No One Is Above the Law, Part 1, Letitia James Edition

[riclag]

Love that part 1

 

We who want to make 6am raids great again with Breitbart reporters  in tow are so seeking retribution, or to be polite ,accountability.

 

Lawyer up madam!

 

[riclag]

8 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

"Prosecutors specifically pointed to a previous Truth Social post by Mr Trump in angry all capital letters: “If you go after me, I’m coming after you!”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-threatens-biden-democrats-criminal-cases-b2401423.html

 

Mwahahahaha democrats facing consequences and boy are the msm consumers triggered by karma. Loving the show.

Its all about where she goes to court!

 

I hope its the GOP side of Virginia and not the Marxist side.

 

“Ms. James was the sitting Attorney General of New York and is required by law to have her primary residence in the state of New York — even though her mortgage applications list her intent to have the Norfolk, VA, property as her primary home,” the letter stated. 

“It appears Ms. James’ property and mortgage-related misrepresentations may have continued to her recent 2023 Norfolk, VA property purchase in order to secure a lower interest rate and more favorable loan terms.”

https://nypost.com/2025/04/15/us-news/trump-administration-refers-ny-ag-tish-james-for-prosecution/

 

 

[riclag]

The one before L. James ,Eric Schneiderman went after Trump ,but in  2018 he was forced  to resign.

 

Love to see the NYC version of Fanny Willis lose a lot of wealth!

 

[SunnyinBangrak]

Facing 30 years on each charge. And Trump didn't even have to change the law just to go after her.

As I said over and over, democrats will severely regret waging lawfare on the guy that is so clean he squeaks in the shower. At least 100% of forumers will support James incarceration, as we all agree everyone is equal under the law, and if you can't do the time don't do the crime. Mantras even the most boneheaded liberals will regret trotting out daily during the anti Trump witch hunts.

 

[placeholder]

8 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Facing 30 years on each charge. And Trump didn't even have to change the law just to go after her.

As I said over and over, democrats will severely regret waging lawfare on the guy that is so clean he squeaks in the shower. At least 100% of forumers will support James incarceration, as we all agree everyone is equal under the law, and if you can't do the time don't do the crime. Mantras even the most boneheaded liberals will regret trotting out daily during the anti Trump witch hunts.

 

The Supreme Court disallowed a big part of the prosecution of Trump on the grounds that any crimes committed by Presidents in their official capacity are not subject to criminal prosecutions even after they leave office. That ruling shocked most legal scholars including conservative ones. Anyway, if you think that's compatible with "squeaky clean", so be it.

[SunnyinBangrak]

Just now, placeholder said:

The Supreme Court disallowed a big part of the prosecution of Trump on the grounds that any crimes committed by Presidents in their official capacity are not subject to criminal prosecutions even after they leave office. That ruling shocked most legal scholars including conservative ones. Anyway, if you think that's compatible with "squeaky clean", so be it.

Let's wait until every democrat politician faces 10 year forensic investigations, storming their kids bedrooms, rifling their wives lingerie drawers, and we will see who was relatively cleaner. Trump was so clean they had to change the law to charge him, and nobody understood any of it. Will Schiff, Pelosi, Schumer and co fare so well? Doubt it.

[placeholder]

2 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Let's wait until every democrat politician faces 10 year forensic investigations, storming their kids bedrooms, rifling their wives lingerie drawers, and we will see who was relatively cleaner. Trump was so clean they had to change the law to charge him, and nobody understood any of it. Will Schiff, Pelosi, Schumer and co fare so well? Doubt it.

Well, as I've posted elsewhere, Trump isn't just going after politicians, is he? Chris Krebs, who was in charge of election security for the government, gave testimony in 2020 debunking voter fraud claims. Trump fired him. Then Trump went after the company he worked for. About a week ago Trump issued this executive order:

 

“Krebs’ misconduct involved the censorship of disfavored speech implicating the 2020 election and COVID-19 pandemic,” the order said. “Krebs, through CISA, falsely and baselessly denied that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen, including by inappropriately and categorically dismissing widespread election malfeasance and serious vulnerabilities with voting machines.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/16/former-cisa-chief-krebs-leaves-sentinelone-after-trump-exec-order.html

 

He "baselessly lied that the election was rigged." And for the crime of telling the truth he's being investigated.

 

[jerrymahoney]

On 4/16/2025 at 9:35 AM, placeholder said:

So what is your point? How does this prove that Laetitia James' prosecution against Trump was defective? Are you saying that if James hadn't authorized a prosecution against Trump, this suggested investigation wouldn't have happened?

James did not prosecute Trump. The fraud trial was a civil action bench trial / no jury.

 

The prosecution of Trump in NY was done by NY DA Alvin Bragg resulting in the 34 felony varieties.

[placeholder]

1 minute ago, jerrymahoney said:

James did not prosecute Trump. The fraud trial was a civil action bench trial / no jury.

 

The prosecution of Trump in NY was done by NY DA Alvin Bragg resulting in the 34 felony varieties.

I thought as AG she would have the power to put a stop to that prosecution. Is that not the case?

[MadAtMatrix]

[SunnyinBangrak]

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

He "baselessly lied that the election was rigged." And for the crime of telling the truth he's being investigated.

The election was known to be fraudulent after the 51 intel experts disinformation and conspiracy to misinform voters. Sadly your record on that whole sorry saga is now legendary😅

[jerrymahoney]

9 minutes ago, placeholder said:

I thought as AG she would have the power to put a stop to that prosecution. Is that not the case?

No. The criminal indictment of Trump was by a grand jury. The AG's power as re: the NY DA is when for some reason the DA needs to be replaced while the elected term is still current.

 

As far as Judge Engoron's bench verdict:

 

Massive civil fraud verdict against Trump gets frosty reception at New York appeals court
A panel of judges voiced skepticism about the size and validity of the nearly half-billion-dollar judgment.

 

09/26/2024 06:42 PM EDT

NEW YORK — Appeals court judges appeared to question the legitimacy of the civil fraud case against Donald Trump as the former president urged the court Thursday to overturn a judgment against him that has ballooned, with interest, to more than $478 million.

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/03/25/trump-no-longer-needs-to-post-full-454m-bond-in-civil-fraud-case-court-rules-00148815

 

 

https://eddsa.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/public/2024_01134_PEOPLE_OF_THE_STATE_OF_v_PEOPLE_OF_THE_STATE_OF_ORDER_21.pdf

 

[SunnyinBangrak]

3 minutes ago, MadAtMatrix said:

They were so sure they would win the election and never face justice. Yikes!

[jerrymahoney]

If the mortgage fraud charges as suggested in the OP should ever proceed, the 2 possible jurisdictions would be either NY city or Norfolk County, VA which was solid blue for Harris 2024.

There was a comment different topic about doing a trial in Montana or rural Texas.

Just to note that the 'venue shopping' you hear and read about is almost exclusively regarding civil actions -- not criminal -- as with the current challenges to Trump's smorgasbord of executive orders.

[placeholder]

19 hours ago, Yagoda said:

AS opposed to Joe Biden and the Dems doing it surreptitiously

 

OH, hes the one seeking disbarment of lawyers for thought crime? What does Letitia James fraud have to do with the right to counsel btw?

The fact that you claim it was surreptitious just show that you have no evidence to support that claim. 

The Leticia James case nothing. But there are others that definitely do.

[bannork]

[rough diamond]

25 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Is Trump a Russian agent? Did he have backhand communications with alpha Bank? Is the steel dossier a lie?

Did he, do you know either way?

A pointless deflecting post from you with no substance, as usual!

[placeholder]

22 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Is Trump a Russian agent? Did he have backhand communications with alpha Bank? Is the steel dossier a lie?

Was the investigation of Trump predicated on the Steele dossier? Even Durham conceded it was not.

As for the other questions...As Mueller pointed out, he believed he had grounds for obstruction of justice one of which was interfering with the Paul Manafort investigation in such a way as to indicate to Manafort that a pardon could be in the offing.

[scorecard]

On 4/16/2025 at 9:36 AM, placeholder said:

To repeat: How does this prove that Laetitia James' prosecution against Trump was defective? How is this an own goal? Would it be one if she hadn't authorized the prosecution of Trump?

Or was she just doing her job as she is expected to?

[Yagoda]

34 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Was the investigation of Trump predicated on the Steele dossier? Even Durham conceded it was not.

As for the other questions...As Mueller pointed out, he believed he had grounds for obstruction of justice one of which was interfering with the Paul Manafort investigation in such a way as to indicate to Manafort that a pardon could be in the offing.

There you have it boys and girls, the grasping of straws by someone so maddened by his obsessive hatred of Trump and America that he cant even admit the blatant truth.

 

Hows the border treating you? Must suck now for you that the door hasnt been left open for military age Chinese Males? Hurts the cause?

 

Hey how the stock market going? World economy crashed yet?

 

 

 

 

[Yagoda]

39 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

Did he, do you know either way?

A pointless deflecting post from you with no substance, as usual!

Lookie another "beleiver" LOL.

 

Bet you still think Hunters laptop was Russian disinfo?

 

Hows Fanni doing? Bet there is a topic on her soon. Still beleive the truth of her case? 

[Yagoda]

47 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

You never read a post properly as you just always assume that any anti Trump post is also anti USA!

The poster is only complaining about Trump and NOT the USA.

Please show an anti USA comment in his post?

This is the same as myself and many posters on AN. Please stop mixing anti Trump posts as being anti USA/Republican/political parties. etc.

Trumps policies are good for America. Unless you support them, you hate America.

 

[connda]

On 4/16/2025 at 9:12 AM, Yagoda said:

Pro Tip: Be clean before you accuse others of being dirty.

Pro Tip 2: When caught, play the race card and incite riots.

[rough diamond]

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Trumps policies are good for America. Unless you support them, you hate America.

 

B.S.

 

[rough diamond]

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Bet you still think Hunters laptop was Russian disinfo?

 

Hows Fanni doing? Bet there is a topic on her soon. Still beleive the truth of her case? 

What are you talking about?

Take your MAGAmanical glasses and earphones off and come back into the real world if you can.

Whatever happened in the past, whatever you are on about above, is past. 

let us look at the total mess Trump is making NOW!

[Mike_Hunt]

Turnabout is fair play. 

[candide]

5 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-did-it-robby-mook-michael-sussmann-donald-trump-russia-collusion-alfa-bank-11653084709

 

Thats how it turned out. Remind us again which side of the Trump Russia collusion hoax you were on. Were there any anti Trump hoaxes brought by irrational haters you didn't swallow hook, line and sinker?

Lol! The Sussman trial confirmed that the FBI did not trust the Alfa bank story and did not use it. It also confirmed that the investigation started before the Alfa Bank allegation was made anyway.

 

But don't let truth get in the way of a good MAGA B.S. claim! 

 

The Durham investigation was a complete waste of time and taxpayers' money.

[placeholder]

30 minutes ago, Mike_Hunt said:

Turnabout is fair play. 

Whether it's fair play or not, vengeance is not grounds for a prosecution. And, of course, Trump is exercising vengeance against people there is no evidence for. He's launching investigation to look for a crime.

[Mike_Hunt]

23 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Whether it's fair play or not, vengeance is not grounds for a prosecution. And, of course, Trump is exercising vengeance against people there is no evidence for. He's launching investigation to look for a crime.

 

What do you think she was doing?  She campaigned on the promise of going after Trump.   Turnabout is fair play. 

[placeholder]

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

There you have it boys and girls, the grasping of straws by someone so maddened by his obsessive hatred of Trump and America that he cant even admit the blatant truth.

 

Hows the border treating you? Must suck now for you that the door hasnt been left open for military age Chinese Males? Hurts the cause?

 

Hey how the stock market going? World economy crashed yet?

Actually what we have is someone so apparently bankrupt of analytical facilities that he consistently resorts to making allegations about other people's emotional condition. What does it take to make you understand that this is the political soapbox not the psychological soapbox. Maybe there are venues appropriate to your kind of comments, This isn't one of them.

I have no idea why you are fixated on military age Chinese? Are you expecting a Chinese Red Army invasion?

As for the stock market. It's still pretty far down. The reason that it hasn't sunk further. Here's something from a Marxist-Leninist at The Telegraph that might explain that:

 

"Trump persists in telling the world that he will not retreat on tariffs and that “nobody is getting off the hook”. But markets are heavily discounting everything he now says.
They can see that he backed down against Canada and Mexico after discovering that US car prices would go through the roof, and that he dared not pull the trigger on full tariffs against Europe, and that he immediately unpicked his own embargo against China after discovering that a US-made iPhone would cost $3,000."

https://archive.ph/1ei57#selection-4567.0-4575.1