DOGE Makes Its Latest Errors Harder to Find

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, rough diamond said:

Nope, it's exactly the kind of thievery DOGE is claiming it is rooting out with no verifiable facts to back up their/his claims.

Yep. It's only Trump-obsessed haters and leftists that pretend there are no "verifiable facts to back up their/his claims." It's pretty clear to the rest of us. 

[Dan O]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Musk only had to correct a few of them, the media lied about most of them. 

 

Any Obama, Biden and Harris are still lying and have refused to go back and correct anything. 

Post a link to show what you claim so we can see

[rough diamond]

6 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Given the opportunity, would you have voted for Ted Cruz, or Rond DeSantis over Harris? 

 

Come on now, don't be shy...

I have already answered that question and the answer is still I don't care who got in as long as it was not this idiot TRUMP.

As I have said time and time again, it is nothing to do with political parties or right/left ideology, TRUMP is a dangerous  megalomaniac who is causing unwarranted chaos around the world.

You and the majority of the US  may have voted for HIM but the rest of the world did not.

[Dan O]

1 hour ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

How can he look something up on the interweb that you just made up?

Would you care to explain what I made up and any links to show that?

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, Dan O said:

That is true for a lot of republicans, me being one of them. But you trumpettes can't seem to understand what a POS he is and the damage he's doing. When it affects you, youll be crying like babies.

 

Maybe the lack of moral character or compass runs thru all the trumpettes and thats why there is no ability to discern fact from fiction.

Oh, name calling, how clever,

 

Would have voted for Ted Cruz, or Rond DeSantis over Harris? 

 

Come on now, don't be shy

[rough diamond]

4 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Yep. It's only Trump-obsessed haters and leftists that pretend there are no "verifiable facts to back up their/his claims." It's pretty clear to the rest of us. 

If it is that clear please post that clarity.

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, rough diamond said:

If it is that clear please post that clarity.

I already have. 

[rough diamond]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

I already have. 

 You say that they are "that clear" it must be very easy to just repost the relevant link(s) to prove your point(s).

[Yellowtail]

3 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

 You say that they are "that clear" it must be very easy to just repost the relevant link(s) to prove your point(s).

You first

[steven100]

7 hours ago, Dan O said:

That is true for a lot of republicans, me being one of them. But you trumpettes can't seem to understand what a POS he is and the damage he's doing. When it affects you, youll be crying like babies.

 

Maybe the lack of moral character or compass runs thru all the trumpettes and thats why there is no ability to discern fact from fiction.

 

I tend to agree with this.   So all those workers who are sacked will go onto social security benefits so the government will end up paying millions upon millions more every month instead of each separate departments budget. 

Some may lose there house and/or cars as they cannot pay the mortgage,   I expect crime will increase and more families will be under stress.  

 

[Jim Blue]

On 3/13/2025 at 9:17 PM, mogandave said:

So DOGE has figured out how to make it more difficult for the Times and other Trump hating media outlets to sabotage

Well said Comrade  .. ...

[jerrymahoney]

March 13 NY Times headline:

DOGE Makes Its Latest Errors Harder to Find
Elon Musk’s group obscured the details of some new claims on its website, despite promises of transparency. But The Times was still able to detect another batch of mistakes.

[transam]

15 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Sorry Keir, I'll leave you to it then

Yes Kier, and wise .....😉

[Dan O]

6 hours ago, steven100 said:

 

I tend to agree with this.   So all those workers who are sacked will go onto social security benefits so the government will end up paying millions upon millions more every month instead of each separate departments budget. 

Some may lose there house and/or cars as they cannot pay the mortgage,   I expect crime will increase and more families will be under stress.  

 

You don't get social security if you're fired you can apply for unemployment which you pay into on your paycheck. That is for a limited time for collection of reduced payments.

 

I agree it is a stupid action for trump to take. Is there waste, overspend and expansive govt, sure and it came from both parties over decades.

The more appropriate action would be to systematically inspect and deal with each agency with some type of plan.  Not slash and burn everything and then put tariffs on every country we deal with.

 

Many of the mass firings are being halted and reversed due to a court case last week where a  judge is reversing trumps exec order. 

[steven100]

5 hours ago, Dan O said:

You don't get social security if you're fired you can apply for unemployment which you pay into on your paycheck. That is for a limited time for collection of reduced payments.

 

I agree it is a stupid action for trump to take. Is there waste, overspend and expansive govt, sure and it came from both parties over decades.

The more appropriate action would be to systematically inspect and deal with each agency with some type of plan.  Not slash and burn everything and then put tariffs on every country we deal with.

 

Many of the mass firings are being halted and reversed due to a court case last week where a  judge is reversing trumps exec order. 

Thank you Dan  

[Yellowtail]

Apparently, we all agree there it waste, overspending, and that it came from both parties over decades.

 

But one side it trying to reduce/eliminate it, while the other side is nitpicking the accuracy of the reporting. 

 

What cuts have been made that you do not agree with? 

 

 

[steven100]

25 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What cuts have been made that you do not agree with? 

what a stupid question as expected. 

 

Tell your question to the family that will be on the street because the banks taken back their house. 

[Yellowtail]

11 minutes ago, steven100 said:

what a stupid question as expected. 

So you have no idea. I thought not. 

11 minutes ago, steven100 said:

Tell your question to the family that will be on the street because the banks taken back their house. 

So, you are against anyone working in the government being fired, correct? 

 

Why limit it to the government. Do you think that everyone that gets a job should have that job for life? 

[JumpingJim]

48 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

What cuts have been made that you do not agree with? 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/03/13/judge-orders-trump-reinstate-fired-workers/82368616007/

 

I think the thousands of cuts that were against the law were wrong.  I don't think a president should be able to openly break the law.

[Yellowtail]

5 minutes ago, JumpingJim said:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/03/13/judge-orders-trump-reinstate-fired-workers/82368616007/

 

I think the thousands of cuts that were against the law were wrong.  I don't think a president should be able to openly break the law.

None of the cuts have been adjudicated illegal. 

 

Just tell me one you disagree with. 

[JumpingJim]

7 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

None of the cuts have been adjudicated illegal. 

 

I guess like Trump, you have no respect for federal judges.  You radical MAGAs no longer believe you need to follow the law.

 

https://www.voanews.com/a/judges-rule-mass-firings-of-agency-employees-to-be-illegal-/8011510.html

 

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, JumpingJim said:

 

I guess like Trump, you have no respect for federal judges.  You radical MAGAs no longer believe you need to follow the law.

 

https://www.voanews.com/a/judges-rule-mass-firings-of-agency-employees-to-be-illegal-/8011510.html

 

Again, not one of the cuts have been adjudicated illegal. 

 

Just tell me one you disagree with. 

[JumpingJim]

10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Again, not one of the cuts have been adjudicated illegal. 

 

And I guess as a radical MAGA, I shouldn't expect you can understand basic english either.

 

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/adjudicate

[Yellowtail]

2 minutes ago, JumpingJim said:

 

And I guess as a radical MAGA, I shouldn't expect you can understand basic english either.

 

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/adjudicate

Again, per your link, not one of the cuts have been adjudicated illegal. 

 

Just tell me one you disagree with. 

[JumpingJim]

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Again, per your link, not one of the cuts have been adjudicated illegal.

Two federal judges openly said they are illegal.

 

What do you think adjudicated means?

 

 

[Yellowtail]

18 minutes ago, JumpingJim said:

Two federal judges openly said they are illegal.

They can say anything they like, it does not mean anything until the cases are resolved. 

 

Do you have a link to a case that has been resolved? No, you don't. 

18 minutes ago, JumpingJim said:

What do you think adjudicated means?

Read your link. It does not mean that if a judge, or if two judges, or if a hundred says something was illegal, it has been adjudicated illegal. If that were true nothing would ever have to go to court.