53 minutes ago, Celsius said:

Either a bunch of clowns or a huge fakery.... either way

Woman and children ist My arse get my arse out of here pronto.

9 minutes ago, MIke B Bad said:

He was naked.

You get a little chubby when you saw the pictire?

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Do hotels where you come from go through the guest's luggage when they check in?

I've been at a workplace that hosted the then Prince Charles. Police checks started on individuals 6 weeks before. The building, which, by an unusual quirk, was the largest brick building in Europe, was meticulously searched ahead of the visit. Years before that, when I was much younger, I hosted a visit to my lab in Tennessee by President Bush (senior); a fascinating experience. Security was extremely tight on the day

I'm very surprised, in light of the current febrile times, the hotel would have been allowed to accept any bookings during and around this event. The President not only faces danger (like all previous Presidents going back to Lincoln) from domestic assassins), but the country is at war against an opponant, where one of the charges is that is a grand organiser and sponsor of international terrorism.

Yes, these days, the hotels I stay at routinely x-ray ans search all guests' luggage. But these aren't Western hotels. However, its common enough that the large kit providers, like Smiths Detection and Rapiscan, will have dedicated sales teams for the hospitality sector.

https://www.smithsdetection.com/media/sgdllu3g/hotel_chart_val_prop_lr_15.pdf

However the thing is this is not a US government, or Whitehouse event, but the White House Correspondant's Association dinner, or gala, to which the sitting President, and guests, is invited. I suspect the White House Correspondant's Association will strongly resist holding future events within the Whitehouse. Its really no necessary for the President to attend. The whole reason there WHCA was established, in 1914, was to counter rumours that only Congress could select which journalists could cover White House or Presidential events.

5 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Woman and children ist My arse get my arse out of here pronto.

But I thought it was all fake? Is that not your claim?

The Secret Service are there to protect the president, not the women and children.

1 minute ago, Roadsternut said:

I've been at a workplace that hosted the then Prince Charles. Police checks started on individuals 6 weeks before. The building, which, by an unusual quirk, was the largest brick building in Europe, was meticulously searched ahead of the visit. Years before that, when I was much younger, I hosted a visit to my lab in Tennessee by President Bush (senior); a fascinating experience. Security was extremely tight on the day

I'm very surprised, in light of the current febrile times, the hotel would have been allowed to accept any bookings during and around this event. The President not only faces danger (like all previous Presidents going back to Lincoln) from domestic assassins), but the country is at war against an opponant, where one of the charges is that is a grand organiser and sponsor of international terrorism.

Yes, these days, the hotels I stay at routinely x-ray ans search all guests' luggage. But these aren't Western hotels. However, its common enough that the large kit providers, like Smiths Detection and Rapiscan, will have dedicated sales teams for the hospitality sector.

https://www.smithsdetection.com/media/sgdllu3g/hotel_chart_val_prop_lr_15.pdf

However the thing is this is not a US government, or Whitehouse event, but the White House Correspondant's Association dinner, or gala, to which the sitting President, and guests, is invited. I suspect the White House Correspondant's Association will strongly resist holding future events within the Whitehouse. Its really no necessary for the President to attend. The whole reason there WHCA was established, in 1914, was to counter rumours that only Congress could select which journalists could cover White House or Presidential events.

Well, that proves it was all fake, thanks.

7 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Can't realy get into this thread yet without more facts but how did this shooter get a shotgun into the Hilton Hotel in the first place as he was a guest at the Hotel ? Why was he not stopped before he pulled his shotgun out people must have been milling out and around the venue, he apparently rushed a secret service checkpoint where he was " Apprehended " why was he not took out immediatly carrying a rifle or a shotgun smells fishy.

He was in the public area. Are your bags searched when you check into a hotel? Mine are not.

If you find it "fishy" it speaks to your mental health and intelligence. He was apprehended when he attempted to run through a security line. Security agents had no legal right to stop and search him until he did something to justify a stop and frisk. Random stop and frisk is illegal in the USA.

25 minutes ago, Roadsternut said:

I've been at a workplace that hosted the then Prince Charles. Police checks started on individuals 6 weeks before. The building, which, by an unusual quirk, was the largest brick building in Europe, was meticulously searched ahead of the visit. Years before that, when I was much younger, I hosted a visit to my lab in Tennessee by President Bush (senior); a fascinating experience. Security was extremely tight on the day

I'm very surprised, in light of the current febrile times, the hotel would have been allowed to accept any bookings during and around this event. The President not only faces danger (like all previous Presidents going back to Lincoln) from domestic assassins), but the country is at war against an opponant, where one of the charges is that is a grand organiser and sponsor of international terrorism.

Yes, these days, the hotels I stay at routinely x-ray ans search all guests' luggage. But these aren't Western hotels. However, its common enough that the large kit providers, like Smiths Detection and Rapiscan, will have dedicated sales teams for the hospitality sector.

https://www.smithsdetection.com/media/sgdllu3g/hotel_chart_val_prop_lr_15.pdf

However the thing is this is not a US government, or Whitehouse event, but the White House Correspondant's Association dinner, or gala, to which the sitting President, and guests, is invited. I suspect the White House Correspondant's Association will strongly resist holding future events within the Whitehouse. Its really no necessary for the President to attend. The whole reason there WHCA was established, in 1914, was to counter rumours that only Congress could select which journalists could cover White House or Presidential events.

Have a look at the multiple inauguration balls and receptions during Inauguration week. All hosted at public venues. The President and VP elect as well as senior Congressional members all attend.

1 hour ago, Celsius said:

Either a bunch of clowns or a huge fakery.... either way

Like Hamas martyr families - his family should have crowdsourced donations so they can live in clover for the rest of their lives from a world thankful to see the eliite class drunk on hubris and blood running around like the useless cowards they are. I would be good for 20 quid.

39 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Woman and children ist My arse get my arse out of here pronto.

Just wait till team woke get their DEI "president" and while she's doing her best in a crisis we'll use your playbook and encourage assassinations, be dropping N bombs, smells like fish and kneepad jokes, concoct all manner of insane things to try jailing her for and.....

Well thats not true. Because conservatives are not crude violent scumbags. We have morals. This thread is a sad example of the mindset a mass mental illness leads too. Diaturbing yet not surprising.

Edited April 26Apr 26 by SunnyinBangrak

4 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Just wait till team woke get their DEI "president" and while she's doing her best in a crisis we'll use your playbook and encourage assassinations, be dropping N bombs, smells like fish jokes, concoct all manner of insane things to try jailing her for and.....

Well thats not true. Because conservatives are not crude violent scumbags. We have morals. This thread is a sad example of the mindset a mass mental illness leads too. Diaturbing yet not surprising.

Well I hope you're right it will make it much easier when we come to round you up. I was worried that you were all armed to the teeth and would resist.

9 hours ago, nauseus said:

Looks like everyone but you knows what "camp" you're in already.

You are correct in the sense that I’m not a trump supporter.I do not support murder but I will not shed any tears by trumps exit from our body politic.in fact I will rejoice.

Don't believe a word of this.

6 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

He was in the public area. Are your bags searched when you check into a hotel? Mine are not.

If you find it "fishy" it speaks to your mental health and intelligence. He was apprehended when he attempted to run through a security line. Security agents had no legal right to stop and search him until he did something to justify a stop and frisk. Random stop and frisk is illegal in the USA.

I would have thought the pan washer in the hotel kitchen would have been searched with the president in the Hotel wouldn't you Patong.What do you think he was running through the checkpoint for A front table ?? come on.

7 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So was it fake?

Do you think the gunman is MAGA?

I thought my post fairly clearly intimated that it wasn't likely fake and that it is best to leave conspiracies to the Maga e.g. silly theories about Trumps election loss.

I haven't looked up today whether there is more information as to what his motivations or political background are. It may tell us about that one person - and though it may let those on this site wax lyrical about what it says about the left or right more generally - it is probably not meaningful as such.

I like those cop camera videos and one conclusion I draw is that a lot of people in America who do crimes have untreated mental illness - whether it applies here we will see in time.

Edited April 26Apr 26 by Fat is a type of crazy

7 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Woman and children ist My arse get my arse out of here pronto.

You are a security expert we see.

So do you consider this event a real attack by a Leftist? Do you condemn it?

12 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

I draw is that a lot of people in America who do crimes have untreated mental illness - whether it applies here we will see in time.

Leftism itself could be classified as a mental illness since it is based on a fantasy exacerbated by psychological factures such as Oedipal syndromes, PTSD, family abuse, sexual abnormalities. None of them would fall under M'Naughten though, nor will this one.

7 hours ago, Roadsternut said:

I've been at a workplace that hosted the then Prince Charles. Police checks started on individuals 6 weeks before. The building, which, by an unusual quirk, was the largest brick building in Europe, was meticulously searched ahead of the visit. Years before that, when I was much younger, I hosted a visit to my lab in Tennessee by President Bush (senior); a fascinating experience. Security was extremely tight on the day

I'm very surprised, in light of the current febrile times, the hotel would have been allowed to accept any bookings during and around this event. The President not only faces danger (like all previous Presidents going back to Lincoln) from domestic assassins), but the country is at war against an opponant, where one of the charges is that is a grand organiser and sponsor of international terrorism.

Yes, these days, the hotels I stay at routinely x-ray ans search all guests' luggage. But these aren't Western hotels. However, its common enough that the large kit providers, like Smiths Detection and Rapiscan, will have dedicated sales teams for the hospitality sector.

https://www.smithsdetection.com/media/sgdllu3g/hotel_chart_val_prop_lr_15.pdf

However the thing is this is not a US government, or Whitehouse event, but the White House Correspondant's Association dinner, or gala, to which the sitting President, and guests, is invited. I suspect the White House Correspondant's Association will strongly resist holding future events within the Whitehouse. Its really no necessary for the President to attend. The whole reason there WHCA was established, in 1914, was to counter rumours that only Congress could select which journalists could cover White House or Presidential events.

I had an experience at a hotel some time before Reagan was to have visited

This was the 80s. Obvious G-man/Secret Service types straight of central casting

Now you would not tell, some are dressed to blend in. The guy on a plane who looks like a biker gang member could be an Federal Air Marshall

1 minute ago, Yagoda said:

Leftism itself could be classified as a mental illness since it is based on a fantasy exacerbated by psychological factures such as Oedipal syndromes, PTSD, family abuse, sexual abnormalities. None of them would fall under M'Naughten though, nor will this one.

Bit early for screeching and spewing.

Leftism could be government run public transport or slightly higher taxes for the ultra rich. But I think the media you guys watch makes you think it means opening the borders to all takers, compulsory gender reassignment, and banning of .. whatever it is you guys hold dear.

5 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

Leftism could be government run public transport or slightly higher taxes for the ultra rich.

Neither is Leftist qua Leftist

6 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

But I think the media you guys watch makes you think it means opening the borders to all takers, compulsory gender reassignment, and banning of .. whatever it is you guys hold dear.

Sounds like the Democratic policies.

Are you sure it was fake?

Could have been an "inside" job.

3 minutes ago, JimHuaHin said:

Are you sure it was fake?

Could have been an "inside" job.

Tin foil hat guys online. Have to laugh.

The moderators need to move this topic to the conspiracy theory area of this forum. This topic is ridiculous and degrades the quality of this website.

4 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

I would have thought the pan washer in the hotel kitchen would have been searched with the president in the Hotel wouldn't you Patong.What do you think he was running through the checkpoint for A front table ?? come on.

The attacker was not a pan washer. He was a guest at the hotel and until he attempted to enter a secure area did not present a threat to anyone. He was far away from everyone, until he attempted to get past security. He was stopped at one of the security zones and did not get near the event itself. Your approach would have restricted everyone's freedom of movement and aside from being illegal, would have been unacceptable to Americans who value their freedom.

Fox has a map of the situation. So people can go look.

13 minutes ago, Rockyroad said:

Fox has a map of the situation. So people can go look.

That's fake as well. Only Jimmy Kimmle and Ilan Omar can be trusted to provide facts.

18 hours ago, save the frogs said:

A lot more things are fake than we realize in this fake simulation we live in.

It was an outstanding typical Mlik Trump performance to justify HIS ballroom waste.

18 hours ago, BLMFem said:

So during the WH correspondents' dinner another fake assassination attempt was 'performed'. Amazingly enough, with both the POTUS and the VPOTUS as well as several cabinet members present security was so lax that many people took notice, and an armed guy just blew past security and started firing randomly.

Yeah, sure, allright.........

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/25/politics/live-news/trump-white-house-correspondents-dinner

The "staged" theory collapses the moment you look at the physical ballistics and the human cost of the breach.

To suggest this was a "performance" ignores the fact that a Secret Service agent was physically struck by a shotgun blast at close range; no professional security detail or political operative would "script" a live-fire scenario.

The "lax" security you mention was actually a high-stakes kinetic engagement at the final magnetometer line, where an agent was physically struck in the vest by a shotgun blast—a variable that no professional coordinator would ever "script" due to the extreme risk of a fatal ricochet or primary impact. Furthermore, the suspect’s digital trail is ironclad: he sent a 1,000-word manifesto to his family in Torrance, California, minutes before the attack, and his own brother contacted the New London Police to report the threat before the first shot was even fired.

With physical shell casings, a wounded federal officer, and a verifiable Caltech-educated suspect now facing a life sentence in a federal cell, the "drama" is backed by a mountain of hard forensic evidence that a political "staged" event simply could not replicate without leaving a massive paper trail of co-conspirators.

The fact you actually quoted CNN is really the nail in the coffin!

3 minutes ago, mikeymike100 said:

The "staged" theory collapses the moment you look at the physical ballistics and the human cost of the breach.

To suggest this was a "performance" ignores the fact that a Secret Service agent was physically struck by a shotgun blast at close range; no professional security detail or political operative would "script" a live-fire scenario.

The "lax" security you mention was actually a high-stakes kinetic engagement at the final magnetometer line, where an agent was physically struck in the vest by a shotgun blast—a variable that no professional coordinator would ever "script" due to the extreme risk of a fatal ricochet or primary impact. Furthermore, the suspect’s digital trail is ironclad: he sent a 1,000-word manifesto to his family in Torrance, California, minutes before the attack, and his own brother contacted the New London Police to report the threat before the first shot was even fired.

With physical shell casings, a wounded federal officer, and a verifiable Caltech-educated suspect now facing a life sentence in a federal cell, the "drama" is backed by a mountain of hard forensic evidence that a political "staged" event simply could not replicate without leaving a massive paper trail of co-conspirators.

The fact you actually quoted CNN is really the nail in the coffin!

That woman is a professional Trump hating troll.

I wonder how long before they start selling Cole Allen T-shirts and coffee mugs on EBay?

You can get your very own Thomas Crooks T-Shirt or a Luigi Mangione coffee mug...

11 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

The Secret Service are there to protect the president, not the women and children.

Just like the DOJ and its handling of the Epstein Files?