Abhisit Keen To Win A Second Term In Thai Poll This Or Next Year

[random]

The best thing will be if the dems are disbanded for breaking the election laws and then the country can move forward, hopefully another party will win power and then also indict them for their acts this year causing the deaths of many Thais, and as for winning a second election, surely to win a second one he needs to win a first one.

flame away but you know I am right

So you have the monopoly on truth, eh? Sounds like Jehovah's Witnesses to me.

Different religion, same flaws...

I would say the ones that are blindly following the untruths should be more likened to religion, rather than those that question the official line. But what do I know, knowledge is perceived on here based on post count.

But of someone is able to come up with a counter argument or proof that my postings are wrong i will happily read them and absorb them, but coming up with petty digs based on religion pretty much shows a lack of intellect, I can imagine you sitting in front of your computers thinking "oh, I have no reasonable argument for these comments, i know what I will do, I will flame in the hope that some of the less intelligent members/sheep think my comment is cool and join in, they will not notice that my post is devoid of any decent contribution but they will think I am cool and funny and some of them might even think I have knowledge"

Pretty sad really guys, counter my comments or <deleted>

[random]

The best thing will be if the dems are disbanded for breaking the election laws and then the country can move forward, hopefully another party will win power and then also indict them for their acts this year causing the deaths of many Thais, and as for winning a second election, surely to win a second one he needs to win a first one.

flame away but you know I am right

I don't think you're right, but you're allowed a personal opinion.

Keep smiling

I also don't agree with your opinion and you have no right to say "but you know I am right".

But, as stated, I respect your right to have and express your opinion.

A couple of sensible posters, disagreeing without the need to flame or try to belittle, thank you :jap:

[Pi Sek]

The best thing will be if the dems are disbanded for breaking the election laws and then the country can move forward, hopefully another party will win power and then also indict them for their acts this year causing the deaths of many Thais, and as for winning a second election, surely to win a second one he needs to win a first one.

flame away but you know I am right

So you have the monopoly on truth, eh? Sounds like Jehovah's Witnesses to me.

Different religion, same flaws...

I would say the ones that are blindly following the untruths should be more likened to religion, rather than those that question the official line. But what do I know, knowledge is perceived on here based on post count.

But of someone is able to come up with a counter argument or proof that my postings are wrong i will happily read them and absorb them, but coming up with petty digs based on religion pretty much shows a lack of intellect, I can imagine you sitting in front of your computers thinking "oh, I have no reasonable argument for these comments, i know what I will do, I will flame in the hope that some of the less intelligent members/sheep think my comment is cool and join in, they will not notice that my post is devoid of any decent contribution but they will think I am cool and funny and some of them might even think I have knowledge"

Pretty sad really guys, counter my comments or <deleted>

It's not for anyone else to prove that you are wrong, it's for you to prove you are right.

For the record:

- I believe Thaksin was paying both the Red Shirts to create a popular movement and the “Ronin Warriors” as a separate agency to create chaos by summary killings of those on both sides to instigate civil war, with a view to clearing a path for him to return as the country’s saviour.

- I do believe Thaksin was legitimately elected as prime minister in 2001.

- I do not believe Thaksin was legitimately elected as prime minister in 2005.

- I do believe Abhisit was legitimately elected as prime minister in 2008.

- I do not believe anything that Jatuporn says.

- I do not believe you really believe what you are posting.

Edited September 15, 2010 by Pi Sek

[SomTumTiger]

It's not for anyone else to prove that you are wrong, it's for you to prove you are right.

For the record:

- I believe Thaksin was paying both the Red Shirts to create a popular movement and the “Ronin Warriors” as a separate agency to create chaos by summary killings of those on both sides to instigate civil war, with a view to clearing a path for him to return as the country’s saviour.

- I do believe Thaksin was legitimately elected as prime minister in 2001.

- I do not believe Thaksin was legitimately elected as prime minister in 2005.

- I do believe Abhisit was legitimately elected as prime minister in 2008.

- I do not believe anything that Jatuporn says.

- I do not believe you really believe what you are posting.

Keep on Rockin Pi!

[whybother]

I would say the ones that are blindly following the untruths should be more likened to religion, rather than those that question the official line. But what do I know, knowledge is perceived on here based on post count.

But of someone is able to come up with a counter argument or proof that my postings are wrong i will happily read them and absorb them, but coming up with petty digs based on religion pretty much shows a lack of intellect, I can imagine you sitting in front of your computers thinking "oh, I have no reasonable argument for these comments, i know what I will do, I will flame in the hope that some of the less intelligent members/sheep think my comment is cool and join in, they will not notice that my post is devoid of any decent contribution but they will think I am cool and funny and some of them might even think I have knowledge"

Pretty sad really guys, counter my comments or <deleted>

What you posted wasn't really an argument. It was your opinion of what you want.

You didn't provide any evidence or opinion of WHY you think the Dems are guilty of breaking election laws. You just said they did and then said you are right.

You didn't provide any evidence or opinion of WHY you think they caused the deaths of people. You just said they did and then said you are right.

There is nothing to argue against, except to ask "Do you have a monopoly on the truth?"

Tell us why you think it was not OK for the army to be shooting back at armed protesters.

Tell us why you think it was OK for protesters to burn down buildings.

Then there might be something to discuss.

edit: And tell us why you think they are "untruths".

Edited September 15, 2010 by whybother

[random]

I have an opinion, if you think it is wrong disagree with me, offer your opinion as to why it is wrong, the onus is not on me to prove my opinion, the onus is on you to come up with a reasonable argument as to why you think I am wrong.

Just saying "no" brings nothing to the table, prove me wrong, if you can't prove me wrong then i guess you have to accept that my theory may be correct.

[whybother]

I have an opinion, if you think it is wrong disagree with me, offer your opinion as to why it is wrong, the onus is not on me to prove my opinion, the onus is on you to come up with a reasonable argument as to why you think I am wrong.

Just saying "no" brings nothing to the table, prove me wrong, if you can't prove me wrong then i guess you have to accept that my theory may be correct.

You're wrong. You know you are wrong.

(It seems to work for you. I thought I'd try it.)