On 5/12/2025 at 10:32 AM, billd766 said:

Yet another obscure website you have found?

His favorite flavor of facts are often hard to find.

12 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

and repeatedly misquoting respected doctors and virologists

 

Is this a reference to my recent mention of Dr. Redfield (which you refused to address because you were supposedly tired of "the idiocy", yet here you are a couple of days later, pushing the same talking points – not tired of the idiocy anymore, I see… but the Redfield issue is circumvented…)?

 

Here you go, from the horse's mouth, feel free to comment.

 

"I… you know, one of the problems… and I'm controversial on this. People in the industry don't like me for what I'm about to say. My son is probably telling me not to say it right now in my ear. But, I don't think the vaccine industry should have immunity.

"I think they should have responsibility, like any other manufacturer of any other product for their product. And I'm particularly concerned about this now because, you know, my clinical practice right now, which I'm still in two half days a week, is largely COVID and long COVID. But among my, quote, long COVID patients are people that don't have long COVID, but they have mRNA vaccine injury."

"And, it's, you know, there's not a clear path for them to have their injury recognized and compensated, and I think that's wrong. I think, hopefully, Kennedy will have a critical review, not saying that the mRNA vaccines aren't safe, not saying they shouldn't…"

"Let's just have an objective review by the FDA. Marty… Marty, you gotta review these products. Let's see the safety data. Don't tell me you're holding it off till 2026. No. I want the safety data out there."