US President Donald Trump has indicated he is contemplating a limited military strike on Iran to pressure its leaders into negotiating an agreement to limit their nuclear program. This statement came in response to a journalist's query shortly after officials suggested the possibility of military action.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Trump remarked on Thursday that the world would likely know "over the next, probably, 10 days" if a deal would be reached or if military action would ensue. Recently, the US has been bolstering its military presence in the region.

US and European allies suspect Iran is progressing towards developing a nuclear weapon, a claim Iran denies. Meetings between US and Iranian officials in Switzerland have shown progress, with Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, stating that Iran is preparing a draft agreement to present to US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff soon.

Amid these talks, American forces have increased their presence near Iran, including deploying the USS Gerald R Ford and USS Abraham Lincoln, along with additional destroyers, combat ships, and fighter jets.

Satellite images reveal Iran has fortified military sites, while Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued warnings on social media, noting the danger of US warships approaching Iran.

Trump's discussions with journalists occur frequently, often leading to varying statements. He tends to keep his plans secret to maintain strategic ambiguity. "I'm not going to talk to you about that," he told a reporter when asked about potential action, stating, "We're going to make a deal or get a deal one way or the other."

Trump has yet to specify the military objectives, despite being presented with various options for potentially prolonged campaigns. Previously, Trump used deadlines strategically to create an element of surprise, as seen during Operation Midnight Hammer last July, which involved striking Iranian nuclear facilities.

Potential strikes could occur during a challenging period domestically, with growing disapproval of Trump's handling of immigration and the economy. A protracted conflict with Iran might alienate parts of Trump's base that preferred his campaign promise to avoid foreign entanglements.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 20 Feb 2026

View full article

Isn't foreign intervention against his MAGA principles?

On the other hand, there is nothing like a good war to distract from other matters like the Epstein files.

"...contemplating a limited military strike on Iran to pressure its leaders into negotiating an agreement to limit their nuclear program."

For the maga types with short or no memory: an agreement was reached limiting Iran's nuke program, multilateral at that as it included Russia, China, Uk, US etc... which may explain why Trump threw it out upon taking office his first term. No stage is big enough to include anyone but the Donald.

I thought Iran's nuclear programme had been successfully wiped out.

8 hours ago, JBChiangRai said:

Isn't foreign intervention against his MAGA principles?

On the other hand, there is nothing like a good war to distract from other matters like the Epstein files.

With the Epstein scandal absolutely not going away, the economy in trouble, his most recent travails over tariffs, and of course with the mid term elections approaching, starting a good old fashioned war is a likely response!