Jump to content

Hegseth Said to Have Shared Attack Details in Second Signal Chat


Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, CallumWK said:

 

Have you looked at pictures of him lately? I would be surprised if he makes it till the end of this year

 

Today

 

image.png.763ce6b11f8c1f0727738cfdff24adb6.png

 

vs 4 years ago.

 

image.jpeg.85f6789468a377d3f9ae29503fdfede0.jpeg

 

Anyone really thinks he will make the end of the year?

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Tug said:

Ahhh only the best people he said……….pro wrestling mama calling the shots on education check……..cosplay Barbie in charge of homeland security check…..anti science anti vaxer in charge of health check……blackout inexperienced drunk with loose lips in charge of the pentagon check…..and on and on……now he’s after Powell….elections have consequences…it’s time to flush the toilet 

AMEN! to that I totally agree.  But to me anyway it seems that the candidates that the SUPERPACS are providing are getting worse every election!  And looking at the Congress, neither party has anyoone worth a penny either.  They all seem to be so worried about re-election to their cushy job and afraid to upset DJT that they won't actually do anything to help the nation and its ciitizens IMHO anyway.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

 Get yourself gone before you're "disappeared" to an El Salvadoran prison.

 

Is that because of his tattoos?

 

20250421500132.webp.4b359c180a9783b0b2eb8fe9c788ec4d.webp

 

I see "M-16" (ok, I know some call it  AR15)

Stars

13 Stripes

 

But honestly, these are not cool tats. Mark him out as a bit of a tit. Who but a little kid gets a gun stuck on their arm. Not enough stars on the flag. It used to be that a right ear pierced on a man indicated he was a homosexua. Not sure the rule extends to tatoos. The strange thing is Hegseth is right handed, but got his right arm only marked.

 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
26 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Trump is just expanding the size of the swamp daily. 

Can't drain the swamp when you continue to plug the drainpipe with trash.

  • Agree 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

So which photo was in the stolen passport?

 

image.png.af7ef961e045c8c08b694eaea5bae221.png

 

well look at her, had heard the stories, we know she loves (not) dogs, only there as pleasue to watch and get those Dakota votes I guess.  She is our Homeland security chief so what does this latest news clips reveal about her?  Not one of the sharpest for sure IMHO but that goes for all the department heads named by DT

  • Agree 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Presnock said:

AMEN! to that I totally agree.  But to me anyway it seems that the candidates that the SUPERPACS are providing are getting worse every election!  And looking at the Congress, neither party has anyoone worth a penny either.  They all seem to be so worried about re-election to their cushy job and afraid to upset DJT that they won't actually do anything to help the nation and its ciitizens IMHO anyway.

I beg to differ the problem with the last one was her sex and color otherwise a HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEAM player who has Americas and our peoples best interests in mind oh and I for one don’t think her sex and color were disqualifying reasons or excuses to have elected this disaster of trump.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
19 hours ago, sscc said:

In the SIGNAL leak about Yemen 6 weeks ago,   Trump of course knew it had been mistakes of some of his subordinates  and help all to fend off the attack,  and Trump succeeded to secure their jobs 

 

And again now ?   this defense secretary may fall. 

Supposedly, both Signal chats occurred around the same time.  So, maybe he has now moved on to more secure forms of communication?

 

 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Tug said:

I beg to differ the problem with the last one was her sex and color otherwise a HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEAM player who has Americas and our peoples best interests in mind oh and I for one don’t think her sex and color were disqualifying reasons or excuses to have elected this disaster of trump.

IMHO she wasn't and isn't qualified to be the president.  But that is my opinion and I also don't believe that Trump is qualified and is showing it now.  But at least, had Harris won, our economy wouldn't be headed for a recession, nor we have such amateurs as heads of agencies nor DOGE.  I do not like Democrat policies either.

  • Agree 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Supposedly, both Signal chats occurred around the same time.  So, maybe he has now moved on to more secure forms of communication?

 

 

 

5 minutes ago, jas007 said:

Supposedly, both Signal chats occurred around the same time.  So, maybe he has now moved on to more secure forms of communication?

 

 

Dream on, he is as unqualified to be an agency head as almost all the rest of Trump's picks.  He is only concerned with wealth, total kneeling at his feet in all aspects.  MO anyway

  • Thanks 2
Posted
41 minutes ago, Presnock said:

 

Dream on, he is as unqualified to be an agency head as almost all the rest of Trump's picks.  He is only concerned with wealth, total kneeling at his feet in all aspects.  MO anyway

That's hardly the point, though. The discussion is about Signal and his use of it.  

Posted
3 hours ago, Presnock said:

well look at her, had heard the stories, we know she loves (not) dogs, only there as pleasue to watch and get those Dakota votes I guess.  She is our Homeland security chief so what does this latest news clips reveal about her?  Not one of the sharpest for sure IMHO but that goes for all the department heads named by DT

Trump has a habit of picking highly unqualified people from the bottom of the barrel, and the qualification is fealty to the new king, and merit, skill and experience never comes into the picture or the formula. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Trump has a habit of picking highly unqualified people from the bottom of the barrel, and the qualification is fealty to the new king, and merit, skill and experience never comes into the picture or the formula. 

Personal loyalty is much more important than ability when choosing staff.

You can work around someone that is barely competent, but someone disloyal will sink you.

I'm guessing you never had staff.

  • Thumbs Down 3
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...