Trump on Supreme Court: They should do what I want

[jerrymahoney]

Our Country has been INVADED by 21,000,000 Illegal Aliens, many of whom are Murderers and Criminals of the Highest Order, and if we aren’t allowed to remove them because of a radicalized and incompetent Court System, the USA will quickly and violently become a CRIME RIDDEN THIRD WORLD NATION, NEVER TO SEE GREATNESS AGAIN

 

Our lawyers should state this FACT when going before the United States Supreme Court, and all other courts:

 

I was elected in a landslide, won ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, 312 Electoral College Votes, Won 2750 to 525 Districts, and easily won the Popular Vote. I must be allowed to do the job that I was elected to do. If not, we won’t have a Country anymore. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!! (punctuation added)

 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114490277514269016

 

***************

 

The Supreme Court of the United States is not allowing me to do what I was elected to do. 

 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114519753109701350

 

 

[Tug]

Ahh nope you follow the law mr trump it was written by far and away better minds than yours.not to mention your very best pal Mr putin does indeed recruit from his prisons and asylums arms them then turns them loose on their neighbor.you are not a dictator.

[HappyExpat57]

Kings (or king wannabes) don't need to observe any laws. Duh.

[Chomper Higgot]

What he needs is an ‘Enabling Act’.

 

 

[JAG]

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

and easily won the Popular Vote.

49.8% is not winning the popular vote.

 

 

[JAG]

10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

What he needs is an ‘Enabling Act’.

 

 

I shouldn't be at all surprised if this is what this is leading up to.

 

The talk of "invasion" could be a lead up to some form of martial law.

 

The talk of not being allowed to do what he "was elected to do" could well be the opening steps towards limiting or suspending elements of the Constitutional framework.

 

I wonder if he will try to introduce it by executive order?

[save the frogs]

11 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Kings (or king wannabes) don't need to observe any laws. Duh.

 

stupid backward outdated laws, apparently

 

he is giving a valid reason. 

 

he is not just trying to act like a "dictator" without valid reasons. 

 

that's too deep for you people, right? 

 

[Chomper Higgot]

3 minutes ago, JAG said:

I shouldn't be at all surprised if this is what this is leading up to.

 

I wonder if he will try to introduce it by executive order?

It’s being attempted via the Supreme Court.

 

His appeal to the SCOTUS regarding birthright citizenship is a direct challenge to give a President the power to override explicit clauses within the Constitution.

 

The SCOTUS has already ruled he can’t be prosecuted for criminal acts if conducted as part of his Presidential duties.  
 

If he is then permitted to ignore the Constitution his power is beyond the control of the judiciary or Congress.

 

“I shall be a Dictator on day one”

 

[JAG]

5 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

 

stupid backward outdated laws, apparently

 

 

 

 

Ah, rather like the "Alien Friends Act" - signed into law some 228 years ago wasn't it?

[jerrymahoney]

New definition: Any law that does not allow a President to do what HE FEELS he was elected to do is stupid, backward, and outdated.

[Yagoda]

15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

His appeal to the SCOTUS regarding birthright citizenship is a direct challenge to give a President the power to override explicit clauses within the Constitution

Lies as usual. Show us how? What "explicit clauses" are to be overridden?

 

You would think after being caught in your blatant lies about Joe Bidens cognitive abilities, and your vicious and disgusting attacks on those who questioned those abilities, you would stop your barrage of lying on this Forum.

[flexomike]

2 hours ago, Tug said:

Ahh nope you follow the law mr trump it was written by far and away better minds than yours.not to mention your very best pal Mr putin does indeed recruit from his prisons and asylums arms them then turns them loose on their neighbor.you are not a dictator.

How many of these illegals are you supporting. You whine about how much things are costing now, ever give any thought too how much they are costing the US tax payer

[Yagoda]

4 minutes ago, flexomike said:

How many of these illegals are you supporting. You whine about how much things are costing now, ever give any thought too how much they are costing the US tax payer

People that support Illegal immigration and put roadblocks in front of the efforts to correct the problem hate the USA. Here, one of the leaders of that little Hate America club is Tug

[HappyExpat57]

30 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

 

stupid backward outdated laws, apparently

 

he is giving a valid reason. 

 

he is not just trying to act like a "dictator" without valid reasons. 

 

that's too deep for you people, right? 

 

There's this pesky little thing called "rule of law." It is what separates the US from most other countries. This allows for legitimate ways to change laws you don't like.

 

Otherwise the US just becomes another rogue state, the president just another despot. Is that what you are advocating?

[jerrymahoney]

10:40 p.m. GMT+7, May 15, 2025
Barrett emerges as key vote in birthright case

 

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a member of the court’s conservative wing, repeatedly pressed President Donald Trump’s attorney about why the government is avoiding the merits of the birthright citizenship case.

 

Her line of questioning drew an important concession from Solicitor General D. John Sauer, who acknowledged the legal arguments defending the merits of Trump’s order were “novel” and “sensitive.”

 

“So this one isn’t clear cut on the merits,” Barrett asked.

 

Sauer agreed.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/supreme-court-birthright-citizenship-cases-05-15-25

 

 

[Tug]

27 minutes ago, flexomike said:

How many of these illegals are you supporting. You whine about how much things are costing now, ever give any thought too how much they are costing the US tax payer

Who’s gonna pick the crops mop the floors do the mundane work?who Mike?I live next to the border my property’s are very near the border im here I don’t see it it’s a problem yes but greatly exaggerated because trump needs it to freak guys like you out.

[Quentin Zen]

church and state, not state and court. 

 

executive order  #88734847010487349073407341, supreme court will send me their cliff notes for ratification.   fired without cause possible.  b-day present, new jet, taken out of their salaries.  

 

Trump will do whatever he wants, no matter what.   I'm curious to see how this plays out.  I'm sure he'll get away with it all, so let the man cook!!!!

 

I'm in Thailand, cook Trump, cook!!!!!    

[Tug]

29 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

People that support Illegal immigration and put roadblocks in front of the efforts to correct the problem hate the USA. Here, one of the leaders of that little Hate America club is Tug

Get a life dude

[save the frogs]

11 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

There's this pesky little thing called "rule of law." It is what separates the US from most other countries. This allows for legitimate ways to change laws you don't like.

 

Otherwise the US just becomes another rogue state, the president just another despot. Is that what you are advocating?

 

This is from the White House page, which many people will claim is "propaganda".

So in your opinion, every official statement from the White House is lies?

Then how corrupt is the country?

 

Anyway, either this is a lie or if they're telling the truth, there's all sorts of corruption taking place anyway. 

How did all these illegal criminals get into the country in the first place? Rule of law? Bribes? Incompetence? Bending the law? 

Pick your poison. 

 

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/protecting-the-american-people-against-invasion/

Section 1.  Purpose.  Over the last 4 years, the prior administration invited, administered, and oversaw an unprecedented flood of illegal immigration into the United States.  Millions of illegal aliens crossed our borders or were permitted to fly directly into the United States on commercial flights and allowed to settle in American communities, in violation of longstanding Federal laws.

 

 

[Yagoda]

13 minutes ago, Tug said:

Get a life dude

I have one. I dont spend hours and hours ranting and raving and cutting and pasting hate spews about the USA. How bout you, how are the punctuation lessons coming?

[Yagoda]

10 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Over the last 4 years, the prior administration invited, administered, and oversaw an unprecedented flood of illegal immigration into the United States.  Millions of illegal aliens crossed our borders or were permitted to fly directly into the United States on commercial flights and allowed to settle in American communities, in violation of longstanding Federal laws.

Any of the haters ready to dispute that? How about an apology from all of those who defended it? Gonna toss some more vitriolic bile and hate at those of us that see reality? Watch how many thumbs down I get from the Emojinauts

[frank83628]

3 hours ago, Tug said:

Ahh nope you follow the law mr trump it was written by far and away better minds than yours.not to mention your very best pal Mr putin does indeed recruit from his prisons and asylums arms them then turns them loose on their neighbor.you are not a dictator.

You claimed he was a dictator many times on here.

What on earth does Putin have to do with anything?

[jerrymahoney]

The big legal question on immigration is whether as in the March 15 exec order there was an 'invasion' as invoked and required in the 1789 Act "by a foreign nation or government."

The above quote was from the JAN 20 Exec Order.

[JAG]

4 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Any of the haters ready to dispute that? How about an apology from all of those who defended it? Gonna toss some more vitriolic bile and hate at those of us that see reality? Watch how many thumbs down I get from the Emojinauts

Looking back over your last 3 posts on this topic, "tossing vitriolic bile" seems to be your forte!

[frank83628]

25 minutes ago, Tug said:

Who’s gonna pick the crops mop the floors do the mundane work?who Mike?I live next to the border my property’s are very near the border im here I don’t see it it’s a problem yes but greatly exaggerated because trump needs it to freak guys like you out.

Gang members and violent thugs are not there to do mundane jobs like picking crops, 

There is a difference between Laval and illegal... you seem to ignore this fact.

[save the frogs]

11 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Any of the haters ready to dispute that? How about an apology from all of those who defended it? Gonna toss some more vitriolic bile and hate at those of us that see reality? Watch how many thumbs down I get from the Emojinauts

Easy to dispute.

Just claim that it's false information and the Govt White House page is propaganda because Trump is a drunken raping golf-swinging dictator.

 

[Chomper Higgot]

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Lies as usual. Show us how? What "explicit clauses" are to be overridden?

 

You would think after being caught in your blatant lies about Joe Bidens cognitive abilities, and your vicious and disgusting attacks on those who questioned those abilities, you would stop your barrage of lying on this Forum.

There you go with your accusations of lying, accusations founded in your own ignorance.

 

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

 

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S1-1-2/ALDE_00000812/

[jerrymahoney]

NB The phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" within the 14th amendment is being challenged in the Exec Order with a much narrower interpretation than is generally acknowledged.

The 14th amendment is at issue in both the Immigration (Invasion) and Birthright executive orders.

[Chomper Higgot]

23 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Easy to dispute.

Just claim that it's false information and the Govt White House page is propaganda because Trump is a drunken raping golf-swinging dictator.

 

Let’s be fare, he’s not a drunk.

[TheAppletons]

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let’s be fare, he’s not a drunk.

 

  *fair

 

  Quite probably true - one suspects it's much more difficult to rape when you're drunk.