A golden age is upon us: Trump brings back liberals from the dead

[SunnyinBangrak]

51 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

Online IQ test scores are worth less than last week's losing lottery ticket. Everybody's a genius on the internet.

 

Unless one takes an IQ test under controlled and monitored conditions, the score is meaningless and a false ego salve for the forlorn, like the subject in question.

 

Mensa offers such controlled tests. I had to take a controlled and monitored test before joining the agency.  I know my score, though I admit that I am probably skilled at taking such tests, because I have no major discoveries nor patents to go along with my score.

 

In online tests, I can come away with an IQ of 200. That is fanciful (or marketing by a company who wants to flatter in order to sell a service). Adjust your score accordingly.

 

From writing style and 'logic', or lack thereof, I would estimate the average MAGA on this site is around 85. Not a one is the brightest bulb. Doubt too many are Ivy or OxBridge.

300 surely

[tomazbodner]

4 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

Nice cherry pick. You would be a good fruit picker.

I thought that was your job

[Harrisfan]

1 minute ago, tomazbodner said:

I thought that was your job

No, I'm smart.

[tomazbodner]

1 minute ago, Harrisfan said:

No, I'm smart.

Totally. The more you know, the more you realise you know nothing.

You're at the beginning of that journey, haven't figured that out yet.

[Harrisfan]

Just now, tomazbodner said:

Totally. The more you know, the more you realise you know nothing.

You're at the beginning of that journey, haven't figured that out yet.

Nice useless cliche.

[tomazbodner]

Just now, Harrisfan said:

Nice useless cliche.

As useless as majority of your posts, Sir

[Harrisfan]

1 minute ago, tomazbodner said:

As useless as majority of your posts, Sir

I won a condo and a motorbike betting on the US election sir.

 

Why would I care about the opinions of people on the internet?

 

The rants on here are great comedy and nothing more.

[bubblegum]

So why is Harrisfan still on this forum? Under all his other names you (AN) blocked him.

[Purdey]

Why does every discussion end in name calling on AN?

[tomazbodner]

3 hours ago, Harrisfan said:

I won a condo and a motorbike betting on the US election sir.

 

Why would I care about the opinions of people on the internet?

 

The rants on here are great comedy and nothing more.

I am happy for you. Enjoy!

[Walker88]

11 hours ago, FriscoKid said:

 

He has a few more user accounts than that which have already been banned as well. Other members have mentioned that he is wheelchair-bound in Australia, angry at the world, living off government disability checks, and constantly on a tight budget. He is known for bargain hunting, having practically no friends or interests, and spends almost all of his waking time attempting to troll and hijack nearly every forum topic while making over 200 posts per day. It is a very sad existence.

I always assumed he was immobile, maybe institutionalized. My image of him was a Stephen Hawking without the brains.

[blaze master]

13 hours ago, hotsun said:

Speaking of which, youve been consistently wrong about everything. I dont think youve ever been correct about a single thing youve ever posted here

 

So ? 

 

He comes from old money and has a family crest.

[Cryingdick]

It makes sense if Trump brought them back from the dead they would be zombies. They wander around the political wilderness like that. I didn't know Trump had the powers of Jesus and could resurrect people. Maybe the dems should call themselves the party of Lazurus? Frankensteinians? 

[MicroB]

20 hours ago, placeholder said:

For those of you who may not be aware of what test Harrisfan is referring to, it's an online IQ test which Harrisfan claims gave him an IQ ranging between 127 to 143. It seems bizarre that someone claiming to have a high IQ would believe that such a claim coming from an anonymous person should have valid evidentiary value.

 

 

Aren't these online tests usually scams; they are designed to flatter, and are designed to elicit information that allows identity theft, or to sign you up to telephonic services

 

 

 

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/AheadoftheCurve/story?id=7814344&page=1

https://www.stuff.co.nz/waikato-times/news/2595541/Online-IQ-test-a-fundraiser-for-internet-scammers

 

[Harrisfan]

17 minutes ago, MicroB said:

 

Aren't these online tests usually scams; they are designed to flatter, and are designed to elicit information that allows identity theft, or to sign you up to telephonic services

 

 

 

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/AheadoftheCurve/story?id=7814344&page=1

https://www.stuff.co.nz/waikato-times/news/2595541/Online-IQ-test-a-fundraiser-for-internet-scammers

 

I did 4. No scams.

[placeholder]

On 2/27/2025 at 10:33 AM, BritManToo said:

Person with high IQ (me) says all polls only show what the polling organisation was paid for them to show, and are therefore worthless.

Well, Canada just had a real election in Ontario. Conservatives won a record victory. Doug Ford, the premier of the province, has been exceptionally hostile to Trump's plans for Canada. He even threatened to cut off Canadian electric power to the US. Is that real enough for you?

[BritManToo]

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

Well, Canada just had a real election in Ontario. Conservatives won a record victory. Doug Ford, the premier of the province, has been exceptionally hostile to Trump's plans for Canada. He even threatened to cut off Canadian electric power to the US. Is that real enough for you?

Countries should make their own essentials, not rely on someone else.

Food, water, energy, weapons, transport, population.

[placeholder]

2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Countries should make their own essentials, not rely on someone else.

Food, water, energy, weapons, transport, population.

American, for one, doesn't have the engineering talent to do that. But if it had a lot more engineers, would it possess all the natural resources that it needs? Maybe you support American aggression to acquire new territory?

[BritManToo]

3 minutes ago, placeholder said:

American, for one, doesn't have the engineering talent to do that. But if it had a lot more engineers, would it possess all the natural resources that it needs? Maybe you support American aggression to acquire new territory?

When you allow another country to control you essentials, your become their servant.

 

NATO, EU, WHO all prime examples, nothing to do with aggression.

[Harrisfan]

7 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Countries should make their own essentials, not rely on someone else.

Food, water, energy, weapons, transport, population.

Lefties want 1 country worldwide

[placeholder]

6 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

When you allow another country to control you essentials, your become their servant.

 

NATO, EU, WHO all prime examples, nothing to do with aggression.

So, tell me, where's the UK going to get its gadolinium from? Or a lot of the other metals and minerals necessary to the modern economy? Or are you thinking it would be feasible for the UK to revert to the economy of a 100 years ago? Although I doubt that even then it produced everything it needed.

[BritManToo]

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

So, tell me, where's the UK going to get its gadolinium from? Or a lot of the other metals and minerals necessary to the modern economy? Or are you thinking it would be feasible for the UK to revert to the economy of a 100 years ago? Although I doubt that even then it produced everything it needed.

I did say essentials, and the UK has plenty of coal, oil and iron.

Green energy is not an essential, it's mostly designed to put control of our countries under the new world order.

 

MRIs are not essential to life, let the weak die as nature intended.

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

I did say essentials, and the UK has plenty of coal, oil and iron.

Green energy is not an essential, it's lefty bs, mostly designed to put control of our countries under the new world order.

Even 100 years ago, coal, oil, and iron were the only essentials? It was only with the so called new world order, that Britain became dependent on foreign goods? Do you have a clue about British history?

 

[BritManToo]

2 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Even 100 years ago, coal, oil, and iron were the only essentials? It was only with the so called new world order, that Britain became dependent on foreign goods? Do you have a clue about British history?

 

Do you have a clue about anything?

From most of your posts it appears not.

[Harrisfan]

1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

Do you have a clue about anything?

From most of your posts it appears not.

Lefty that's why. They live in bubbles.

[bubblegum]

6 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Do you have a clue about anything?

From most of your posts it appears not.

Actually your posts seem a bit clue less.

[placeholder]

7 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Do you have a clue about anything?

From most of your posts it appears not.

And that settles it. You can't offer a relevant reply so you come up with this kind of generalization instead.

[mrwebb8825]

On 2/26/2025 at 11:01 PM, Walker88 said:

He's just the latest iteration of the shut-in who has gone by such names as Sparktrader, Bignok, susanlea, uttradit, etc.

 

2200 post in 20 days. Oh my!

Psssstttt, you need to change your location. 😁

[Harrisfan]

On 3/2/2025 at 11:07 AM, bubblegum said:

Actually your posts seem a bit clue less.

Irony

[frank83628]