newbee2022 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: I don’t think there is any suggestion of ‘war crimes’, rather unlawful use of lethal force/unlawful killing. There was no declaration of war and civil law was in force at the time of the killings. Why then there have been killings if there was no war? Makes no sense. And if these killings indeed happened in their daily job...then it's murder.❗ Let the court decide. 2
johng Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 15 minutes ago, transam said: Oh, and where do you come from........? oh I come from a land down under you better run you better take cover ! no not really, I already told you were I come from in another tread about "the war" the country that built Lancaster Bombers. 2
newbee2022 Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said: War crimes? Are you on a controlled substance because it seems as if you are. Are you blindfolded? 1
Chomper Higgot Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago Just now, newbee2022 said: Why then there have been killings if there was no war? Makes no sense. And if these killings indeed happened in their daily job...then it's murder.❗ Let the court decide. Yes, let the court decide. 1
Popular Post transam Posted 20 hours ago Popular Post Posted 20 hours ago 7 minutes ago, johng said: oh I come from a land down under you better run you better take cover ! no not really, I already told you were I come from in another tread about "the war" the country that built Lancaster Bombers. Then perhaps you should refrain from putting the boot in regarding UK special forces...🤔 1 1 2
johng Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 8 minutes ago, transam said: Then perhaps you should refrain from putting the boot in regarding UK special forces...🤔 Not at all, Just because I come from that country doesn't mean I have to agree with everything the "special forces" do , I can agree with some of what they do and be uncomfortable with some of the things they do and be totally against some of the things they do and at the same time acknowledging the "special forces" are "only following orders" and face severe punishment for disobedience. 1
transam Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 1 minute ago, johng said: Not at all, Just because I come from that country doesn't mean I have to agree with everything the "special forces" do , I can agree with some of what they do and be uncomfortable with some of the things they do and be totally against some of the things they do and at the same time acknowledging the "special forces" are "only following orders" and face severe punishment for disobedience. In other words, you know nothing but like to scrutinise a service that is basically secret........ 1 1 1 1
Chomper Higgot Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 21 minutes ago, johng said: oh I come from a land down under you better run you better take cover ! no not really, I already told you were I come from in another tread about "the war" the country that built Lancaster Bombers. That particular Lancaster Bomber ( The Mynarski Memorial Lancaster) is at the Canadian War Planes Heritage Museum in Canada. A nation that built Lancaster Bombers under license. https://www.warplane.com/lady-orchid.aspx 1
transam Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: That particular Lancaster Bomber ( The Mynarski Memorial Lancaster) is at the Canadian War Planes Heritage Museum in Canada. A nation that built Lancaster Bombers under license. https://www.warplane.com/lady-orchid.aspx Reminds me of Hughie Green.........😉 1 1
johng Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 5 minutes ago, transam said: in other words, you know nothing but like to scrutinise a service that is basically secret Yes they are secret so that means everything they do is perfect and should have no scrutiny at all ? 2 1
transam Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Just now, johng said: Yes they are secret so that means everything they do is perfect and should have no scrutiny at all ? Exactly, only to their team officers or the PM, not Joe Bloggs..........🙄 1 1 1 1
Popular Post Bkk Brian Posted 19 hours ago Popular Post Posted 19 hours ago 1 hour ago, newbee2022 said: Why then there have been killings if there was no war? Makes no sense. And if these killings indeed happened in their daily job...then it's murder.❗ Let the court decide. They killed terrorists who were carrying out terrorist attacks in both N Ireland and the UK. Their daily job was the SAS. 1 3
Popular Post Patong2021 Posted 17 hours ago Popular Post Posted 17 hours ago 3 hours ago, Andrew65 said: It's questionable whether or not the IRA were involved in a war, in the true meaning of it. Provisional IRA described their insurgency as a war of liberation. 1 2 1
JAG Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 5 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said: Congratulations, you managed to vomit your both your LGBT and your immigrant fixations into a topic that isn’t about either. Says the man who raised the spectre of the NAZI " just following orders defence" PIRA had just driven a digger, carrying a massive bomb (which exploded) in its front bucket into the police station, followed by machine gunning the wreckage with a 12.7mm heavy machine gun. They were ambushed and killed in the response, whilst dismantling the HMG in order to escape. Those are the facts. Not a war crime, not a crime at all. Certainly not murder. 1
Chomper Higgot Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 4 minutes ago, JAG said: Says the man who raised the spectre of the NAZI " just following orders defence" I was merely responding to a quote from the OP. Thanks you for remind where I had previously heard that defense. 9 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said: The ‘only following orders’ defense. Where have heard that before? 1
Bkk Brian Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 22 hours ago, Social Media said: The issue is further complicated by lawyers bringing human rights claims against British troops, a practice that some veterans believe is being exploited. Simm specifically criticizes figures like Phil Shiner, a former left-wing lawyer who was disbarred and sentenced for making false allegations of abuse against British soldiers in Iraq. Shiner, once celebrated by civil rights groups, was found to have illegally profited from taxpayer funds while pursuing these cases. “Without clarity of the legal framework these troops will be operating within, the British public should prepare for more instances of ambulance-chasing, human-rights zealots like Phil Shiner assuming their ‘international duty’ of ensuring that no enemy of this country will die on their watch – under any circumstances,” Simm says. So true. Left wing "ambulance-chasing, human-rights zealots" 1 1
Social Media Posted 6 hours ago Author Posted 6 hours ago A number of your troll posts removed @newbee2022 If you have nothing to add to the discussion other than responding with antagonizing deflection then I suggest you move to another topic. A further post removed for comment on moderation from the above poster has also been removed and now earned himself a posting break. 2
JAG Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, Bkk Brian said: So true. Left wing "ambulance-chasing, human-rights zealots" And didn't so many of us chuckle when "Shiner's" little scam came unstuck!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now