29 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Disgusting language.

 

Shame on you.

Oh no, are you ok petal? The rightest of posters are the biggest of snowflakes.

The inference was clear, the language was used to make a point.

7 hours ago, Peabody said:

So the woman was a "DEI failure", whereas the men just performed poorly.

Your definition of DEI is the Rethuglican shorthand for "Niggers, spics, and <deleted>".

 

No.  DEI is assigning a 5'6" 120# woman in a position where she may be called on to be a human shield for a 6'2" fat guy.  The woman was nothing but heart and courage in this picture, and I respect and commend her for that.  But she was in the wrong job. 

 

 

Don't even get me started on the one that couldn't get her gun back in its holster after several tries.

2 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Oh no, are you ok petal? The rightest of posters are the biggest of snowflakes.

The inference was clear, the language was used to make a point.

 

Use of the N word is way over the line. 

 

Not surprised you endorse it though. Leftists are often secret racists. 

On 7/12/2025 at 6:56 AM, spidermike007 said:

None of this story makes any sense on any level, there were only three or four rooftops in the entire vicinity, they had drones examining the entire surroundings, they had Secret Service agents inspecting every rooftop, so how is this guy able to set up a 20 foot ladder on the side of one of those buildings, crawl up to a flat roof without being detected, even though agents were very close by on nearby rooftops, and fire off some shots?

 

The other aspect of the story that makes no sense is that Trump's ear healed in 5 days. I've talked to a few doctors about this and they say the one part of the body that will never heal is the ear, when the ear gets badly injured it does not regrow, and it does not repair itself. So something very, very fishy happened on that day in Butler field. 

 

I am not a conspiracy theorist though some will probably accuse me of being such but that whole incident made about as much sense as the so-called Epstein suicide. 

I cut my ear when shaving a few times, and it bleeds like hell, but grow quick.

 

Thats a hell of a conspiracy. How did they fool the shooter to climb up there with a gun, for then shoot him and the other victim of his bullets 

4 minutes ago, Hummin said:

I cut my ear when shaving a few times, and it bleeds like hell, but grow quick.

 

Thats a hell of a conspiracy. How did they fool the shooter to climb up there with a gun, for then shoot him and the other victim of his bullets 

How bad at shaving are you to cut your ear so badly that part of it had to grow back?? And how hairy are your ears to make that a necessity?

You just made that up.

BTW I don't think it was staged.

15 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Use of the N word is way over the line. 

 

Ok treacle. 

The word is horrendous and I am surprised it got through the forum software, but it was making a point.

And your fake outrage is really pathetic, you knew the point he was making. If you need it spelling out it is that the anti DEI brigade are generally misogynistic racists.
 

Quote

Not surprised you endorse it though. 

Where did I endorse it? 

 

Quote

Leftists are often secret racists. 

And where the heck do you dream this stuff up?? 

I can see why they want to keep their work a secret !

On 7/12/2025 at 5:56 AM, spidermike007 said:

None of this story makes any sense on any level, there were only three or four rooftops in the entire vicinity, they had drones examining the entire surroundings, they had Secret Service agents inspecting every rooftop, so how is this guy able to set up a 20 foot ladder on the side of one of those buildings, crawl up to a flat roof without being detected, even though agents were very close by on nearby rooftops, and fire off some shots?

 

The other aspect of the story that makes no sense is that Trump's ear healed in 5 days. I've talked to a few doctors about this and they say the one part of the body that will never heal is the ear, when the ear gets badly injured it does not regrow, and it does not repair itself. So something very, very fishy happened on that day in Butler field. 

 

I am not a conspiracy theorist though some will probably accuse me of being such but that whole incident made about as much sense as the so-called Epstein suicide. 

What is the probability that a bullet would come just that close to "pinge" on the ear, causing it to bleed, but not close enough to cause irreparable damage (and please, no BS about "ears frowing back"!). That must have been a matter of either 1 mm too far out, not touching and no blood, or 1 mm too far in and then irrepatable damage.

 

That probability must be 1 out of millions!

8 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Oh no, are you ok petal? The rightest of posters are the biggest of snowflakes.

The inference was clear, the language was used to make a point.

I think perhaps it was a bit too close to the truth! That often provokes an outraged pearl clutching response!

22 hours ago, proton said:

Presidents need men protecting them, not short, fat DEI girlies who cannot even draw a gun and who panic at the first sign of an emergency.

Sounds like the synopsis for the opening scene of a Frank Dreben movie!

yeah, it's not good to be surrounded by bumbling fumbling idiots 

 

12 hours ago, Hummin said:

I cut my ear when shaving a few times, and it bleeds like hell, but grow quick.

 

Thats a hell of a conspiracy. How did they fool the shooter to climb up there with a gun, for then shoot him and the other victim of his bullets 

That is the nagging question isn't it? One never knows, he could have been terminally ill, his family could have been promised a fortune, there are an infinite number of variables. One thing that is certain is that the whole event was not as it appeared to be. Often times that 9s the case. Unless of course one always wants to accept the official narrative. 

9 hours ago, gejohesch said:

What is the probability that a bullet would come just that close to "pinge" on the ear, causing it to bleed, but not close enough to cause irreparable damage (and please, no BS about "ears frowing back"!). That must have been a matter of either 1 mm too far out, not touching and no blood, or 1 mm too far in and then irrepatable damage.

 

That probability must be 1 out of millions!

True. Unless the entire thing was staged, and the whole thing was set up by a Hollywood stunt crew, and no bullets were directed toward him. I'm not saying that's what happened. I'm just saying it's incredibly fishy that his ear healed in 5 days. Doctors that have spoken to tell me they've never seen anything like that before. 

12 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

True. Unless the entire thing was staged, and the whole thing was set up by a Hollywood stunt crew, and no bullets were directed toward him. I'm not saying that's what happened. I'm just saying it's incredibly fishy that his ear healed in 5 days. Doctors that have spoken to tell me they've never seen anything like that before. 

The bottom line, just on from this probability pov is that :

- it is extremely unlikely that a genuine bullet just happened to graze Trump's ear within a mm (no "hand of God" BS please!)

- it is rather likely that the assassination attempt was staged (ear growing back? mistery around the would-be assassin? no clear and official medical report?)

2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

That is the nagging question isn't it? One never knows, he could have been terminally ill, his family could have been promised a fortune, there are an infinite number of variables. One thing that is certain is that the whole event was not as it appeared to be. Often times that 9s the case. Unless of course one always wants to accept the official narrative. 

 

A bit far fetch if you ask me, the parents sold him out, dont you think so? 

 

There is detail where the shooter was observed, but no action was taken before to late, and it is quite common, the more obvious things seems to be, there is human mistakes. Just surprised no one from secret service is jailed yet.