Clarification on Retirement Visa

[sandyf]

12 hours ago, BrandonJT said:

You CANNOT get the first 1-year extension using transfers.  Period.  End of story.  Even if you can show 20 years of transfers. you CANNOT USE IT.

That is incorrect, there is an exception in para 2 of the procedures.

 

 

[Felt 35]

14 minutes ago, sandyf said:

That is incorrect, there is an exception in para 2 of the procedures.

 

 

 

But does this also apply to extension based on retirement? I can see in the text above reason for application, documents required, and procedures that retirement is mentioned but the rest seems to be application based on marriage 

Felt

[sandyf]

2 minutes ago, Felt 35 said:

 

But does this also apply to extension based on retirement? I can see in the text above reason for application, documents required, and procedures that retirement is mentioned but the rest seems to be application based on marriage 

Felt

The document was issued in response to the embassies stopping the issue of letters, to be used in conjunction with existing regulations on both cases.

You can see in the text above the table it says something like " in the case of family members and retirement".

This is the lower part of the document.

[Felt 35]

3 hours ago, DrJack54 said:

Was thinking that. 

Point is for Canadians using income method we need to see what "transition" to perhaps money in bank will be required. 

 

Can really wonder but I guess they would be unemployed without all the "#¤¤¤#"#¤ %&   Bangkok Bank account for 28-years, paid taxes on more than 800k annually the last 15 years documented annually from Revenue dep., with tax payment certificate and certificate of residence, and retirement extension for 14 years. Sorry for the rant, but what kind of transition?

Felt

[bwanajohn]

From what you indicate you might have enough dosh to qualify for a LTR  visa.  Worth speaking to a lawyer/agent to see if that's possible...It's a better deal if you do .