Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
36 minutes ago, Ben Zioner said:

You haven't got your facts right.

The "boomers" were too young for the Korean/Vietnamese war.

  • Confused 3
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, daveAustin said:

Yes, why not pat yourselves on the back! You guys are in total deniaL. The golden age was the generation before yours btw, a people that had balls and scruples. The boomer generation must be the most contemptible, needy and weak of any. They never fought a proper war and had the world handed to them on a plate, and at the same time have reaped MASSIVE pensions and property etc. Shame on you!!

 

1) Not fighting in wars is a good thing.

2) There are huge disparities between the early and tail end boomers. 

 

https://crr.bc.edu/great-recession-cut-late-boomers-retirement-wealth/

 

https://moneywise.com/real-estate/real-estate/american-boomers-becoming-homeless-at-an-alarming-rate

 

Sure, the group holds about half of all U.S. wealth — with much of it tied up in real estate — but it’s mainly attributed to older boomers born between 1946 and 1954. Younger boomers, on the other hand, are increasingly sliding into homelessness — a problem, experts say, is rooted in major events that took place as they entered adulthood.

 

 

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

Never mind when the "boomer generation" exactly started. We had 80 years of peace and a certain amount of prosperity for most. 80 years of this constellation is very rare in history.

 

Since recorded European history, only in some 300 years Europe was totally free of any wars. Cumulatively.

 

Historically, we have lived in a rare "peace bubble", combined with incresing prosperity for most.

 

That is the essence of this thread. I personally am grateful that I was born at the right time at the right place.

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
8 hours ago, Kinnock said:

The original post sounds like a UK-centric viewpoint?

 

Vietnam was pretty disasterous for some US, French and Vietnamese nationals .... but I agree with the general sentiment about our generation, although 'boomer' seems to now be used an insult, which is odd I don't see any of the subsequent generations covering themselves in glory either, and no generation to date has done anything to save the planet.

IMO any such discussion relates to white boomers in western countries.

I doubt anyone in certain countries are happy with their lot in life.

 

I certainly had the best of 50,000 years of advancement of civilization. It was good while it lasted, but younger generations have stuffed it up, and it's going down the gurgler at an ever increasing rate of knots. It could have been so good, but wars, woke, PC and BS like gender insanity have ruined it. However the main cause of the end is the unsupportable world population and debt.

While I could fill several pages on this subject, I'll leave it at that.

 

Sayonara baby, it was real while it lasted and thanks for all the fish.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
9 hours ago, swissie said:

To me, true "boomers" were born between 1955 and 1970.

You can reinvent history as much as you wish but the accepted definition is 1946-1964.  

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Kinnock said:

OK .... so 2 years of conscription before the war ended, and average age of Vietnam soldiers was 19.

 

But I thought the definition of Boomers starts in 1946 ... so plenty of time for US  oomers to serve in Vietnam, and of course Vietnamese Boomers also fought in the war.

Don't forget Aus and NZ defence forces.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Blame your own generation for that. We gave you everything needed for a utopia and your lot were too greedy.

Paradise was lost when Kennedy was assassinated and the b'tards started Vietnam.

 

By the time I was 18 the major effects were already in full motion. Manufacturing was already being shifted overseas. Governments and pensions totally bloated. Etc etc.

  • Sad 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Boomer refers to people born in the baby boom after WW2. You are 10 years too late.

Agreed, 1946 to 1964 is the official period.

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, swissie said:

But everytime you activate your smart phone, you being engulfed in a functioning society etc etc etc.

Who made all this possible for you? The boomers.

You guys hand land lines and black and white TVs

Posted
5 hours ago, Sierra Tango said:

Don't forget Aus and NZ defence forces.

and the South Koreans.

 

NZ had less than 600 personnel in Vietnam at any one time. The NZ artillery reportedly did a good job. The government was reluctant to send anyone, but NZ needs the US to protect us, so probably a good idea to send a nominal force. NZ also had a civilian nursing cohort there. I knew one of them- a lovely woman.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   1 member





×
×
  • Create New...