51 Security Clearances Revoked?

[CallumWK]

12 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

 

I thought you were such a big Biden fan.

 

You must have

 

 

 

 

[frank83628]

1 hour ago, Dan O said:

Your actually describing trumps actions after his loss in the last election and now his unbridled hatred and vindictive nature towards all that opposed or disagreed with him. 

*cheated him

[candide]

3 hours ago, theblether said:

2. The reason why it was bizarre that the FBI got a court warrant to seize Hunter's laptop? The shopkeeper had continually offered to hand it over voluntarily and was rebuffed. All the FBI had to do was walk in and pick it up. 

It was according to a grand jury subpoena.

[Dan O]

32 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

They should also be charged in some way with election interference. In fact many should be.

Oh they should be charged but trump and his cabal of lackies shouldnt for all there violations? thats pathetic

[Dan O]

28 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

*cheated him

Show 1 piece of proof he was cheated! you cant,  just like the 30+ lawsuits that failed to show he was cheated. you are clueless about facts and history

[Will B Good]

1 minute ago, Dan O said:

Show 1 piece of proof he was cheated! you cant,  just like the 30+ lawsuits that failed to show he was cheated. you are clueless about facts and history

 

60 to be fair......how many corrupt judges do they have over there....555

[tjintx]

44 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Words from a great philosopher.

 

Joe South was a decent songwriter and performer, I wouldn't characterize him as a great philosopher. lol 

[placeholder]

58 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

You seemed to be the only one concerned about whether he missed the point or not.  The fact is these former intelligence officials showed an extreme lack of judgement.  They made fools of themselves and anyone who defends their decision is a fool, too.  Has any one of them come out an apologized for their damning letter?

Why did they make fools of themselves? The transcript of the hard drive was released to the public shortly before the election. The experienced reporter that the NY Post assigned to do the article refused because he was given no time to do any investigation of its bona fides. Rudolph Giuliani refused to release any metadata that might have confirmed its validity.  Given these circumstance, it would have been foolish not to consider some sort of skullduggery.

 

I think it's clear why the transcript of the hard drive was released so late. The people who had copies of the laptop's hard drive in their custody for months and months knew that there was nothing there to incriminate Joe Biden. So they kept it hidden until shortly before the election, That way, Joe Biden could be accused of all sorts of things and there wouldn't be time to respond to them. To this day, nothing in that laptop has been shown to be evidence of any crime or special dealing on the part of Joe Biden. 

[candide]

- The laptop story misteriously popped up a few days before the election.(Giuliani had it for one year)

- Brought up by the crook Giuliani, known for his contacts with Russian operatives (ex. Derkach) and for previously diffusing Russian disinformation (ex. Crowdstrike)

- Giuliani gave a copy of the laptop only to the biased NYPost so no one else could assess it (actually even the NYPost could not assess it, for lack of time)

- the Mueller report, and also the GOP Senate committee report had evidenced Russian interference during the previous election.

 

Frankly, who  could have had the wild idea that it could present all the earmarks of a Russian disinformation!   🤣

[theblether]

58 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

How would you know, if you walk only in your shoes, and not in his?

 

Sad?  Just a matter of degree, since we are all living a sad life, relative to the happier life we have only heard about, but never have seen.

 

Or, are you the ONE who is living the happy life?

If so, for how much longer?

 

If you happy life is limited in length, then can it actually be as happy as you might imagine?

Or, had you never considered such existential sorrows.....

 

A SAD life, indeed, and would you not agree?

 

 

 

I mention one worthless troll and look who shows up. 

 

How truly pathetic. 

[candide]

11 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Why did they make fools of themselves? The transcript of the hard drive was released to the public shortly before the election. The experienced reporter that the NY Post assigned to do the article refused because he was given no time to do any investigation of its bona fides. Rudolph Giuliani refused to release any metadata that might have confirmed its validity.  Given these circumstance, it would have been foolish not to consider some sort of skullduggery.

 

I think it's clear why the transcript of the hard drive was released so late. The people who had copies of the laptop's hard drive in their custody for months and months knew that there was nothing there to incriminate Joe Biden. So they kept it hidden until shortly before the election, That way, Joe Biden could be accused of all sorts of things and there wouldn't be time to respond to them. To this day, nothing in that laptop has been shown to be evidence of any crime or special dealing on the part of Joe Biden. 

And the loser Giuliani tricked himself into it by trying to be smarter than he really is! 😆

[frank83628]

15 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Show 1 piece of proof he was cheated! you cant,  just like the 30+ lawsuits that failed to show he was cheated. you are clueless about facts and history

You only really need to look at the past election history to see the dramatic spike in votes was the one time that mass mail in ballots were used.

[candide]

48 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

*cheated him

You can repeat the big lie as often as you want, it won't make it true! 

[theblether]

5 minutes ago, candide said:

- The laptop story misteriously popped up a few days before the election.(Giuliani had it for one year)

- Brought up by the crook Giuliani, known for his contacts with Russian operatives (ex. Derkach) and for previously diffusing Russian disinformation (ex. Crowdstrike)

- Giuliani gave a copy of the laptop only to the biased NYPost so no one else could assess it (actually even the NYPost could not assess it, for lack of time)

- the Mueller report, and also the GOP Senate committee report had evidenced Russian interference during the previous election.

 

Frankly, who  could have had the wild idea that it could present all the earmarks of a Russian disinformation!   🤣

 

The laptop was seized by the FBI under a court warrant in 2019. 

 

The second court warrant aimed at Hunter Biden's devices that year. 

[frank83628]

10 minutes ago, candide said:

- The laptop story misteriously popped up a few days before the election.(Giuliani had it for one year)

- Brought up by the crook Giuliani, known for his contacts with Russian operatives (ex. Derkach) and for previously diffusing Russian disinformation (ex. Crowdstrike)

- Giuliani gave a copy of the laptop only to the biased NYPost so no one else could assess it (actually even the NYPost could not assess it, for lack of time)

- the Mueller report, and also the GOP Senate committee report had evidenced Russian interference during the previous election.

 

Frankly, who  could have had the wild idea that it could present all the earmarks of a Russian disinformation!   🤣

No russian collusion

[placeholder]

2 minutes ago, theblether said:

 

The laptop was seized by the FBI under a court warrant in 2019. 

 

The second court warrant aimed at Hunter Biden's devices that year. 

What don't you understand about the significance of the fact that the existence of the laptop was only made public shortly before the election?

[frank83628]

2 minutes ago, candide said:

You can repeat the big lie as often as you want, it won't make it true! 

Fine people,  Russian collusion, suckers s losers, impeachment hoax, 

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

No russian collusion

False. 

As the Mueller report pointed out, one of the possible charges against Trump would have been that he could be prosecuted for obstruction of justice in the case of Paul Manafort, the campaign manager who was communicating with Russia intelligence.

[GammaGlobulin]

11 minutes ago, theblether said:

 

I mention one worthless troll and look who shows up. 

 

How truly pathetic. 

 

I think you meant....

Ironic.

 

Correct me if I am mistaken, please.

Thank you.

 

[CallumWK]

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

What don't you understand about the significance of the fact that the existence of the laptop was only made public shortly before the election?

 

Let me guess.............because they could no longer hide it?

[placeholder]

5 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Let me guess.............because they could no longer hide it?

You might surprise us and get yourself acquainted with the facts. The person who originally had the laptop was the repair shop owner. He turned it over to right wingers. They handed the computer over to the FBI but kept a copy of the hard drive. They could have released it well before the elections. But they chose to to do so until shortly before the elections were to take place. Is that clear to you now?

[candide]

5 minutes ago, theblether said:

 

The laptop was seized by the FBI under a court warrant in 2019. 

 

The second court warrant aimed at Hunter Biden's devices that year. 

That was during the Weiss investigation. I wrote it in another post.

 

Since when is it allowed to disclose publicly the content of material obtained under a Grand Jury subpoena? Or to anyone without a court decision? If I'm wrong (it happens) can you cite the article(s) allowing it.

 

What characteristic of the way the laptop content was brought to the the attention of the general public was likely to raise trust in it?

[candide]

15 minutes ago, CallumWK said:

 

Let me guess.............because they could no longer hide it?

Giuliani had it for around one year already. He could have disclosed it much earlier, could have given it to all MSMs so that they could assess it. He pathetically tricked himself by trying to play too smart! 😆

[candide]

28 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

No russian collusion

Don't distort what I wrote. I wrote Russian interference and it's been evidenced.

Collusion was neither proven nor disproved in the Mueller report.

[Lacessit]

3 hours ago, theblether said:

 

I miss no point, You are making a fool of yourself. 

There's a lot of that going around.

 

Did you make a fool of yourself in Thailand, and have to retreat to the UK?

[Oliver Holzerfilled]

1 hour ago, Hawaiian said:

Words from a great philosopher.

Confusedcius

[frank83628]

54 minutes ago, candide said:

Don't distort what I wrote. I wrote Russian interference and it's been evidenced.

Collusion was neither proven nor disproved in the Mueller report.

No collusion or interference, Clinton just lost.

[placeholder]

Just now, frank83628 said:

No collusion or interference, Clinton just lost.

You know I had my doubts but since you say so....it is to laugh.

[frank83628]

1 hour ago, candide said:

You can repeat the big lie as often as you want, it won't make it true! 

No, collusion no interference

[placeholder]

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

No, collusion no interference

From the Hunting of the Snark.

"Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:

That alone should encourage the crew.

Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:

What I tell you three times is true."

Most of us would recognize that that this is also a piece of nonsense. At least, unlike your nonsense, it's inspired nonsense.