On 8/5/2026 at 3:46 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not sure this news will be welcomed by the Tate brothers.

For sure. Dropping truth bombs on social media is a much worse crime than murdering a policeman. Only fitting the laughing irish gypsy murderers are set free (perhaps with some compensation?) While the conservative pundit gets to rot in jail for making lefties look silly in front of his teen audience (unforgiveable🤣).

Nice 1 chomps

5 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

For sure. Dropping truth bombs on social media is a much worse crime than murdering a policeman. Only fitting the laughing irish gypsy murderers are set free (perhaps with some compensation?) While the conservative pundit gets to rot in jail for making lefties look silly in front of his teen audience (unforgiveable🤣).

Nice 1 chomps

More nonsense from Sunny. You've never told us where you get your nonsense from, but now I know - probably from watching the Tate brothers like a good little incel follower.

Andrew Tate is charged with 10 counts of rape, 5 counts of human trafficking / sexual exploitation, 7 counts of physical assault, 1 count of controlling prostitution for gain, 19 counts relating to indecent images of a child and extreme pornography.

His brother is charged with 5 counts of rape, 5 counts of human trafficking / sexual exploitation, 6 counts of physical assault, 1 count of sexual assault.

All forwarded for prosecution by the CPS which means evidence is strong, strong enough for the US police to arrest them.

https://www.cps.gov.uk/national-news/news/cps-decides-prosecute-tate-brothers-additional-sexual-offences

Oh, and don't forget the Romanian charges against them:

Human trafficking, Trafficking of minors, Rape, Forming an organized crime group (to sexually exploit women), Money laundering, Attempting to influence a witness, Sex with a minor.

None of the charges relate to "dropping truth bombs". You have to be the most gullible person alive to believe what they say. All their charges relate to violent and sexual offences, including against underage people and child pornography. But yeah, you stick up for them. Good boy!

Edited August 6Aug 6 by josephbloggs

12 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

For sure. Dropping truth bombs on social media is a much worse crime than murdering a policeman. Only fitting the laughing irish gypsy murderers are set free (perhaps with some compensation?) While the conservative pundit gets to rot in jail for making lefties look silly in front of his teen audience (unforgiveable🤣).

Nice 1 chomps

I think it relates more to the scores of criminal charges against the Tate brothers’ for human trafficking, rape and child pornography.

The Bros you look up to.. Go figure.

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I think it relates more to the scores of criminal charges against the Tate brothers’ for human trafficking, rape and child pornography.

The Bros you look up to.. Go figure.

He's no Hunter Biden. The bro you look up to. Go figure.

On 8/4/2026 at 7:58 AM, James105 said:

No, it's a consequence of Labour being in government. A sensible government would consider letting out violent criminals early the equivalent of going up to the victims family and spitting in their faces. They would either:

1. Deport the foreign criminals (11,000 of them)

2. Build temporary prisons for non violent criminals.

3. Increase the capacity of cells, knock down walls and make bigger communal cells (for reference, see Bangkok Hilton)

There were many options to solve this problem. Labour have been in government for 2 years now. They should withdraw from government if they are too stupid to find another solution to this problem rather than let violent criminals out early.

It would be easier and more effective to install the death penalty for all murderers, serial racists and peados who have been convicted without any doubt to their guilt.

Start with Levi Bellfirld, Delroy Grant and Colin Pitchfork. Gary Glitter could be included for a bit of glam.

17 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

He's no Hunter Biden. The bro you look up to. Go figure.

The guy’s living re t free in your head.

7 minutes ago, youreavinalaff said:

It would be easier and more effective to install the death penalty for all murderers, serial racists and peados who have been convicted without any doubt to their guilt.

Start with Levi Bellfirld, Delroy Grant and Colin Pitchfork. Gary Glitter could be included for a bit of glam.

The irreversible punishment on the basis of a fallible justice system.

The sensible option is build more prisons and perhaps stop jailing so many people who are not a threat to anyone.

https://insidetime.org/newsround/revealed-locations-of-14000-new-prison-places/

Perhaps the Dutch have, once again, something to teach the British:

“Lower rates of remand and falling crime rate

Another major factor in the Netherlands is the fall in the number people being held in pre-trial detention. The study shows that 21,029 spent time on remand in Dutch prisons in 2005, with that number falling to 13,350 by 2016 — a decrease of 37%.

In the same period — 2005 to 2016 — the number of crimes registered in the Netherlands fell from 1.35 million to 930,000. Crimes against property fell by 216,000 (-27%) and there were 32,000 fewer violent crimes (-26%).”

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477370819896220?utm_source=chatgpt.com

27 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The irreversible punishment on the basis of a fallible justice system.

The sensible option is build more prisons and perhaps stop jailing so many people who are not a threat to anyone.

https://insidetime.org/newsround/revealed-locations-of-14000-new-prison-places/

No. There are many brutal prisoners that have been convicted beyond doubt. They have nothing to offer humanity. Time to go.

Edited August 7Aug 7 by youreavinalaff

1 hour ago, youreavinalaff said:

No. There are many brutal prisoners that have been convicted beyond doubt. They have nothing to offer humanity. Time to go.

Humanity is perhaps a poor coice of words for such an argument.

There’s plenty of evidence of the fallibility of justice.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Humanity is perhaps a poor coice of words for such an argument.

There’s plenty of evidence of the fallibility of justice.

Not in many cases. The three I used as examples are hook, line and sinker and there are many others. There is absolutely no reason to keep them alive, let alone use tax payers money to do so.

Edited August 7Aug 7 by youreavinalaff