10 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

I watched 2/3 of her video.

She claims Glyphosate doesn't cause cancer, vaccines are the reason people have gluten intolerance.

And vaccines are the all-around villain and cause of all the world's problems.

Her lecture hasn't convinced me of anything except she sounds like a charlatan.

That was quick. I'm watching it and I'm only 50% through.

I'm familiar with her work. She is not a doctor and works almost exclusively on data. She does say, in other essays, that poisons, such as Glyphosate cause damage in the body. especially the liverm and spells it out. I can post a link.

I reckon it is a good thing to keep in mind that vaccines by-pass the body defence mechanisms.

1 minute ago, Stiddle Mump said:

She does say, in other essays, that poisons, such as Glyphosate cause damage in the body. especially the liverm and spells it out. I can post a link.

But in this video, she makes it sound like vaccines are much more harmful than Glyphosate.

Sorry, I don't have time to debate every claim this woman utters.

Her lecture here is unconvincing.

And she has added yet another ailment to an already long list of ailments that is allegedly caused by vaccines - gluten intolerance.

20 minutes ago, save the frogs said:

But in this video, she makes it sound like vaccines are much more harmful than Glyphosate.

Sorry, I don't have time to debate every claim this woman utters.

Her lecture here is unconvincing.

And she has added yet another ailment to an already long list of ailments that is allegedly caused by vaccines - gluten intolerance.

She is looking at data from about the mid 1800s to the present day. Where there are variations she investigates. She was a R & D manager at a pharmaceutical company. She knows what she is talking about.

In my own research. I've found that a healthy body can fight of most stuff that comes at it naturally. Be that, by eating, drinking, breathing or skin exposures. Vaccines by-pass nature's safety nets. However, conversely, a body that is not well nourished and not up to scratch cannot fight off toxins, as they arrive, in real time. This can lead to the body coating the entity, and tucking them away out of harm's way. This is my opinion and differs somewhat with the data in Sasha's essay.

There are other things to take into consideration also. An injection, of any sort, has an effect on the bioelectrical within. What mRNA does, is to a certain degree, unknown. But it's not likely to be one little bit beneficial. IMO. This is somewhat borne out by the stringy stuff found in the body of corpses.** Again, it is my opinion, that a mRNA jab, destroys the negative charge of the blood and the constituents of the blood no longer have natural separation.

There is also a strong possibility that the jab destroys magnesium. The result of this is calcium roaming about unsynthesized. Can then find its way into blood vessels. Hence the white strings found in blood vessels during autopsies.

** For more info on this read John O'Loony.

Nature is boss OK!

9 hours ago, gamb00ler said:

Use the one of the principles of the scientific method. Assume you're wrong, then search for supporting evidence that you are indeed wrong.

"The scientific method"… 😅

This thread is about vaccination, probably the most unscientific industry there is.

He made a bet with a scientist to prove him wrong and show that vaccinated kids were healthier. The study was finished in 2020 but never published. When Del Bigtree finally saw it on hidden camera, the results were shocking — vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to have chronic disease. The scientist admitted it was a good and important study but said publishing it would end his career.

On 9/4/2026 at 5:00 AM, Red Phoenix said:

Because it was - and to a large degree still is - one of the only on-line publications, that provides uncensored freedom of speech to those making use of the platform. So it became a natural heaven for those with controversial or inconvenient views, which were censored or banned by the pharma- and vested interests bought legacy fora like Facebook. Most of those writing on substack, initally did not have enough clout or funds for having their own on-line publication, so substack was the way to go to present their message and build following.

They censor and throttle too. 3 Letter guys put a call in and....

2 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

"The scientific method"… 😅

This thread is about vaccination, probably the most unscientific industry there is.

He made a bet with a scientist to prove him wrong and show that vaccinated kids were healthier. The study was finished in 2020 but never published. When Del Bigtree finally saw it on hidden camera, the results were shocking — vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to have chronic disease. The scientist admitted it was a good and important study but said publishing it would end his career.

Einstein came up with a concept called “thought experiments” where he would imagine something and call it an experiment.

The heliocentric model

Global cooling

Global warming

Vaccines

Viruses

Non binary gender

They’re all a bunch of really interesting thoughts that don’t have any connection whatsoever to the scientific method or reality in any way.

Their evidence is just someone saying “how dare you (question this)”

4 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

"The scientific method"… 😅

This thread is about vaccination, probably the most unscientific industry there is.

Easy to say... hard to be credible when the method has advanced human knowledge so much. So science isn't relevant to vaccination?

Yet you yourself love to misuse science and statistics to make you feel good about your silly analysis.

1 hour ago, Tourist2 said:

Their evidence is just someone saying “how dare you (question this)”

We have another contender for the special AN Ignoble Olympics medals in General Science.

20 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

Easy to say... hard to be credible when the method has advanced human knowledge so much. So science isn't relevant to vaccination?

Yet you yourself love to misuse science and statistics to make you feel good about your silly analysis.

There is nothing scientific about vaccinations what so ever. All started 100+ years ago by people who wanted to be famous, had big egos and to make $$$. Small pox it was then. Now it's any thing the white-coats can make up. Seemingly anything they can scare the people about will do.

A look at the official data will show just how ineffective vaccines have been in stopping anything. www.disolvingillusions.com

What is in a modern vaccine? I would say over 40 chemicals. Plus a metal or two. What are they for? To stop, lessen the impact or, or stop transmission of a complaint that, we are told, is caused by that elusive virus. www.canyoucatchacold.com

Nature has the answers we seek.

5 hours ago, Stiddle Mump said:

There is nothing scientific about vaccinations what so ever. All started 100+ years ago by people who wanted to be famous, had big egos and to make $$$. Small pox it was then. Now it's any thing the white-coats can make up. Seemingly anything they can scare the people about will do.

LOL... so obviously a projection of your 'view' out into the world. They have help available for such cases.

Continue checking under your bed to help keep the monsters at bay.

Edited 3 hours ago3 hr by gamb00ler

10 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

"The scientific method"… 😅

This thread is about vaccination, probably the most unscientific industry there is.

He made a bet with a scientist to prove him wrong and show that vaccinated kids were healthier. The study was finished in 2020 but never published. When Del Bigtree finally saw it on hidden camera, the results were shocking — vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to have chronic disease. The scientist admitted it was a good and important study but said publishing it would end his career.

The unpublished Henry Ford Health draft study did not prove that vaccines cause chronic illness, but rather suffered from severe methodological flaws and biases that led researchers to reject it.

Is it your habit to rummage through the internet trash bins? To each his own.

Unfortunately the trash in those bins isn't recyclable... it hangs around forever wasting people's time.

Edited 3 hours ago3 hr by gamb00ler

49 minutes ago, gamb00ler said:

The unpublished Henry Ford Health draft study did not prove that vaccines cause chronic illness, but rather suffered from severe methodological flaws and biases that led researchers to reject it.

Is it your habit to rummage through the internet trash bins? To each his own.

Unfortunately the trash in those bins isn't recyclable... it hangs around forever wasting people's time.

Of course I expected you to remind us of the 'damage control' talking points…

Vaccines cause autism, and Del Bigtree is a hero for fighting for all the innocent kids who suffered brain damage. Major respect to President Trump for taking action on this.

Edited 2 hours ago2 hr by rattlesnake