43 minutes ago, atpeace said:

I'm extremely healthy and Covid wasn't a real danger for me. I got vaccinated for other reasons other than fearing death.

I got the jab due to peer pressure. Family members all got it and wanted to go to restaurants. In the early stages, restaurants were off limits to the unjabbed.

I neither feared the vaccine (well, I was a bit nervous) nor death from Covid.

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

Nothing to do with science, but all to do with their power and greed.

And their level of response and repression, will be proportional to their direct financial loss.

There is corruption in every industry.

But there is also an army of doctors working hard to help people.

You guys are getting carried away making all doctors look like money-grubbing buffoons.

There are several doctors I follow on youtube and I have learned a lot from them.

Edited Wednesday at 07:32 AM2 days by save the frogs

23 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

That is from AI I guess.

This pathogenic route is a Red Herring IMO. There have been hundreds of experiments then have tried to demonstrate that a 'sickness' can be passed from one human to another. Well! Of course they can. And I agree. But can they make a well person sick with the same illness that the other had?*

The most notable pathogen is the mysterious virus. And it is the insistence by the Germ Theorists that viruses exist, that is mostly at the centre of debate. After all; no virus - no use for vaccines. So, it is important for the whole $$$ chabang to keep rolling along, that viruses do indeed exist. However! **

In my view Terrain fact and Germ Theory cannot live side by side. Bit like petrol and fire being best buddies. Or an elephant having a unicorn as a best friend.

* Many experiments were done, many by the US Navy, to prove pathogenicity, and contagion. Available for all to see. Any decent AI will soon find them.

** Why is mRNA the talk of the medical town? I'll say why i think it is being so heavily promoted. In time to come, the word 'virus' will be gently dropped from medical literature.

The medical powers-that-be will not need to point to a virus to justify a vaccine. No! Jabs will be termed 'theoropy' (or similar). and these theoropies will change everything for the sick; the not so sick and the gullible. Ingrowing hairs. Excess body weight. Wrong sexuality. Fear of arachnids. Worry not folks. MRNA is the saviour. The elusive and mythical virus will be in the bin. Listen up there viruses; is a new kid on the block.

55 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

There is corruption in every industry.

But there is also an army of doctors working hard to help people.

You guys are getting carried away making all doctors look like money-grubbing buffoons.

There are several doctors I follow on youtube and I have learned a lot from them.

Doctors have their set programmes mapped out for them from the first day they step into the lecture room. The syllabus is Big Pharmas (BP). The books are donated by BP. The teaching establishments are funded by BP. Many of the top doggies receive grants from; guess where. Even holidays can be complimented by BP.

Not all doctors are money grabbing buffoons it's true. Just most of them. Safe n effective. Safe n effective. But it is not the know-nothing white-coat dumboes that irk me. Well they do a bit. A lot really. Especially when it comes to babes and toddlers. No, it's the fraudsters, on high, that pretend for power, status and $$$ that annoy me most. Especially when they know they are lying through their clenched teeth, and hope they don't get rumbled. And we know it too.

Ever been to medical school Sir? Well I have, and I can tell you the quickest way to be thrown out or even flunk yer finals is to ask questions. Question a lecturer? No way!! Especially if the question suggests the expert could be a BP shill, or somewhat unknowledgeable.

If you can remember what pills to prescribe for the ills you see in front of you, then you have it cracked; and can don the whitecoat proper. Safe and effective.

Edited Wednesday at 09:00 AM2 days by Stiddle Mump

39 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Excess body weight. Wrong sexuality. Fear of arachnids. Worry not folks. MRNA is the saviour.

For excess body weight, there are peptides -- GLP-1s

And there is actually a provable mechanism on how they work and lower weight ie they reduce insulin, block glucagon ... it's a provable mechanism.

But with mRNA, for some reason, you claim there is no provable mechanism?

mRNA mechanism might be a bit more complex and mysterious than GLP-1, but it's not a fairy tale.

11 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Ever been to medical school Sir?

No, I wasn't smart enough for medical school.

30 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Ever been to medical school Sir? Well I have, and I can tell you the quickest way to be thrown out or even flunk yer finals is to ask questions.

Never outshine the master.

When you are in a subordinate role, of course you will have problems if you keep sticking your neck out and acting like you are smarter than everyone else.

The only time you can act like a big shot is when you work independently / you are your own boss / you have substantial savings. When you are in any subordinate role in any industry, you can't act like you own the joint and your way of doing things is better.

The last place I worked at, I wasn't allowed to question anything, even though a lot of things about the business model were really bad. They know they can fire you easily, and they are too lazy to upgrade anything because it's more work for them and it makes them look bad. Everyone is afraid of being blamed and losing their job. A lot of people are like that in most industries.

Edited Wednesday at 09:33 AM2 days by save the frogs

5 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Doctors have their set programmes mapped out for them from the first day they step into the lecture room. The syllabus is Big Pharmas (BP). The books are donated by BP. The teaching establishments are funded by BP. Many of the top doggies receive grants from; guess where. Even holidays can be complimented by BP.

Not all doctors are money grabbing buffoons it's true. Just most of them. Safe n effective. Safe n effective. But it is not the know-nothing white-coat dumboes that irk me. Well they do a bit. A lot really. Especially when it comes to babes and toddlers. No, it's the fraudsters, on high, that pretend for power, status and $$$ that annoy me most. Especially when they know they are lying through their clenched teeth, and hope they don't get rumbled. And we know it too.

Ever been to medical school Sir? Well I have, and I can tell you the quickest way to be thrown out or even flunk yer finals is to ask questions. Question a lecturer? No way!! Especially if the question suggests the expert could be a BP shill, or somewhat unknowledgeable.

If you can remember what pills to prescribe for the ills you see in front of you, then you have it cracked; and can don the whitecoat proper. Safe and effective.

A silly story based on your misunderstanding of just about everything.

Your tale of medical school attendance and being sidelined for asking questions is probably as honest as your attempt to convince the AN community that you are NOT an owl from Isaan.

10 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

A silly story based on your misunderstanding of just about everything.

Your tale of medical school attendance and being sidelined for asking questions is probably as honest as your attempt to convince the AN community that you are NOT an owl from Isaan.

His visit to medical school was probably during children day, and he was thrown out for being the annoyance he is on this forum.

15 hours ago, CallumWK said:

His visit to medical school was probably during children day, and he was thrown out for being the annoyance he is on this forum.

Very droll. An attempt at humour there. Off to the joke section with you Sir.

Actually it was on a 12 month exchange programme, via my Uni, where I was reading physiology.

Edited yesterday at 06:37 AM1 day by Stiddle Mump

On 9/9/2026 at 11:33 AM, Stiddle Mump said:

I'm not at all sure if you actually believe the stuff in your posts,or you just like being contentious.

I don't need to bring evidence to the table. Terrain and nature are here as we correspond. No need to prove anything there.

However, if the virologists and the other 'ologist say there is a virus out there; then let them show the evidence. Where is there a paper that shows isolation and purification of the said entity? I've looked, others have looked. Kary Mullis looked, Doctors, Cowan, Kaufman, Bailey, Lanka and many others have looked and what do you know. They couldn't find any.

Now! If virus don't exist. At least the contagious ones, surely that brings into focus the whole vaccine industry. After all, one of its cornerstones is the virus.

"I'm not at all sure if you actually believe the stuff in your posts,or you just like being contentious."

Possibly the most unintentionally ironic sentence I have ever read.

1 hour ago, cdemundo said:

"I'm not at all sure if you actually believe the stuff in your posts,or you just like being contentious."

Possibly the most unintentionally ironic sentence I have ever read.

I don't think I've posted anything on any AN 'health' topics, that could be considered contentious.

Nature is truth. Terrain is truth. Stiddle is truth.

3 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

I don't think I've posted anything on any AN 'health' topics, that could be considered contentious.

I don't think you've posted anything that includes science developed since the 1920's.

3 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Nature is truth. Terrain is truth. Stiddle is truth.

Terrain is 5% truth and the rest is simply denial of discoveries more recent that early 20th century.

Modern medicine has paid attention to the portion of terrain theory that isn't nonsense. Science has recently recognized that human's relationship to the bacterial biome of our GI tract is very important to good health. Fibre has long been recommended as an essential component of a healthy diet. The details of its role has really only been determined in the last 30 years.

Edited yesterday at 03:44 PM1 day by gamb00ler

8 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

I don't think you've posted anything that includes science developed since the 1920's.

Terrain is 5% truth and the rest is simply denial of discoveries more recent that early 20th century.

Modern medicine has paid attention to the portion of terrain theory that isn't nonsense. Science has recently recognized that human's relationship to the bacterial biome of our GI tract is very important to good health. Fibre has long been recommended as an essential component of a healthy diet. The details of its role has really only been determined in the last 30 years.

Doctors were warning about cancer causing vaccines before the turn of 1900.

Vaccines are still dangerous, not safe, not effective and not necessary. Don't see much has changed in the last 100+ years regarding vaxxes.

3 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Doctors were warning about cancer causing vaccines before the turn of 1900.

Definitely some doctors are vulnerable to the same logic malfunctions clearly evident in the general population.

6 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Vaccines are still dangerous, not safe, not effective and not necessary. Don't see much has changed in the last 100+ years regarding vaxxes.

No reasonable career vaccine researchers have ever claimed that there are NO dangers associated with vaccinations. That is not the safety standard of ANY medical treatment. So in your infinite (LOL) wisdom even the rabies vaccine is not necessary? You blanket statements are indistinguishable from lunacy.

Bring us some evidence that a rabies infection is due to some sudden onset of toxin poisoning that terrain theory can eliminate with some silly 'cleansing' regimen.

Edited 19 hours ago19 hr by gamb00ler

On 9/8/2026 at 9:40 PM, rattlesnake said:

Why would I phrase it differently?

I rest my case. You're so convinced that what you 'know' is correct that you can't imagine ever improving based on any advice. Perhaps that is what some people call arrogance.

Do some testing! Set your mind free of the chains you've wrapped it in.

Use the one of the principles of the scientific method. Assume you're wrong, then search for supporting evidence that you are indeed wrong.

Edited 19 hours ago19 hr by gamb00ler

39 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Doctors were warning about cancer causing vaccines before the turn of 1900.

Vaccines are still dangerous, not safe, not effective and not necessary. Don't see much has changed in the last 100+ years regarding vaxxes.

Well, you still insist vaccines cause cancer.

And this doctor here claims they are on the cusp of curing cancer with vaccines.

You can't both be right. So by logical conclusion, one of you must be crazy.

In fact, I'd like to suggest you are so insane that you would rather see people continue to die of cancer (which is not caused by vaccines, but a multitude of different factors) than a see a vaccine cancer treatment being developed.

You don't want them to actually find a cure for cancer because it will make you look bad. That's how arrogant and sick in the head you are.

Edited 19 hours ago19 hr by save the frogs

18 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

Well, you still insist vaccines cause cancer.

And this doctor here claims they are on the cusp of curing cancer with vaccines.

You can't both be right. So by logical conclusion, one of you must be crazy.

In fact, I'd like to suggest you are so insane that you would rather see people continue to die of cancer (which is not caused by vaccines, but a multitude of different factors) than a see a vaccine cancer treatment being developed.

You don't want them to actually find a cure for cancer because it will make you look bad. That's how arrogant and sick in the head you are.

Interesting!

A vaccine that cures the damage caused by other vaccines. What could possibly go wrong?

The following is from a report in 1892.

"It is claimed that cancer is hereditary and is occasionally due to local injury, but is it not obvious that there must be some antecedent constitutional taint or diathesis to give rise to the development, of the disease? To what, then, is this condition really due? Sir James Paget also says cancer is due to a morbid condition of the blood, and some of your readers will have little difficulty in pointing out one cause of the morbidity. It is allowed by physicians that cancer may be caused by impregnating the blood with impure matter.

Dr. Joseph Jones, President of the Louisiana Board of Health, a well-known pathologist, says that, this disease is inoculable; that cancer may be propagated by inoculation, or by the injection of cancerous matter into the veins. He adds:"

2 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

A vaccine that cures the damage caused by other vaccines. What could possibly go wrong?

What could possibly go wrong is your hypothesis is total quackery.

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

A vaccine that cures the damage caused by other vaccines. What could possibly go wrong?

The misinformation that just keeps on missing.

1 hour ago, Stiddle Mump said:

The following is from a report in 1892.

New nonsense just can't compete with that old nonsense.

2 hours ago, save the frogs said:

Well, you still insist vaccines cause cancer.

And this doctor here claims they are on the cusp of curing cancer with vaccines.

You can't both be right. So by logical conclusion, one of you must be crazy.

Obviously this 'doctor' is a totally deluded quack.

In most of your posts you consistently consider the hyperbolic medical/sciency terminology nonsense-promises spouted by 'for every ill there is a pill (or vax)' Medical qualifications carrying idiots < the shouldn't be called doctors > as truth and the future of medicine.

But these deluded quacks make grandiose promises and NEVER deliver, and count on your and the public's gullibility, absence of a sane perspective or the ability to distinguish between truth and fakery. Without a solid compass allowing you to recognize truth you are like a ping-pong ball in a tornado, at the mercy of the latest soundbites.

Time for introspection...

Edited 15 hours ago15 hr by Red Phoenix

On 9/1/2026 at 7:08 PM, Red Phoenix said:

Another victim of the 'safe and effective' COVID-19 Mrna jab

Yes, another who has inherited poor genes, faulty DNA.

1 hour ago, Red Phoenix said:

But these deluded quacks make grandiose promises and NEVER deliver, and count on your and the public's gullibility,

Yeah, gullibility. Forgot about that.

So watch out for the sharks then?

6 hours ago, save the frogs said:

What could possibly go wrong is your hypothesis is total quackery.

OK then. I hear you. Anything I write you discard. I've copied a small section of an essay by Sasha Latypova.

''Cancer is 99% preventable and an avoidable condition, because it is an induced illness, not a naturally present one. Cancer is induced by “vaccinations”, i.e. injections of foreign proteins, “adjuvants” (metals and toxic chemicals), and many other dangerous substances that are contained in “vaccines” (intentional poisons). If this is understood, cancer prevention is straightforward. We have to simply abstain from any vaccines or injectable products that contain typical vaccine ingredients (biologics and metals). Once this is understood, you can quite reliably liberate yourself, your children or grandchildren from the risk of cancer.''

Full essay with a vid or two:

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/what-is-cancer-a-comprehensive-theory

Obviously, Sasha has been reading my work down the years. Nature rules!

2 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

OK then. I hear you. Anything I write you discard.

You get the last word.

I am blocking out all vaccine threads in the future.

Best wishes to you.

3 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

Time for introspection...

Good that you interrupt the stream of nonsense and take a breather to partake...it's long overdue.

3 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

You get the last word.

I am blocking out all vaccine threads in the future.

Best wishes to you.

Didn't want to hear what Sasha's got to say eh? Are you another AN poster that dives for cover when proved wrong. Dear me! The list is growing.

Give it out but can't take it. I'm disappointed in you Sir.

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Give it out but can't take it. I'm disappointed in you Sir.

I've always been a quitter.

One of my many foibles.

I surrender.

Edited 11 hours ago11 hr by save the frogs

Statistics are difficult to interpret unless all the facts are given.

For every one person who died, how many millions were saved?

Naturally, no data presented.

The poor girl got rectal cancer but I assume she wasn't vaccinated in her <deleted>.

Did her doctors postulate the cause of her cancer or is the association simply guessed at?

42 minutes ago, Stiddle Mump said:

Didn't want to hear what Sasha's got to say eh? Are you another AN poster that dives for cover when proved wrong. Dear me! The list is growing.

I watched 2/3 of her video.

She claims Glyphosate doesn't cause cancer, vaccines are the reason people have gluten intolerance.

And vaccines are the all-around villain and cause of all the world's problems.

Her lecture hasn't convinced me of anything except she sounds like a charlatan.

Edited 11 hours ago11 hr by save the frogs