So-called Liberal Science Textbooks for Young People: Why show only the missionary position?

[GammaGlobulin]

Dear Folks,

 

I have recently reviewed several science textbooks for young people, books which purportedly teach the Natural Sciences.

 

Included in these Natural Science textbooks, there is invariably a short chapter on human reproduction.

 

And then, these liberals, without exception, include a drawing of a couple copulating. AND, these books ALWAYS have the couple in the Missionary Position.

 

FIRST OF ALL….

 

a.  I do not see why these diagrams should be included in a basic science book introducing concepts about the Natural Sciences.

b.   And, should these books not FIRST introduce REAL science concerning cellular replication, even BEFORE they cough up these prurient images in books designed for kids not yet 13-years old?

 

What is wrong with the world today….ANYWAY….????????

 

And, if you REALLY WANT to get LIBERAL about it…then….

 

Why not just have a few more positions to show the various VALID ways for a male human to impregnate a female human?

 

I would suggest the DOGGIE STYLE because, I think this is more effective, just speaking from a biological point of view.

 

I mean, the position of the female should be such that impregnation happens most effectively, based on REAL SCIENCE.

 

Why is there this BIAS towards the missionary position and away from other more effective positions, during coitus????

 

Any thoughts about this?

 

My guess is that these darned liberals who are writing these New Age Science Books are just NOT liberal enough….for my tastes…

 

What do you think?

 

Best regards,

Gamma

 

Note:  No elucidating images will I upload, supporting my claim, because….this is a family website, TV is…..

 

Note2:  I have just about HAD IT with these lousy Liberals polluting our science textbooks with their Liberal Political Agendas.

 

There is NO NEED of ANY diagrams in textbooks showing either the missionary position, or any other positions....UNLESS this might be a class in Physiology.

 

Why not just have each Elementary Science Textbook include a link to the YouPorn website???

 

Note3:  Or, why not just talk about REAL SCIENCE in the textbooks....????

 

Note4:  WHAT?  Am I being too prudish?  NO WAY, JOSE....I just care about having a science book concerning the Natural Sciences provide information on Natural Sciences in the best way.

 

 

 

 

[rough diamond]

Yet another pointless load of .............!

[GammaGlobulin]

2 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

Yet another pointless load of .............!

 

Another great opinion of yours.

I will read your opinions.

But, SOMETIMES, I reserve the right to disagree.

 

Take care, Man....!!!!

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

15 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

Yet another pointless load of .............!

 

I think that young parents should be very wary of BOGUS Liberal Science Books being foisted off on them, and on their children, these days.

 

What do you think...Sir....?

 

Or, can you even express a contrary opinion in a logical way, to mine?

 

Cough it Up, Sir....

 

Please....

 

I am waiting for you, Sir.

 

Say something USEFUL, for a change, Sir....

 

CAN YOU?????????

 

 

[jvs]

Well normally i do not respond to your posts but here i go.

Today is the 26th of April 2025.

Do you know kids have access to the internet now?

There is not one kid(boy or girl) over 12 years old that has not seen porn.

[GammaGlobulin]

5 minutes ago, jvs said:

Well normally i do not respond to your posts but here i go.

Today is the 26th of April 2025.

Do you know kids have access to the internet now?

There is not one kid(boy or girl) over 12 years old that has not seen porn.

 

Although your point is well taken, yet, it is not, in any way, germane to this Topic.

 

[rough diamond]

5 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

Although your point is well taken, yet, it is not, in any way, germane to this Topic.

 

How can anything be germane to your so called pointless (as usual) topic?

[rough diamond]

40 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

I will read your opinions.

The problem is that although you say you will read my opinions, and those of others, you never act on them and continue to pollute AN with your utter garbage.

[GammaGlobulin]

17 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

The problem is that although you say you will read my opinions, and those of others, you never act on them and continue to pollute AN with your utter garbage.

 

Are you saying that, even at the most elementary level, that America, due to the Liberals, have not strayed from science, even at the first grade?

 

 

 

Maybe you should take up the BONGOS, and learn something of value?

 

 

[rough diamond]

26 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

Maybe you should take up the BONGOS, and learn something of value?

If you have taken them up they obviously did you no good.

[GammaGlobulin]

12 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

If you have taken them up they obviously did you no good.

 

Eat your heart out....Man....

 

 

[Lacessit]

IME woman are most likely to orgasm in the dominant position.

 

Considerate men take this into account when having sex.

[GammaGlobulin]

38 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

IME woman are most likely to orgasm in the dominant position.

 

Considerate men take this into account when having sex.

 

Temperature and moisture content are particularly important factors influencing the longevity of seeds.

[Jim Blue]

I ve just told the wife  to  remind me we  must try this new missionary position !

[Will B Good]

 

 

Pretty sure any other position guarantees you go straight to Hell.

[richard_smith237]

2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

IME woman are most likely to orgasm in the dominant position.

 

Considerate men take this into account when having sex.

 

 

Oh I don't know... Give the 'Butter Churner' or the 'Sultry Hill' a go...   

 

 

[Peabody]

7 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

I have recently reviewed several science textbooks for young people, books which purportedly teach the Natural Sciences.

ISBNs, please.

[GammaGlobulin]

10 minutes ago, Peabody said:

ISBNs, please.

 

As usual....

 

I do NOT name names.

 

The books know who they are.

 

 

[Lacessit]

4 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

 

Oh I don't know... Give the 'Butter Churner' or the 'Sultry Hill' a go...   

 

 

I regret my experiences in the Pink Pavilion are not as extensive as yours.

 

Perhaps you could post a couple of videos? I am always eager to further my education.

[Lacessit]

6 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

Temperature and moisture content are particularly important factors influencing the longevity of seeds.

I have no wish to overpopulate the planet, I am all about recreation.

[GammaGlobulin]

Just now, Lacessit said:

I have no wish to overpopulate the planet, I am all about recreation.

 

So, please...

 

Recreate, if you can, because you probably cannot Procreate at your old age.

 

Have you had your sperm count tested, recently...???

 

Just asking.

 

[Gottfrid]

9 hours ago, rough diamond said:

The problem is that although you say you will read my opinions, and those of others, you never act on them and continue to pollute AN with your utter garbage.

You know that you don´t have to read them, right? Also, people are of different opinions, which also might mean your are not right or adaptive for all.

[rough diamond]

2 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

You know that you don´t have to read them, right? Also, people are of different opinions, which also might mean your are not right or adaptive for all.

You know that you don´t have to read post them, right? Also, people are of different opinions, which also might mean your are not right or adaptive for all.

[GammaGlobulin]

4 minutes ago, Gottfrid said:

You know that you don´t have to read them, right? Also, people are of different opinions, which also might mean your are not right or adaptive for all.

 

Adaptive?

IDK

 

But, obviously, I have an Evolutionary Advantage, or otherwise I would not even be here....

 

Right?

 

 

[rough diamond]

3 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

The books know who they are.

How can a book "know" who it is?

[Gottfrid]

42 minutes ago, rough diamond said:

How can a book "know" who it is?

Ops! That, man! You have to find out all by yourself.

[Lacessit]

2 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

So, please...

 

Recreate, if you can, because you probably cannot Procreate at your old age.

 

Have you had your sperm count tested, recently...???

 

Just asking.

 

I probably don't have a sperm count. Modern medicine sometimes does things like that.

 

Even for people 60-70 yo, procreation is ridiculous. Imagine dealing with teenagers at age 80. IMO that would be the apogee of stupidity and masochism.

[GammaGlobulin]

39 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

Even for people 60-70 yo, procreation is ridiculous.

 

No more ridiculous than for someone at the age of 16 or 17.

 

Procreation is absolutely ridiculous, these days, until we get a few problems worked out.

 

Such as....

 

I am sure you know the ones that need to be solved.

 

 

[Lacessit]

7 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

No more ridiculous than for someone at the age of 16 or 17.

 

Procreation is absolutely ridiculous, these days, until we get a few problems worked out.

 

Such as....

 

I am sure you know the ones that need to be solved.

 

 

IIRC Robert Heinlein had a pretty good solution.

[Peabody]

18 hours ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

As usual....

 

I do NOT name names.

 

The books know who they are.

 

 

You are so full of feces. There are no books as you described