Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 hours ago, cjinchiangrai said:

i find the southern bible thumping nutjobs much more threatening.

Like who and why?

Posted

Zero political or life experience and he's got a chance to be NYC mayor? Crazy.

 

Zohran Mamdani has barely ever held a job, admitted he’s a nepo baby and has no experience in local government, The Post has learned.

New York City Mayor candidate Mamdani – who has lived most of his life in subsidized housing – failed in his attempts to be a rapper, musician and managing previous political campaigns.

An analysis of the 33-year-old’s work history shows he has been employed for only approximately three years in the time between graduating college in 2014 and being elected to the New York State Assembly in 2020.

https://nypost.com/2025/06/17/us-news/zohran-mamdani-has-barely-ever-held-a-job-and-has-no-experience-in-government-sources/

Posted

A Ugandan born, Muslim, democratic socialist, Democrat nominee for NY Mayor - that pushes so many MAGAt buttons all at once their heads explode

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Stocky said:

A Ugandan born, Muslim, democratic socialist, Democrat nominee for NY Mayor - that pushes so many MAGAt buttons all at once their heads explode

Hopefully he will push the buttons of the citizens of NYC and they will consign him to the dungheap of history

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Hopefully he will push the buttons of the citizens of NYC and they will consign him to the dungheap of history

I dont know, do you have faith in in new york or cali? I dont

Posted
6 hours ago, theblether said:

 

He won't.  You have no idea what effect he'll have on national politics. Even the anti-Trump Brits on this forum know I am correct. 

 

Militant Tendency level Muslim in charge of NYC? Wow, hilarious. 

Violent right wing radical magan's are no less militant or violent.

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, saakura said:

Violent right wing radical magan's are no less militant or violent.

Which ones? That are part of mainstream America First movement?

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, josephbloggs said:


None of my family are Muslim. None of their circle of friends are Muslim. But they all voted for Khan.

You are so blinkered that you assume a Muslim win can only be because all the Muslims got together to vote him in. Well there wouldn't be enough of them for a start, and believe it or not many people don't care a jot about his religion, they care only whether or not he is doing a good job for London. And he is. Which is why LONDONERS (of all creeds and colours) kep voting for him. I know that must be hard for you to come to terms with, sorry.

Rubbish. The point is that if there's a Muslim candidate ALL Muslims will vote for that candidate. That is the MO for Muslims, they stick rigidly with their own when it comes to voting. 

So Khan has a HUGE head start for every mayoral election. Then you add in the lefties and the die hard Labour voters and he's nailed on to win very time. 

 

You don't get this with any other religious or racial group. Blacks will not ALL vote for the black candidate. Christians will not ALL back the Christian candidate. 

 

As for Khan doing a good job for London, I can only assume that was a tongue-in-cheek comment :wacko:

 

Mamdani is going to have the same head start as Khan. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
7 hours ago, theblether said:

 

You don't understand what I'm talking about. Google "Militant Tendency, Liverpool." 

 

It destroyed the UK labour party in the 80's. Mamdani is from the same school of nutters. 

And you don't understand what Militant did for Liverpool, the City that Thatcher wanted a 'managed decline' for, she got a big f off and money flowed into the City. Strange that eh.

Posted
6 minutes ago, stuandjulie said:

And you don't understand what Militant did for Liverpool, the City that Thatcher wanted a 'managed decline' for, she got a big f off and money flowed into the City. Strange that eh.

 

This guy? In 1986, Hatton and 46 other councillors were subsequently found to have committed wilful misconduct by the district auditor, ordered to repay the costs incurred by the council due to the failure to set a rate as a surcharge, and disqualified from office.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/mar/28/ex-liverpool-mayor-joe-anderson-derek-hatton-bribery-charges-court

Posted
12 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

Rubbish. The point is that if there's a Muslim candidate ALL Muslims will vote for that candidate. That is the MO for Muslims, they stick rigidly with their own when it comes to voting. 

So Khan has a HUGE head start for every mayoral election. Then you add in the lefties and the die hard Labour voters and he's nailed on to win very time. 

 

You don't get this with any other religious or racial group. Blacks will not ALL vote for the black candidate. Christians will not ALL back the Christian candidate. 

 

Mamdani is going to have the same head start as Khan. 

 


You just made all of that up didn't you. To say that ALL Muslims voted for Khan is complete nonsense. Many of them didn't. Any evidence? Londoners are very cosmopolitan and are not divided along racial or religious lines like you think.  Sure, some of them will have voted for him because he's Muslim, just like some people voted for Farage because they are racist, some people vote Tory because they don't care about anyone else but themself. But not all.

 

Quote

As for Khan doing a good job for London, I can only assume that was a tongue-in-cheek comment :wacko:


Do you live in London?

My family do. My friends do. They are all supportive of the work he does and they all consistently vote for him because of it.  Race and religion does not come in to it.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You don’t seem to know much about the part NY has played in history of immigration to America.

 

yeah I know, some people came there and now other people are coming there. Makes no difference who the actual people are or where they came from. All humans. Yes I'm all too familiar with this way of thinking.

Posted
37 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

You don't get this with any other religious or racial group. Blacks will not ALL vote for the black candidate. Christians will not ALL back the Christian candidate. 

 

 

Blacks are also extremely ethnocentric. They will 100% vote for other black candidates based on race.

 

Not saying this is wrong, honestly they're more likely to understand each other and do what they need for each other.

 

Yet another reason why multiracial societies devolve in conflict and voting becomes an ethnic head count.  Only white people don't follow this rule and will explicitly vote for a person of another race. How many times have you seen them cheering for the "the first black xxx" or whatever.

 

image.png.5eaf86ded9a74e3def6f867459dd56cb.png

Posted
24 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

You just made all of that up didn't you. To say that ALL Muslims voted for Khan is complete nonsense. Many of them didn't. Any evidence? Londoners are very cosmopolitan and are not divided along racial or religious lines like you think.  Sure, some of them will have voted for him because he's Muslim, just like some people voted for Farage because they are racist, some people vote Tory because they don't care about anyone else but themself. But not all.

 

I think the UK tries to had as much race stats as they can but I have seen maps of which districts voted for him and how non-white they were. Muslims absolutely vote in blocs and aren't they introducing new Islamic parties now? There's even a Muslim Council of Britain!

 

You're literally being invaded and displaced in your capital city but at least you're not racist! 😂

 

"Why have the white British left London?"

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-21511904

 

 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bkk Brian said:

Zero political or life experience and he's got a chance to be NYC mayor? Crazy.

 

 

None of that means anything anymore. Just promise free stuff and make the tax payers pay for it. No experience required. Once the tax negative people outnumber the others voting is just a headcount and there's nothing you can do about it except move.

Posted
8 hours ago, theblether said:

My fellow Brits have seen this play before. Militant Tendency ( Liverpool ) destroyed Labours chances of election in the 1980's. 

 

Added, the Muslim vote now controls Mayoral elections in London and elsewhere. The American backlash will drive moderate Dems to the GOP. 

 

The cuckoo has landed in the Democrat nest and it's kicking out the traditional voters. 

Oh you are SO correct.  Islam is political suicide. 

  • Love It 1
Posted
8 hours ago, theblether said:

You have no idea what effect he'll have on national politics.

Neither do you.

 

8 hours ago, theblether said:

Even the anti-Trump Brits on this forum know I am correct. 

 

Speak for yourself, you blethering idiot.

Posted
26 minutes ago, NorthernRyland said:

 

yeah I know, some people came there and now other people are coming there. Makes no difference who the actual people are or where they came from. All humans. Yes I'm all too familiar with this way of thinking.

 

What? You have something against humans?

Posted
1 hour ago, Stocky said:

A Ugandan born, Muslim, democratic socialist, Democrat nominee for NY Mayor - that pushes so many MAGAt buttons all at once their heads explode

 

Just think what it is doing to the old school, deep blue Democrats.

 

So little hair, so much fire.

Posted
8 hours ago, theblether said:

So ya'll laughed at London and now you can 100% guarantee a Muslim mayor of NYC. Why? Mamdani will lift 100% of the Muslim vote. You will see a vast turnout on his behalf. 

 

Add to that the "educated whites" that think they are being clever and he will be unbeatable. Unless - 

 

Trump endorses Adams. Get ready for the first true Black MAGA v Muslim/Muslim cuck confrontation in American political history. 

 

Wait till you see the reaction of black voters to being undermined by a Muslim/White socialist coalition. 

 

The Dems are already bleeding Hispanic votes. 60 years after the Civil Rights Act watch the new realignment take place. 

 

You really do not understand NYC politics. Only 993,456 people voted. Of that, a minority, 432,305 voted for the man. 56.5% of Democrats who voted  picked an alternative candidate.  There are almost 5 million  municipal voters in NYC.  Once people become aware of the potential risk of electing a man with no management experience, and of dubious political positions,  voter turnout may increase.

 

There is lots of time for an independent to enter the race. If not Cuomo, a  candidate mutually agreed upon by civic power brokers, vested interests and people who will lose their businesses and assets if Mamdani is elected. Too many voters are still upset with Cuomo and his baggage.

 

Moderate Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine won the  City comptroller race, with a 14% cushion ahead of his nearest rival. There's a message there, and it is that people did not want Cuomo. The support for Mamdani is not likely to grow for the election in November.

Posted
1 hour ago, NorthernRyland said:

 

I think the UK tries to had as much race stats as they can but I have seen maps of which districts voted for him and how non-white they were. Muslims absolutely vote in blocs and aren't they introducing new Islamic parties now? There's even a Muslim Council of Britain!

 


OMG, a Muslim Council of Britain!!!  Do you know what they do?

There is also a Christian umbrella organisation called Churches Together in England (CTE) - OMG!!

There is also a Jewish umbrella organisation called Board of Deputies of British Jews - OMG!!

There is also a Buddhist umbrella organisation called Network of Buddhist Organisations (NBO) - OMG!!

Interestingly the Jewish group has a political lobbying arm whereas the others don't. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, NanLaew said:

Neither do you.

 

 

Speak for yourself, you blethering idiot.

 

I do as I've seen it before. 

 

And raise the quality of your insults, you're showing up your inner geriatric. 

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...