Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

image.png

 

Trump Concedes Putin Unwilling to End Ukraine War, But Holds Back on Sanctions

 

In a private conversation with European leaders earlier this week, U.S. President Donald Trump acknowledged for the first time that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not prepared to end the war in Ukraine—a stark departure from his previous public statements. According to three individuals familiar with the exchange, Trump told European counterparts during a Monday call that Putin believes he is winning the war and thus sees no reason to pursue peace.

 

This candid admission marked a significant shift in tone for Trump, who has often portrayed Putin as a potential partner for peace. For European leaders, the statement was less a revelation than a confirmation of what they had long suspected. However, hearing it directly from Trump for the first time added weight to their ongoing diplomatic concerns.

 

The White House declined to comment officially on the conversation but pointed to a social-media post by Trump on Monday, in which he characterized his call with Putin as positive. “The tone and spirit of the conversation were excellent. If it wasn’t, I would say so now,” Trump wrote.

 

Despite his newfound understanding of Putin’s reluctance to end the conflict, Trump has not taken the tougher stance that European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have been urging. In a call with European leaders on Sunday, prior to his two-hour conversation with Putin, Trump had floated the possibility of imposing sanctions on Russia should Putin refuse to agree to a cease-fire. However, by Monday, he had reversed course, expressing instead a desire to initiate lower-level peace talks between Russia and Ukraine at the Vatican.

 

The Monday call, which included Zelensky, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, was the culmination of an intensive European diplomatic push to persuade Trump to apply pressure on Putin. While the effort failed to convince Trump to enact new sanctions, European leaders saw value in the exchange. It served to clarify Trump's position and reinforced their belief that Putin has no intention of ending the war for now.

 

“This isn’t my war,” Trump told reporters following his conversation with Putin. “We got ourselves entangled in something we shouldn’t have been involved in.”

 

Despite the lack of direct U.S. action, European officials remain cautiously optimistic that the U.S. will not obstruct the continued flow of weapons to Ukraine, provided that either European nations or Ukraine bear the financial burden. According to those familiar with the situation, there is little concern among European leaders that the Trump administration would block arms shipments under those conditions.

 

On Sunday’s call with European heads of state—including Macron, Merz, Meloni, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer—Trump had suggested he would send Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Keith Kellogg to participate in the upcoming peace talks in the Vatican. However, by Monday, he appeared less committed to any concrete U.S. role in the discussions, according to a person briefed on the call.

 

The proposed negotiations at the Vatican are expected to commence in mid-June, with hopes that even a limited dialogue might lead to some form of diplomatic progress. Yet with Putin showing no signs of retreat and Trump hesitant to escalate pressure, European leaders now find themselves increasingly responsible for shaping the path forward in Ukraine.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Wall Street Journal  2025-05-23

 

 

newsletter-banner-1.png

  • Like 2
Posted

He could have ended the war , but he was blinded by the money of the bad RE-metals deal.

Money that was wasted , disappeared and laundred by the Biden autopen administration.

Now his only option ( get completely out of ANY support for Ukraine and NATO) is blocked by that deal.

Just another couple of million Ukrainians to go and complete victory for Russia. 👍

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
  • Haha 3
Posted

Lot of context missing here.  Putin doesn't want a temporary cease fire because that just gives Zelensky a breather to recover, regroup and rearm. 

 

Which would be stupid on Russia's part to grant them.  Putin's not stupid.

 

 

  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
8 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Peace ! We are talking about ending the war not a cease fire. Talking about context.


And the plan would be? 

 

Zelensky's still stuck on returning Donbass AND Crimea.  Not going to happen. 

 

Any cease fire would benefit him.  Putin isn't having it.  Not until Zelensky gets real.

 

  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted

Who or what is this "Donny" the forum laptop deniers and conspiracy theorists are talking about?

Q. Does it suggest they have strong arguments when they need special rules and just hurl insults? 

A. No

  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
7 hours ago, tomazbodner said:

Still waiting for MAGA clan to dismantle this one...

Easy peasy .... anyone MAGAn worth their salt knows you can't trust any channel other than Faux.... and of course Faux hasn't bothered to report Trump's retreat

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:


You did however state during your election campaign that you would end this war in 24hrs.

 

You own that Donny as much as it now owns you.

This was obviously one of those odd (TIC) occasions when he was suffering from a bout of foot-in-mouth disease.

Posted
17 hours ago, Social Media said:

image.png

 

Trump Concedes Putin Unwilling to End Ukraine War, But Holds Back on Sanctions

 

In a private conversation with European leaders earlier this week, U.S. President Donald Trump acknowledged for the first time that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not prepared to end the war in Ukraine—a stark departure from his previous public statements. According to three individuals familiar with the exchange, Trump told European counterparts during a Monday call that Putin believes he is winning the war and thus sees no reason to pursue peace.

 

This candid admission marked a significant shift in tone for Trump, who has often portrayed Putin as a potential partner for peace. For European leaders, the statement was less a revelation than a confirmation of what they had long suspected. However, hearing it directly from Trump for the first time added weight to their ongoing diplomatic concerns.

 

The White House declined to comment officially on the conversation but pointed to a social-media post by Trump on Monday, in which he characterized his call with Putin as positive. “The tone and spirit of the conversation were excellent. If it wasn’t, I would say so now,” Trump wrote.

 

Despite his newfound understanding of Putin’s reluctance to end the conflict, Trump has not taken the tougher stance that European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have been urging. In a call with European leaders on Sunday, prior to his two-hour conversation with Putin, Trump had floated the possibility of imposing sanctions on Russia should Putin refuse to agree to a cease-fire. However, by Monday, he had reversed course, expressing instead a desire to initiate lower-level peace talks between Russia and Ukraine at the Vatican.

 

The Monday call, which included Zelensky, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, was the culmination of an intensive European diplomatic push to persuade Trump to apply pressure on Putin. While the effort failed to convince Trump to enact new sanctions, European leaders saw value in the exchange. It served to clarify Trump's position and reinforced their belief that Putin has no intention of ending the war for now.

 

“This isn’t my war,” Trump told reporters following his conversation with Putin. “We got ourselves entangled in something we shouldn’t have been involved in.”

 

Despite the lack of direct U.S. action, European officials remain cautiously optimistic that the U.S. will not obstruct the continued flow of weapons to Ukraine, provided that either European nations or Ukraine bear the financial burden. According to those familiar with the situation, there is little concern among European leaders that the Trump administration would block arms shipments under those conditions.

 

On Sunday’s call with European heads of state—including Macron, Merz, Meloni, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer—Trump had suggested he would send Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Keith Kellogg to participate in the upcoming peace talks in the Vatican. However, by Monday, he appeared less committed to any concrete U.S. role in the discussions, according to a person briefed on the call.

 

The proposed negotiations at the Vatican are expected to commence in mid-June, with hopes that even a limited dialogue might lead to some form of diplomatic progress. Yet with Putin showing no signs of retreat and Trump hesitant to escalate pressure, European leaders now find themselves increasingly responsible for shaping the path forward in Ukraine.

 

image.png  Adapted by ASEAN Now from Wall Street Journal  2025-05-23

 

 

newsletter-banner-1.png

Thinking about this (sorry in advance), I am of the mind that it wouldn't make any difference - to Putin - even if America had continued its support of Ukraine as was the policy under Biden. And if Donny did decide to follow on with Biden's policy, who knows what Putin would have done; maybe get on the blower to President Xi Jinping. 

As for NATO without the U.S., the so-called eu army and the British army, please don't get involved (to put it politely); I don't want the see the UK nuked. 

Posted
10 hours ago, xylophone said:

He said at a Pennsylvania rally later that month: “Before I even arrive at the Oval Office, shortly after we all together win the presidency, we will have the horrible war between Russia and Ukraine settled. It will be settled. The war is going to be settled. I’ll get them both – I know Zelensky, I know Putin, it’ll be done within 24 hours, you watch. They all say, ‘That’s such a boast.’ It will be done very quickly.”

 

Sorry about having to repeat part of your post, SM007, but I thought it was necessary to really show what an idiot trump is, but then again his MAGA goons will still worship him and believe everything that this compulsive liar says – – how stupid can they be.

 

Correct. No lie seems to be too far a stretch for his devotees. 

 

Saint Donald. Total revisionist history, a complete reformation of his entire career, and a total erasure of his past crimes, moral terpitude, and a total and complete willingness to overlook a lifetime of moral bankruptcy. 

 

I do have some friends that will come right out and say the man is a butthead, he's an idiot, and he's an absolute clown, but I like his policies. And then they will have the courage to criticize some of his stupidest policies. Those are the Republicans I admire. 

 

With many people, once they got attached to a theory, it was hard to get them detached. They’d screen out unhelpful facts, invent favorable ones, and ignore contradictions in their own claims. Look at those Sandy Hook, multiple fraud convictions, and Jan. 6th truthers, babbling about false flags and crisis actors and all the rest. When people were motivated enough to believe something, they were going to believe it no matter what. There was no such thing as a bridge too far.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...