So-called Liberal Science Textbooks for Young People: Why show only the missionary position?

[blaze master]

On 4/26/2025 at 10:12 AM, jvs said:

Well normally i do not respond to your posts but here i go.

Today is the 26th of April 2025.

Do you know kids have access to the internet now?

There is not one kid(boy or girl) over 12 years old that has not seen porn.

 

What's porn daddy ?

[newbee2022]

On 4/26/2025 at 8:21 PM, GammaGlobulin said:

Dear Folks,

 

I have recently reviewed several science textbooks for young people, books which purportedly teach the Natural Sciences.

 

Included in these Natural Science textbooks, there is invariably a short chapter on human reproduction.

 

And then, these liberals, without exception, include a drawing of a couple copulating. AND, these books ALWAYS have the couple in the Missionary Position.

 

FIRST OF ALL….

 

a.  I do not see why these diagrams should be included in a basic science book introducing concepts about the Natural Sciences.

b.   And, should these books not FIRST introduce REAL science concerning cellular replication, even BEFORE they cough up these prurient images in books designed for kids not yet 13-years old?

 

What is wrong with the world today….ANYWAY….????????

 

And, if you REALLY WANT to get LIBERAL about it…then….

 

Why not just have a few more positions to show the various VALID ways for a male human to impregnate a female human?

 

I would suggest the DOGGIE STYLE because, I think this is more effective, just speaking from a biological point of view.

 

I mean, the position of the female should be such that impregnation happens most effectively, based on REAL SCIENCE.

 

Why is there this BIAS towards the missionary position and away from other more effective positions, during coitus????

 

Any thoughts about this?

 

My guess is that these darned liberals who are writing these New Age Science Books are just NOT liberal enough….for my tastes…

 

What do you think?

 

Best regards,

Gamma

 

Note:  No elucidating images will I upload, supporting my claim, because….this is a family website, TV is…..

 

Note2:  I have just about HAD IT with these lousy Liberals polluting our science textbooks with their Liberal Political Agendas.

 

There is NO NEED of ANY diagrams in textbooks showing either the missionary position, or any other positions....UNLESS this might be a class in Physiology.

 

Why not just have each Elementary Science Textbook include a link to the YouPorn website???

 

Note3:  Or, why not just talk about REAL SCIENCE in the textbooks....????

 

Note4:  WHAT?  Am I being too prudish?  NO WAY, JOSE....I just care about having a science book concerning the Natural Sciences provide information on Natural Sciences in the best way.

 

 

 

 

13 year old kids are watching youporn but not reading outdated booklets 😂

[scorecard]

10 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

13 year old kids are watching youporn but not reading outdated booklets 😂

Posted in error, my mistake, apologies, removed.

[newbee2022]

2 minutes ago, scorecard said:

Quote:  "...Note2:  I have just about HAD IT with these lousy Liberals polluting our science textbooks with their Liberal Political Agendas."

'...lousy liberals...' please explain what that means. 

'...Liberal Political Agenda...' please explain what that means. 

Not my post..sorry

[scorecard]

3 minutes ago, newbee2022 said:

Not my post..sorry

My error, my apologies, now removed. 

[impulse]

I don't know about the rest of them, but they aren't allowed to show them having sex standing up.  It looks too much like dancing and that would get their book banned by the Southern Baptists.

 

[RocketDog]

On 4/26/2025 at 8:59 PM, GammaGlobulin said:

 

I think that young parents should be very wary of BOGUS Liberal Science Books being foisted off on them, and on their children, these days.

 

What do you think...Sir....?

 

Or, can you even express a contrary opinion in a logical way, to mine?

 

Cough it Up, Sir....

 

Please....

 

I am waiting for you, Sir.

 

Say something USEFUL, for a change, Sir....

 

CAN YOU?????????

 

 

Ah. Looks like somebody pushed your hot buttons.

No emotion, right?

[scorecard]

Is there not a bottom line here. Easily available there's thousands of short / long HD video clips of M/F, F/F, M/M penetration etc., in every conceivable position, with sound.

 

Kids know how to find these clips, hide them, and how to delete them after they replay them a hundred times. 

[Grumpy one]

Do you not find it difficult using the missionary position with your boyfriend ?

[Purdey]

A teacher was teaching a class about how people mate. He started off by stating, "There are 32 positions for people to use when mating."

"33," said a kid at the back .

"32," repeated the teacher. "I will count them off for you. Number one, the missionary position."

"34," said the kid.

[scorecard]

3 hours ago, RocketDog said:

Ah. Looks like somebody pushed your hot buttons.

No emotion, right?

What are / is "Liberal Science Books"?

[spidermike007]

Are you somehow trying to insinuate that conservatives are less prudish about sex than democrats? You are going to have to establish a much higher burden of proof before anybody falls for that rather silly and juvenile little meme.