Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hawaiian said:

Thanks, that makes sense. From your link: 

 

The court argued the restrictions were justified on security grounds, as the independent entry of journalists could endanger Israeli soldiers battling Gaza’s Hamas terrorists.

 

In its ruling handed down on Monday, the court said allowing journalists inside Gaza could give away operational details, including troop locations, in a way that could “put them in real danger.”

 

So, Israel is justifiably concerned that the independent "journalists" might compromise the safety of their troops. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Thanks, that makes sense. From your link: 

 

The court argued the restrictions were justified on security grounds, as the independent entry of journalists could endanger Israeli soldiers battling Gaza’s Hamas terrorists.

 

In its ruling handed down on Monday, the court said allowing journalists inside Gaza could give away operational details, including troop locations, in a way that could “put them in real danger.”

 

So, Israel is justifiably concerned that the independent "journalists" might compromise the safety of their troops. 

Might compromise what Israel is doing illegally , more like.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   The WHO announced that they would stop staff travelling the World for group meetings and now use video calls instead as a direct result of the USA cutbacks .

   The WHO staff will no longer be traveling the World on expenses paid for by the USA , they will call each on video calls instead . 

   Do you agree with those cutbacks which will reduce the USAs national debt ?

Yes I do, however the WHO is a toxic organization along with the FDA, the CDC, and many others. When we're talking about small local charities it's a whole different story, a whole different level of productivity, and so it's much more helpful if you compare apples to apples. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Yes I do, however the WHO is a toxic organization along with the FDA, the CDC, and many others. When we're talking about small local charities it's a whole different story, a whole different level of productivity, and so it's much more helpful if you compare apples to apples. 

I think local charities should be funded locally, that's how communities are built. 

 

NGOs that get federal money are generally not helping communities. Look at the homeless debacle. Billions thrown at it and more homeless than ever.  

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Yes I do, however the WHO is a toxic organization along with the FDA, the CDC, and many others. When we're talking about small local charities it's a whole different story, a whole different level of productivity, and so it's much more helpful if you compare apples to apples. 

 

   Which small local charities are we talking about ?

(I kind of lost track with all the Israel and Trump bashing going on )

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, bannork said:

Trump says disinfectant knocks out ( COVID) in a minute. Then he says can we inject something like that, inside, a kind of cleaning.

So what does the' something like that" refer to?

I suggest, your honour, it refers to something like disinfectant, and indeed some hapless Maga fans did just that!

 

So, do you actually believe that the word 'disinfectant',  in a  medical/surgical context actually means house hold bleach or similar.

 

 

 

Posted
33 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

So, do you actually believe that the word 'disinfectant',  in a  medical/surgical context actually means house hold bleach or similar.

 

 

 

Doctors reject Trump's idea to use medical disinfectants.

Doctors reject Trump’s dangerous suggestion to use disinfectant as a coronavirus treatment | CNN Politics https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/24/politics/doctors-respond-trump-disinfectant-injection-coronavirus/index.html

  • Sad 1
Posted
2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

Yes I do, however the WHO is a toxic organization along with the FDA, the CDC, and many others. When we're talking about small local charities it's a whole different story, a whole different level of productivity, and so it's much more helpful if you compare apples to apples. 

 

   WHO officials will still be flying to meetings , they have just cut down on flying non essential meetings to save money .

   So, Whilst WHO officials are flying to meetings , people below them on the ground in Thailand will be dying because lack of funding 

Posted
5 hours ago, bannork said:

To quote Dr Trump ad verbatim 

He added: "I see the disinfectant that knocks it out in a minute, one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that by injection inside or almost a cleaning? As you see, it gets in the lungs, it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it would be interesting to check that."

 

 

Trump's recommendation of chlorine dioxide was absolutely correct.

  • Confused 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Trump's recommendation of chlorine dioxide was absolutely correct.

Lol

While the world was horrified by President Donald Trump's suggestion of drinking household disinfectants to prevent COVID-19 (Litman et al., 2020), less has been mentioned about the extensive use of chlorine dioxide as treatment in l., 1986; Zoffoli et al., 2005). Exposure to high doses of chlorine dioxide has been shown to cause thyroid suppression, DNA damage and neurotoxicity in several animal models (Bercz et al., 1982; Abdel-Rahman et al., 1984; Orme et al., 1985; Harrington et al., 1986; Toth et al., 1990). It is therefore understood that chlorine dioxide is not safe for human consumption

Posted
2 minutes ago, bannork said:

While the world was horrified by President Donald Trump's suggestion of drinking household disinfectants to prevent COVID-19

 

   Do stop saying things that are untrue

Posted
2 hours ago, bannork said:

Lol

While the world was horrified by President Donald Trump's suggestion of drinking household disinfectants to prevent COVID-19 (Litman et al., 2020), less has been mentioned about the extensive use of chlorine dioxide as treatment in l., 1986; Zoffoli et al., 2005). Exposure to high doses of chlorine dioxide has been shown to cause thyroid suppression, DNA damage and neurotoxicity in several animal models (Bercz et al., 1982; Abdel-Rahman et al., 1984; Orme et al., 1985; Harrington et al., 1986; Toth et al., 1990). It is therefore understood that chlorine dioxide is not safe for human consumption

 

Happy reading!

 

Inhibition of the Binding of Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Spike Protein to a Human Receptor by Chlorine Dioxide

https://www.remedypublications.com/open-access/inhibition-of-the-binding-of-variants-of-sars-cov-2-coronavirus-spike-7364.pdf

 

"These findings show that chlorine dioxide aqueous solution can inactivate the binding of the variant spike proteins to the human ACE2 receptor protein, indicating that this strategy may be useful in blocking the transmission of variant SARS-CoV-2 viruses."

 

Protective effect of low-concentration chlorine dioxide gas against influenza A virus infection

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18089729/

 

Evaluation of the antiviral activity of chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite against feline calicivirus, human influenza virus, measles virus, canine distemper virus, human herpesvirus, human adenovirus, canine adenovirus and canine parvovirus

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20616431/

Posted
36 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Trump's recommendation of chlorine dioxide was absolutely correct.

Did you try?

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Happy reading!

 

Inhibition of the Binding of Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Spike Protein to a Human Receptor by Chlorine Dioxide

https://www.remedypublications.com/open-access/inhibition-of-the-binding-of-variants-of-sars-cov-2-coronavirus-spike-7364.pdf

 

"These findings show that chlorine dioxide aqueous solution can inactivate the binding of the variant spike proteins to the human ACE2 receptor protein, indicating that this strategy may be useful in blocking the transmission of variant SARS-CoV-2 viruses."

 

Protective effect of low-concentration chlorine dioxide gas against influenza A virus infection

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18089729/

 

Evaluation of the antiviral activity of chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite against feline calicivirus, human influenza virus, measles virus, canine distemper virus, human herpesvirus, human adenovirus, canine adenovirus and canine parvovirus

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20616431/

 

19 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   Do stop saying things that are untrue

Fact Check: Post falsely claims bleach can help dozens of health conditions

By Reuters Fact Check

February 15, 202411:57 PM GMT+7Updated a year ago

 

Such products were thrown into the spotlight four years ago when then-U.S. President Donald Trump suggested scientists should investigate inserting a cleaning agent into the body to combat COVID-19.

The widely viewed and shared Facebook post, opens new tab said CDS “was healing many conditions”.

 

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/post-falsely-claims-bleach-can-help-dozens-health-conditions-2024-02-15/

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hummin said:

 

Fact Check: Post falsely claims bleach can help dozens of health conditions

By Reuters Fact Check

February 15, 202411:57 PM GMT+7Updated a year ago

 

Such products were thrown into the spotlight four years ago when then-U.S. President Donald Trump suggested scientists should investigate inserting a cleaning agent into the body to combat COVID-19.

The widely viewed and shared Facebook post, opens new tab said CDS “was healing many conditions”.

 

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/post-falsely-claims-bleach-can-help-dozens-health-conditions-2024-02-15/

 

   What is you link trying to show ? 

I can't see why you posted that  link , you could do with giving a little explanation of why your link is relevant .

   Confused 

Posted
15 minutes ago, Hummin said:

 

Fact Check: Post falsely claims bleach can help dozens of health conditions

By Reuters Fact Check

February 15, 202411:57 PM GMT+7Updated a year ago

 

Such products were thrown into the spotlight four years ago when then-U.S. President Donald Trump suggested scientists should investigate inserting a cleaning agent into the body to combat COVID-19.

The widely viewed and shared Facebook post, opens new tab said CDS “was healing many conditions”.

 

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/post-falsely-claims-bleach-can-help-dozens-health-conditions-2024-02-15/

 

Is that the same Reuters Fact Check which said this in March 2021?

 

image.png.c25c1bb6c711de9cfe2f6180de668d6d.thumb.png.e6cfc81b201a58534c7a6a985da58287.png

Posted
6 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

 

Is that the same Reuters Fact Check which said this in March 2021?

 

image.png.c25c1bb6c711de9cfe2f6180de668d6d.thumb.png.e6cfc81b201a58534c7a6a985da58287.png

Do you have the link to the article?

 

What I read:

 

AsteaZeneca claims no evidence, not Reuters. Do you understand the difference?

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Do you have the link to the article?

 

What I read:

 

AsteaZeneca claims no evidence, not Reuters. Do you understand the difference?

 

I understand Reuters is full of sh*t and will say whatever is necessary to push the pharmaceutical cartel's nefarious agenda.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/middle-east/astrazeneca-finds-no-evidence-of-increased-blood-clot-risk-from-vaccine-idUSKBN2B60L5/

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, bannork said:

Doctors reject Trump's idea to use medical disinfectants.

Doctors reject Trump’s dangerous suggestion to use disinfectant as a coronavirus treatment | CNN Politics https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/24/politics/doctors-respond-trump-disinfectant-injection-coronavirus/index.html

Yes, I'm sure they would had he actually suggested it was something people should do, but it wasn't was it... it was a  question he asked his medical advisors during a press briefing in the beginning of COVID. The words he said are there to hear, you can also see who is is addressing while speaking. It is not the press and it is not said as a statement, you are either purposely spreading misinformation or a ... 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Then you obviously do not understand the article. 

 

I understand a lie when I see one. Just like the one below:

 

"While luciferase was involved in some COVID-19 research in the summer of 2020, none of the available vaccines contain either ingredient"

 

photo_2025-01-30_14-57-58.thumb.jpg.67e1bb7a93710a5ef048401d76354312.jpg

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/modernas-covid-19-vaccine-does-not-contain-luciferin-or-luciferase-idUSL1N2MT265/

 

Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine Evaluation Report (January 2021) mentions luciferase 37 times.

 

https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/foi-2389-06.pdf

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...