Jump to content

Health Canada Confirms Undisclosed Presence of DNA Sequence in Pfizer Covid-19 Shot


Recommended Posts

Posted

Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed.

There is debate among scientists with regards to the significance of the finding, with some saying the DNA sequence has the potential to cause cancer, and others saying it poses little to no threat.

 

Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically functional DNA sequences within a plasmid (such as an SV40 enhancer) at the time of submission,” the agency said in an email to The Epoch Times.

Although the full DNA sequence of the Pfizer plasmid was provided at the time of initial filing, the sponsor did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence.”

The regulator said that after scientists Kevin McKernan and Dr. Phillip J. Buckhaults publicly raised the presence of SV40 enhancers in the vaccines earlier this year, “it was possible for Health Canada to confirm the presence of the enhancer based on the plasmid DNA sequence submitted by Pfizer against the published SV40 enhancer sequence.

Both scientists made waves after discovering plasmid DNA in the mRNA COVID-19 injections, warning it could potentially alter the human genome. However, the two share different degrees of concern about the significance of an SV40 sequence—which is used as an enhancer to drive gene transcription during the vaccine manufacturing process—being present in the shots.
 
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Looks like the pro-vaxxers are doomed then? They will obviously mutate - just like a virus - and terrorise the anti-vaxxers. But the anties will stand strong,

 

But in the end, it will be victory for the original humans. Then the anties will be sitting pretty.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

OP's source Epoch Times, formerly not even allowed as a credible source here on the forum:

 

The Epoch Times – Bias and Credibility


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

  • Overall, we rate The Epoch Times Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of pseudoscience and the promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as numerous failed fact checks.

 

"the Epoch Times frequently publishes pseudoscience news, such as Supernormal Abilities Developed Through Meditation: Dr. Dean Radin Discusses. They also publish false claims from Pseudoscience and anti-vaccination activist Joeseph Mercola who has a long track record of publishing misinformation. Finally, the above referenced NBC News report states, “In addition to claims that alien abductions are real and the “deep state engineered the drug epidemic,” the channel pushes the QAnon conspiracy theory, which falsely posits that the same “Spygate” cabal is a front for a global pedophile ring being taken down by Trump.”

 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-epoch-times/

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted

No, DNA fragments in COVID-19 vaccines aren't linked to 'major safety concerns' | Fact check

March 29, 2024

 

"There is no evidence DNA fragments in COVID-19 vaccines pose any risk, according to the Food and Drug Administration and multiple medical experts. Such fragments are often found in vaccines for viruses. Experts say the leftover material does not cause cancer, lacks a way to get into a cell’s nucleus to change it and is found in too small of a quantity to alter a cell's DNA."

...

Experts say fear of DNA integration defies science

DNA fragments are found in many viral vaccines as an active ingredient or the byproducts of the manufacturing process, according to Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Viruses are usually grown in cells, and some fragments can make their way through filtration processes into the finished vaccine.

...

"With over a billion doses of the mRNA vaccines administered, no safety concerns related to residual DNA have been identified," Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, wrote in the letter. "Studies have been conducted in animals using the modified mRNA and lipid nanoparticle together that constitute the vaccine, including the minute quantities of residual DNA fragments left over after DNAse treatment during manufacturing, and demonstrate no evidence for genotoxicity from the vaccine.”

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/03/29/covid-19-vaccines-dna-fragments-harmless/73134331007/

  • Thanks 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

No, the COVID-19 vaccines don’t contain ‘monkey virus DNA’

June 21, 2023

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/jun/21/facebook-posts/no-the-covid-19-vaccines-dont-contain-monkey-virus/

 

2 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

No, DNA fragments in COVID-19 vaccines aren't linked to 'major safety concerns' | Fact check

March 29, 2024

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/03/29/covid-19-vaccines-dna-fragments-harmless/73134331007/

 

Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed.

 

> Now stop trolling, if all you can come up with are 2 year old Poltifact and 1 year old UsaToday articles, to 'debunk'  what official  HealthCanada is now stating.

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

 

Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed.

 

> Now stop trolling, if all you can come up with are 2 year old Poltifact and 1 year old UsaToday articles, to 'debunk'  what official  HealthCanada is now stating.

 

 

You're just recycling long-debunked anti-vax nonsense:

 

As per the USA Today fact check report above:

 

"There is no evidence DNA fragments in COVID-19 vaccines pose any risk, according to the Food and Drug Administration and multiple medical experts. Such fragments are often found in vaccines for viruses. Experts say the leftover material does not cause cancer, lacks a way to get into a cell’s nucleus to change it and is found in too small of a quantity to alter a cell's DNA." [emphasis added]

...

Experts say fear of DNA integration defies science

DNA fragments are found in many viral vaccines as an active ingredient or the byproducts of the manufacturing process, according to Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia."

 

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/03/29/covid-19-vaccines-dna-fragments-harmless/73134331007/

 

Posted

No evidence that DNA sequence used in Pfizer shot leads to cancer and other health issues

November 21, 2023

 

CLAIM: Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains a DNA sequence called Simian Virus 40 that can cause health problems, including cancer.

 

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. No evidence has been found to suggest DNA fragments used in the development of the coronavirus vaccine -- such as a portion of SV40’s DNA sequence -- are causing health problems in people who have received the COVID-19 vaccine.

 

THE FACTS: A congressional hearing has revived baseless claims that coronavirus vaccines contain dangerous levels of monkey virus DNA.

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccine-pfizer-sv40-dna-853343189368

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Health Canada statement on DNA in COVID-19 vaccines misrepresented online

Nov 24, 2023

 

"People on social media are using a screenshot from an article to claim Health Canada concluded that a cancer-causing virus "gene sequence" from simian virus 40 (SV40) exists in Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines. This is misleading. The public health agency says the vaccine does not contain SV40 virus, but instead an inactive fragment of that virus DNA, known as SV40 promoter enhancer, that is not harmful to humans."

...

Health Canada spokeswoman Anna Maddison said SV40 was not found in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. However, residual DNA fragments of the SV40 promoter enhancer sequence, which is used during the manufacturing process of the vaccine, was found.

...

"The presence of the SV40 promoter enhancer sequence is not the same as the presence of the whole virus itself."

 

https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/fact_checking/health-canada-statement-on-dna-in-covid-19-vaccines-misrepresented-online/article_c0bd8391-4ca6-54bf-905a-e0c105f666f3.html

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Looks like the pro-vaxxers are doomed then? They will obviously mutate - just like a virus - and terrorise the anti-vaxxers. But the anties will stand strong,

 

But in the end, it will be victory for the original humans. Then the anties will be sitting pretty.

 

The sad reality is that anyone who tells you they know the definitive long term answer is lying to you.  It hasn't been long term yet.  We won't know the long term effects for years, decades and maybe generations.

 

In the meantime, what we do know is being hidden from us under the guise of "media fact checkers" who are no more credible than the media they're checking.

 

I got to see a life sized dose of that when I went to the ER after my 2nd Pfizer and the doctors told me they don't know what caused my symptoms the day after, but it definitely wasn't the Pfizer.  Over 2 years later, I went to the ER again for lingering symptoms that wax and wane, and the nurses and one doctor told me that they've been getting a lot of reports of my symptoms post Pfizer.  But it was in hushed tones when nobody else was in the room.

 

Selfishly, the more people that suffer the symptoms I've lived with for almost 4 years, the more they'll spend on finding solutions for us.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

5 Reasons We Know The COVID-19 Vaccines Don't Have Long-Term Health Effects

Posted on February 1, 2022 by Henry Ford Health Staff

 

"...a perpetual worry that’s fueling vaccine hesitancy is the question of long-term health effects. “The only long-term effect of the COVID-19 vaccines is survival,” says Dr. Cunningham. “There are no adverse long-term effects to worry about. Contracting COVID-19, however, can leave you with lingering health problems.” 

 

Here he shares five reasons we know the COVID-19 vaccines won’t cause long-term health effects. 

1. History has showed us that with vaccines, adverse effects occur within eight weeks of vaccination—not years later. “These COVID-19 vaccines have been given to hundreds of millions of people for more than a year, so we know they are extremely safe,” says Dr. Cunningham. “You are much, much more likely to be hospitalized from COVID-19 than you are to have an adverse reaction from the vaccines.”  ...

 

4. As opposed to other types of treatments and medications that are taken regularly, vaccines can’t cause a surprise reaction years down the road. Medications that are used to manage chronic conditions are monitored by the FDA for long-term effects for years. They are completely different from vaccines, which don’t significantly or permanently alter biologic functions—nor are they used routinely.

 

https://www.henryford.com/blog/2022/02/5-reasons-we-know-the-covid-vaccines-dont-have-longterm-effects

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, impulse said:

 

The sad reality is that anyone who tells you they know the definitive long term answer is lying to you.  It hasn't been long term yet.  We won't know the long term effects for years, decades and maybe generations.

 

In the meantime, what we do know is being hidden from us under the guise of "media fact checkers" who are no more credible than the media they're checking.

 

I got to see a life sized dose of that when I went to the ER after my 2nd Pfizer and the doctors told me they don't know what caused my symptoms the day after, but it definitely wasn't the Pfizer.  Over 2 years later, I went to the ER again for lingering symptoms that wax and wane, and the nurses and one doctor told me that they've been getting a lot of reports of my symptoms post Pfizer.  But it was in hushed tones when nobody else was in the room.

 

Selfishly, the more people that suffer the symptoms I've lived with for almost 4 years, the more they'll spend on finding solutions for us.

 

It's sad to hear of bad effects due to the jabs. And you are on the money regarding the 'shushy-shushy' mode of the medical people,

 

We - the human race  - is at a cross road. Do we move forward and reap the rewards of tech, medical innovation and AI convenience. Is it progress? Does it all make us happyier?

 

 IMO. we would be better off is we could accept that we are a integral part of nature, It is there for us. It is not there to harm us.

 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

5 Reasons We Know The COVID-19 Vaccines Don't Have Long-Term Health Effects

Posted on February 1, 2022 by Henry Ford Health Staff

 

"...a perpetual worry that’s fueling vaccine hesitancy is the question of long-term health effects. “The only long-term effect of the COVID-19 vaccines is survival,” says Dr. Cunningham. “There are no adverse long-term effects to worry about. Contracting COVID-19, however, can leave you with lingering health problems.” 

 

Here he shares five reasons we know the COVID-19 vaccines won’t cause long-term health effects. 

1. History has showed us that with vaccines, adverse effects occur within eight weeks of vaccination—not years later. “These COVID-19 vaccines have been given to hundreds of millions of people for more than a year, so we know they are extremely safe,” says Dr. Cunningham. “You are much, much more likely to be hospitalized from COVID-19 than you are to have an adverse reaction from the vaccines.”  ...

 

4. As opposed to other types of treatments and medications that are taken regularly, vaccines can’t cause a surprise reaction years down the road. Medications that are used to manage chronic conditions are monitored by the FDA for long-term effects for years. They are completely different from vaccines, which don’t significantly or permanently alter biologic functions—nor are they used routinely.

 

https://www.henryford.com/blog/2022/02/5-reasons-we-know-the-covid-vaccines-dont-have-longterm-effects

 

 

 

 

1 year is long term ? Hmmm.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

You're just recycling long-debunked anti-vax nonsense:

 

As per the USA Today fact check report above:

 

"There is no evidence DNA fragments in COVID-19 vaccines pose any risk, according to the Food and Drug Administration and multiple medical experts. Such fragments are often found in vaccines for viruses. Experts say the leftover material does not cause cancer, lacks a way to get into a cell’s nucleus to change it and is found in too small of a quantity to alter a cell's DNA." [emphasis added]

...

Experts say fear of DNA integration defies science

DNA fragments are found in many viral vaccines as an active ingredient or the byproducts of the manufacturing process, according to Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia."

 

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2024/03/29/covid-19-vaccines-dna-fragments-harmless/73134331007/

 

 

image.png.32dcc03c982c8372e6bed8a998bdc9bd.png

> Pathetic, a 1-year old newspaper article to 'debunk' the recent official HealthCanada statement

 

Posted
9 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

No evidence that DNA sequence used in Pfizer shot leads to cancer and other health issues

November 21, 2023

 

CLAIM: Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine contains a DNA sequence called Simian Virus 40 that can cause health problems, including cancer.

 

AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. No evidence has been found to suggest DNA fragments used in the development of the coronavirus vaccine -- such as a portion of SV40’s DNA sequence -- are causing health problems in people who have received the COVID-19 vaccine.

 

THE FACTS: A congressional hearing has revived baseless claims that coronavirus vaccines contain dangerous levels of monkey virus DNA.

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-covid-vaccine-pfizer-sv40-dna-853343189368

 

image.png.e9afe49c170a3c54b4589a6433cfd163.png

> Scraping the barrel?  A +1-year old article to 'debunk' the recent official HealthCanada statement

Posted
8 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Here he shares five reasons we know the COVID-19 vaccines won’t cause long-term health effects. 

1. History has showed us that with vaccines, adverse effects occur within eight weeks of vaccination—not years later. “These COVID-19 vaccines have been given to hundreds of millions of people for more than a year, so we know they are extremely safe,” says Dr. Cunningham. “You are much, much more likely to be hospitalized from COVID-19 than you are to have an adverse reaction from the vaccines.”  ..

 

But mRNA's aren't traditional vaccines.  Their intended mechanism isn't the same as a traditional vaccine. 

 

We're in uncharted territory.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

5 Reasons We Know The COVID-19 Vaccines Don't Have Long-Term Health Effects

Posted on February 1, 2022 by Henry Ford Health Staff

 

We are 2025.  Posting articles +3 years old to 'debunk' recent developments is not helpful to debate the issue, but we all know you are only posting this tsunami of scientific-sounding denial garbage, to derail the topic.  

Try to stick to the issue > Official regulator HealthCanada statement that confirms that Pfizer did not disclose the presence of this SV40 DNA sequence to them, which they are legally obliged to do.  The juridicial consequences of this are quite interesting, as it could be considered fraud with Pfizer losing its indemnity for any claims of vaccine-harm. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

 

Note that the topic as covered in the posted Epoch Times article has been addressed in this longer but very worthwhile piece by dr Byram W. Brydle on his substack providing some background on the significance and implications of that SV40 sequence.

 
In that article Brydle also addresses the potential juridicial consequences of Pfizer not having disclosed the presence of this SV40 DNA sequence to the HealthCanada regulator. 
An excerpt: 
> Notably, Pfizer has been granted legal indemnity for their shots; something which in and of itself should be a major concern. However, an important court ruling was recently made in Michigan, USA. Specifically, the court ruled that a pharmaceutical company’s legal indemnity was null and void for a contaminated version of the medical product. The product, but not any contaminants are subject to the legal indemnity. And failing to disclose a bioactive component would seem to go one step further. You can read an article about the legal issue herehttps://wwmt.com/news/local/michigan-judge-denies-drug-manufacturers-immunity-in-case-of-contaminated-covid-19-medication ]

So, it would follow that Pfizer’s legal indemnity should be null and void for shots that contaminated with bacterial DNA that included a bioactive sequence that was not disclosed to regulatory agencies.

= = =
Posted
9 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

It's sad to hear of bad effects due to the jabs. And you are on the money regarding the 'shushy-shushy' mode of the medical people,

 

We - the human race  - is at a cross road. Do we move forward and reap the rewards of tech, medical innovation and AI convenience. Is it progress? Does it all make us happyier?

 

 IMO. we would be better off is we could accept that we are a integral part of nature, It is there for us. It is not there to harm us.

 

 

 

Nature is pragmatic, it doesn't raise one species over another, one could say it's a very effective adjustment mechanism, one species fails another rises to take its place. What we call evolution is in fact just an adjustment to the prevailing environment at the time, there is nothing special about Homo Sapiens.

Posted
28 minutes ago, cdemundo said:

The question no one wants to address:

Is the sky falling?

Not for all those that experienced (or will experience) adverse effects after having first been coerced/manipulated into taking an experimental gen-therapy shot to 'protect their health', and then being gaslighted about these '100% safe and effective' shots.

Posted

Clearest sign all of the OP's posts above are just another episode of his unrelenting tidal wave of anti-vax nonsense.

 

Look at the subject topic in the OP, and then try to find any credible major news media outlet reporting the Epoch Times latest claims. The answer you'll find is NONE!

 

Meanwhile, a layman's version below of why all the OP's claims are recycled anti-vax scaremongering nonsense:

 

 

 

https://youtu.be/nGOEc_9WFcw

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

And on the Canada front... here's what Health Canada actually has to say:

 

Screenshot_3.thumb.jpg.3557144cfb6d309310839193327c5757.jpg

 

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/drugs-vaccines-treatments/vaccines/pfizer-biontech.html

 

AND

 

 

Pfizer Canada and BioNTech Receive Health Canada Approval of Omicron KP.2 Variant Adapted COVID-19 Vaccine

24/09/24

 

KIRKLAND, QC, September 24, 2024 - Pfizer Canada ULC and BioNTech SE (Nasdaq: BNTX, “BioNTech”) announced today that Health Canada has authorized the KP.2 variant adapted COMIRNATY® COVID-19 vaccine for ages 6 months and older. The updated COMIRNATY® vaccine targets the Omicron KP.2 variant, one of the most recently circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages. {emphasis added]
 

https://www.pfizer.ca/en/media-centre/pfizer-canada-and-biontech-receive-health-canada-approval-of-omicron-kp2-variant-adapted-covid-19-vaccine

 

 

Posted
17 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

And on the Canada front... here's what Health Canada actually has to say:

 

Screenshot_3.thumb.jpg.3557144cfb6d309310839193327c5757.jpg

 

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/covid19-industry/drugs-vaccines-treatments/vaccines/pfizer-biontech.html

 

AND

 

 

Pfizer Canada and BioNTech Receive Health Canada Approval of Omicron KP.2 Variant Adapted COVID-19 Vaccine

24/09/24

 

KIRKLAND, QC, September 24, 2024 - Pfizer Canada ULC and BioNTech SE (Nasdaq: BNTX, “BioNTech”) announced today that Health Canada has authorized the KP.2 variant adapted COMIRNATY® COVID-19 vaccine for ages 6 months and older. The updated COMIRNATY® vaccine targets the Omicron KP.2 variant, one of the most recently circulating SARS-CoV-2 lineages. {emphasis added]
 

https://www.pfizer.ca/en/media-centre/pfizer-canada-and-biontech-receive-health-canada-approval-of-omicron-kp2-variant-adapted-covid-19-vaccine

 

Yes, that was their previous September 2024 stance. 

However, my post is about the official Health Canada regulator's statement last week in an e-mail to the Epoch Times confirming the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed.

This is an evolving story and it's tiring having to constantly remind you of actually reading what the article states and not responding by posting old rebuttals that do not keep up with developments re the issue.  

 

Note that the topic as covered in the posted Epoch Times article has been addressed in this longer but very worthwhile piece by dr Byram W. Brydle on his substack providing some background on the significance and implications of that SV40 sequence.

Posted

Brydle, another serial COVID and vaccines misinformer out of your reliable stable of such sources who have long records of failed COVID fact checks and often can do no better than self publish their own nonsense on Substack, because no credible outlet is going to use them as a source:

 

"Dr. Byram Bridle is an associate professor at the Ontario Veterinary College at the University of Guelph, in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Bridle is not a medical doctor, nor is he a veterinarian. Dr. Bridle holds a PhD in immunology; he is a bench scientist, who conducts research on animals.

 

According to court filings, Dr. Bridle has never treated a (human) infectious disease, he has never performed a (human) childhood vaccination, nor has he ever treated a (human) adverse reaction to a vaccine.

 

Bridle's claims were have been rebutted by peers, fellow scientists, and media watchdogs, and have been rejected in court. ... More than 80 of Dr. Bridle's colleagues at the University of Guelph signed a letter denouncing Bridle's ideas as misinformation."

 

https://byrambridle.com/

 

 

Per Reuters:

Fact Check: No evidence spike proteins from COVID-19 vaccines are toxic

June 15, 2021

 

...

The claim was made by immunologist Byram Bridle (here) in an interview on May 28 (here) with Canadian broadcaster Alex Pierson (here and here).

...

The studies Bridle cited as proof of toxicity do not support his claims.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/no-evidence-spike-proteins-from-covid-19-vaccines-are-toxic-idUSL2N2NX1J6/

 

 

Per Agence France-Presse:

Immunologist’s misinterpretation of data fuels misleading Covid-19 vaccine claims

Updated on June 30, 2021

 

Social media users are sharing a radio interview in which a Canadian immunologist claims that widely used Covid-19 vaccines are dangerous. But a pharmaceutical company document and Harvard study presented by the professor as evidence have been misinterpreted, and experts said the jabs are working safely and effectively as intended.
 

“The story I’m about to tell is a bit of a scary one. This is cutting-edge science,” says Byram Bridle, an associate professor at the University of Guelph, in a May 27, 2021 radio interview on Global News 980 CFPL.

 

https://factcheck.afp.com/immunologists-misinterpretation-data-fuels-misleading-covid-19-vaccine-claims

 

 

Per FactCheck.org

COVID-19 Vaccine-Generated Spike Protein is Safe, Contrary to Viral Claims

Posted on July 1, 2021

 

"Hundreds of millions of COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered safely in the United States in the last six months. There is no evidence to indicate that the spike proteins generated by human cells following vaccination are a toxin or that they circulate in the body and damage tissues, contrary to what a Canadian virus immunologist recently claimed. 

 

...

But researchers and health officials told FactCheck.org there is no “mistake” and that there is no evidence to support Bridle’s claims. 

 

There is no evidence that the spike protein in vaccines “is toxic or that it lingers at any toxic level in the body after vaccination,” an FDA spokesperson told us in an email.

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-covid-19-vaccine-generated-spike-protein-is-safe-contrary-to-viral-claims/

 

------------------------------------

 

Bridle is also listed as a scientific advisory committee member of a notorious Canadian anti-vax and misinformation group called Canadian COVID Care Alliance:

 

https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/about-us/

 

Re CCCA, from Agence France-Presse:

Video repeats false claims about safety of Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine

Updated on January 19, 2022

 

A video produced by a group claiming to represent Canadian doctors and health care professionals alleges that the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine is dangerous. But the video repeats several previously debunked assertions about the safety of the shot, experts say the benefits outweigh the risks of rare side effects, and the Canadian government recommends it to prevent hospitalization and death.

 

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.9VJ3DA

 

 

And although the above fact checks are older, the link below shows that Bridle is still promoting COVID misinfo and associating with a raft of other well-known COVID misinfo purveyors at a 2024 event hosted by a local branch of Canada's United Conservative Party (UCP).

 

UCP removes COVID-19 vaccine child-death references, takes over ticket sales to controversial event

Published: May 16, 2024 at 2:10PM EDT

Screenshot_4.jpg.a8b8650e3ddd4b1396ee756d15695708.jpg

 

"According to what CTV News has found, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario confirmed Speicher is not a medical doctor, Payne filed a lawsuit against AHS over mandatory vaccination, Makis' licence with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta was cancelled in 2019, Shoemaker was suspended by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario in 2023, Rose is an "independent researcher"

 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/calgary/article/ucp-removes-covid-19-vaccine-child-death-references-takes-over-ticket-sales-to-controversial-event/

 

For Brydle, of course:

 

"More than 80 of Dr. Bridle's colleagues at the University of Guelph signed a letter denouncing Bridle's ideas as misinformation."

 

Screenshot_5.jpg.9eb7422cabfc5996e6d93fc184d05920.jpg

 

Screenshot_6.jpg.88ebff8aeaaf9aa476b21727a4d769b6.jpg

 

https://www.wormsandgermsblog.com/files/2021/07/20210709-VaccineSafety_UoGuelph.pdf

 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

Brydle, another serial COVID and vaccines misinformer out of your reliable stable of such sources who have long records of failed COVID fact checks and often can do no better than self publish their own nonsense on Substack, because no credible outlet is going to use them as a source:

 

"Dr. Byram Bridle is an associate professor at the Ontario Veterinary College at the University of Guelph, in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Bridle is not a medical doctor, nor is he a veterinarian. Dr. Bridle holds a PhD in immunology; he is a bench scientist, who conducts research on animals.

 

According to court filings, Dr. Bridle has never treated a (human) infectious disease, he has never performed a (human) childhood vaccination, nor has he ever treated a (human) adverse reaction to a vaccine.

 

Bridle's claims were have been rebutted by peers, fellow scientists, and media watchdogs, and have been rejected in court. ... More than 80 of Dr. Bridle's colleagues at the University of Guelph signed a letter denouncing Bridle's ideas as misinformation."

 

https://byrambridle.com/

 

 

Per Reuters:

Fact Check: No evidence spike proteins from COVID-19 vaccines are toxic

June 15, 2021

 

...

The claim was made by immunologist Byram Bridle (here) in an interview on May 28 (here) with Canadian broadcaster Alex Pierson (here and here).

...

The studies Bridle cited as proof of toxicity do not support his claims.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/no-evidence-spike-proteins-from-covid-19-vaccines-are-toxic-idUSL2N2NX1J6/

 

 

Per Agence France-Presse:

Immunologist’s misinterpretation of data fuels misleading Covid-19 vaccine claims

Updated on June 30, 2021

 

Social media users are sharing a radio interview in which a Canadian immunologist claims that widely used Covid-19 vaccines are dangerous. But a pharmaceutical company document and Harvard study presented by the professor as evidence have been misinterpreted, and experts said the jabs are working safely and effectively as intended.
 

“The story I’m about to tell is a bit of a scary one. This is cutting-edge science,” says Byram Bridle, an associate professor at the University of Guelph, in a May 27, 2021 radio interview on Global News 980 CFPL.

 

https://factcheck.afp.com/immunologists-misinterpretation-data-fuels-misleading-covid-19-vaccine-claims

 

 

Per FactCheck.org

COVID-19 Vaccine-Generated Spike Protein is Safe, Contrary to Viral Claims

Posted on July 1, 2021

 

"Hundreds of millions of COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered safely in the United States in the last six months. There is no evidence to indicate that the spike proteins generated by human cells following vaccination are a toxin or that they circulate in the body and damage tissues, contrary to what a Canadian virus immunologist recently claimed. 

 

...

But researchers and health officials told FactCheck.org there is no “mistake” and that there is no evidence to support Bridle’s claims. 

 

There is no evidence that the spike protein in vaccines “is toxic or that it lingers at any toxic level in the body after vaccination,” an FDA spokesperson told us in an email.

 

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/scicheck-covid-19-vaccine-generated-spike-protein-is-safe-contrary-to-viral-claims/

 

He's also listed as a scientific advisory committee member of a notorious Canadian anti-vax and misinformation group called Canadian COVID Care Alliance:

 

https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/about-us/

 

Re CCCA, from Agence France-Presse:

 

Video repeats false claims about safety of Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine

Updated on January 19, 2022

 

A video produced by a group claiming to represent Canadian doctors and health care professionals alleges that the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine is dangerous. But the video repeats several previously debunked assertions about the safety of the shot, experts say the benefits outweigh the risks of rare side effects, and the Canadian government recommends it to prevent hospitalization and death.

 

https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.9VJ3DA

 

And although the above fact checks are older, the link below shows that Bridle is still promoting COVID misinfo and associating with a raft of other well-known COVID misinfo purveyors at a 2024 event hosted by a local branch of Canada's United Conservative Party (UCP).

 

UCP removes COVID-19 vaccine child-death references, takes over ticket sales to controversial event

Published: May 16, 2024 at 2:10PM EDT

Screenshot_4.jpg.a8b8650e3ddd4b1396ee756d15695708.jpg

 

"According to what CTV News has found, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario confirmed Speicher is not a medical doctor, Payne filed a lawsuit against AHS over mandatory vaccination, Makis' licence with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta was cancelled in 2019, Shoemaker was suspended by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario in 2023, Rose is an "independent researcher"

 

https://www.ctvnews.ca/calgary/article/ucp-removes-covid-19-vaccine-child-death-references-takes-over-ticket-sales-to-controversial-event/

 

 

Recycling the 2, 3 and 4 year old ad-hominem trash from your FactCheck archive? 

A desperate last resort in trying to counter the irrefutable evidence that the Covid-19 response was a disaster, and that specifically the Covid-19 gen therapies (the experimental jabs) were neither safe nor effective, and even more important > not necessary. 

 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...