
Cherry-picking Editors ≠ Evidence Against Vaccines Yes, the T-shirt is right: “Science doesn’t care what you believe.” And no — science isn’t only what appears in The Lancet or NEJM. But let’s stop pretending that quoting disgruntled former editors somehow proves mainstream science is broken or that vaccines are deadly. That’s a leap so big it should have a parachute. Take the often-misused quotes from Marcia Angell and Richard Horton. They’re expressing frustration with corporate influence and the publication of low-quality or biased studies — a valid concern shared by many in the scientific community. But here’s the trick: anti-vaxxers rip these quotes out of context and spin them into a false syllogism: “Some science is flawed → All science is fake → Therefore my wild theory must be true.” It doesn’t follow. If half the literature is “untrue” — you still don’t get to assume your blog post, YouTube video, or Telegram meme is in the other half. And those wild claims like “All vaccines will kill you” or “mRNA shots are proven deadly”? That’s not evidence. That’s propaganda. Repeating it louder or wrapping it in stolen credibility doesn’t make it true. The actual data — from countries all over the world, across millions of doses — shows the opposite: COVID vaccines have saved lives, massively. So no, these editor quotes are not proof of anything except that science needs to be rigorous and constantly self-correcting — which is exactly what peer review, replication, and critical analysis are for. The real danger isn’t scientific debate — it’s the distortion of it by people who want to replace evidence with ideolog -
2
Report Thailand–Cambodia Tensions May Shutter Key Checkpoints, Slash Trade by 60%
Anyone else get a feeling this is boiling over just enough for public concern to reach a certain point then a certain ex pm will go to Cambodia and meet his influential friends over the border then return a hero and things return to normalcy -
37
What things bore and annoy you most?
That's awesome, that you can find happiness with middle aged women.More happiness in the world. I find them very calculating and harsh. The worst is when you get a 58 year old masseuse. I complain but they still give me the grandma. -
27
Middle East Israel’s Strikes on Iran’s Nuclear Program Is a Necessary Defense Against a Global Threat
A number of posts making specific claims that are false have been removed along with a couple of pure troll posts 5. You will not use ASEAN NOW to post any material which is knowingly or can be reasonably construed as false, inaccurate, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of any law. Topics or posts deemed to be scaremongering, deliberately misleading or which deliberately distort information will be removed. In factual areas such as news forums and current affairs topics member content that is claimed or portrayed as a fact should be supported by a link to a relevant reputable source. -
20
New footage shows Brit strolling out of air crash.
What is the “mistake” you are referring to?
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now