Over 15,000 Doctors Urge Senate to Block RFK Jr.’s Nomination as Health Secretary
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
164
Promises made Promises kept , POTUS first few days! The lefts radical response!
What are you talking about. By most typical measures the US economy was booming in 2024. Inflation down more than all other top countries. Employment at record levels. Just like it has been the last 30 years under Republicans it will tank and be fixed by the next Democrat president. That's fact. https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/democrats/2024/10/the-u-s-economy-performs-better-under-democratic-presidents -
164
Promises made Promises kept , POTUS first few days! The lefts radical response!
Eight days before the inauguration, Vice President-to-be JD Vance said on "Fox News Sunday" that Jan. 6 convicts who assaulted police ought not get clemency: "If you committed violence that day, obviously you shouldn't be pardoned." Trump vacillated during an internal debate over targeted clemency vs. a blanket decision according to two insiders. But as Trump's team wrestled with the issue, and planned a shock-and-awe batch of executive orders Day 1, "Trump just said: 'F -k it: Release 'em all,'" an adviser familiar with the discussions said. -
164
Promises made Promises kept , POTUS first few days! The lefts radical response!
Sorry, they were released from prison and their sentences were commutated.- 1
-
164
Promises made Promises kept , POTUS first few days! The lefts radical response!
Can't be bothered dumbing it down for you. Go away. -
164
Promises made Promises kept , POTUS first few days! The lefts radical response!
Obviously. Could you explain for those at the back? -
164
Promises made Promises kept , POTUS first few days! The lefts radical response!
Colorado Supreme Court's Judgment Any definition of insurrection involves ''an attempt by people to hinder or prevent the US government from taking the actions necessary to accomplish a peaceful transfer of power in this country." The participants should "act in a concerted way, [but] need not be highly organised". In applying that definition to the events of 6 January 2021, the court found: A large number of armed protestors forcibly entered the Capitol Building. Actual and threatened force was used by those protestors. The protestors' use of force was concerted and had a unity of purpose, in that they wished to inflict violence against members of Congress and Mike Pence. Upon entering the Capitol Building, the protestors attempted to and did enter the chambers of the House and Senate, for the purposes of preventing the certification of the 2020 Presidential election. The full judgment can be read on the Colorado Supreme Court's website here: https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA300.pdf. 'Insurrection' under English law- 1
-
-
Popular in The Pub
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now