Lords Committee Criticizes 'Rushed' and 'Unclear' Grey Belt Housing Policy

[Social Media]

 

A report from a House of Lords committee has raised concerns that the government's approach to meeting housebuilding targets through development on so-called grey belt land is "rushed" and "not properly thought through." The committee found it unclear whether crucial factors such as environmental impact and access to essential infrastructure like public transport, schools, and parks were adequately considered.

 

The House of Lords cross-party Built Environment Committee concluded that the grey belt policy is unlikely to lead to a significant increase in the number of new homes being built. The government has proposed developing on areas described as the grey belt, which includes unattractive sections of the green belt, disused car parks, and former petrol stations, as a means to reach its target of constructing 1.5 million homes by the end of the current parliamentary term in 2029.

 

This strategy was seen as a method to ease construction restrictions in the green belt, a designated buffer zone of natural and agricultural land that separates urban areas. By identifying certain locations within the green belt as suitable for development, the government hoped to balance the need for new housing with environmental preservation. However, the Lords committee expressed concerns that the government "appears to lack a sufficient understanding of the implications of introducing multiple intersecting planning policies at the same time."

 

This lack of coherence, the report warned, undermines the government’s ability to successfully implement any of its housing policies. Furthermore, the committee criticized the absence of a clear framework to assess the policy’s impact.

 

"The government also does not seem to have any plan to measure progress or determine the success of this policy," said Lord Daniel Moylan, chair of the Built Environment Committee. "Effective policy must be evidence-based and be able to demonstrate its efficacy. Sadly, this is not the case here."

As housebuilding is a central pillar of the government’s strategy to drive economic growth, the grey belt initiative was expected to play a key role.

 

However, Lord Moylan described its implementation as "somewhat rushed and incoherent," adding to broader concerns about whether the policy will effectively address the UK’s housing crisis.

 

Based on a report by Sky News 2025-02-07

 

 

[JonnyF]

Rushed, ill thought out and doomed to failure.

 

Sums up Labour really. 

 

Good to see Rayner managed to stop smoking for a minute for the photo shoot. That flourescant jacket looks better than the usual shell suit as well.

[Chomper Higgot]

The House of Lords, full of generational landowners, much of it been in the possession of lords since the Norman conquest.

 

Of course they don’t like ordinary art folk getting land to have a home on.

[Bkk Brian]

5 hours ago, Social Media said:

The committee found it unclear whether crucial factors such as environmental impact and access to essential infrastructure like public transport, schools, and parks were adequately considered.

ooops, always helps if there is actual infrastructure in place, especially schools.

[JonnyF]

13 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Of course they don’t like ordinary art folk getting land to have a home on.

 

Has Banksy reserved a house?

[JonnyF]

6 hours ago, Social Media said:

The committee found it unclear whether crucial factors such as environmental impact and access to essential infrastructure like public transport, schools, and parks were adequately considered.

 

 

I bet they didn't forget the Mosques.