I'm not the only one who thinks you consider yourself above us and think we are idiots when your called out you accuse members of lying because you only post your opinion and think we are stupid because we don't agree with you so you throw accusations hoping some of it will stick and makes you look good. Your Patronising to members is well known. You did it to me and now your dong it to Eloquent.

6 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

I'm not the only one who thinks you consider yourself above us and think we are idiots when your called out you accuse members of lying because you only post your opinion and think we are stupid because we don't agree with you so you throw accusations hoping some of it will stick and makes you look good. Your Patronising to members is well known. You did it to me and now your dong it to Eloquent.

I have always found facts to be above false statements. Nothing to do with me or my status compared to anyone else's.

I've stated facts, not opinions, and I've provided links to prove them, twice as you didn't like the first set of facts.

If you can prove the facts I posted, and their origins, to be incorrect, please do so.

2 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

Starmer will be lucky if he is in a job today as over 73 labour MPs have asked him to resighn. 4 front bench members close to him have also told him to go including Lammy, Shabana Mahmood, Wes Streeting and Yvette Cooper. They have all asked Starmer to set a time table to go. A meeting is set this morning in Downing Street where these have said either go or we will go and he wiil throw the towel in.

Labour haemorrhage millions of votes to Reform because working class Labour voters have had enough of uncontrolled immigration and left wing policies, and Labour’s answer:

Let’s get rid of Starmer and replace him with someone that will almost certainly be much further to the left, and work on trying to reverse as much of our divorce from the EU as we possibly can.

Staggering that they don’t seem to understand why they lost all those votes.

2 hours ago, BarraMarra said:

55 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

It looks like you need to check the comments trail before you start hurling accusations and calling people left wing and liars.

Please point out whereabouts in my comment I called the person I was replying to, or anyone else for that matter, a liar.

Thanks

Edited May 12May 12 by Eloquent pilgrim

I'm watching TV at the moment there is a cabinet meeting in Downing Street and there are loads of reporters in Downing Street looks like they are expecting an announcement.

I just want the government to get on with the job of running the country changing the leader is not going to achieve much at all it's like <deleted>ting your pants and changing your hat.

4 hours ago, emptypockets said:

There are asylum seekers in many countries, not just the UK.

It wasn't a deflection, merely a simple question that you have avoided to answer.

Too many on the left welcome illegals with open arms, as long as they don't affect them personally. Also known as hypocrisy

I thought I did answer but here we go. If I did have a big enough house, and the government was giving me money to take in asylum seekers, or it could all be written off against taxes, then yes I would. Many on the right love a government handout after all.

14 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

Please point out whereabouts in my comment I called the person I was replying to, or anyone else for that matter, a liar.

Thanks

You wrote:

"And you have the temerity to talk about truth, and facts, when those two essentials are absent from your own comments"

Suggesting someone is not telling any truths is tantamount to calling thrm a liar.

Edited May 12May 12 by youreavinalaff

37 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

I have always found facts to be above false statements. Nothing to do with me or my status compared to anyone else's.

I've stated facts, not opinions, and I've provided links to prove them, twice as you didn't like the first set of facts.

If you can prove the facts I posted, and their origins, to be incorrect, please do so.

Even if we produce or post links you dissrepect them.

Well the deck hands look like there heading for the lifeboats, will the Captain remain to go down with the ship or will he join them before it finally sinks.

16 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

Suggesting someone is not telling any truths is tantamount to calling thrm a liar.

Nope, not tantamount to anything; you accused me of “calling people left wing and liars” and I did not call anyone a liar, so don’t make false accusations against me.

9 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Even if we produce or post links you dissrepect them.

It's not that we disrespect as much as we disregard them.

BTW, I'm not in the UK right now. Is that still relevant to you?

Edited May 12May 12 by NanLaew

29 minutes ago, BarraMarra said:

Even if we produce or post links you dissrepect them.

You've only posted links to YouTube.

Pist some facts from reliable sources, as you asked me to do, and you'll get better responses.

21 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

Nope, not tantamount to anything; you accused me of “calling people left wing and liars” and I did not call anyone a liar, so don’t make false accusations against me.

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Is English not your first language?

Do you not know that the opposite of telling the truth us lying?

31 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

🤣🤣🤣🤣

Is English not your first language?

Do you not know that the opposite of telling the truth us lying?

Stop obfuscating; you accused me of calling people liars, which I most certainly did not do; and now, lacking the good grace to apologise,  you start waffling.

Well done Reform voters, the Labour Government is in total meltdown, all stabbing each other in the backs and trying to save their own careers, with no thoughts whatsoever for the good of the country.

Unfortunately, this will be a disaster for the UK, unless Starmer does the right thing by the country and calls a General Election.

20 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

Well done Reform voters, the Labour Government is in total meltdown, all stabbing each other in the backs and trying to save their own careers, with no thoughts whatsoever for the good of the country.

Unfortunately, this will be a disaster for the UK, unless Starmer does the right thing by the country and calls a General Election.

Turkeys don't vote for Christmas! There won't be an election, and despite the media pressure it looks like the PM is staying put. Good for him.

1 hour ago, youreavinalaff said:

You've only posted links to YouTube.

Pist some facts from reliable sources, as you asked me to do, and you'll get better responses.

13 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Turkeys don't vote for Christmas! There won't be an election, and despite the media pressure it looks like the PM is staying put. Good for him.

There will not be forced into a general Election at the moment mainly because they know they will all be unenployed when there defeated by Reform.

1 hour ago, youreavinalaff said:

You've only posted links to YouTube.

Pist some facts from reliable sources, as you asked me to do, and you'll get better responses.

I post links and videos that are allowed by the team and not from sites unknown by some members on here like Fullform.org wonder how many have hear'd of this.

24 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Turkeys don't vote for Christmas! There won't be an election, and despite the media pressure it looks like the PM is staying put. Good for him.

I agree, of course he won’t call a General Election. He will stumble on with total disregard for the well-being of the country; unfortunately, he will now have an even greater debt of compliance to his left wing backbenches; the ones that have forced him into continual U-turns every time he made a half decent decision for the good of the country.

However, probably better to have him remain than be replaced by Streeting, Rayner, Burnham, or heaven forbid, Lammy.

59 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

I agree, of course he won’t call a General Election. He will stumble on with total disregard for the well-being of the country; unfortunately, he will now have an even greater debt of compliance to his left wing backbenches; the ones that have forced him into continual U-turns every time he made a half decent decision for the good of the country.

However, probably better to have him remain than be replaced by Streeting, Rayner, Burnham, or heaven forbid, Lammy.

Sub 70 IQ Lammy is incredibly probably the best hope. A general election is desperately needed.

I hope we eventually find out Sir Kiers role in importing his most loved family, the Rudakubanas. I believe the moment his premiership was toast was when he falsely claimed the son was a "welsh choirboy" and banged up terrified mothers. Sick and disgusting.

On 5/8/2026 at 12:31 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Obviously a million times better than Starmer and co, but Im not convinced Farage will be the magic bullet to end the systematic wiping out of Britishness.

Restore led by common sense patriot Rupert Lowe would seem to be the only real chance to end the lefts slow-mo genocide of British people and their culture

Unfortunately Lowe lacks sufficient MPs to mount a real challenge yet. Plus there is a risk that a vote split between Reform and Restore will weaken both and could even allow Liebour to survive. Which leaves us voting for Reform and Farage as the best chance of getting our country back before the Muslims overrun us.

11 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Sub 70 IQ Lammy is incredibly probably the best hope. A general election is desperately needed.

I hope we eventually find out Sir Kiers role in importing his most loved family, the Rudakubanas. I believe the moment his premiership was toast was when he falsely claimed the son was a "welsh choirboy" and banged up terrified mothers. Sick and disgusting.

Starmer was not PM in 2002.

3 hours ago, NanLaew said:

I thought I did answer but here we go. If I did have a big enough house, and the government was giving me money to take in asylum seekers, or it could all be written off against taxes, then yes I would. Many on the right love a government handout after all.

So no real support for the illegals if it costs you money.

Astonishing claims just dropped on X by Ben Habib ex UKIP MEP and ex Reform chairman detailing insider info about Farage and his connections to Harborne the Thai crypto billionaire. Former Reform UK Deputy Leader Ben Habib has made explosive allegations claiming that crypto-billionaire Christopher Harborne paid Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson £1m each to coordinate political maneuvers such as election pacts that favoured a specific pro-Brexit outcome in 2019.

Habib further alleges that a previously undisclosed £5m "gift" received by Farage in early 2024 was not for personal security as claimed, but was a direct payment to secure Farage’s return as Reform UK leader and his candidacy in Clacton and calls him out as the shamless grifter he undoubtedly is and why he is refusing to discuss in detail what exactly took place. Unelected crypto-billionaires living in Thailand attempting to influence British elections - man of the people my arris !

Oh and Habib says to Farage sue me if I'm wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Habib

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/apr/25/christopher-harborne-mystery-billionaire-bankrolling-reform-uk-nigel-farage

Shortly before Christmas 2022, Chakrit Sakunkrit, owner of the Kamalaya Wellness Sanctuary on the Thai island of Koh Samui, invited 200 guests to spend a few days celebrating his 60th birthday. One sultry afternoon, Sakunkrit and a small group gathered around a table near the shore, surrounded by the burgundy foliage of Good Luck plants. To his right, dressed down in a polo shirt, sat Nigel Farage.

Edited May 12May 12 by beautifulthailand99

The appalling Safeguarding Minister, Jess Phillips, who has been kicking the Pakistani rape gang inquiry down the road, has just resigned.

So some good is coming out of this fiasco.

1 hour ago, emptypockets said:

So no real support for the illegals if it costs you money.

Who's talking about illegals? My comment referred to asylum seekers.

18 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Who's talking about illegals? My comment referred to asylum seekers.

The phrase "asylum seekers" thanks to the left has lost its original meaning. France is not a war zone. Nobody arriving from safe country France could ever be considered "asylum seekers" These young military age muslim males that abandoned their vulnerable family members back home to suckle on the lefts freebie nipple in the UK are freeloaders. The left only want them seeing as very few real Brits would dream of voting for leftist parties.

Why play word games? You fool nobody.

7 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

The phrase "asylum seekers" thanks to the left has lost its original meaning. France is not a war zone. Nobody arriving from safe country France could ever be considered "asylum seekers" These young military age muslim males that abandoned their vulnerable family members back home to suckle on the lefts freebie nipple in the UK are freeloaders. The left only want them seeing as very few real Brits would dream of voting for leftist parties.

Why play word games? You fool nobody.

Proper fooled you are. But never mind, you're not alone in your misinformed sadness.

Listening to BBC World Service news this morning, the program presenter asked the interviewing reporter,' Does he think the UK is ungovernable? ' Thinking that since 2016 the UK is on its 5th prime minister.

Un governable, to me means banana republic/failed state, the intervening reporter said: "well may be".

In all the years I have been around, that is the first time I have heard that.

47 minutes ago, kickstart said:

Listening to BBC World Service news this morning, the program presenter asked the interviewing reporter,' Does he think the UK is ungovernable? ' Thinking that since 2016 the UK is on its 5th prime minister.

Un governable, to me means banana republic/failed state, the intervening reporter said: "well may be".

In all the years I have been around, that is the first time I have heard that.

An interesting point. Think of a flock of sheep. Easily coralled by a sheepdog, no drama. Then add a few dozen lions, a couple of crocodiles and 50 flamingoes to the sheep flock and hey presto, the sheepdog is buggered.

Much like the UK. Working proper Brits want one thing. Sharia freeloaders another, coastal elites and Cotswolds virtue signalling Dorises another. Its mental.

Deport. Deport. Deport. Then govern.